The principal metacarpal, which forms the region of the _canon_, is

directed vertically; its anterior surface is slightly convex

transversely. This surface is covered by a number of tendons, which

slightly alter its appearance; so that it is the principal base of this

part of the fore-limb. Its posterior surface is flattened. The superior

extremity of this metacarpal presents plane surfaces, variously

inclined, with which the bones of the inferior row of the carpus

articulate. On the anterior surface, and a little to the inner side, is

found a tuberosity, which is destined for the insertion of _the anterior

extensor of the metacarpus_, the homologue of the radial muscles. The

inferior extremity is formed by two condyles, an internal and an

external; between which is found a median crest.

This extremity, the superior extremity of the first phalanx, which

articulates with it, together with two sesamoid bones--the great

sesamoids--which are situated on its posterior surface, collectively

form the region which from its rounded outlines is called the _ball_.

With regard to the rudimentary metacarpals, external and internal, to

which some authors give the name of _fibulae_, they are applied to the

sides of the posterior surface of the principal metacarpal. They are

elongated bones, of which the superior extremity, which is a little

thickened, is called the _head_; the lateral bones of the second row of

the carpus partly rest on the heads of these. They become more slender

as they descend, and terminate opposite the inferior fourth of the

principal metacarpal. Each ends in a slight swelling, to which the name

_button_ has been given. The internal one is the better developed.

The rudimentary metacarpals are vestiges of atrophied digits, as will be

explained further on.

The single finger of the horse consists of three phalanges. The first

phalanx, which is directed obliquely downwards and forwards, corresponds

to the constricted region situated below the 'ball,' and known as the

_pastern_. It is flattened from before backwards; its anterior surface

is convex transversely, while the posterior surface is plane. Its

superior extremity is moulded on the inferior extremity of the principal

metacarpal, and its inferior extremity, which is smaller, presents a

trochlea with which the second phalanx articulates. This is also

directed downwards and forwards, and is shorter. It corresponds to the

region which, situated between the pastern and the hoof, is known as the

_cornet_.

The third phalanx, situated entirely within the hoof, has the same

direction as the first and second. It is large and broad, and presents

three surfaces separated by well-marked angular borders (see Fig. 96).

The anterior surface is oblique downwards and forwards; it is convex

transversely. The inferior surface is slightly hollowed, and is in

relation with the sole, or plantar surface of the hoof.

The superior surface, which is articular, is divided by a median ridge

into two lateral cavities, which correspond to the trochlea on the

inferior surface of the lower extremity of the second phalanx. The

inferior border corresponds in shape with the hoof. The superior border

presents in its median part a projection, _the pyramidal eminence_,

which prolongs at this level the anterior surface of the bone. Finally,

the posterior border, which is concave, is in contact with a sesamoid

bone, _the lesser sesamoid_, which increases the superior articular

surface behind, and is also in contact with the second phalanx.

As we have just seen, the horse possesses but one digit. In the

ancestors of the animal--that is, in the prehistoric species which

are now extinct (_orohippus_, _miohippus_, _protohippus_, or

_hipparion_)--the number of digits was larger; this fact conclusively

proves that the rudimentary metacarpals of the existing horse are

vestiges of digits which have disappeared through want of use. In the

first of those ancestors--orohippus--there were four digits; all save

the first, the thumb, being then developed. In the others of the series

there existed but three digits. It must, however, be noted that in those

animals it is always the digit which corresponds to the middle finger of

the pentedactyl hand that is longest. In other less ancient species the

lateral fingers are reduced to the condition of mere splints of bone. It

follows from what has been said that the digit which persists in the

equine species should be considered as the third finger, and that the

rudimentary metacarpals represent lateral digits considerably

atrophied.

This disappearance of the lateral digits cannot excite surprise when we

consider the functions of the organs. Becoming useless, they must

undergo gradual atrophy from want of use.

There undoubtedly is, in this former existence of supplementary digits

in the horse, something analogous to what we still find in the pig;

where the two principal digits are accompanied by two shorter ones,

which very probably, from their infrequent use, are destined to

disappear in a more or less distant future.

Proportions of the Arm, the Forearm, and the Metacarpus

As a supplement to the study of the anterior limbs which we have just

finished, it appears necessary to give some indications of the relative

proportions of certain of the segments which form these limbs in the

plantigrades, the digitigrades, and the ungulates.

First, we would remark that, in following this order of classification,

the scapula becomes less and less narrow, and assumes a form more and

more elongated. In order to convince ourselves of this, it will be

sufficient to study the bone first in man, then in the bear, the cat,

dog, ox, and finally in the horse.

As to the proportions of length, which are those we should chiefly

study, we shall commence with the comparison of the forearm and

arm--that is to say, the radius and the humerus. The radius is found to

be longer in proportion to the humerus, as the number of digits is

smaller, and the hand loses more and more the functions of an organ of

prehension. In man, the radius is shorter than the humerus; in the

horse, on the contrary, it is longer.

To give an idea of this proportion, we shall employ what is known as the

antibrachial index. This index gives the relation which exists between

the length of the forearm and that of the humerus; the length of this

latter, whatever may be the actual measurement, is represented by a

fixed figure, the number 100. A very simple arithmetical operation

gives the proportion--

forearm x 100

-------------, the quotient obtained furnishes the index.

humerus

The index is less than 100 if the forearm is shorter than the bone of

the arm. The index is more than 100 if, on the contrary, the forearm is

longer.

In man, the radius is shorter than the humerus; indeed, in adult

individuals of the white race the average index is 74.

In the bear, the length of the radius approaches closely to that of the

humerus; the index is about 90. In the skeleton of a bear in the

anatomical museum of the Ecole des Beaux-Arts, the humerus is 33

centimetres in length, and the radius 30 centimetres.

In the cat, the radius is very little shorter than the humerus. In the

dog they are equal. The antibrachial index of the latter is,

accordingly, 100.

In the horse, the radius is longer than the humerus; the index is

therefore above 100. Thus, in the skeleton of the horse which we have in

the museum of the Ecole des Beaux-Arts, the index is 113--length of

humerus, 29 centimetres; length of radius, 33 centimetres. In other

skeletons which we have measured we found: in one, 108--humerus, 34

centimetres; radius, 37 centimetres; in another, 116--humerus, 25

centimetres; radius, 29 centimetres.

The metacarpal bone undergoes, relatively to the humerus, a proportional

elongation, analogous to that of the forearm.

In man, the length of the metacarpus is contained about 5-1/2 times in

that of the humerus; in the bear, it is contained 4 times; in the dog,

2-1/2 times; in the horse, 1-1/3 times only.

It is well known that the proportions vary according to race, and that

what we have here given are but the general indications.

The Articulations of the Anterior Limbs

The knowledge of human arthrology which we presume the reader to have

previously acquired makes it unnecessary for us to enter into numerous

details regarding the configuration of the articular osseous surfaces

and the disposition of the fibrous bands that retain them in position.

Accordingly, in the description which follows, and also in that of the

articulations of the posterior limbs, we shall occupy ourselves but very

briefly with the details above referred to, so as to devote ourselves

especially to the indication of the movements--that is to say, of that

which, while easily comprehended on recollection of former studies,

presents the greatest interest from the artistic standpoint in these

studies in comparative anatomy.

=The Scapulo-Humeral Articulation.=--The head of the humerus and the

glenoid cavity of the scapula being in contact, the two bones are bound

together by a rather loose articular capsule, which is strengthened by

the muscles of this region which fulfil the function of active

ligaments.

This articulation, so movable in every direction in the human species,

is not so much so in quadrupeds; the arm in the latter, as also the

shoulder, being kept in contact with the lateral region of the thorax by

the numerous muscles which surround it.

Of the movements performed by the humerus, flexion and extension are the

most extensive; those of abduction and adduction are much less so.

It is necessary, before proceeding further, to determine what the two

principal movements which we have just mentioned really are, viz.,

flexion and extension.

We know that in man the displacements of the humerus which take place in

the antero-posterior direction are known as movement or projection

forwards, and movement or projection backwards, respectively. We do not

say that the humerus is flexed or extended, because, in reality, on

account of the position which the skeleton of the shoulder occupies, it

is not able to flex or place itself on the line of prolongation of the

scapula with which it articulates.

In quadrupeds it is not so. The humerus and the scapula are contained in

almost the same vertical plane; and the bone of the arm can take, in

relation to the latter, the positions characteristic of flexion and

extension--that is, of approach to the scapula and removal from it.

What makes the meanings of these terms a little confusing is that, in

human anatomy, some authors consider the backward movement of the

humerus as extension, and the forward movement as flexion; in order to

be able to compare these movements to those that the femur executes in

relation to the pelvis.

Now, in our opinion, the indication of this correspondence is not

absolutely necessary; since it ceases to be exact if we wished, from the

point of view of the direction given to other segments of the skeleton,

to establish the same relation between the elbow and the articulation of

the knee.

It is therefore indispensable, when discussing quadrupeds, to

discontinue these terms, in order the more readily to recognise that: in

flexion the inferior extremity of the humerus is directed backwards; in

extension, on the contrary, it is directed forwards. In the first case

the humerus approaches the scapula; in the second, on the contrary, it

moves away from it.

These movements, which take place during walking, are executed in the

following manner: When one of the anterior limbs is at the end of that

stage of progression which is called support (see p. 289, Displacements

of the Limbs)--that is to say, during the time that the foot remains in

contact with the ground, whilst the trunk is moving forward--the

direction of this limb becomes more and more oblique downwards and

backwards. At a certain moment the limb is raised from the ground, to be

carried forwards, in order to be again pressed on the ground, and

recommence a new resting stage. In these different phases the humerus is

flexed. But at the moment that the limb, when carried forwards, is about

to resume its contact with the ground it becomes directed obliquely

downwards and forwards; then the humerus is in the position of

extension.

During these movements of the humerus, there exists an essential

factor--that is, the scapular balance. (It is the same as what occurs in

man when he balances his arm in the antero-posterior plane.) When the

humerus is flexed, the scapula moves in such a way that the superior

portion projects forwards; when it is extended, the scapula, on the

other hand, is inclined more backwards. But it is necessary to add that,

during these displacements, the scapulo-humeral angle varies; it tends

to close during the flexion of the humerus, and becomes more open during

extension.

The movements and the relations of the humerus and the scapula are

clearly represented in Figs. 41 and 42, reproduced from the

chromophotographic studies of Professor Marey--studies relative to the

analyses of the movements of the horse.[13] They show clearly the

movements of flexion and extension of the humerus, also the balancing of

the scapula which accompanies the movements.

[13] E. J. Marey, 'Analyses of the Movements of the Horse by the

Chromophotograph' (_La Nature_, June 11, 1898).

[Illustration: FIG. 41.--FLEXION OF THE HUMERUS: RIGHT ANTERIOR LIMB OF

THE HORSE, EXTERNAL SURFACE (AFTER A CHROMOPHOTOGRAPHIC STUDY BY

PROFESSOR MAREY).]

[Illustration: FIG. 42.--EXTENSION OF THE HUMERUS: RIGHT ANTERIOR LIMB

OF THE HORSE, EXTERNAL SURFACE (AFTER A CHROMOPHOTOGRAPHIC STUDY BY

PROFESSOR MAREY).]

=The Articulation of the Elbow, or the Humero-ulnar Articulation.=--In

this articulation, which is constructed in the form of a true hinge, the

movements of flexion and extension alone are possible. In flexion, the

forearm, directed forwards, is folded on the arm, with which, in certain

circumstances, it comes in contact. For example, in a horse of mettle

which leaps over an elevated obstacle, the animal forcibly raises his

fore-limbs by flexing them. Flexion is produced to the same extent, and

even more so, and for a longer period, in felides which crouch.

In extension, on the contrary, the forearm is carried backward. This

movement being limited only by the contact of the tip of the olecranon

with the bottom of the olecranon fossa of the humerus, the forearm is

enabled, in this case, to move until it is in line with the arm. For

example, during walking, when one of the anterior limbs, having reached

the end of its resting stage, is considerably inclined downwards and

backwards.

