ANXIOUS ABOUT EARTH, OR EARNEST ABOUT THE KINGDOM

'And He said unto His disciples, Therefore I say unto

you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat;

neither for the body, what ye shall put on. 23. The

life is more than meat, and the body is more than

raiment. 24. Consider the ravens: for they neither sow

nor reap; which neither have storehouse nor barn; and

God feedeth them: how much more are ye better than the

fowls? 25. And which of you with taking thought can

add to his stature one cubit? 26. If ye then be not

able to do that thing which is least, why take ye

thought for the rest? 27. Consider the lilies how they

grow: they toil not, they spin not; and yet I say unto

you, that Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed

like one of these. 28. If then God so clothe the grass,

which is to-day in the field, and to-morrow is cast

into the oven; how much more will He clothe you, O ye

of little faith! 29. And seek not ye what ye shall eat,

or what ye shall drink, neither be ye of doubtful mind.

30. For all these things do the nations of the world

seek after: and your Father knoweth that ye have need

of these things. 31. But rather seek ye the kingdom of

God; and all these things shall he added unto you.'

--LUKE xii. 22-31.

The parable of the rich fool was spoken to the multitude, but our

Lord now addresses the disciples. 'Therefore' connects the following

with the foregoing teachings. The warnings against anxiety are

another application of the prohibition of laying up treasure for

self. Torturing care is the poor man's form of worldliness, as

luxurious self-indulgence is the rich man's. There are two kinds of

gout, as doctors tell us--one from high living, and one from poverty

of blood. This passage falls into two parts--the prohibition against

anxious care (vs. 22-31), and the exhortation to set the affections

on the true treasure (vs. 31-34).

I. The first part gives the condemnation of anxiety about earthly

necessities. The precept is first stated generally, and then

followed by a series of reasons enforcing it. As to the precept, we

may remark that the disciples were mostly poor men, who might think

that they were in no danger of the folly branded in the parable.

They had no barns bursting with plenty, and their concern was how to

find food and clothing, not what to do with superfluities. Christ

would have them see that the same temper may be in them, though it

takes a different shape. Dives and Lazarus may be precisely alike.

The temper condemned here is 'self-consuming care,' the opposite of

trust. Its misery is forcibly expressed by the original meaning of

the Greek word, which implies being torn in pieces, and thus paints

the distraction and self-inflicted harrassment which are the lot of

the anxious mind. Prudent foresight and strenuous work are equally

outside this prohibition. Anxiety is so little akin to foresight

that it disables from exercising it, and both hinders from seeing

what to do to provide daily bread, and from doing it.

The disciples' danger of being thus anxious may be measured by the

number and variety of reasons against it given by Jesus. The first

of these is that such anxiety does not go deep enough, and forgets

how we come to have lives to be fed and bodies to be clothed. We

have received the greater, life and body, without our anxiety. The

rich fool could keep his goods, but not his 'soul' or 'life.' How

superficial, then, after all, our anxieties are, when God may end

life at any moment! Further, since the greater is given, the less

which it needs will also be given. The thought of God as 'a faithful

creator' is implied. We must trust Him for the 'more'; we may trust

Him for the less.

The second reason bids us look with attention at examples of

unanxious lives abundantly fed. Perhaps Elijah's feathered

providers, or the words of the Psalmist (Ps. cxlvii. 9), were in

Christ's mind. The raven was one of the 'unclean' birds, and of ill

omen, from Noah's days, and yet had its meat in due season, though

that meat was corpses. Notice the allusions to the preceding parable

in 'sow not, neither reap,' and in 'neither have storehouse nor

barn.' In these particulars the birds are inferior to us, and, so to

speak, the harder to care for. If they who neither work nor store

still get their living, shall not we, who can do both? Our superior

value is in part expressed by the capacity to sow and reap; and

these are more wholesome occupations for a man than worrying.

How lovingly Jesus looked on all creatures, and how clearly He saw

everywhere God's hand at work! As Luther said, 'God spends every

year in feeding sparrows more than the revenues of the King of

France.'

The third reason is the impotence of anxiety (ver. 25). It is

difficult to decide between the two possible renderings here. That

of 'a cubit' to the 'stature' corresponds best with the growth of

the lilies, while 'age' preserves an allusion to the rich fool, and

avoids treating the addition of a foot and a half to an ordinary

man's height as a small thing. But age is not measured by cubits,

and it is best to keep to 'stature.'

At first sight, the argument of verse 23 seems to be now inverted,

and what was 'more' to be now 'least.' But the supposed addition, if

possible, would be of the smallest importance as regards ensuring

food or clothing, and measured by the divine power required to

effect it, is less than the continual providing which God does. That

smaller work of His, no anxiety will enable us to do. How much less

can we effect the complicated and wide-reaching arrangements needed

to feed and clothe ourselves! Anxiety is impotent. It only works on

our own minds, racking them in vain, but has no effect on the

material world, not even on our own bodies, still less on the

universe.

The fourth reason bids us look with attention at examples of

unanxious existence clothed with beauty. Christ here teaches the

highest use of nature, and the noblest way of looking at it. The

scientific botanist considers how the lilies grow, and can tell all

about cells and chlorophyll and the like. The poet is in raptures

with their beauty. Both teach us much, but the religious way of

looking at nature includes and transcends both the others. Nature is

a parable. It is a visible manifestation of God, and His ways there

shadow His ways with us, and are lessons in trust.

