THE REWARDS OF THE TRADING SERVANTS

'Because thou hast been faithful in a very little,

have thou authority over ten cities... Be thou also

over five cities.'--LUKE xix. 17, 19.

The relation between this parable of the pounds and the other of the

talents has often been misunderstood, and is very noteworthy. They

are not two editions of one parable variously manipulated by the

Evangelists, but they are two parables presenting two kindred and

yet diverse aspects of one truth. They are neither identical, as

some have supposed, nor contradictory, as others have imagined; but

they are complementary. The parable of the talents represents the

servants as receiving different endowments; one gets five; another

two; another one. They make the same rate of profit with their

different endowments. The man that turned his two talents into four

did just as well as he that turned his five into ten. In either case

the capital is doubled. Since the diligence is the same, the rewards

are the same, and to each is given the identical same eulogium and

the same entrance into the joy of his Lord. So the lesson of that

parable is that, however unequal are our endowments, there may be as

much diligence shown in the use of the smallest as in the greatest,

and where that is the case, the man with the small endowments will

stand on the same level of recompense as the man with the large.

But that is not all. This parable comes in to complete the thoughts.

Here all the servants get the same gift, the one pound, but they

make different profits out of it, one securing twice as much as the

other. And, inasmuch as the diligence has been different, the

rewards are different. So the lesson of this parable is that unequal

faithfulness in the use of the same opportunities results in unequal

retribution and reward. Unequal faithfulness, I say, because, of

course, in both parables it is presupposed that the factor in

producing the profit is not any accidental circumstance, but the

earnestness and faithfulness of the servant. Christ does not pay for

results; He pays for motives. And it is not because the man has made

a certain number of pounds, but because in making them he has shown

a certain amount of faithfulness, that he is rewarded. Christ does

not say, 'Well done! good and _successful_ servant,' but 'Well

done! good and _faithful_ servant.'

So, keeping these two sides of the one truth in view, I desire now

to draw out two or three of the lessons which seem to me to lie in

the principle laid down in my texts, of the unequal results of the

unequal diligence of these servants.

I. I would note the solemn view of this present life that underlies

the whole.

'Thou hast been faithful in a very little; have thou authority over

five cities.' Well, that rests upon the thought that all our present

life here is a stewardship, which in its nature is preparatory to

larger work yonder. And that is the point of view from which alone

it is right to look at, and possible to understand, this else

unintelligible and bewildering life on earth. Clearly enough, to

anybody that has eyes in his head, moral ends are supreme in man's

relation to nature, and in man's life. We are here for the sake of

making character, and of acquiring aptitudes and capacities which

shall be exercised hereafter. The whole of our earthly career is the

exercise of stewardship in regard to all the gifts with which we

have been entrusted, in order that by the right exercise of that

stewardship we may develop ourselves and acquire powers.

Now if it is clear that the whole meaning and end of the present

life are to make character, and that we have to do with the material

and the transient only, in order that, like the creatures that build

up the coral reefs, we may draw from the ever-varying waves of the

ocean that welters around us solid substance which we can pile up

into an enduring monument--is this process of making character, and

developing ourselves, to be cut short by such a contemptible thing

as the death of the body? One very distinguished evolutionist, who

has been forced onwards from his position to a kind of theism,

declares that he is driven to a belief in immortality because he

must believe in the reasonableness of God's work. And it seems to me

that if indeed--as is plainly the case--moral ends are supreme in

our life's history, it brings utter intellectual bewilderment and

confusion to suppose that these ends are kept in view up till the

moment of death, and that then down comes the guillotine and cuts

off all. God does not take the rough ore out of the mine, and deal

with it, and change it to polished steel, and shape His weapons, and

then take them when they are at their highest temper and their

sharpest edge, and break them across His knee. No! if here we are

shaped, it is because yonder there is work for the tool.

So all here is apprenticeship, and the issues of to-day are recorded

in eternity. We are like men perched up in a signal-box by the side

of the line; we pull over a lever here, and it lifts an arm half a

mile off. The smallest wheel upon one end of a shaft may cause

another ten times its diameter to revolve, at the other end of the

shaft through the wall there. Here we prepare, yonder we achieve.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: St. Luke · 第 228 / 274 题