The apex of the olecranon process--that is to say, the point of the

elbow--forms a marked prominence, more salient in flexion than in

extension, as in the corresponding region of the human elbow.

=The Radio-ulnar Articulation.=--It is in the dog and the cat, in which

the two bones of the forearm articulate by their extremities only, and

remain separate in the rest of their extent, that the articulations call

for special notice.

In the upper part, the radius rotates on itself; while below, it rotates

around the ulna. It follows that the forearm, which in all quadrupeds is

in a state of permanent pronation, can, in carnivora, take the position

of supination, or rather, of demi-supination. In fact, whatever be the

mobility of the two bones of the forearm, the movement is not able to

bring the palmar surface to the front, but only to direct it towards the

median line.

=The Articulation of the Wrist.=--Here are found, as in man, three

superimposed articulations: the radio-carpal, intercarpal, and

carpo-metacarpal.

If we remember the movements which take place at the plane of these

articulations in man, and take account of the fact that the mobility of

the limbs is reduced just in proportion as they are simplified in

structure so as to become organs of support only, we can easily

comprehend that, in the horse and the ox, and, in a word, animals that

have a canon bone, the movements of the wrist are little varied in

character, while in carnivorae, on the other hand, they are relatively

more so.

We will remember that in the ox and the horse the region of the wrist is

called the _knee_.

In flexion, the hand is bent backwards; in extension it is carried

forwards. These two movements take place especially in the radiocarpal

and intercarpal articulations. In the first of these articulations, it

is the superior row of the carpus which glides backwards and forwards on

the corresponding articular surface of the forearm. In the second

articulation, it is the second row which moves; gliding on the inferior

articular surfaces of the row above it. This inferior row carries the

metacarpus with it; for the carpo-metacarpal articulation is much less

mobile than either of the other two.

In flexion, the articular surfaces are separated from one another in

front; and the changes of form which result from this are noticeable on

the anterior surface of the 'knee.' Moreover, at that moment this region

contrasts markedly in its outlines with the parts above it and below

it--that is to say, with the corresponding surfaces of the forearm and

of the canon bone.

As for the lateral movements, by which the hand is inclined outwards and

inwards in its movements at the wrist, they exist to an appreciable

extent in the cat and the dog only; in order to understand this, it is

enough to compare the shape of the articular surfaces of this region in

carnivora and the horse, for example. In the latter, those surfaces are

almost plane; in the cat, on the contrary, they are curved (inferior

surface of the forearm, concave; superior border of the carpus, convex).

These latter, then, are, in form, similar to those which exist at the

same level in the human being; this explains the possibility of

analogous movements of the whole hand--that is to say, of the movements

of abduction and adduction.

=The Metacarpo-phalangeal Articulations.=--With regard to the mobility,

it is in these articulations, as in those of the wrist--that is to say,

although in all quadrupeds the first phalanges can be flexed and

extended on the metacarpus, it is only in the cat and dog that lateral

movement is possible. Indeed, in the horse, in which the principal

metacarpal terminates inferiorly in two convex surfaces, which are

separated by a crest; and where the whole articulates with a cavity on

the superior extremity of the first phalanx; because of the hinging of

these surfaces, there can only be movements of opening and closing of

this articulation. The first phalanx is directed backwards during

flexion and forwards during extension. In the dog and the cat the digits

can be separated from each other, and also drawn together--that is to

say, abducted and adducted; but, as in man, these movements can be made

only when the first phalanges are in the state of extension. During

flexion they are impossible, because of the tension of the lateral

ligaments, which increases as the flexion is more pronounced. This can

be demonstrated, for example, in the cat, which, in order to separate

the digits, opens the hand widely--that is to say, forcibly raises the

first phalanges.

=The Interphalangeal Articulations.=--The phalanges are in contact with

one another by surfaces, which, on one side, are of trochlear form, and,

on the other, are moulded on these trochleae; accordingly, at the level

of these articulations, the movements of flexion and extension only can

take place.

In the felidae, the claws which the third phalanges bear cannot be

utilized when the latter are in a state of extension, at which time,

being forcibly raised, they are, in fact, placed on the outer sides of

the phalanges, which are grooved to receive them. But when the animal

wishes to use them, it flexes those third phalanges, of which the

terminal extremity is then projected forward, and the claws are ready to

fulfil their function. But at the same time it extends the first

phalanges, to produce a certain tension of the flexors of the digits,

and thus enable the latter to act with greater efficacy, with a minimum

of contraction. We can demonstrate this action experimentally on

ourselves. It is enough to carry the first phalanges forcibly into a

state of extension; the third phalanges then become flexed, quite

spontaneously, by the tension of the tendons of the flexors which are

inserted into them.

At the same time, if we examine the felidae which we have taken as

examples, when the first phalanges are in the state of extension, the

digits will be found to be separable, as we have already indicated in

connection with the metacarpo-phalangeal articulations, with the result

that the claws are then able to lacerate a wider surface.

The extension of the ungual phalanx, which determines the retraction of

the claw and stops its action, is the mechanical result of an elastic,

fibrous apparatus which is attached to each of the third phalanges, and

has its origin of the second.

THE POSTERIOR LIMBS[14]

[14] Examine Figs. 21, 33, 34, 38, 39, 49.

The posterior limbs are divided, as are the inferior limbs of the human

being, of which they are the homologues, into four parts: pelvis, thigh,

leg, and foot.

The Pelvis

The pelvis, which incompletely limits the abdominal cavity, inferiorly

in the vertical position of the body and posteriorly in the normal

attitude of quadrupeds, is formed by the iliac bones and sacrum--the

coccyx forming a prolongation of the latter. We have already described

the two latter (pp. 10 and 11) in connection with the vertebral column,

of which they form the inferior or posterior portion or segment,

according to the attitude of the individual.

=The Iliac Bone.=--The iliac or coxal bone, is a paired or

non-symmetrical bone, united below to its fellow of the opposite side,

while it is separated from it above by the sacrum.

In all animals, as well as in man, the iliac bone, at the beginning of

life, consists of three parts, which afterwards unite and fuse together

and join at the middle of the bottom of a deep cavity which is situated

on the outer aspect of the bone--the cotyloid cavity.

Of those three portions when examined in the human iliac bone, that

above the cavity is the ilium; that on the inside is the pubis; and the

last, the lower one, is the ischium. In quadrupeds, the iliac bone

being, in its entirety, directed much more obliquely downwards and

backwards, the relative position of these constituent parts is a little

modified: the ilium is in front, the pubis is still internal, but in a

more inferior position, and the ischium is behind the cotyloid cavity.

We notice this peculiarity of the development of the iliac bone because

it is customary to continue to apply to the osseous regions which

correspond to these parts the names by which they were known when

independent bones.

[Illustration: FIG. 43.--THE LEFT ILIAC BONE OF THE HUMAN BEING:

EXTERNAL SURFACE, PLACED IN THE POSITION WHICH IT WOULD OCCUPY IN THE

SKELETON OF A QUADRUPED.

1, Cotyloid cavity; 2, ilium; 3, iliac crest; 4, anterior iliac crest;

5, posterior iliac spine; 6, pubis; 7, tuberosity of the ischium; 8,

obturator foramen; 9, ischiadic spine.]

[Illustration: FIG. 44.--LEFT ILIAC BONE OF A QUADRUPED (HORSE):

EXTERNAL SURFACE.

1, Cotyloid cavity; 2, ilium, external iliac fossa (directed upward in

the horse); 3, iliac crest; 4, anterior iliac spine (directed inwards in

the horse, it is the angle of the haunch); 5, posterior iliac spine

(directed inwards in the horse; it is the angle of the haunch); 6,

pubis; 7, tuberosity of the ischium; 8, obturator foramen; 9, ischiadic

spine, or subcotyloid foramen.]

The bones which form the skeleton of the pelvis of quadrupeds are

proportionally more elongated and less massive than those of the human

pelvis (Figs. 43 and 44).

We find, on the external surface of the iliac bone, the cotyloid cavity,

whose border is interrupted by the cotyloid notch; a deep notch which

looks downwards.

In front of this cavity is the ilium. This portion, narrow in the part

which is next the cavity, is directed forwards and upwards, expanding

more and more as it passes upwards. It presents an external or superior

surface (external in some animals, superior in others), which recalls

the external iliac fossa; and an internal or inferior surface, at the

superior part of which is found the auricular surface for articulation

with the sacrum.

The anterior border of the ilium is rough; this is the iliac crest, at

the extremities of which we find, below or outside, a prominence which

corresponds to the anterior superior iliac spine of man; and internally

another projection which corresponds to the posterior iliac spine.

Immediately above the cotyloid cavity is a rough crest, which is known

as the _supracotyloid crest_, which is, however, no other than the

homologue of the sciatic spine. In front of this prominence, the border

of the ilium, which is notched, forms the great sciatic notch.

If, still taking the cotyloid cavity as the point of departure, we

proceed inwards--that is, towards the median line of the body--we find

the pubis; if in a posterior direction, the ischium. These two portions,

pubis and ischium, limit an oval orifice, the subpubic foramen.

In the human skeleton, the pubis of one side is united to that of the

opposite side, to form the pubic symphysis. In the animals which we are

now studying a portion of the ischium enters into the formation of the

symphysis; in other words, it is formed, not only by the body of the

pubis, but also by the descending branch or ramus of the pubis and a

portion of the ascending branch or ramus of the ischium, which are fused

with those of the opposite side. It results that, though in the human

being the symphysis is short and the ischio-pubic arch large, in

quadrupeds it is the opposite. In them the arch is a mere slot, and

being formed by the ischium alone, merits the name of the ischial arch.

The ischio-pubic symphysis is very large, and forms a horizontal surface

relatively extensive, a sort of floor, on which rest certain organs

which occupy the cavity of the pelvis.

The posterior and external angle of the ischium is rough and prominent;

it is the tuberosity of the ischium. This forms a projection under the

skin; it also does in man when the trunk is strongly inclined forwards,

while the thighs are maintained in the vertical position. In

marsupials--opossum, kangaroo, and phalanger--the pelvis at its pubic

region is surmounted by two bones, situated one on each side of the

median line, and arranged in the form of a fork of two prongs (Fig. 45).

These, which are called _marsupial bones_, support the pouch which, in

animals of this genus, lodges their young, which, at the time of birth,

are incapable of supporting a separate existence, their development

being absolutely incomplete.

[Illustration: FIG. 45.--PUBIC REGION OF THE PELVIS OF A MARSUPIAL

(PHALANGER, FOX).

1, Symphysis pubis; 2, obturator foramen; 3, marsupial bones.]

In the cetaceans--for example, the dolphin--because of the absence of

posterior limbs, the pelvis is represented by two separate bones only,

which have no connection with the vertebral column. In birds, the pelvis

is remarkable for its elongated form (see for its form Fig. 21, and for

details Fig. 46). The cotyloid cavity is pierced by an opening, and

presents on its posterior border, which is here a little prominent, a

surface with which the great trochanter is in contact.

The ilium is very highly developed, and is fused in the median line with

the ilium of the opposite side, the last dorsal vertebrae, the lumbar

vertebrae, and the sacrum. Because of these relations with the dorsal

vertebrae, it is in contact anteriorly with the last ribs, which

consequently emerge from each side of the iliac region of the pelvis.

The ischium forms a plate of bone which, in part, closes the external

portion of the cavity of the pelvis. Its superior border is separate for

a certain distance from the external border of the ilium; there is thus

left an opening of more or less considerable size, which represents or

takes the place of the great sciatic notch.

[Illustration: FIG. 46.--PELVIS OF A BIRD (THE COCK): EXTERNAL SURFACE,

LEFT SIDE.

1, Ilium; 2, ischium; 3, pubis; 4, inferior extremity of the pubis; 5,

sciatic foramen; 6, oval foramen, homologous to the obturator; 7,

coccygeal vertebrae.]