The glorious colours of the lily come from no dyer's vats, nor the

marvellous texture of their petals from any loom. They are inferior

to us in that they do not toil or spin, and in their short

blossoming time. Man's 'days are as grass; as a flower of the field

so he flourisheth'; but his date is longer, and therefore he has a

larger claim on God. 'God clothes the grass of the field' is a truth

quite independent of scientific truths or hypotheses about how He

does it. If the colours of flowers depend on the visits of insects,

God established the dependence, and is the real cause of the

resulting loveliness.

The most modern theories of the evolutionist do not in the least

diminish the force of Christ's appeal to creation's witness to a

loving Care in the heavens. But that appeal teaches us that we miss

the best and plainest lesson of nature, unless we see God present

and working in it all, and are thereby heartened to trust quietly in

His care for us, who are better than the ravens because we have to

sow and reap, or than the lilies because we must toil and spin.

Verse 29 adds to the reference to clothing a repeated prohibition as

to the other half of our anxieties, and thus rounds off the whole

with the same double warning as in verse 22. But it gives a striking

metaphor in the new command against 'being of doubtful mind.' The

word so rendered means to be lifted on high, and thence to be tossed

from height to depth, as a ship in a storm. So it paints the

wretchedness of anxiety as ever shuttlecocked about between hopes

and fears, sometimes up on the crest of a vain dream of good,

sometimes down in the trough of an imaginary evil. We are sure to be

thus the sport of our own fancies, unless we have our minds fixed on

God in quiet trust, and therefore stable and restful.

Verse 30 gives yet another reason against not only anxiety, but

against that eager desire after outward things which is the parent

of anxiety. If we 'seek after' them, we shall not be able to avoid

being anxious and of doubtful mind. Such seeking, says Christ, is

pure heathenism. The nations of the world who know not God make

these their chief good, and securing them the aim of their lives. If

we do the like, we drop to their level. What is the difference

between a heathen and a Christian, if the Christian has the same

objects and treasures as the heathen? That is a question which a

good many so-called Christians at present would find it hard to

answer.

But the crowning reason of all is kept for the last. Much of what

precedes might be spoken by a man who had but the coldest belief in

Providence. But the great and blessed faith in our Father, God,

scatters all anxious care. How should we be anxious if we know that

we have a Father in heaven, and that He knows our needs? He

recognises our claims on Him. He made the needs, and will send the

supply. That is a wide truth, stretching far beyond the mere earthly

wants of food and raiment. My wants, so far as God has made me to

feel them, are prophecies of God's gifts. He has made them as doors

by which He will come in and bless me. How, then, can anxious care

fret the heart which feels the Father's presence, and knows that its

emptiness is the occasion for the gift of a divine fullness? Trust

is the only reasonable temper for a child of such a father. Anxious

care is a denial of His love or knowledge or power.

II. Verses 31-34 point out the true direction of effort and

affection, and the true way of using outward good so as to secure

the higher riches. It is useless to tell men not to set their

longings or efforts on worldly things unless you tell them of

something better. Life must have some aim, and the mind must turn to

something as supremely good. The only way to drive out heathenish

seeking after perishable good is to fill the heart with the love and

longing for eternal and spiritual good. The ejected demon comes back

with a troop at his heels unless his house be filled. To seek 'the

kingdom,' to count it our highest good to have our wills and whole

being bowed in submission to the loving will of God, to labour after

entire conformity to it, to postpone all earthly delights to that,

and to count them all but loss if we may win it--this is the true

way to conquer worldly anxieties, and is the only course of life

which will not at last earn the stern judgment, 'Thou fool.'

That direction of all our desires and energies to the attainment of

the kingdom which is the state of being ruled by the will of God, is

to be accompanied with joyous, brave confidence. How should they

fear whose desires and efforts run parallel with the 'Father's good

pleasure'? They are seeking as their chief good what He desires, as

His chief delight, to give them. Then they may be sure that, if He

gives that, He will not withhold less gifts than may be needed. He

will not 'spoil the ship for a ha'p'orth of tar,' nor allow His

children, whom He has made heirs of a kingdom, to starve on their

road to their crown. If they can trust Him to give them the kingdom,

they may surely trust Him for bread and clothes.

Mark, too, the tenderness of that 'little flock.' They might fear

when they contrasted their numbers with the crowds of worldly men;

but, being a flock, they have a shepherd, and that is enough to

quiet anxiety.

Seeking and courage are to be crowned by surrender of outward good

and the use of earthly wealth in such manner as that it will secure

an unfailing treasure in heaven. The manner of obeying this command

varies with circumstances. For some the literal fulfilment is best;

and there are more Christian men to-day whose souls would be

delivered from the snares if they would part with their possessions

than we are willing to believe.

Sometimes the surrender is rather to be effected by the conscientious

consecration and prayerful use of wealth. That is for each man to

settle for himself. But what is not variable is the obligation to set

the kingdom high above all else, and to use all outward wealth, as

Christ's servants, not for luxury and self-gratification, but as in

His sight and for His glory. Let us not be afraid of believing what

Jesus and His Apostles plainly teach, that wealth so spent here is

treasured in heaven, and that a Christian's place in the future life

depends upon this among other conditions--how he used his money here.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: St. Luke · 第 124 / 274 题