THE PRODIGAL AND HIS FATHER

'And He said, A certain man had two sons: 12. And the

younger of them said to his father, Father, give me

the portion of goods that falleth to me. And he

divided unto them his living. 13. And not many days

after the younger son gathered all together, and took

his journey into a far country, and there wasted his

substance with riotous living. 14. And when he had

spent all, there arose a mighty famine in that land;

and he began to be in want. 15. And he went and joined

himself to a citizen of that country; and he sent him

into his fields to feed swine. 16. And he would fain

have filled his belly with the husks that the swine

did eat: and no man gave unto him. 17. And when he

came to himself, he said, How many hired servants of

my father's have bread enough, and to spare, and I

perish with hunger! 18. I will arise and go to my

father, and will say unto him, Father, I have sinned

against Heaven, and before thee, 19. And am no more

worthy to be called thy son: make me as one of thy

hired servants. 20. And he arose, and came to his

father. But when he was yet a great way off, his

father saw him, and had compassion, and ran, and fell

on his neck, and kissed him. 21. And the son said unto

him, Father, I have sinned against Heaven, and in thy

sight, and am no more worthy to be called thy son.

22. But the father said to his servants, Bring forth

the best robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on

his hand, and shoes on his feet: 23. And bring hither

the fatted calf, and kill it; and let us eat, and be

merry: 24. For this my son was dead, and is alive

again; he was lost, and is found. And they began to

be merry.'--LUKE xv. 11-24.

The purpose of the three parables in this chapter has to be kept in

mind. Christ is vindicating His action in receiving sinners, which

had evoked the murmurings of the Pharisees. The first two parables,

those of the lost sheep and the lost drachma, appeal to the common

feeling which attaches more importance to lost property just because

it is lost than to that which is possessed safely. This parable

rises to a higher level. It appeals to the universal emotion of

fatherhood, which yearns over a wandering child just because he has

wandered.

We note a further advance, in the proportion of one stray sheep to

the ninety-nine, and of one lost coin to the nine, contrasted with

the sad equality of obedience and disobedience in the two sons. One

per cent., ten per cent., are bearable losses, but fifty per cent.

is tragic.

I. The first part (vs. 11-16) tells of the son's wish to be his own

master, and what came of it. The desire to be independent is good,

but when it can only be attained by being dependent on him whose

authority is irksome, it takes another colour. This foolish boy

wished to be able to use his father's property as his own, but he

had to get the father's consent first. It is a poor beginning of

independence when it has to be set up in business by a gift.

That is the essential absurdity in our attempts to do without God

and to shake off His control. We can only get power to seem to do it

by misusing His gifts. When we say, 'Who is Lord over us?' the

tongues which say it were given us by Him. The next step soon

followed. 'Not many days after,' of course, for the sense of

ownership could not be kept up while near the father. A man who

wishes to enjoy worldly good without reference to God is obliged, in

self-defence, to hustle God out of his thoughts as soon and as

completely as possible.

The 'far country' is easily reached; and it is far, though a step

can land us in it. A narrow bay may compel a long journey round its

head before those on its opposite shores can meet. Sin takes us far

away from God, and the root of all sin is that desire of living to

one's self which began the prodigal's evil course.

The third step in his downward career, wasting his substance in riotous

living, comes naturally after the two others; for all self-centred life

is in deepest truth waste, and the special forms of gross dissipation

to which youth is tempted are only too apt to follow the first sense

of being their own masters, and removed from the safeguards of their

earthly father's home. Many a lad in our great cities goes through the

very stages of the parable, and, when a mother's eye is no longer on

him, plunges into filthy debauchery. But living which does not outrage

the proprieties may be riotous all the same; for all conduct which

ignores God and asserts self as supreme is flagrantly against the

very nature of man, and is reckless waste.

Such a 'merry' life is sure to be 'short.' There is always famine in

the land of forgetfulness of God, and when the first gloss is off

its enjoyments, and one's substance is spent, its pinch is felt. The

unsatisfied hunger of heart, which dogs godless living, too often

leads but to deeper degradation and closer entanglement with low

satisfactions. Men madly plunge deeper into the mud in hope of

finding the pearl which has thus far eluded their search.

A miserable thing this young fool had made of his venture, having

spent his capital, and now being forced to become a slave, and being

set to nothing better than to feed swine. The godless world is a

hard master, and has very odious tasks for its bondsmen. The unclean

animals are fit companions for one who made himself lower than they,

since filth is natural to them and shameful for him. They are better

off than he is, for husks do nourish them, and they get their fill,

but he who has sunk to longing for swine's food cannot get even

that. The dark picture is only too often verified in the experience

of godless men.