The pubis, long and slender, is in connection with the inferior border

of the ischium, of which it follows the general direction; and

circumscribes with this latter, below the cotyloid cavity, an oval

orifice, which is the homologue of the obturator foramen. Its inferior

extremity reaches beyond the corresponding part of the ischium, bending

towards the middle line, but without joining the pubis of the opposite

side. On this account there is no symphysis pubis in birds.

Nevertheless, an exception must be noted in the case of the ostrich, the

pubic bones of which meet in the middle line, and are articulated in

form of a symphysis.

The Thigh

A single bone, the femur, forms the skeleton of this portion of the

lower limb.

=The Femur.=--The bone of the thigh is, in man, directed downwards and

inwards; this obliquity, we may remind the reader, is due to the

difference in length of the two condyles which form its inferior

extremity; the internal is the more prominent, the result of which is

that when the femur is held vertically, the internal condyle descends

lower than the external. Now, as those two articular expansions rest on

the horizontal plane formed by the upper extremity of the tibia, it

follows that the superior part of the femur inclines towards the side of

the shorter condyle--that is to say, outwards--and that, the leg being

vertical, it and the bone of the thigh unite in forming an angle, of

which the apex is directed towards the inner side of the knee.

In many mammals the two condyles are equally prominent, the result of

which is that the femur inclines neither inwards nor outwards, but is

contained in a plane parallel to the axis of the trunk; while the leg is

included in the same plane. Nevertheless, although contained in the

plane which we have just indicated, the femur is obliquely placed, and

directed downwards and forwards; it accordingly forms, with the pelvis,

an angle, of which the opening is directed to the anterior aspect of the

body.

In reptiles and in birds the femur and leg are both placed in the same

plane, but this plane is not parallel to the axis of the trunk. This is

the result, on the one hand, of the thorax being wide, and, on the other

hand, of the femur, which is directed forwards, being in contact by its

anterior extremity with the lateral aspect of the costal region, it is

thus necessarily placed in a direction forwards and outwards, and the

knee is further removed from the axis of the trunk than is the

articulation which unites the thigh with the pelvis.

The femur, like the humerus, is almost completely enveloped by muscular

masses, which bind it to the lateral walls of the abdomen. Its inferior

extremity alone is free, and is always the more so in proportion to its

elongation--that is to say, as it belongs to an animal whose foot is

more divided. The femur in this respect conforms to the law which we

have indicated in connection with the bone of the arm, in which the

development, as to length, is in proportion to the division of the hand.

If we compare the femur of certain animals with that of man, we see that

the corresponding details of form are readily recognisable, but they are

slightly modified. Thus, on examining the superior extremity, we find

there a head, a neck, a great trochanter, and a lesser; but the neck is

usually short and thick, and the great trochanter does not occupy the

same level with regard to the articular head of the bone. In man, the

great trochanter does not rise to the level of the head of the femur; in

the dog and the cat it approaches that level; in the horse and in

ruminants it rises above it.

With regard to the inferior extremity, its surfaces undergo

modifications which are further accentuated as we pass from the

digitigrades to the ungulates, or unguligrades. We know that in man the

femoral trochlea is continuous behind, without interruption, with the

condyles--that is to say, that each of the condyles is the continuation

of one of the lips of the trochlea. We have just said that the trochlea

is continuous without interruption with the condyles; this is accurate.

Nevertheless, we must remark that, at the level of the junction of these

surfaces, the bone presents a slight constriction, which is more marked

on the external than on the internal aspect. This constriction, which is

but slightly marked in man, is accentuated in the dog and the cat; in

the ruminants and the solipeds it is still more pronounced so that we

may say that in these latter the trochlea and the condyles are almost

completely separated.

There is another modification in regard to the prominence and extent of

the two lips of the trochlea. In man, the external lip of the trochlea

reaches higher than the internal, and it is more prominent in front. In

the dog, these lips are equal with regard to thickness, but the external

still reaches higher than the internal; in the cat, they are equal in

every respect; in ruminants and solipeds the internal lip is wider,

thicker, and rises higher than the external.

In animals the trochlea is, as a general rule, narrower than in man, and

the condyles are more prominent posteriorly; so that, when viewed from

one of the lateral aspects, the inferior extremity of the femur is, in

them, better developed in the antero-posterior direction.

In birds, the femur is shorter than the bones of the leg; its great

trochanter is in contact with a prominence which occupies the posterior

part of the border of the cotyloid cavity. Instead of articulating at

the level of the knee, with the knee-cap and tibia only, as in man, it

articulates, in addition, with the superior extremity of the fibula. A

similar arrangement is found in marsupials and reptiles.

=The Knee-cap.=--This bone, developed in the thickness of the tendon of

the triceps muscle of the thigh, is in contact, by its posterior

surface, with the femoral trochlea. The two articular surfaces which are

applied to the lips of the trochlea present, with regard to their

extent, an inequality which is in proportion to the arrangement which we

have above indicated--that is, while in man it is the external surface

which is the larger, in the horse it is the internal. We shall see what

the general form of the knee-cap is when we come, later on, to study

more particularly the posterior limbs of some animals.

The Leg

The skeleton of the leg consists of two bones: the tibia and the fibula.

The tibia is the more internal and the larger of the two; the fibula is

slender, and situated on the outer side, and a little posterior to, the

preceding. The fibula is more or less developed according to the

species; in some it is complete, in others it is very much atrophied.

This peculiarity may be compared with that which we have drawn attention

to regarding the development of the ulna; but here the seriation is less

distinct. Not only in the different species, but even in the individuals

of the same species, the development of the fibula presents little

regularity. In quadrupeds, the bones of the leg are directed obliquely

downwards and backwards, so that they form, with the femur, which is

directed obliquely downwards and forwards, an angle, the apex of which

is placed at the anterior surface of the knee.

=Tibia.=--The tibia of quadrupeds is readily comparable with that of

man; as in the case of the latter, its shaft has three surfaces--an

external, which is hollowed out in its upper portion, and becomes

anterior below; an internal, slightly convex and subcutaneous; the

posterior, which presents, in its superior part, a crest, the oblique

line of the tibia, and some rugosities. The borders separate the

surfaces. The anterior border, or crest of the tibia, is prominent in

its superior part; below it gradually disappears in passing towards the

internal aspect of the inferior extremity. The external and internal

borders separate the corresponding surfaces from the posterior one.

The superior extremity is thick, and expands in forming three

tuberosities: two lateral and an anterior. The anterior tuberosity,

situated at the superior part of the crest of the tibia, is very

prominent; for this reason the superior extremity is very much expanded

in the antero-posterior direction--hence it results that this diameter

is equal to the transverse, and sometimes even greater. In man, it is

the latter which is the larger. The anterior tuberosity is visible under

the skin.

The inferior extremity, less thick, is prolonged internally by a

prominence which corresponds to the internal malleolus of man. In

animals whose fibula is but slightly developed the tibia presents, on

the external part of its inferior extremity, a small prominence, which

replaces the fibular malleolus. The ruminants must, however, be

excepted, in which we find in this region a special bone, which certain

authors look on as the inferior part of the fibula (see p. 97). The

inferior surface of this extremity of the tibia is articular; and is in

contact with one of the tarsal bones, the astragalus. Because the

superior surface of this latter has the form of a pulley, a pulley much

more marked than that on the human astragalus, the corresponding surface

of the tibia, which has the opposite form, presents two lateral

cavities, separated by a median ridge, which is directed forwards and

slightly outwards; this ridge projects into the groove of the pulley.

=The Fibula.=--This bone, situated at the back of the external

surface of the tibia, is, as we have said, more or less developed. Its

superior extremity, or head, articulates with the external tuberosity

of the tibia. Its inferior extremity, when it exists--it is this

which disappears in animals which have the fibula incompletely

developed--forms a prominence which, placed on the external surface of

the inferior extremity of the tibia, articulates with the astragalus,

and recalls the external malleolus of man.

We have stated above that it is the inferior extremity of the fibula

which disappears when the bone is incompletely developed; it is

necessary to except the bat, in which the fibula, fairly well developed

at its inferior extremity, by which it articulates with the tibia, thins

off in its superior portion, and does not reach the corresponding

extremity of the latter. Further, as in this animal the surface of the

knee, which corresponds to the anterior surface of the same region in

other animals, is turned backwards, the result is that the fibula is

situated on the inner side of the tibia, instead of being placed on the

outer.

The Foot

The foot, in animals, as well as in man, is formed of three portions,

which, as we pass from the part which articulates with the leg towards

the terminal extremity, are: the tarsus, the metatarsus, and the toes.

These three portions are the homologues of the carpus, the metacarpus,

and the fingers, which, as we have already seen in the case of the hand,

are the osseous groups which form its skeleton. The tarsus is formed of

short bones, as the carpus is; these are, in man, seven in number. The

bones are arranged in two rows: one, the posterior, formed of two bones

superimposed--the astragalus, by which the tarsus articulates with the

leg, and the calcaneum, which forms the prominence of the heel; and an

anterior row formed of five juxtaposed ones--the cuboid, situated

externally, and the scaphoid internally, in front of which are found the

three cuneiforms. To the tarsus succeeds the metatarsus, whose form

reminds us very much of that of the metacarpals.

With regard to the toes, which we enumerate in proceeding from the most

internal to the most external, they are formed of phalanges, which are

three in number for the four outer toes; but the number is reduced to

two in the case of the first--that is, the so-called great-toe.

The bones of the tarsus are not seven in all animals; they are fewer in

ruminants and solipeds. We already know that, in the latter, the

metacarpals and the digits are equally reduced in number; the same is

the case for the metatarsals and the toes. We will analyze these

differences when dealing with the species individually.

When we studied the anterior limbs, we saw in passing from the

plantigrades to the digitigrades, and finally the ungulates, or

unguligrades, as the hand became hyperextended, the carpus was raised

and more and more removed from the ground. We shall establish the

existence of the same condition in the posterior limbs; in the

plantigrades the tarsus rests on the ground; in the digitigrades it is

removed from it; while in the unguligrades the distance which separates

it from the point of support is still more considerable; and it is,

indeed, necessary to imagine that if these latter were plantigrades,

would occupy the position on the ground which is indicated by Fig. 47.

In veterinary anatomy the tarsus is called the _ham_; a name we adopt

in conformity with usage, but which we cannot but regret, as in human

anatomy the ham is the region of the posterior surface of the knee.

The general arrangement of the region of the digits of the posterior

limbs in birds, presents some points of interest.

We shall merely say with regard to the metatarsus, that it is formed by

a single bone, which in the cock is furnished towards its inferior third

with a pointed process, the _spur_. At the inferior part, there is,

however, found another, which is but very slightly developed, and with

which the first phalanx of the innermost toe articulates.

The toes are, in the majority of species, four in number:[15] an

internal, which is directed backwards, and corresponds to the great-toe;

the others are directed forwards. This arrangement is constant in

grallatores (wading birds), gallinaceae[16] (domestic fowls), and

raptores (birds of prey).

[15] In spite of the fact that the custom is to designate the terminal

portions of the foot of birds by the name of digits, we prefer to

employ here the terms _foot_ and _toes_. In adopting this

decision we believe we are acting according to a more didactic

method. Homology of names should, in our opinion, always

accompany homology of regions.

[16] With regard to the gallinaceae, we must add that in certain

varieties the number of toes is five; those which are directed

forwards are three in number; the internal one which passes

backward, is double. The two toes which are the subject of this

special arrangement are placed very close together, and are

nearly always superimposed. This condition is found in the Houdan

and Dorking breeds.

[Illustration: FIG. 47.--POSTERIOR LIMB OF THE HORSE PLACED IN THE

POSITION WHICH IT SHOULD OCCUPY IF THE ANIMAL WERE A PLANTIGRADE: LEFT

LIMB, EXTERNAL SURFACE.

1, Tibia; 2, astragalus; 3, calcaneum; 4, metatarsus; 5, first phalanx;

6, second phalanx; 7, third phalanx.]

In climbing birds (parrots, woodpeckers, and toucans), the innermost

toe is not only directed backward, but the external toe accompanies it

in that direction; consequently, there are two posterior and two

anterior toes. Sometimes they are all directed forwards; this

disposition is found in the martins. In some birds, the number of toes

is reduced to three: the cassowary shows this reduction; in others, the

number is still further diminished--the ostrich, for example, has but

two.

