CHAPTER III.

Appointment of the Inquisitors in Spain—their extensive

privileges—procedure of the tribunal of the "Holy

Office"—eagerness of the Inquisitors to preserve secrecy in all

their transactions—prisons of the Inquisition—examination of a

culprit—artifice and injustice practised by the judges to induce

a person to criminate himself—striking example of their duplicity

and barbarity.

Having thus seen the complete establishment of the Inquisition in

Spain, before proceeding further in its history, we shall give an

outline of the mode of procedure in the "Holy Office," together with

some account of the officers belonging to that infamous tribunal. At

the head of the Inquisition in Spain, stands the Inquisitor-general.

This high officer is appointed nominally by the king, but in reality

by the Pope, for the Holy See enjoys the privilege of a _veto_ on

the election of the sovereign. The supreme Inquisitor cannot proceed

one step in the discharge of his office, till he has received the

confirmation of the Sovereign Pontiff. When thus elected and confirmed,

the Inquisitor-general appoints the subordinate Inquisitors, but in

this last instance, the nomination of the supreme Inquisitor is subject

to the review of the king. So high in dignity is the Inquisitor-general

esteemed by the Romish Church, that he enjoys the title of "most

reverend," a title which places him on an equal footing with bishops.

The privileges of the Inquisitors are many and valuable. They are not

subject to the bishops of the provinces where they reside, or to the

superiors of the religious orders to which they belong. They alone

can publish the edicts against heretics; they can excommunicate,

interdict, and suspend; and, except in a few cases which are distinctly

specified, they can prevent the ordinaries or resident bishops from

absolving those whom they have subjected to the censure of the Church.

They may apprehend heretics, though they take refuge in churches; make

statutes, and increase the punishments on those who violate them; grant

indulgences of twenty or forty days; and give full pardon of sins to

all their officers who die in their service. "Whoever, by himself or

others, shall kill, beat, or strike any of the Inquisitors, or the

officials of the holy office, or who shall injure or damage their

effects, shall be delivered over to the secular power."

With a few exceptions, the Inquisitors may proceed against all persons

whatsoever, both among the clergy and the laity. Bishops, priests, and

friars, nay, princes and kings, must be subject to this extraordinary

tribunal. Persons of every age and condition, and of both sexes, may be

cited as witnesses, in the causes which it takes up. We have a striking

example of this in the citation of Joan, daughter of the Emperor

Charles V., before that tribunal, to give evidence in a case where a

person was accused of holding doctrines contrary to the faith. So great

was the awe with which this court inspired the superstitious emperor,

that he commanded his daughter without delay to obey the summons,

in order to avoid the sentence of excommunication. She accordingly

appeared before the Inquisitor-general on the day appointed, and gave

her evidence in the case under consideration.

The Inquisitors of Spain and Portugal, especially, pretend to have

jurisdiction over the subjects of other kings. Of this we have a

remarkable example in the case of Thomas Maynard, consul of the British

nation in Lisbon, under the protectorate of Oliver Cromwell, who

was imprisoned in the Inquisition under pretence of having spoken

something against the Romish faith. M. Meadows, who at that period

took care of the English affairs at Lisbon, informed Cromwell of the

imprisonment of the consul, and having received instructions from the

Protector, he obtained an audience of the king of Portugal, and, in

the name of Cromwell, demanded the liberation of Maynard. The king,

however, informed him, that this was not in his power—the consul

being detained by the Inquisition, over which he had no authority.

This answer was transmitted by Meadows to Cromwell; and, having

shortly afterwards received new instructions, he informed the king,

that, seeing his majesty had no power over the Inquisition, he was

commanded by the Protector immediately to declare war against it. This

unexpected declaration so alarmed both the king and the Inquisitors,

that they immediately gave Maynard liberty to leave the Inquisition.

But, scorning to accept of a private dismission, the consul compelled

the Inquisitors, in order to repair the injury done to his character,

to give him an honourable acquittal. Very few, however, are the

individuals who thus escape out of the hands of these tyrants.

