CHAPTER XXI.

DISEASES OF THE FALLOPIAN TUBES.

THE Fallopian tubes are the ovi ducts, along which the spermatozoids

pass from the womb to fertilize the ovum, and along which the

fertilized or non-fertilized ovum, as the case may be, is carried to

the cavity of the uterus.

They are two small canals, between three and a half and four inches

in length, and constitute the only means of communication between the

womb and ovaries; their caliber is exceedingly small and lined with a

delicate mucous membrane.

The diseases which affect the Fallopian tubes are inflammation,

stricture, distention and displacements.

The inflammation is distinguished as salpingitis, from _salpinx_,

Fallopian tube, and _itis_, in composition, inflammation; this consists

of a catarrhal inflammation of the lining membrane of the tubes, which

rarely if ever originates in the tubes themselves, but is secondary to

an inflammatory process in the neighboring organs.

Chronic endometritis or catarrh of the womb is undoubtedly the most

fruitful cause of salpingitis, although this is not absolutely the

rule, for there are some women who have had uterine catarrh for years

without its affecting the tubes in the least. But there is a type

of uterine catarrh that has a special tendency to spread from the

womb to the lining membrane of the tubes, and this is the infectious

endometritis. An infectious inflammation of the womb may be due to many

different sources of infection; the retained products of conception

after an abortion may become putrescent and furnish one source;

carrying putrefactive germs into the uterine cavity from the vaginal

canal by means of probes or instruments, that are in themselves

defiled by not having been thoroughly cleansed and purified since their

last employment, is another source of infection; the latter is perhaps

the commoner cause of blood poisoning in criminal abortions by the

abortionists. Gonorrhœal infection seems to have a greater tendency

than any other to spread itself from the uterus to the tubes; this has

been the subject of special inquiry, and has been thoroughly confirmed,

and this may arise many months after the infected male has imagined

himself entirely cured.

The diseases of the tubes that I have enumerated are in the relation

of cause and effect; a catarrhal inflammation is quite likely to

induce a stricture or an occlusion, and this causes a distention from

retention of the secretions, whether the secretions are a natural or

an inflammatory product. If the inflammation has an infectious origin,

then the retained secretion becomes purulent, or it may be a muco-pus

secretion from the commencement. The dilated tube may also contain

blood or serum; the latter constitutes tubal dropsy; or it may contain

a fertilized ovum; this gives rise to tubal pregnancy.

Tubal dropsy may be a distention of the tubes when both ends are sealed

by inflammatory adhesions; these distentions vary in size from the

thickness of a finger to a large ovarian tumor, from which it is not an

easy matter to distinguish it.

The most dangerous form of tubal obstruction and distention is where

the contents are pus or purulent matter; this is liable to be poured

into the peritoneal cavity from ulceration or rupture of the sac, and

excites fatal peritonitis.

Salpingitis can only be viewed as a complication of some prior

inflammatory process in some of the adjacent organs and tissues;

these are the uterus and ovaries and the pelvic peritoneum and pelvic

cellular tissue.

The symptoms of inflammation of the tubes are not so clearly defined

as to indicate the nature of the affection, because it is hardly ever

limited to the tubes alone, the surrounding tissue being always more

or less involved. These patients are so seldom free from pain that

their lives are a constant suffering. If the pain subsides, it is only

for a few days, and the slightest exertion brings about a relapse,

so that walking or standing must be avoided. During menstruation the

pain always increases, and the menses may be excessive at one period

and scant at another; these harassing pains make powerful inroads on

the patient’s strength; she becomes pale and debilitated, while her

emaciated form and careworn expression give us a picture of the typical

invalid. Fortunately, this complication is not as frequent as one might

expect from the intimate relation of the tubes to the womb and ovaries,

but the possibility of the Fallopian tubes becoming inflamed should

admonish women against taking any chances by neglecting the rules of

hygiene, that I have laid down in another chapter, for the old saying

that “prevention is better than cure” is only too true of this malady.

TREATMENT.

The curative measures for inflammatory diseases or abscesses of the

tubes have not been, on the whole, until within a comparatively recent

period, very satisfactory.

When this affection complicates uterine or vaginal catarrh, then

the treatment that is recommended elsewhere for the relief of these

complaints should be adopted; quietude is of paramount importance, and

total continence must be practiced by the sufferer. Hot sitz baths and

warm fomentations are important auxiliaries in the treatment. Vaginal

irrigations of hot water, night and morning, relieve the congestion and

stimulate the absorbents of the pelvic glands. Femina vaginal capsules

are a great assistance towards accomplishing the same end; one capsule

introduced into the vagina at bedtime should be combined with the other

treatment.

If these measures fail to accomplish a cure, then a surgical operation

may be required as a last resort, which consists in extirpating the

diseased tubes and ovaries.

This operation has given some brilliant results, but it has also

hurried a great many to an untimely grave. Fool-hardy surgeons or

operators are the rule; doctors of only mediocre talent worm themselves

into positions that give them prestige in the community. Where nature

refuses a capacity for the acquirement of solid wisdom, she seems to

compensate her creatures by endowing them with faculties for cunning

and intrigue, that galvanize the spurious into the apparently genuine.

They have charge of hospitals and are professors in colleges, and are

ambitious to imitate the operations of the European masters. On the

other hand are the statistics of able surgeons, who seem to have an

inborn genius for a special line of operations; such a one is Lawson

Tait, of Birmingham, and Martin, of Berlin. Tait has had phenomenal

success in cutting open the abdomen and removing diseased tubes and

ovaries. He possesses the faculty and skill to select only those cases

that are especially suited for an operation, and those that are not

adapted for the knife are excluded. In the exercise of this judgment

the danger of the operation is reduced to a, minimum. The tubes and

ovaries are often so matted and tied down with inflammatory adhesions,

that their removal means sure death, and does the average surgeon know

this? To have the genius of a Tait is to be one in ten thousand, and

for this reason his statistics should be neither a guide nor an excuse

for the other nine thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine, to attempt to

do as he does. To assume that they can, is as absurd as to admit that

our indigenous colonels of the State militia can plan or execute the

campaigns of Napoleon.

Galvanism or electricity has come to the rescue of this class of cases,

as a safe and reliable method of treatment; of course it takes more

time and patience. Should not this outweigh the selfish ambition of the

unscrupulous surgeon who desires to boast of the number of times he

has opened the abdomen, with little compunction of the confiding lives

that he has sacrificed?

I have myself had abundant experience to be convinced of the usefulness

of electricity as a curative agent in this class of diseases, but I

prefer to illustrate the treatment by quoting from a paper on “The

Value of Electricity as a Substitute for Laparotomy,” by Augustin H.

Goelet, M. D., in the New York _Medical Journal_. He says:—

“Mrs. T., aged twenty-six. Severe pelvic pain referred to left side;

profuse leucorrhœa; prolonged and painful menstruation. Diagnosis:

Pyosalpinx (or pus) in the left tube. Laparotomy (opening the abdomen)

advised at Woman’s Hospital. Treatment: Tube emptied into the uterus by

applications of positive galvanism to the left horn of the cavity of

the uterus. Intravaginal applications afterwards, completed the cure.

Duration of treatment, four months Complete relief of pain followed the

removal of the pus from the tube. At the end of the treatment she had

completely regained her health. Menstruation was normal, and symptoms

relieved.”

Femina, A Work for Every Woman · 第 21 / 32 章