[Illustration: FIG. 48.--SKELETON OF THE FOOT OF A BIRD (THE COCK): LEFT

SIDE, EXTERNAL SURFACE.

1, Metatarsus; 2, spur; 3, rudimentary metatarsal; 4, first toe; 5,

second toe; 6, third toe; 7, fourth toe.]

Further, we find that, in general, the number of the phalanges

increases, when we examine the toes in commencing with the most internal

(Fig. 48): this has two; then the following one three; that which comes

next in order has four; and the most external toe has five. The

phalanges of this last are short; so that, although it is formed by a

larger number of bones, it is not the longest of the toes.

THE POSTERIOR LIMBS IN SOME ANIMALS.

=Plantigrades=: =Bear= (Fig. 33, p. 50).--The external iliac fossa is

very deep. The femur is longer than the bones of the leg; the great

trochanter does not reach the level of the head of the femur. The

fibula is well developed; it is united to the tibia at its superior and

inferior extremities only.

The foot, which, as in the case of the hand, rests on the ground by the

whole extent of its plantar surface, presents five toes; the shortest of

these is the internal--that is, the toe which corresponds to the

great-toe in man; the third and fourth are the longest, and they are

almost equal; there is a very slight difference in favour of the fourth,

which is slightly superior in dimensions to the third.

=Digitigrades=: =Cat=, =Dog= (Fig. 34, p. 52).--The external iliac

fossa, which looks outwards, is deep; the iliac crest is convex

anteriorly, the convexity is continued from one iliac spine to the

other.

[Illustration: FIG. 49.--PELVIS OF THE DOG, SEEN FROM ABOVE.

1, Iliac crest; 2, external iliac fossa; 3, sacrum; AA', bi-iliac

diameter; BB', bi-ischial diameter.]

In the dog, the distance which separates the anterior iliac spines is

less than that which separates the ischia (Fig. 49). On a skeleton which

we measured, the transverse diameter, the distance from the anterior

iliac spine of one side to that of the opposite side, was 8 centimetres,

whilst the distance which separated the ischia was 105 millimetres; on

another skeleton, the first measurement was 127 metres, and the second

was 146 millimetres. It seems to us unnecessary to multiply examples.

In the cat, the iliac spines are but slightly marked; the result is

that the iliac crest is almost confounded with the inferior and superior

borders of the ilium. The two diameters referred to above are almost

equal (Fig. 50).

We draw particular attention to what we have just noted in regard to the

transverse proportions of the iliac and ischiatic regions of the dog and

the cat. These relations are evidently of importance with regard to

shape, since the iliac crests and the ischia are noticeable beneath the

skin.

[Illustration: FIG. 50.--PELVIS OF A FELIDE (LION), VIEWED FROM ABOVE.

1, Iliac crest; 2, external iliac fossa; 3, sacrum; AA', bi-iliac

diameter; BB', bi-ischial diameter.]

In the dog, the shaft of the femur is slightly convex in front; but in

the cat it is straight. The borders of the shaft are slightly marked, so

that it is almost cylindrical. The _linea aspera_, less prominent than

in man, gains in width what it loses in elevation; it constitutes what

may almost be called a rough _surface_. This surface is narrower in its

middle portion than at its extremities, where it bifurcates to go

upwards to the two trochanters, and downwards to the two condyles. At

the superior extremity, the neck is short, the great trochanter reaching

almost to the level of the head of the femur; the digital _cavity_,

which is situated on the internal surface of the great trochanter, is

very deep. At its inferior extremity it projects strongly backward. The

trochlea is narrow; in the cat its two lips are equally prominent, while

in the dog the external is a little more elevated than the internal,

which on its part is a little thicker. The trochlea is still more

independent of the condyles than in the human femur; it is separated

from these latter by a slight constriction.

The knee-cap is long and narrow.

The tibia of the dog is slightly curved from before backward: it has the

form of an elongated S; this conformation is in great part due to the

very marked projection of the anterior tuberosity and of the superior

portion of the crest, which, a little below that tuberosity, turns

abruptly backwards, and thus describes a curve the concavity of which is

directed forward. The superior part of the external surface is very much

hollowed out.

The superior extremity is much thicker than the inferior one. It is not

only wide in the transverse direction, but is more especially extended

from before backwards; the prominence of the anterior tuberosity is the

cause of the elongation of this antero-posterior diameter. On the

posterior part of the external tuberosity is found a surface to which

the superior extremity of the fibula is applied.

The inferior extremity presents an articular surface, which is formed of

two lateral cavities, separated by a crest, which is directed obliquely

forwards and outwards. The internal part is prominent, and forms the

internal malleolus.

With regard to the fibula, it is united to the tibia by its extremities

and by the inferior half of its shaft. This latter is more expanded

below than in its upper part. The superior extremity is flattened from

without inwards. The inferior extremity projects beyond the articular

surface of the tibia, and forms the external malleolus, which, instead

of, as in man, descending further than the tibial malleolus, stops at

the same level, and even descends a little less than does the latter.

In the cat, the curve of the tibia is less pronounced; this is due to

the fact that the crest, instead of being concave in its middle portion,

is slightly convex anteriorly. The fibula, less flattened than that of

the dog, is united to the tibia by its extremities only, and is separate

in the rest of its extent.

The bones of the tarsus are seven in number, and arranged as in man,

with this difference (which is easily comprehended), that their general

relations are changed on account of the vertical direction of the

tarsus. For example, the astragalus, instead of being above the

calcaneum, is situated in front of it; the cuneiform bones, instead of

being situated in front of the scaphoid, are found below it, etc.

These animals have but four well-developed metatarsals; that which

corresponds to the great-toe is represented merely by a small

style-shaped bone, situate at the internal part of the region.

Nevertheless, we find this toe fully developed in some dogs.

Notwithstanding this, the bones which form it are, however, but

rudimentary, and much smaller than those of the innermost digit of the

fore-limb.

Sometimes it is double; this condition is demonstrable in individuals

belonging to breeds of large size. The median metatarsals are more fully

developed than the other bones of the same region which are next them.

Viewed as a whole, the metatarsal bones are a little longer than the

metacarpals; the result is that the distance which separates the tarsus

from the ground is a little greater than that which separates the carpus

from the plane on which the anterior limbs rest. The length of the

calcaneum still further exaggerates this difference, and, as in the

animals with which we shall occupy ourselves later on, the projection

which this bone forms is distinctly higher than that which is produced

by the pisiform.

The metatarsus, as a whole, is a little narrower than the metacarpus;

not only on account of the presence of a thumb in the anterior limb,

but, further, because the bones of this latter region are wider than

those of the corresponding part of the posterior limb.

The phalanges closely resemble those of the anterior limbs.

=Unguligrades=: =Pig= (Fig. 38, p. 58).--The pelvis in this animal

presents a few of the characters which we shall again meet with in the

ruminants and the solipeds; however, the posterior (or internal) iliac

spines are relatively more widely separated from one another than in the

latter. This arrangement reminds us of that found in the carnivora.

The femur presents nothing very special. The knee-cap is thick, and

ovoid in outline.

The fibula is completely developed, as in the carnivora; and is

connected with the tibia at both its extremities.

The tarsus consists of seven bones. The astragalus and the calcaneum

differ slightly from those of ruminants.

The foot, like the hand, has two median digits which rest on the ground

by their third phalanges; and an internal and an external digit, which

are removed from it. The metatarsals are a little longer than the

metacarpals.

[Illustration: FIG. 51.--PELVIS OF THE OX: SUPERIOR SURFACE.

1, Iliac crest; 2, external iliac fossa; 3, sacrum; AA', bi-iliac

diameter; BB', bi-ischiadic diameter.]

=Unguligrades=: =Sheep=, =Ox= (Fig. 39, p. 61).--The pelvis of ruminants

of this group closely resembles that of the horse, which we will study

later on (see p. 99). That which we must at once point out is that, with

regard to the ratio formed by a comparison of the bi-iliac and

bi-ischiatic diameters, it may be placed between the ratio obtained in

comparing those diameters in the pelvis of the carnivora and that of the

solipeds. Indeed, in the ruminants, the distance which separates the

ischia exceeds the width of one iliac only, and does not equal, as in

the felide, the total width of the anterior part of the pelvis (Fig.

51). In the skeleton of the ox, which forms part of the anatomical

museum of the Ecole des Beaux-Arts, the bi-ischiadic diameter is 39

centimetres, whilst the width of one iliac crest is 29 centimetres, so

that, in contrast to that which we find in the dog, the width of the

ischiadic region is less than that formed in front by the addition of

the iliac crests.

The great trochanter is large, and extends beyond the level of the plane

in which the head of the femur is found.

In the ox, the linea aspera, instead of being a narrow crest, is spread

out, and forms in reality a surface; the posterior surface of the femur.

At the inferior and external part of this surface is situated a cavity

which surmounts the corresponding condyle, and is known as the

_supracondyloid fossa_. On the internal part of the same region there

are a series of tubercles, which, because of their position in relation

to the corresponding condyle, constitute the _supracondyloid crest_.

The internal lip of the trochlea is much thicker and much more prominent

than the external.

The details which we have just now examined in connection with the ox

are less marked in the sheep.

The trochlea, narrow as a whole, is clearly separate from the condyles

by a very marked constriction.

The patella, which is thickened in the antero-posterior direction, has

the shape of a triangular pyramid with the base upwards. Its posterior

surface, which articulates with the trochlea, presents an arrangement

which is adapted to the disposition of this latter--that is to say, the

surface which is in contact with the internal lip is larger than that

which articulates with the lip of the opposite side.

The tibia of the ox is proportionately shorter than that of the sheep.

The shaft of this bone is flattened from before backwards, in its

inferior half. The median crest of the articular surface of the inferior

extremity is the most prominent part of that region.

[Illustration: FIG. 52.--TARSUS OF THE OX: POSTERIOR LEFT LIMB,

ANTERO-EXTERNAL SURFACE.

1, Tibia; 2, coronoid bone of the tarsus; 3, superior articular surface

of the astragalus; 4, inferior articular surface of the astragalus; 5,

calcaneum; 6, cuboido-scaphoid bone; 7, great cuneiform bone--the small

cuneiform bone is situated at the back of the latter; 8, principal

metatarsal--the small, or rudimentary, metatarsal bone is very small; it

is situated at the back of the preceding, and is not to be seen in the

sketch. It would be visible if the view were directly lateral, but then

the superior and inferior articular surfaces of the astragalus would be

less apparent.]

The fibula is extremely atrophied. The shaft and superior extremity of

this bone are represented merely by a simple ligamentous cord, which is

sometimes ossified. There remains of the fibula, as a portion well and

distinctly developed, the inferior extremity only. This presents itself

under the form of a small bone situated in the region ordinarily

occupied by the inferior extremity of the outer bone of the leg--that is

to say, the external part of the inferior extremity of the tibia; this

little bone articulates with the astragalus and the calcaneum. Some

authors consider it to be a tarsal bone, and describe it under the name

of the coronoid bone of the tarsus (Fig. 52, 2). It is not, perhaps,

quite legitimate to describe it as a bone of this region, for it has

not a homologue in the tarsus of other animals. Its external surface is

rough; its superior border is furnished with a small pointed process

occupying a depression which is provided for it by the tibia. It reaches

lower down than the latter, and forms in this way a sort of external

malleolus, which frames, on the outer aspect, the mortise in which the

astragalus is maintained.

The tarsus, as a whole, has an elongated form; it is formed of five

bones: the astragalus, calcaneum, cuboid and scaphoid, which coalesce,

to form a single bone, and two cuneiform bones, which correspond to the

second and third cuneiform bones of the human foot. These cuneiforms are

called, from their size, commencing internally, by the names small and

great cuneiform.

The calcaneum is long and narrow; it is longer than that of the horse;

it is on the anterior and external part that the bone (coronoid tarsal

bone) which represents the inferior extremity of the fibula is situated.