The Inquisitors can prevent cognizance being taken of any particular

matter, may order any process to be stopped, and may bring before

themselves any cause, at what ever stage of the proceedings. They

can further modify and alter all sentences of condemnation, in the

terms they may think proper. Nay, they even possess the character of

legislators, being authorized to interpret the canon law, in matters

relating to the government of the court. They may also compel the

governors of cities to swear that they will defend the Church against

heretics, and to extirpate all who are denounced heretics by the

Church. And for the better apprehending of heretics, as well as for

their own safety, they may arm both themselves and their attendants.

"Even in exterior pomp and parade," says Puigblanch, "the supreme

chief of the Inquisition emulated kingly power and ostentation, both

within and without his tribunal. It is well known that Torquemada, in

his journeys, either because he was influenced by fear, or sought to

infuse it, carried about with him fifty familiars on horseback, and

two hundred on foot. A penitent by profession—for this is the real

definition of a friar—bearing about with him arrogance and terror

wherever he went! In the service also of the Inquisitor-general, and

of his tribunal, the grandees of the most distinguished pedigree have

been employed; indeed, they have not disdained to accept the title and

duties of bailiff. Even the Cortes of the kingdom have had to yield to

his predominant authority."

Besides the Inquisitor-general, there are five counsellors, who have

the title of Apostolical Inquisitors. These counsellors deliberate

upon all affairs with the Inquisitor-general, settle disputes among

the particular Inquisitors, punish the familiars attached to the

institution, and receive appeals. These officers, together with an

advocate-fiscal, two secretaries, a treasurer, accountant, reporters,

bailiffs, and qualificators, constitute the supreme council, or high

court of the Inquisition in Spain. The provincial tribunals have three

and sometimes four Inquisitors of the secular clergy, and a number of

other officers bearing the same names, and occupying the same stations,

as those attached to the supreme council.

In regard to the mode of procedure before the tribunal of the holy

office, it must be kept in mind, that the Inquisitors not only

encourage, but compel, by their threatenings and excommunications,

every class of the community to become _informers_, or accusers of

all whom they suspect of holding heretical tenets. Informations are

consequently received, without any respect to the character of the

persons by whom they are given. Thieves and cheats, prejudiced persons,

the nearest relatives, and even children, are not only allowed, but

invited to inform: while the names of the accusers and witnesses are

uniformly kept hidden from the unhappy individual who is thus denounced

to the holy office. "Their form of proceeding," says Voltaire, "is

an infallible way to destroy whomsoever the Inquisitors wish. The

prisoners are not confronted with the accuser or informer. Nor is there

any informer or witness who is not listened to. A public convict,

a notorious malefactor, an infamous person, a common prostitute, a

child, are in the holy office, though nowhere else, credible accusers

and witnesses. Even the son may depose against his father, the wife

against her husband. This procedure, unheard of till the institution of

this court, makes the whole kingdom tremble. Suspicion reigns in every

breast. Friendship and quietness are at an end. The brother dreads his

brother, the father his son."

There are three ways in which the process may begin before the

Inquisitorial courts. First, by investigation, where the Inquisitor

summons certain individuals into his presence, and inquires into

the state of the town or district where they reside. Secondly, by

accusation, where a direct charge of heresy is brought before the

court, against one or more persons distinctly named. Thirdly, by

denunciation, where the Inquisitor is merely informed, that certain

heretical persons, or persons suspected of heresy, who are likewise

distinctly named, exist within the limits of his jurisdiction. The last

is by far the most common mode, and it is that which the Inquisitors

are most desirous to encourage Nor is it difficult to perceive the

reason, seeing the denunciator does not bind himself to prove the

charge he prefers, and is under no apprehension of punishment.

When the information has been lodged, the following questions are

usually proposed: Whether the informer knows the person suspected of

heresy, and if so, how long he has known him? Whether he has said or

done the things imputed to him oftener than once? and whether in jest

or in earnest, and in whose company those things were said or done?

The answers to these and similar questions, are written down by the

notary, and read over to the informer, who either subscribes them, or

puts under them the mark of the cross. He is then sworn to secrecy.