II. The wastrel's returning sanity is described in verses 17-20_a_.

'He came to himself.' Then he had been beside himself before. It is

insanity to try to shake off God, to aim at independence, to wander

from Him, to fling away our 'substance,' that is, our true selves,

and to starve among the swine-troughs. He remembers the bountiful

housekeeping at home, as starving men dream of feasts, and he thinks

of himself with a kind of pity and amazement.

There is no sign that his conscience smote him, or that his heart

woke in love to his father. His stomach, and it only, urged him to

go home. He did, indeed, feel that he had been wrong, and had

forfeited the right to be called a son, but he did not care much for

losing that name, or even for losing the love to which it had the

right, if only he could get as much to eat as one of the hired

servants, whose relation to the master was less close, and, in

patriarchal times, less happy, than that of slaves born in the

house.

One good thing about the lad was that he did not let the grass grow

under his feet, but, as soon as he had made the resolution, began to

carry it into effect. The bane of many a resolve to go back to God

is that it is 'sicklied o'er' by procrastination. The ragged

prodigal has not much to leave which need hold him, but many such a

one says, 'I will arise and go to my father to-morrow,' and lets all

the to-morrows become yesterdays, and is sitting among the swine

still.

Low as the prodigal's motive for return was, the fact of his return

was enough. So is it in regard to our attitude to the gospel. Men

may be drawn to give heed to its invitations from the instinct of

self-preservation, or from their sense of hungry need, and the

belief that in it they will find the food they crave for, while

there may be little consciousness of longing for more from the

Father than the satisfaction of felt wants. The longing for a place

in the Father's heart will spring up later, but the beginning of

most men's taking refuge in God as revealed in Christ is the gnawing

of a hungry heart. The call to all is, 'Ho, every one that

thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money; come

ye, buy, and eat.'

III. The climax of the parable, for which all the rest is but as

scaffolding, is the father's welcome (vs. 20_b_-24). Filial

love may die in the son's heart, but paternal yearning lives in the

father's. The wanderer's heart would be likely to sink as he came

nearer the father's tent. It had seemed easy to go back when he

acted the scene in imagination, but every step homewards made the

reality more difficult.

No doubt he hesitated when the old home came in sight, and perhaps

his resolution would have oozed out at his finger ends if he had had

to march up alone in his rags, and run the gauntlet of servants

before he came to speech with his father. So his father's seeing him

far off and running to meet him is exquisitely in keeping, as well

as movingly setting forth how God's love goes out to meet His

returning prodigals. That divine insight which discerns the first

motions towards return, that divine pity which we dare venture to

associate with His infinite love, that eager meeting the shamefaced

and slow-stepping boy half-way, and that kiss of welcome before one

word of penitence or request had been spoken, are all revelations of

the heart of God, and its outgoings to every wanderer who sets his

face to return.

Beautifully does the father's welcome make the son's completion of

his rehearsed speech impossible. It does not prevent his expression

of penitence, for the more God's love is poured over us, the more we

feel our sin. But he had already been treated as a son, and could

not ask to be taken as a servant. Beautifully, too, the father gives

no verbal answer to the lad's confession, for his kiss had answered

it already; but he issues instructions to the servants which show

that the pair have now reached the home and entered it together.

The gifts to the prodigal are probably significant. They not only

express in general the cordiality of the welcome, but seem to be

capable of specific interpretations, as representing various aspects

of the blessed results of return to God. The robe is the familiar

emblem of character. The prodigal son is treated like the high-priest

in Zechariah's vision; his rags are stripped off, and he is clothed

anew in a dress of honour. 'Them he also justified: and whom he

justified, them he also sanctified.' The ring is a token of wealth,

position, and honour. It is also a sign of delegated authority, and

is an ornament to the hand. So God gives His prodigals, when they

come back, an elevation which unforgiven beings do not reach, and

sets them to represent Him, and arrays them in strange beauty. No

doubt the lad had come back footsore and bleeding, and the shoes

may simply serve to keep up the naturalness of the story. But probably

they suggest equipment for the journey of life. That is one of the

gifts that accompany forgiveness. Our feet are shod with the

preparedness of the gospel of peace.

Last of all comes the feast. Heaven keeps holiday when some poor

waif comes shrinking back to the Father. The prodigal had been

content to sink his sonship for the sake of a loaf, but he could not

get bread on such terms. He had to be forgiven and bathed in the

outflow of his father's love before he could be fed; and, being thus

received, he could not but be fed. The feast is for those who come

back penitently, and are received forgivingly, and endowed richly by

the Father in heaven.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: St. Luke · 第 197 / 274 题