It forms the prominence known as _the point of the ham_, a prominence

which is no other than the heel, which, in the unguligrades, is, as we

have already said, very far removed from the ground.

The astragalus, which is elongated in the vertical direction, has three

articular surfaces disposed in the form of trochleae: a superior

trochlea, which is in contact with the skeleton of the leg, and which is

present in all animals; an inferior, which replaces the articular head

found on the anterior aspect of the astragalus in man; this articulates

with the portion of the scaphoido-cuboid that corresponds to the

scaphoid; and, lastly, a posterior trochlea with which the calcaneum

articulates. Of these three trochleae, the superior is the most strongly

marked. Between this latter and the inferior is found, on the anterior

surface of the astragalus, a deep depression, which, during flexion of

the foot on the leg, receives a prominence which the inferior extremity

of the tibia presents in its median portion.

We can easily recognise the trochleae which we have been discussing, in

the little bones which children use 'to play at bones'; these bones are

no other than the astragali of sheep.

We have already mentioned that the scaphoid and the cuboid are

ankylosed; they form by their union an irregular bone, on which the

astragalus and calcaneum are supported.

The cuneiforms articulate with the internal half of the superior

extremity of the principal metatarsal; the external half of this

metatarsal articulates with the portion of bone which represents the

cuboid.

The metatarsus is represented by a principal metatarsal, formed by the

coalescence of two metatarsals; we also find in this region a very small

rudimentary metatarsal.

The metatarsus is a little longer than the metacarpus; its transverse

measurement is a little less; on the other hand, it is a little thicker

in antero-posterior direction; from these two differences it results

that the body of the metatarsus is quadrilateral, whereas the metacarpus

presents only an anterior and a posterior surface.

The rudimentary metatarsal is a very small roundish bone, situated at

the back of the superior extremity of the principal metatarsal.

The phalanges closely resemble those of the anterior limbs;

nevertheless, the first and second phalanges differ from the latter in

the fact that they are a little longer and narrower.

At the back of the metatarso-phalangeal articulations, as in the

corresponding region of the anterior limbs, are found the sesamoid

bones. Such also exist at the articulations of the second and third

phalanges.

=Unguligrades=: =Horse= (Fig. 40, p. 64).--The pelvis of the horse

presents a general form which sharply differentiates it from that of the

carnivora; in fact, the ilium is twisted in such a way that the external

iliac fossa does not look outwards, but upwards. It results from this

twist that the anterior iliac spine, which we have seen to be directed

downwards in the carnivora, has become external; and this prominence is

much farther removed from the vertebral column than in the dog or cat.

On the other hand, the posterior iliac spine, which is directed upwards

in the carnivora, has become internal; it is also placed nearer to the

vertebral column, with the result that the distance which separates this

spine from that of the bone of the opposite side is proportionately

less.

The internal iliac spine, which is conical in shape, and curved upwards,

forms a prominence known as _the angle of the crupper_; the external

iliac spine, thick and provided with tuberosities, forms a

clearly-defined prominence; this is the angle of the _haunch_.

The iliac crest, extending directly from one spine to the other, is

curved, its concavity being turned upwards. The external iliac fossa,

which looks upward, is limited anteriorly by this crest, and is, like

the latter, slightly hollowed. The portion of the bone which connects

the ilium to the region occupied by the cotyloid cavity is extremely

narrow; posteriorly, the bone enlarges again to form the ischial and

pubic portions.

The tuberosity of the ischium, thick and curved upwards, but less so

than in the ox, forms the most prominent part of the posterior border of

the region of the thigh; this projecting portion, so sharply defined in

spare subjects, is known as the _point_ or _angle of the buttock_.

Contrary to what we have indicated in the case of the dog, the distance

which separates the ischiatic tuberosities is inconsiderable in

proportion to that which we find between the external iliac spine of one

side and that of the opposite. The bi-ischiatic diameter does not even

equal the width of one iliac bone measured at the level of its crest

(Fig. 53). On the skeleton of the horse in the Ecole des Beaux-Arts, the

distance which separates the tuberosities of the ischia is 225

millimetres; that between the two spines of each iliac bone is 25

centimetres.

The anterior region of the crupper is thus much broader than that

occupied by the ischia.

The femur is relatively short. Its shaft is rectilinear, and does not

present the anterior convexity which is found on the human femur, and

which we indicated when discussing that of the dog. The shaft of the

bone, instead of being prismatic and triangular, presents four surfaces;

the anterior, internal, and external, almost pass into each other, being

separated one from the other merely by rounded and slightly marked

borders; the posterior surface, which is plane, replaces the linea

aspera, which in the horse, instead of presenting the appearance of a

crest, is considerably widened. The numerous irregularities which this

surface presents give insertion to the muscles which correspond to those

attached to the linea aspera.

Between this posterior surface and the external is found a rough

prominence which curves forward; this was designated by Cuvier the

_third trochanter_; it replaces the external branch of the superior line

of bifurcation of the linea aspera; other authors call it the

_infratrochanteric crest_, because it is situated below the great

trochanter. At the inferior part of the same region is found a deep

fossa, the borders of which are rough; this is the _supracondyloid

fossa_.

[Illustration: FIG 53.--PELVIS OF THE HORSE: SUPERIOR SURFACE.

1, Iliac crest; 2, external iliac fossa; 3, sacrum; AA', bi-iliac

diameter; BB', bi-ischiatic diameter.]

Between the posterior surface and the internal are found: above, the

lesser trochanter, which is long and rough; below, at the level of the

supracondyloid fossa, an equally rough surface known by the name of the

_supracondyloid crest_.

The superior extremity is flattened from before backwards. The neck is

not well marked. The great trochanter is very prominent, and projects

beyond the level of the head of the femur. We divide the great

trochanter into three parts: the summit, which is the most elevated

portion; the convexity, which is situated in front; and the crest,

formed by muscular impressions, situated outside and below the

convexity. The digital fossa is situated behind and below the summit of

the great trochanter. With regard to the lesser trochanter, it is placed

so far down that it really forms part of the shaft of the bone, with

which, besides, we have described it.

On the inferior extremity of the femur are two condyles and a trochlea;

the condyles are clearly separated from this latter by a marked

constriction.

The trochlea is directed with a slight obliquity downwards and inwards;

its internal lip is much thicker and more prominent than the external;

this is, accordingly, a condition exactly the opposite of that which

characterizes the corresponding region of the human femur.

The knee-cap is lozenge-shaped; its superior angle projects upward, and

produces a prominence at the part which corresponds to the base of the

human patella, the part which is here the thickest portion of the bone.

Its anterior surface is convex and rough. Its posterior surface presents

two lateral articular facets, separated by a crest; this surface is in

contact with the trochlea of the femur, and, as it is the internal lip

of the latter which is the more developed, it results therefrom that the

internal articular surface of the knee-cap is larger than the external.

The knee-cap contributes to the formation of the region of the posterior

limb which is called the _stifle_.

The tibia is large in its upper portion; in its inferior part it is

flattened from before backwards. The posterior surface of the shaft

presents an oblique line, below which are found vertical rough lines for

the insertion of muscles. The external surface is hollowed out in its

upper part. The anterior tuberosity of the tibia rises just to the level

of the flat articular surface; it is hollowed in its median portion by a

vertical groove of elongated form, which receives the ligament that

binds the knee-cap to the tibia. The external tuberosity is more

prominent than the internal; in it is found a groove for the passage of

the anterior tibial muscle.

The inferior extremity, flattened from before backwards, presents a

surface which is moulded on the trochlea of the astragalus; the median

crest of this surface is thick, and descends lower posteriorly than the

tuberosities which are situated on the external and internal aspects of

this extremity.

Of the two tuberosities, that which is internal is comparable to the

internal malleolus of man, the one on the outer side forms a sort of

external malleolus; but this latter here belongs to the tibia, and not

to the fibula.

The fibula, in fact, does not reach the inferior extremity of the tibia;

it is a poorly developed bone, elongated and terminating inferiorly in a

point, at the middle of the shaft of the tibia or at its lower third.

Its superior extremity, which is slightly expanded, articulates with the

tuberosity which occupies the outer aspect of the corresponding

extremity of the tibia.

The bones of the tarsus are six in number: the calcaneum and astragalus

form the upper row; the cuboid, scaphoid, and two cuneiforms form the

lower (Fig. 54).

The astragalus has not, as in ruminants, an inferior trochlea for

articulation with the scaphoid; this portion of the bone presents a

surface which is slightly convex. It articulates with the tibia by a

trochlea that occupies not only the superior surface, but also the

anterior. This trochlea, which is directed slightly obliquely downwards

and outwards, has a very pronounced form; its lips, which are extremely

prominent, determine by their anterior part one of the features which we

recognise on the anterior aspect of the _ham_--a feature which is still

more accentuated when the metatarsus (_canon_) is extended on the leg.

On the internal surface of the astragalus is found a tubercle, which

forms a projection in the corresponding region of the ham.

The calcaneum, which is not quite so long as that of the ox, forms by

its summit a prominence which is called _the point of the ham_.

The cuboid is small; the scaphoid is large, and flattened from above

downwards. Of the two cuneiforms, the more external is the larger; it

closely resembles the scaphoid; it is flattened from above downwards as

is the latter; but it is a little smaller in size. The small cuneiform,

which occupies the inner side of the tarsus, is the smallest bone in

this region; it is sometimes divided into two parts; this raises the

number of the cuneiforms to three, and that of the bones of the tarsus

to seven.

[Illustration: FIG. 54.--TARSUS OF THE HORSE: LEFT POSTERIOR LIMB,

ANTERIOR SURFACE.

1, Tibia; 2, internal tuberosity of the inferior extremity of the tibia

(homologue of the internal malleolus of man); 3, external tuberosity of

the inferior extremity of the tibia (homologue of the external

malleolus); 4, median crest lodged in the groove of the pulley of the

astragalus; 5, pulley of the astragalus; 6, internal tuberosity of the

astragalus; 7, calcaneum; 8, cuboid; 9, scaphoid; 10, great cuneiform,

the small cuneiform is placed behind this latter; 11, principal

metatarsal; 12, external rudimentary metatarsal. The internal

rudimentary metatarsal, being more slender than the external, does not

appear in the figure.]

The bones of the metatarsus and the phalanges are equal in number to the

corresponding bones in the anterior limbs; they are formed on a type

analogous to that of these latter. Accordingly, we shall merely indicate

the differences which characterize them.

The principal metatarsal is longer than the metacarpal of the same

class; its shaft is more cylindrical; its inferior extremity is somewhat

thicker. The external rudimentary metatarsal is better developed than

the internal; in the metacarpus the reverse is the case.

The phalanges so far resemble those of the anterior limb that, as

differential characters, we need point out only the following: the first

phalanx of the hind-foot is a little shorter than that of the fore-foot;

its inferior extremity is a little narrower, and its superior extremity

a little thicker. The second phalanx is a little less expanded

laterally.

The difference in appearance which the three phalanges, anterior and

posterior, respectively present are to be borne in mind; for they are

correlated to the general form of the fore and hind feet. We will

establish this point when we come to study the hoof (see Figs. 101 and

102, p. 257). In the fore-foot the ungual phalanx has its inferior

surface limited externally by a circular border, while the same bone of

the hind-foot has this surface a little narrower, more concave, and

limited by two curved borders which unite anteriorly to form an

angle--an arrangement which gives to the general outline of this region

the form of the letter V.

Articulations of the Posterior Limbs

=The Coxo-femoral Articulation.=--The head of the femur is received in

the cotyloid cavity; these are the osseous surfaces in contact in this

articulation. They are maintained in position by a fibrous capsule and a

round ligament. To this latter is found attached, in the horse, a

fasciculus which, commencing, as does the round ligament, at the

depression on the head of the femur, emerges from the cotyloid cavity by

the notch which is present in its circumference, and is attached to the

anterior border of the pubes, to blend with the tendon of the rectus

muscle of the abdomen. This is the pubio-femoral ligament.

The movements which this joint permits are the same in the quadrupeds as

in man, but less extensive. They are: flexion and extension, abduction

and adduction, the two latter being much more limited than the former.