"His name, his personal appearance, the place of his abode, and every

other circumstance respecting him, are studiously concealed by the

Inquisitors, lest the practice of informing should be discouraged; and

having once put the court in possession of the requisite intelligence,

he drops away entirely from the view, and is never again mentioned,

and, if possible, is never again referred to, in the whole course

of the process. Thus does this odious tribunal, called by an abuse

of language the Holy Office, in the very first step of its judicial

procedure, afford to the most infamous the pleasure of gratification

with the certainty of concealment, and provide an opportunity for

indulging the worst feelings and passions of our nature—personal

malice, envy, and revenge."

Nay, not only are informers and witnesses sworn to secrecy; every

individual connected with the Inquisition, from the highest rank to the

keeper of the jail, must take a similar oath; and strict watch is kept

on all their movements. A striking example of the rigour with which all

are treated who deviate in the smallest degree from this Inquisitorial

injunction, is given by Gonsalvius Montanus, in the following

narrative: "One Peter ab Herera," says he, "a man not altogether vile,

but of some humanity, and not very old, was appointed keeper of the

tower of Triana, which is the prison of the Inquisition. It happened,

as it often doth, in such numerous and promiscuous imprisonments, that

among other prisoners committed to his custody, there was a certain

good matron, with her two daughters who were put in different cells,

and earnestly desired the liberty of seeing one another, and comforting

each other in so great a calamity. They therefore earnestly entreated

the keeper, that he would suffer them to be together for one quarter

of an hour, that they might have the satisfaction of embracing each

other. He being moved with humanity and compassion, allowed them to

be together, and talk with one another, for half an hour; and after

they had indulged their mutual affections, he put them as they were

before, in their separate prisons. A few days after this they were put

with great cruelty to the torture; and the keeper being afraid, that

through the severity of their torments, they should discover to the

lords, the fathers Inquisitors, his small humanity in suffering them

to converse together for half an hour without the Inquisitor's leave;

through terror went himself to the holy tribunal, and of his own accord

confessed his sin, and prayed for pardon; foolishly believing, that by

such his confession, he should prevent the punishment that threatened

him for this action. But the lords Inquisitors judged this to be so

heinous a crime, that they ordered him immediately to be thrown into

jail, and such was the cruelty of his treatment, and disorder of mind

that followed on it, that he soon grew distracted. His disorder and

madness did not, however, save him from a more grievous punishment.

For after he had lain a full year in that cursed prison, they brought

him out in the public procession, clothed with the yellow garment,

and a halter about his neck, as if he had been a common thief; and

condemned him first to receive two hundred lashes through the streets

of the city, and then to be banished to the galleys for six years.

The day after the procession, as he was carried from the prison to be

whipped, his madness, which usually seized him every hour, came on him,

and throwing himself from the ass, on which, for the greater shame,

he was carried, he flew upon the Inquisitory alguazil, and snatching

from him a sword, would certainly have killed himself, had he not been

prevented by the mob who attended him, who set him again upon an ass,

and guarded him till he had received the two hundred lashes according

to his sentence. After this, the lords Inquisitors ordered, that as he

had behaved himself indecently towards the alguazil, four years more

should be added to the six for which he was at first condemned to the

galleys."

When the tribunal judges that the words or actions which are denounced,

are sufficient to warrant an inquiry, witnesses are cited, none of whom

are informed of the subject on which they are to make depositions.

They are only asked in general terms, "If they have ever heard or

seen any thing which was, or appeared contrary to the Catholic faith,

or the right of the Inquisition?" The consequence is, that sometimes

circumstances foreign to the case in hand are recollected, and deposed

to by the witnesses, which tend to criminate others, against whom new

processes are immediately commenced! "When we speak of witnesses in

Great Britain," says an eminent writer, "we almost unavoidably think of

a charge regularly brought, the judges upon the bench, the jury sworn,

the criminal apprehended, and in open court, the people admitted as

auditors, and the whole judicial assembly feeling and acting under

the assurance that they are responsible to an intelligent and watchful

public, for every part of their proceedings. But, in the Inquisitorial

tribunal, when the witnesses are summoned, the party accused has not

even been taken into custody. He remains in his own house, and in the

bosom of his family, engaged in his ordinary occupations, and entering,

it may be, into the amusements of the place where he lives; utterly

ignorant of all that has been done against him, and utterly unprepared

for all that is to follow. In truth, the depositions of the witnesses

are viewed, rather in connection with the charge, than with the issue,

and relate not so much to the guilt or the innocence of the party

accused, as to the sufficiency or insufficiency of the information.

