THE FOLLIES OF THE WISE

'The children of this world are in their generation

wiser than the children of light.'--LUKE xvi. 8.

The parable of which these words are the close is remarkable in that

it proposes a piece of deliberate roguery as, in some sort, a

pattern for Christian people. The steward's conduct was neither more

nor less than rascality, and yet, says Christ, 'Do like that!'

The explanation is to be found mainly in the consideration that what

was faithless sacrifice of his master's interests, on the part of the

steward, is, in regard to the Christian man's use of earthly gifts,

the right employment of the possessions which have been entrusted to

him. But there is another vindication of the singular selection of

such conduct as an example, in the consideration that what is praised

is not the dishonesty, but the foresight, realisation of the facts of

the case, promptitude, wisdom of various kinds exhibited by the

steward. And so says our Lord--shutting out the consideration of ends,

and looking only for a moment at means,--the world can teach the

Church a great many lessons; and it would be well for the Church if

its members lived in the fashion in which the men of the world do.

There is eulogium here, a recognition of splendid qualities,

prostituted to low purposes; a recognition of wisdom in the adaptation

of means to an end; and a limitation of the recognition, because it is

only _in their generation_ that 'the children of this world are

wiser than the children of light.'

I. So we may look, first, at these two classes, which our Lord

opposes here to one another.

'The children of this world' would have, for their natural

antithesis, the children of another world. The 'children of light'

would have, for their natural antithesis, 'the children of

darkness.' But our Lord so orders His words as to suggest a double

antithesis, one member of which has to be supplied in each case, and

He would teach us that whoever the children of this world may be,

they are 'children of darkness'; and that the 'children of light'

are so, just because they are the children of another world than

this. Thus He limits His praise, because it is the sons of darkness

that, in a certain sense, are wiser than the enlightened ones. And

that is what makes the wonder and the inconsistency to which our

Lord is pointing. We can understand a man being a consistent,

thorough-paced fool all through. But men whose folly is so dashed

and streaked with wisdom, and others whose wisdom is so spotted and

blurred with folly, are the extraordinary paradoxes which experience

of life presents to us.

The children of this world are of darkness; the children of light

are the children of another world. Now I need not spend more than a

sentence or two in further explaining these two antitheses. I do not

intend to vindicate them, or to vindicate our Lord's distinct

classification of men into these two halves. What does He mean by

the children of this world? The old Hebrew idiom, the children of

so-and-so, simply suggests persons who are so fully possessed and

saturated with a given quality, or who belong so entirely to a given

person, as that they are spoken of as if they stood to it, or to

him, in the relation of children to their parents. And a child of

this world is a man whose whole thoughts, aims, and objects of life

are limited and conditioned by this material present. But the word

which is employed here, translated rightly enough 'world,' is not

the same as that which is often used, especially in John's writings,

for the same idea. Although it conveys a similar idea, still it is

different. The characteristic quality of the visible and material

world which is set forth by the expression here employed is its

transiency. 'The children of this epoch' rather than 'of this world'

is the meaning of the phrase. And it suggests, not so much the

inadequacy of the material to satisfy the spiritual, as the absurdity

of a man fixing his hopes and limiting his aims and life-purpose

within the bounds of what is destined to fade and perish. Fleeting

wealth, fleeting honours, mortal loves, wisdom, and studies that pass

away with the passing away of the material; these, however elevating

some of them may be, however sweet some of them may be, however

needful all of them are in their places, are not the things to which

a man can safely lash his being, or entrust his happiness, or wisely

devote his life. And therefore the men who, ignoring the fact that

they live and the world passes, make themselves its slaves, and

itself their object, are convicted by the very fact of the

disproportion between the duration of themselves and of that which

is their aim, of being children of the darkness.

Then we come to the other antithesis. The children of light are so

in the measure in which their lives are not dependent exclusively

upon, nor directed solely towards, the present order and condition

of things. If there be a _this,_ then there is a _that_. If there be an

age which is qualified as being present, then that implies that there

is an age or epoch which is yet to come. And that coming 'age' should

regulate the whole of our relations to that age which at present is. For

life is continuous, and the coming epoch is the outcome of the present.

As truly as 'the child is father of the man,' so truly is Eternity the

offspring of Time, and that which we are to-day determines that which

we shall be through the ages. He that recognises the relations of the

present and the future, who sees the small, limited things of the

moment running out into the dim eternity beyond, and the track

unbroken across the gulfs of death and the broad expanse of countless

years, and who therefore orders the little things here so as to secure

the great things yonder, he, and only he, who has made time the

'lackey to eternity,' and in his pursuit of the things seen and

temporal, regards them always in the light of things unseen and eternal,

is a child of light.

II. The second consideration suggested here is the limited and

relative wisdom of the fools.