There is also rotation.

By flexion, the inferior extremity of the femur is directed forwards;

the bone of the thigh then takes a more oblique direction than the

normal. This movement takes place, for example, when the animal carries

forward one of its hinder limbs. Extension, which takes place in an

inverse sense, is produced when the foot is fixed on the ground, while

the body is projected forward. It is also produced in the action of

kicking.

As for the lateral movements--viz., abduction and adduction--they are

less extensive than the preceding movements. The absence of the

pubio-femoral ligament in other quadrupeds than the horse explains why

in them abduction is less limited than in the latter. Indeed, it is the

tension of this ligament, occasioned by the abduction of the thighs,

which arrests more quickly the movement in question.

=Articulation of the Knee.=--This articulation, as in man, is formed by

the femur, the patella, and the tibia.

In the horse the ligament of the patella is not single, but consists of

three parts, designated, on account of their position, by the respective

names of external, internal, and median patellar ligaments. The two

former come from the angles on the corresponding borders of the

knee-cap; the median springs from the anterior surface and inferior

angle of the same bone. They all three pass to their termination on the

anterior tubercle of the tibia. The external ligament is the strongest,

and the internal ligament the least developed.

In the dog, the cat, the pig, and the sheep, the patellar ligament

consists of a single band. The articulation is further strengthened on

the sides by lateral ligaments--an internal and an external.

With regard to the principal movements, these are flexion and extension,

to which may be added movements of rotation of limited extent. In

flexion, the leg bends on the thigh; its inferior extremity is directed

upwards and backwards; the angle which the tibia naturally forms with

the femur becomes less obtuse.

But it should be understood that one part of this description--that

which has relation to the leg--holds good only when the femur is in its

normal condition, or in flexion. Indeed, at the close of the movement in

which, during a step, the foot is in contact with the ground--that is,

at the termination of the resting stage--the inferior extremity of the

tibia is directed backwards. But the femur is then in a state of

extension, and in regard to this latter the attitude of the leg is

unchanged.

[Illustration: FIG. 55.--EXTENSION OF THE LEG: RIGHT POSTERIOR LIMB OF

THE HORSE, EXTERNAL SURFACE. (AFTER A CHRONOGRAPHIC STUDY BY PROFESSOR

MAREY.)]

At this moment, notwithstanding the direction, which recalls that which

it has at the time of flexion, the leg is not bent on the thigh; on the

contrary, it is almost in the line of its continuation (Fig. 55). As we

have done in connection with the articulations of the anterior limbs, we

borrow this figure from the interesting chronophotographic studies of

Professor Marey.[17]

[17] E. J. Marey, 'Analysis of the Movements of the Horse by the

Chronophotograph' (_La Nature_, June 11, 1898).

=The Tibio-tarsal Articulation and of the Bones of the Tarsus.=--In the

region which veterinary anatomists call the ham, the articulations of

the leg and foot alone call for special study in the case of the horse.

The articulations of the bones of the tarsus, and of these with the

metatarsus, do not offer any interest with regard to mobility, this

being almost wholly absent at that level.

The leg and the astragalus, in a general way, are placed in contact by

such articular surfaces that the resulting joint, which is a true hinge,

permits movements of flexion and extension only. Indeed, as we have

indicated above, the tibia is furnished, on the inferior surface, with a

crest that fits into the deep groove which is situated on the

corresponding surface of the astragalus.

During flexion, the anterior surface of the foot tends to approach the

anterior surface of the leg, the angle formed by these two segments

becoming more and more narrowed. The displacement in the opposite

direction characterizes extension.

In other quadrupeds, the articulations which bind together the bones of

the tarsus possess a little more freedom of movement. The shape of these

bones, and particularly the shape of the surfaces of the astragalus,

which are in contact with them, allow movements in this region, in the

case of the dog and cat, which, without being so extensive as those of

the human foot, in the subastragaloid articulation, nevertheless, recall

the mobility which we find in the human species at this level--that is

to say, rotation, abduction, and adduction of the foot.

As for the articulations of the metatarsus with the phalanges, and of

the phalanges with one another, they resemble those of the anterior limb

too closely that it should be necessary to study them here. Such a study

would be, in this case, but a repetition (see p. 76, a description of

the articulations in question).

THE HEAD IN GENERAL, AND IN SOME ANIMALS IN PARTICULAR

When we compare, by the examination of one of their lateral aspects, the

skull of man and the same region in other mammals, it is easy to observe

that the relative development of the cranium and face is entirely

different. In the case of man the cranium is large, and the face

relatively small; in animals the face is proportionally much more highly

developed. The measure of the facial angle permits us to note these

differences, and the figures relative to the value of this angle are

sufficiently demonstrative to induce us to indicate those which are, in

a general way, connected with some of the forms in individuals which

here occupy our attention. In the first place, we must remember that the

angle in question is more acute, as the cranium is less developed in

proportion to the facial region (Figs. 56 and 57). It is especially to

this character that we wish to draw attention.

Man 70 deg.-80 deg.

Cat 41 deg.

Dog 28 deg.-41 deg.

Sheep 20 deg.-25 deg.

Ox 18 deg.-20 deg.

Ass 12 deg.-16 deg.

Horse 11 deg.-13 deg.

Besides, in animals the cranium is very prominent superiorly, and the

face, more or less elongated, is sharply projected downwards and

forwards; in man the cranial region occupies not only the superior, but

also the posterior part; the face is short and of a compact form. The

human head, in its general aspect, may be compared to a sphere, while

the skull of the quadrupeds presents the aspect of a quadrangular

pyramid, with the base turned upwards and the summit at the incisor

teeth.

=Direction of the Head.=--Before entering on the study of the bones of

the head, it is necessary, in our opinion, to agree as to the position

in which we shall suppose it to be placed.

The question may seem to be one of little importance; nevertheless, it

cannot be regarded as indifferent, since authors are not all agreed on

this subject.

Some suppose it to be placed vertically--that is, with the incisor teeth

turned directly downwards. Others, on the contrary, suppose it to be

placed horizontally, resting on the whole length of the lower jaw, the

face being then turned upwards. These two extreme methods of arrangement

appear to us to possess inconveniences--at least, for comparison with

the human head.

[Illustration: FIG. 56.--HUMAN SKULL: MEASURE OF THE FACIAL ANGLE BY THE

METHOD OF CAMPER. ANGLE BAC = 80 deg.

The internal wall of the cranial cavity is marked by the dotted line.]

[Illustration: FIG. 57.--SKULL OF THE HORSE: MEASURE OF THE FACIAL ANGLE

BY THE METHOD OF CAMPER.[18] ANGLE BAC = 13 deg.

The internal wall of the cranial cavity is shown by the dotted line.]

[18] We have indicated on this sketch of the skull of the horse the

facial angle measured by the method of Camper, in order that the

correspondence with Fig. 56 may be more complete. But it is

certain that the procedure here employed is in practice not

satisfactory, since the apex of the angle, as we can demonstrate,

is found to be situated within the contour of the head, and that,

consequently, it is rather difficult to localize it precisely in

the case of a given skeleton. Further, because of the absence of

the base of the nose in the complete skull, the auriculo-nasal

line cannot be accurately fixed. It would be the same for most

other animals. This is why the method employed for these latter

is preferably that of Cuvier, or, again, that of Cloquet. In the

former, the apex of the angle of Camper is transferred to the

free border of the upper incisors, but these teeth may be absent,

and, on the other hand, ruminants are destitute of them. In the

second, the same apex is placed at the alveolar border, and the

angle then becomes fairly easy to appreciate.

Indeed, if, when the head is vertical, the same regions of the face

(forehead, nose) are, in the case of animals as well as man, turned

forward, the lower jaw ceases to merit its appellation, as it is then

situated, not below, but behind the upper. Furthermore, if this

position is chosen, for example, for modelling or drawing, it cannot be

obtained without difficulty when we have to deal with an isolated piece

of the skeleton, on account of the absence of equilibrium, which it is

necessary to obviate. It is true that the question of convenience should

not take precedence of all others, and it suffices for us in this

connection to recall, in regard to the human pelvis, that, although the

older anatomists used to represent it as resting commodiously on the

three angles which terminate it at its lower part (ischial tuberosities

and coccyx), this attitude being false, it is customary now to incline

the superior aspect forwards, inasmuch as this arrangement more nearly

conforms to reality, in spite of the fact that it is a little more

difficult so to dispose an isolated pelvis. Further, to return to the

head; if its vertical direction can be demonstrated, for example, in

many horses, it is not sufficiently general to be adopted as the classic

position.

In regard to the facility of placing in position, the horizontal

direction is certainly to be preferred; but this is also far removed

from the natural position in the animal while in the state of repose. On

the other hand, the mind is not satisfied with the idea that certain

regions of the face, such as the nose and the forehead, are then

directed upwards. And yet it is necessary to come to a decision, seeing

that what we are now investigating applies also to the position to which

it is necessary to give the preference in placing the skeleton of the

head when we wish to draw it in profile. That which we adopt is a

compromise, but to us it seems more rational.

The position of the head of the horse, to be normal, should be such as

to give it an inclination of 45 deg. In this case the lower jaw is still

posterior; and, for this reason, we see in adopting this position some

inconveniences from a didactic point of view. Accordingly, we will

suppose the head brought a little nearer to the horizontal, and this,

from the imaginative point of view, has certainly an advantage which we

cannot afford to neglect when addressing artists.

Indeed, let us suppose that to a clay model of a human head we wish to

give the aspect of the head of a quadruped. We should elevate the

occiput; and then, taking hold of the lower part of the face, we should

lengthen it, not in a direction precisely antero-posterior, but

downwards and forwards. It is obviously this latter procedure which, on

the other hand, is carried out when a person wishes to give to his own

face some resemblance to the muzzle of a quadruped.

It is true that, in the position we have adopted, the face is directed

obliquely downwards and forwards, and that there may result a certain

confusion in describing the position of its different parts. On

this account, with the object of not making complications, we

purpose, for the present, to substitute, for example, for the term

'antero-superior'--which when speaking of the position of the forehead

and nose would be more exact--the term 'anterior,' which is sufficiently

comprehensible. The mouth will be, for the same reason, referred to as

being situated at the inferior part of the face, and not the

antero-inferior.

=The Skull.=--The elevation of the cranial region becomes especially

appreciable when we examine the occipital bone. Before verifying this

fact, it is not superfluous to recall the general arrangement which this

bone presents in the human skull. A portion of the occipital bone

occupies the base of the skull; but this base in man is horizontal; to

this region succeeds the shell-shaped portion of the occipital bone,

which, passing vertically upwards, forms with the preceding portion an

angle situated at the level of the external occipital protuberance, and

of the curved line which starts from it on each side. In animals a

portion of the occipital bone is horizontal, it is true; but this bone

being sharply bent at the level of the occipital foramen and condyles,

the result is that the portion which surmounts these latter looks

backwards, and is limited above by the external occipital protuberance,

which forms the culminating point of the skull; this point is situated

between the ears.

[Illustration: FIG. 58.--SKULL OF ONE OF THE FELIDAE (JAGUAR): LEFT

LATERAL ASPECT.

1, Posterior surface of the occipital bone; 2, external occipital

protuberance; 3, condyle of the occipital bone; 4, jugular process; 5,

parietal bone; 6, frontal bone; 7, orbital process; 8, orbital cavity;

9, squamous portion of the temporal bone; 10, external auditory canal,

in front of which is situated the zygomatic process; 11, tympanic bulla;

12, superior maxillary bone; 13, intermaxillary or incisor bone; 14,

nasal bone; 15, anterior orifice of the nasal cavity; 16, malar bone;

17, ungual or lachrymal bone; 18, inferior maxillary bone; 19, condyle

of the inferior maxillary bone; 20, coronoid process; 21, incisor teeth;

22, canine teeth; 23, molar teeth.]

[Illustration: FIG. 59.--SKULL OF THE LION: LEFT LATERAL ASPECT.

This figure is intended to show that in the lion the contour of the face

between the nasal bones and the cranial region is more flattened than in

other felidae, such as the tiger, jaguar, panther, and domestic cat. This

difference is shown by comparison of this figure with the preceding one

(Fig. 58). We are indebted to M. Tramond, the well-known naturalist, for

the indication of this differential character which, from the artistic

plastic point of view, is one of real interest.]

This protuberance, prolonged on each side by the superior curved line of

the occipital bone, is so much the more prominent as this bone bends

sharply a second time, so as to form a third portion, which, looking

forwards, forms part of the anterior aspect of the skull, and proceeds

to articulate with the parietals. On this third portion is found a crest

which, proceeding from the occipital protuberance, is continuous in

front with the parietal crests, to which we will again refer in speaking

of the parietal bones.

On the inferior surface of the human occipital bone are found, at the

level of, and external to, the condyles two bony elevations which bear

the name of _jugular eminences_. They are long in quadrupeds, and

constitute what are designated by some authors the _styloid processes_,

but they must not be confounded with the processes of the same name

which in the case of man form part of the temporal bone. These processes

are very highly developed in the pig, horse, ox, and sheep.

In the ox, the occipital bone is deprived of the protuberance, and is

not bent on itself in the anterior portion, neither does it form the

most salient part of the skull; this latter, which is situated at the

level of the horns, belongs to the frontal bone. In the pig, also, the

occipital bone is not bent upon itself in its anterior portion, but

forms the summit of the head. The occipital protuberance, hollowed on

its posterior surface, rises vertically, and rests upon the parietal

bone, with which it forms an acute angle.

The parietals, two separate bones in the dog and the cat, but fused in

the median line in the ox, sheep, and horse, are of special interest in

regard to the two crests which, in the carnivora, and also in the pig

and the horse, occupy their external surface, and, after diverging from

one another, are continued by a crest which crosses the frontal bone

and ends at the external orbital process of the latter bone.

These crests, known as the _parietal_ or _temporal crests_, recall both

in position and relations the temporal curved line of the parietal bone

of man. They contribute, as in the case of the latter, to the formation

of the boundaries of the temporal fossa.

[Illustration: FIG. 60.--SKULL OF THE DOG: LEFT LATERAL ASPECT.

1, Posterior surface of the occipital bone; 2, external occipital

protuberance; 3, occipital condyle; 4, jugular process; 5, parietal

bone; 6, frontal bone; 7, orbital process; 8, orbital cavity; 9,

external auditory canal, in front of which is found the zygomatic

process; 10, tympanic bulla; 11, superior maxillary bone; 12,

intermaxillary or incisor bone; 13, nasal bone; 14, anterior opening of

the cavity of the nasal fossae; 15, malar bone; 16, lachrymal bone; 17,

inferior maxillary bone; 18, condyle of the inferior maxillary bone; 19,

coronoid process; 20, incisor teeth; 21, canine teeth; 22, molar teeth.]

In the carnivora, these crests are situated, throughout their whole

length, in the median line, the temporal fossae being, accordingly, as

extended as they possibly can be. In certain species, the development of

these crests is such that they form by their union a vertical plate,

which, in separating the two temporal fossae, gives them a greater depth.

In the pig, the parietal crests, analogous in this respect to the

temporal curved lines of the parietal bones of man, are separated by an

interval, proportionately less extended, however, than that of the human

skull. The parietal bone in the ox and the sheep does not enter into the

formation of the anterior surface of the skull; it is formed by an

osseous plate, narrow and elongated transversely, which, with the

occipital bone, constitutes the base of the region of _the nape of the

neck_. It is bent upon itself at the level of its lateral portions so as

to occupy the temporal fossa.

The anterior surface of the frontal bone, which is depressed in the

median line in the dog, but plane in the horse, is limited by two

crests, which, situated on the prolongation of the parietal crests,

diverge more and more from one another in proportion as they occupy a

lower position. This surface terminates externally in two processes,

which are the homologues of the external orbital processes of the human

frontal bone.

The superior border of these orbital processes, situated on the

prolongation of the corresponding parietal crests, contributes to limit

the temporal fossa. Each of these orbital processes terminates in the

following manner: In the bear, dog, cat, and pig, in which the orbital

cavities are incompletely bounded by bone, this process, slightly

developed, is not in connection, by its inferior extremity, with any

other part of the skeleton of the region. In the ox and the sheep, it

articulates with a process of the malar bone. In the horse, it

articulates with the zygomatic process of the temporal bone. The

inferior margin of this process forms a part of the boundary of the

anterior opening of the orbital cavity.

The supra-orbital foramen, which does not exist in carnivora, occupies

in the horse the base of the orbital process. In the ox, it is situated

a little nearer the middle line; and its anterior orifice opens into an

osseous gutter which is directed upwards towards the base of the horn,

while inferiorly it meets the inferior border of the frontal bone; in

the sheep this groove is but slightly developed. In this latter, as in

the ox, it is the frontal bone which forms the most elevated portion of

the skull. In fact, being bent upon itself at a certain level, its

external surface is formed of two planes: one, posterior, which is

inclined downwards and directed backwards; the other, anterior, is also

inclined downwards, but with a forward obliquity. At the union of these

planes the bone forms an elbow, on either side of which are found the

osseous processes on which the horns are mounted.

[Illustration: FIG. 61.--SKULL OF THE PIG: LEFT LATERAL ASPECT.

1, Occipital bone; 2, condyle of the occipital; 3, jugular process; 4,

parietal bone; 5, parietal crests; 6, frontal bone; 7, orbital process;

8, orbital cavity; 9, external auditory canal; 10, zygomatic process;

11, superior maxillary bone; 12, intermaxillary or incisor bone; 13,

nasal bone; 14, anterior orifice of the cavity of the nasal fossae; 15,

malar bone; 16, lachrymal bone; 17, inferior maxillary bone; 18, condyle

of the inferior maxillary bone; 19, incisor teeth; 20, canine teeth; 21,

molar teeth.]

In the bear, the anterior margin of the frontal bone is prolonged by two

small tongues of bone, which, descending on the lateral borders of the

nasal bones, articulate with the superior half of the latter.

The temporal bone is, as in man, furnished with a squamous portion,

from which springs the zygomatic process, which is directed towards the

face, to terminate in the following manner: in the carnivora, the pig,

and ruminants, it articulates with the malar bone by its inferior

border; in the horse, it insinuates itself as a sort of wedge between

the malar bone and the orbital process of the frontal bone, with which

it articulates, as we have already pointed out, and contributes, by a

portion situated in front of this articulation, to form the boundary of

the anterior opening of the corresponding orbital cavity. As in man, the

zygomatic process arises by two roots: one, transverse, behind which is

situated the glenoid cavity of the temporal bone; the other,

antero-posterior, which proceeds to join above with the superior curved

line of the occipital bone.

Behind the glenoid cavity is found the external auditory canal, and,

further back still, the mastoid process. This latter, but slightly

developed in the carnivora, a little more so in the ruminants, and still

more in the horse, has its external surface traversed by a crest, _the

mastoid crest_, which, after becoming blended with the antero-posterior

root of the zygomatic process, proceeds with this latter to join the

superior occipital curved line.

Below the auditory canal is situated a round prominence, highly

developed in carnivora; this is _the tympanic bulla_, also called _the

mastoid protuberance_; it is an appendage of the tympanum.

The Face

The bone of this region, around which all the others come to be grouped,

is, as in man, the superior maxillary. The relations of this maxillary

with the neighbouring bones is not exactly the same in all animals; for

example, in the ox, sheep, and horse, in which the bones of the nose are

wide in their upper part, and in which the lachrymal bone, which is very

highly developed, encroaches on the face, the superior maxillary does

not meet the frontal bone; it is separated from it by the above-named

bones. It unites with it, on the other hand, in the dog and the cat. In

the bear, it is separated from the bones of the nose by a small tongue

of bone which springs from the anterior border of the frontal--a

process which we have noticed in connection with this latter.

[Illustration: FIG. 62.--THE SKULL OF THE OX: LEFT LATERAL ASPECT.

1, Occipital condyle; 2, jugular process; 3, parietal bone; 4, frontal

bone; 5, osseous process, which serves to support the horn (horn-core);

6, orbital cavity; 7, external auditory canal, in front of which is

found the zygomatic process; 8, temporal fossa; 9, superior maxillary

bone; 10, intermaxillary or incisor bone; 11, nasal bone; 12, anterior

orifice of the cavity of the nasal fossae; 13, malar bone; 14, lachrymal

bone; 15, inferior maxillary bone; 16, condyle of the inferior maxillary

bone; 17, incisor teeth; 18, molar teeth.]

In the pig, ox, sheep, and horse, the external surface is traversed, to

a greater or less extent, by a crest which is situated on the

prolongation of the inferior border of the malar bone. This crest, which

is straight in the horse, but curved with its convexity upwards in the

ox and the sheep, is known as _the maxillary spine_ or _the malar

tuberosity_: it gives attachment to the masseter muscle, and, in the

horse, is distinctly visible under the skin. It does not exist in the

carnivora. On the same surface is situated the sub-orbital foramen.

The inferior border is hollowed out into alveoli, in which are implanted

the superior molar and canine teeth. This border is prolonged forwards

from the alveolus, which corresponds to the first molar tooth, to

terminate, after a course more or less prolonged, at the alveolus of the

canine. This space, more or less considerably expanded, which thus

separates these teeth is called the _interdental space_; but this

denomination is not applicable to ruminants, because these latter

possess neither canine nor incisor teeth in the upper jaw (see p. 125,

dentition of the ox and sheep). The superior maxillary bone of one side

and that of the opposite side do not meet in the median line in the

region which corresponds to the incisor teeth; they are separated by a

bone which, in the human species, is present only at the commencement of

life, and afterwards coalesces with the maxilla; this is the

intermaxillary or incisor bone. This bone, which is paired, is formed of

a central part, which bears the superior incisor teeth; it is prolonged

upwards and backwards by two processes: one, external, which insinuates

itself between the superior maxillary and the nasal bone, except in the

sheep, in which it remains widely separated from the latter; the other,

internal, which is united to that which belongs to the bone of the

opposite side to form part of the floor of the cavity of the nasal

fossae; the external border of this process, which is separated from the

body of the bone by a notch, forms the internal boundary of the

corresponding _incisor opening_ or the _incisor slit_. Owing to the

absence of superior incisors in ruminants, the intermaxillary bone

presents no alveoli.

The malar bone, and the os unguis or lachrymal, are more or less

developed according to the species considered. With regard to the malar

bone, it is most important to notice the part which it takes in the

formation of the zygomatic arch, and that its inferior border

contributes to form the crest to which is attached the masseter muscle.

As for the nasal bones, they present differential characters which, as

they affect the form of the region which they occupy, are worthy of

notice.

[Illustration: FIG. 63.--SKULL OF THE HORSE: LEFT LATERAL ASPECT.

1, Posterior surface of the occipital bone; 2, external occipital

protuberance; 3, occipital condyle; 4, jugular process; 5, parietal

bone; 6, frontal bone; 7, orbital cavity; 8, zygomatic process of the

temporal bone; 9, external auditory canal; 10, mastoid process; 11,

superior maxillary bone or _maxilla_; 12, intermaxillary or incisor

bone; 13, nasal bone; 14, anterior orifice of the cavity of the nasal

fossae; 14', malar bone; 15, lachrymal bone; 16, inferior maxillary bone

or _mandible_; 17, inferior maxillary fissure; 18, condyle of the

inferior maxillary bone; 19, coronoid process of the inferior maxillary

bone; 20, incisor teeth; 21, canine teeth; 22, molar teeth.]

Their dimensions in length are proportional to those of the face. Very

small in man, they are more developed in carnivora. We recognise in the

latter the two curves which characterize them in the human species, and

which we clearly notice when we view them on one of their lateral

aspects: a concavity above, and a convexity below. These curves are more

or less accentuated--very strongly marked in the bulldog, and scarcely

at all in the greyhound. Moreover, in the carnivora also the nasal bones

are wider below than above, and form, by their junction, a semicircular

notch which limits, in its superior portion, the anterior opening of the

cavity of the nasal fossae. In the horse they present an opposite

arrangement with regard to their dimensions in width; broad above, each

terminates below by forming a pointed process which, separated from the

intermaxillary bones, is prolonged in front of the nasal orifice.