The children of this world, who are the children of darkness, and

who at bottom are thoroughly unwise, considered relatively, 'are

wiser than the children of light.' The steward is the example. 'A

rogue is always'--as one of our thinkers puts it--'a roundabout

fool.' He would have been a much wiser man if he had been an

honester one; and, instead of tampering with his lord's goods, had

faithfully administered them.

But, shutting out the consideration of the moral quality of his

action, look how much there was in it that was wise, prudent, and

worthy of praise. There were courage, fertility of resource, a clear

insight into what was the right thing to do. There was a wise

adaptation of means to an end. There was promptitude in carrying out

the wise means that suggested themselves to him. The design was bad.

Granted. We are not talking about goodness, but about cleverness.

So, very significantly, in the parable the person cheated cannot

help saying that the cheat was a clever one. The 'lord,' although he

had suffered by it, 'commended the unjust steward, because he had

done wisely.'

Did you never know in Manchester some piece of sharp practice, about

which people said, 'Ah, well, he is a clever fellow,' and all but

condoned the immorality for the sake of the smartness? The lord and

the steward belong to the same level of character; and vulpine

sagacity, astuteness, and qualities which ensure success in material

things seem to both of them to be of the highest value. 'The children

of this world, _in their generation'_--but only in it--are wiser

than the children of light.'

Now I draw a very simple, practical lesson, and it is just this,

that if Christian men, in their Christian lives, would practise the

virtues that the world practises, in pursuit of its shabby aims and

ends, their whole Christian character would be revolutionised. Why,

a boy will spend more pains in learning to whistle than half of you

do in trying to cultivate your Christian character. The secret of

success religiously is precisely the same as the secret of success

in ordinary things. Look at the splendid qualities that go to the

making of a successful housebreaker. Audacity, resource, secrecy,

promptitude, persistence, skill of hand, and a hundred others, are

put into play before a man can break into your back kitchen and

steal your goods. Look at the qualities that go to the making of a

successful amuser of people. Men will spend endless time and pains,

and devote concentration, persistence, self-denial, diligence, to

learning how to play upon some instrument, how to swing upon a

trapeze, how to twist themselves into abnormal contortions. Jugglers

and fiddlers, and circus-riders and dancers, and people of that sort

spend far more time upon efforts to perfect themselves in their

profession, than ninety-nine out of every hundred professing

Christians do to make themselves true followers of Jesus Christ.

They know that nothing is to be got without working for it, and

there is nothing to be got in the Christian life without working for

it any more than in any other.

Shut out the end for a moment, and look at the means. From the ranks

of criminals, of amusers, and of the purely worldly men of business

that we come in contact with every day, we may get lessons that

ought to bring a blush to all our cheeks, when we think to ourselves

how a wealth of intellectual and moral qualities and virtues, such

as we do not bring to bear on our Christian lives, are by these men

employed in regard of their infinitely smaller pursuits.

Oh, brethren! we ought to be our own rebukes, for it is not only

other people who show forth in other fields of life the virtues that

would make so much better Christians of us, if we used them in ours,

but that we ourselves carry within ourselves the condemning

contrast. Look at your daily life! Do you give anything like the

effort to grow in the knowledge of your Lord and Saviour, Jesus

Christ, that you do to make or maintain your position in the world?

When you are working side by side with the children of this world

for the same objects, you keep step with them, and are known to be

diligent in business as they are. When you pass into the church,

what do you do there? Are we not ice in one half of our lives, and

fire in the other? We may well lay to heart these solemn words of

our Lord, and take shame when we think that not only do the unwise,

who choose the world as their portion, put us to shame in their

self-denial, their earnestness, their absorption, their clear

insight into facts, their swiftness in availing themselves of every

opportunity, their persistence and their perseverance, but that we

rebuke ourselves because of the difference between the earnestness

with which we follow the things that are of this world, and the

languor of our pursuit after the things that are unseen and eternal.

Of course the reasons for the contrast are easy enough to apprehend,

and I do not need to spend time upon them. The objects that so have

power to stimulate and to lash men into energy, continuously through

their lives, lie at hand, and a candle near will dim the sunshine

beyond. These objects appeal to sense, and such make a deeper

impression than things that are shown to the mind, as every picture-book

may prove to us. And we, in regard to the aims of our Christian life,

have to make a continual effort to bring and keep them before us, or

they are crowded out by the intrusive vulgarities and dazzling

brilliances of the present. And so it comes to pass that the men who

hunt after trifles that are to perish set examples to the men who say

that they are pursuing eternal realities. 'Go to the ant, thou sluggard,

consider her ways and be wise.' Go to the men of the world, thou

Christian, and do not let it be said that the devil's scholars are more

studious and earnest than Christ's disciples.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: St. Luke · 第 203 / 274 题