The inferior maxillary bone is, as in man, formed of a body and two

branches. But among the many special characteristics of form and size

which sharply differentiate it from the human bone, one detail must be

indicated; this is the absence of a mental prominence. Hence it results

that the anterior border of the body of the lower jaw, instead of being

directed obliquely downwards and forwards, is, on the contrary, oblique

downwards and backwards, and that in certain animals this border is

actually found almost exactly on the prolongation of the inferior border

of the body of the bone.

On the external surface of the body are found the three mental foramina.

The superior border is hollowed out by alveoli.

With regard to the branches (_rami_), they terminate in two processes:

one, the posterior, is the condyle; the other, situated more forwards,

is the coronoid process, which gives insertion to the temporal muscle.

These two processes are separated by the sigmoid notch.

For reasons which we will explain further on (see p. 127, movements of

the lower jaw), the condyle presents differences of form. In the

carnivora, it is strongly convex from before backwards, expanded

transversely, and firmly mortised in the glenoid cavity of the temporal

bone; in the ruminants, it is less convex from before backwards, it is

more slightly concave in the transverse direction; in the rodents--we

give as an example the hare (Fig. 64)--the condyle is still convex from

before backwards, but it is flattened from without inwards.

In the animals in which the muscles of mastication are very highly

developed, and especially in the carnivora, the osseous regions occupied

by these muscles are more extensive and more deep than in the human

species. The length of the coronoid process, the depth of the temporal

fossa, the extent of the zygomatic arch, the appearance of the external

surface of each of the rami of the lower jaw, deeply hollowed out for

accommodation of the masseter, and to provide extensive surfaces of

insertion for this muscle, are sure proofs furnished by the skeleton of

the occasionally enormous development of the muscles of mastication.

In the carnivora, a rather strong process, which is directed backwards,

occupies the angle of the inferior maxilla; it is, accordingly, situated

below the region of the condyle.

[Illustration: FIG. 64.--SKULL OF THE HARE: LEFT LATERAL ASPECT.

1, External occipital protuberance; 2, occipital condyle; 3, parietal

bone; 4, frontal bone; 5, orbital process; 6, orbital cavity; 7,

zygomatic process; 8, external auditory canal; 9, superior maxillary

bone; 10, intermaxillary or incisor bone; 11, nasal bone; 12, anterior

opening of the nasal fossa; 13, malar bone; 14, inferior maxillary bone;

15, condyle of the inferior maxillary bone; 16, incisor teeth; 17, molar

teeth.]

The teeth which the jaws carry vary in number, and even in appearance,

according to species; it is useful to note their differences. In order

to establish the nature of these latter more effectively, we will first

recall the fact that in man the teeth, thirty-two in number, are equally

distributed between the jaws, and are divided into incisors, canines,

and molars, of which the arrangement is thus formulated:

5_m._ 1_c._ 2_i._ | 2_i._ 1_c._ 5_m._

--------------------+-------------------- = 32.[19]

5_m._ 1_c._ 2_i._ | 2_i._ 1_c._ 5_m._

[19] _I.e._, _i_, incisors; _c_, canines; _m_, molars.

We also note that the incisors are edged, the canines are pointed, and

that the molars, cubical in shape, have their surface of contact

provided with tubercles.

The teeth of the cat are thirty in number; they are thus arranged:

4_m._ 1_c._ 3_i._ | 3_i._ 1_c._ 4_m._

--------------------+-------------------- = 30.

3_m._ 1_c._ 3_i._ | 3_i._ 1_c._ 3_m._

Those of the dog number forty-two:

6_m._ 1_c._ 3_i._ | 3_i._ 1_c._ 6_m._

--------------------+-------------------- = 42.

7_m._ 1_c._ 3_i._ | 3_i._ 1_c._ 7_m._

In these animals, the incisors, such as are not damaged by use, are

furnished, on the free border of their crown, with three tubercles, of

which one, the median, is more developed than those which are situated

laterally. We denote these teeth, commencing with those nearest the

median line, by the names _central incisors_ or _nippers_,

_intermediate_ and _corner incisors_. The canines, or _fangs_, are long

and conical; they are curved backwards and outwards. The upper canines,

which are larger than those of the lower jaw, are separated from the

most external of the incisors (_corner_) by an interval in which the

canines of the lower jaw are received. The lower canines, on the other

hand, are in contact with the neighbouring incisors, and are each

separated from the first molar which succeeds them by a wider interval

than that which is situated between the corresponding teeth in the upper

jaw.

The molars differ essentially from the teeth of the same class in the

human species. Their crown terminates in a cutting border bristling with

sharp-pointed projections; this formation indicates that these teeth are

principally designed for tearing. During the movement of raising the

lower jaw, which is so energetic in the carnivora, they act, indeed, in

the same manner as the two blades of a pair of scissors. The largest

molars are: in the dog, the fourth of the upper jaw, and the fifth in

the opposite one; in the cat, the third both above and below.

The pig has forty-four teeth disposed in the following manner:

7_m._ 1_c._ 3_i._ | 3_i._ 1_c._ 7_m._

--------------------+-------------------- = 44.

7_m._ 1_c._ 3_i._ | 3_i._ 1_c._ 7_m._

Of the incisors, the nippers and the intermediate ones of the upper jaw

have their analogues in those of the horse; in the lower jaw, the

corresponding teeth, straight, and directed forward, rather resemble the

same incisors in rodents. The corner incisor teeth are much smaller, and

are separated from the neighbouring teeth. The canine teeth, also called

_tusks_ or _tushes_, are greatly developed, especially in the male. The

molars increase in size from the first to the last; they are not

cutting, as in the carnivora, but they are not flattened and provided

with tubercles on their surfaces of contact as in the herbivora.

In the ox and the sheep the teeth are thirty-two in number:

6_m._ 0_c._ 0_i._ | 0_i._ 0_c._ 6_m._

--------------------+-------------------- = 32.

6_m._ 0_c._ 4_i._ | 4_i._ 0_c._ 6_m._

As we see from this dental formula, the incisors are found only in the

lower jaw; they are replaced in the upper jaw by a thick cartilaginous

pad on which the inferior incisors find a surface of resistance.

These have their crowns flattened from above downwards, and gradually

become thinner from the root to the anterior border, which is edged and

slightly convex. These teeth gradually wear away. In proportion to the

progress of this wear, on account of the fact that it involves the

anterior borders and upper surfaces of the incisor teeth, and that these

teeth are narrower towards the root than at the opposite extremity, the

intervals which separate them tend to become wider and wider; and when

the roots become exposed by the retraction of the gums, they are then

separated from one another by a considerable interval. The molars have

their grinding surface comparable to that of the horse; they increase in

size from the first to the sixth.

The teeth of the horse are forty in number; they are thus distributed:

6_m._ 1_c._ 3_i._ | 3_i._ 1_c._ 6_m._

--------------------+-------------------- = 40.

6_m._ 1_c._ 3_i._ | 3_i._ 1_c._ 6_m._

As they become worn, these teeth continue to grow, and as, on the one

hand, this phenomenon takes place throughout the whole life of the

animal, and, on the other hand, the process of wear brings out and makes

visible at the surface of friction parts formerly deeper and deeper, and

of which the configuration varies at different levels, there result

special features which permit the determination of the age of the animal

by an examination of its jaws. The incisors are called, commencing with

those situated nearest the middle line, _central incisors_ or _nippers_,

_intermediate_ and _corner incisors_. The canines, also designated as

the _fangs_, exist only in the male. It is exceptional to find them in

the mare, and when they exist in this latter they are less developed

than those of the horse. The molars have cuboid crowns; the surface of

friction is almost square in the case of the upper molars, and is

inclined so as to look inwards; in the case of the inferior ones, it is

a little narrowed, and is inclined so as to look outwards. In the upper

jaw the external surface of the crown is hollowed by two longitudinal

furrows; in the lower jaw the same surface has only one furrow, which at

times is but slightly marked.

In the hare the teeth are twenty-eight in number:

6_m._ 0_c._ 2_i._ | 2_i._ 0_c._ 6_m._

--------------------+-------------------- = 28.

5_m._ 0_c._ 1_i._ | 1_i._ 0_c._ 5_m._

The four incisors of the upper jaw are divided into two groups; one of

these is formed by the two principal teeth, the other by two very small

incisors which are placed behind the preceding.

Having studied the jaws and examined the arrangement of the teeth, we

should say a few words on the movements which the lower jaw is able to

execute. In man, these movements are varied in character: the jaw is

lowered and raised; it can also be projected forwards and drawn

backwards, or carried to the right or left side by lateral movements.

Owing to the different modes of nutrition of animals, with which the

shape of the teeth is clearly correlated, being more specialized than in

the human species, the lower jaw is moved in a fashion less varied and

in the direction most suitable for the mastication of the foods which

form the aliment of the species considered. Moreover, this is plainly

shown in the skeleton by the shape of the condyle of the lower jaw (see

p. 122, different forms of this condyle). In the carnivora, whose teeth,

as we have seen, are all cutting ones, the jaw rises and falls; the food

then is, if we consider the two jaws, cut as by the blades of a pair of

scissors. In the ruminants, the incisors exist only in the lower jaw,

but the molars are thick and well developed; the food is ground by these

latter as by millstones, and the movements which favour this action are,

above all, the lateral. As for the rodents, in which the incisors are

formed for filing down and cutting through hard resisting bodies, their

lower jaw moves in the antero-posterior direction, in such a way that

the inferior incisors alternately advance and recede beneath those of

the upper jaw. The free cutting border of these teeth effectively

fulfils the function to which they are destined; their constant wear

preserves and revivifies the chisel edge which characterizes them,

without leading to their destruction, for the incisors in rodents are of

continuous growth.

THE SKULL OF BIRDS

=The Skull of Birds= (Fig. 65).--If, because it is less important from

the artistic point of view, we do not consider it necessary to describe

in detail the skull of birds, we yet think it useful to indicate, in

their general lines, the peculiarities it presents.

In this group the skull is generally pear-shaped; to the cranium, of

which the bones are arranged in such a way as to give it a form more or

less spherical, succeeds a face more or less elongated, according as the

bill is more or less developed.

In general, the bones of the skull coalesce very early, with the result

that it is only in very young individuals that we can determine their

presence.

We find the skull to consist of an occipital bone, two parietals, a

frontal, etc.; we will indicate but one detail in connection with these

bones: it is the presence of a single condyle for the articulation of

the occipital bone with the atlas. We also note the quadrate bone, which

is situated on the lateral part of the cranium, is movable on this

latter, and acts as an intermediary between it, the bones of the face,

and the lower jaw. The quadrate bone is regarded as a detached portion

of the temporal; on the signification of this we do not now propose to

dwell.

[Illustration: FIG. 65.--SKULL OF THE COCK: LEFT LATERAL SURFACE.

1, Occipital bone; 2, parietal bone; 3, frontal bone; 4, ethmoid bone;

5, cavity of the tympanum; 6, quadrate bone; 7, superior maxillary bone;

8, malar bone; 9, nasal bone; 10, 10, intermaxillary bone; 11, nasal

orifice; 12, os unguis or lachrymal bone; 13, inferior maxillary bone.]

On the anterior portion of the face we find the nasal bones, which,

articulating with the frontal on one side, circumscribe, on the other,

the posterior border of the nares. The nasal bone of the one side is

separated from that of the opposite by the intermaxillary or

premaxillary bone, which forms the skeleton of the superior mandible.

The superior maxillaries, which are rudimentary, are situated on the

lateral parts, and prolonged backward by an osseous style which

articulates with the quadrate bone; this styloid bone, the homologue of

the malar, is designated by certain authors as the _jugal_ or

_quadrato-jugal_ bone.

It is with the quadrate bone also that the inferior maxillary

articulates.

Artistic Anatomy of Animals · 第 2 / 7 章