Like the informer, the witnesses are sworn to secrecy; their names

and personal history are most industriously concealed; and there are

instances upon record, where brothers and sisters have given evidence

against brothers and sisters, where the wife has deposed against the

husband, and the husband against the wife."

The next step, is the apprehension of the person accused. This is given

in charge to the high bailiff, who executes his commission by carrying

with him a competent number of officers, taking the precaution to

surprise the unhappy victim, which is generally done at night. Not the

slightest hint of insecurity is given, not a suspicion is breathed,

till about midnight, a band of monsters calmly approach the residence

of the accused and demand an entrance.[13] To the question, "In

whose name is this required?" the answer is, "The Holy Office." "The

thunderbolt, launched from the black and angry cloud," says Puigblanch,

"strikes not with such alarm, as the sound of 'Deliver yourself up a

prisoner to the Inquisition.' Astonished and trembling, the unwary

citizen hears the dismal voice; a thousand different affections at once

seize upon his panic-struck frame—he remains perplexed and motionless.

His life, in danger, his deserted wife and orphan children, eternal

infamy, the only patrimony that now awaits his bereft family, are all

ideas which rush upon his mind—he is at once agitated by an agony of

dilemma and despair. The burning tear scarcely glistens on his livid

cheek, the accents of woe die on his lips, and amidst the alarm and

desolation of his family, and the confusion and pity of his neighbours,

he is borne away to dungeons, whose damp and bare walls can alone

witness the anguish of his mind. "Here," continues the same elegant

writer, "was usually confined the father of a family, perhaps his

amiable wife, or tender daughter, the exemplary priest, or peaceful

scholar; and in the meantime his house was bathed in tears, and filled

with desolation. Venerable matrons and timid damsels have been hurried

from their homes, and, ignorant of the cause of their misfortune, have

awakened from the frenzy of the brain, and found themselves here alone,

and helpless in a solitary cell. Here the manly youth, torn from his

bewailing kindred, and often wrested from ties still more endearing,

pines amidst damp seclusion and chill despair, and vainly invokes

the names of objects which so lately thrilled him with pleasure.

The dripping vaults re-echo the sighs of the aged father, no longer

encircled by the fond endearments of a numerous progeny; all, in short,

are condemned to drag existence amidst a death-like silence, and, as it

were, immured from the sight of their weeping relatives."

The prisoners are confined in separate cells, which are not only

small, but contain no other furniture except a wooden bed stead, a

table, one chair, and sometimes none. There are usually two rows of

cells, built over each other. The upper rows are lighted by means of a

small iron grate, and the lower are perfectly dark. In each cell there

are placed two pots of water, one to wash in, and the other to drink.

The treatment of the prisoners varies according to their rank; their

allowance sometimes amounting to no more than three half-pence or two

pence a day. The under rows of cells are appropriated for heretics.

There, in solitude and silence, they never see a human being except

their keeper. Thus persons the most nearly related to each other, may

be confined in contiguous cells without knowing it; and the merciless

turnkeys are constantly on the watch, to prevent the utterance of any

sound, lest it should occasion the discovery of some secret. If a

person bemoans himself, or bewails his misfortune, or prays to God with

an audible voice, he is instantly silenced. As persons may know one

another by their cough, as well as by their articulate voice, no one

is allowed even this expression of his misery, in the dungeons of the

Inquisition. Limborch relates the following instance of such unheard

of barbarity, which, he says, he had from several persons. "A prisoner

in the Inquisition coughed; the jailers came to him, and admonished

him to forbear coughing, because it was unlawful to make any noise in

that house. He answered that it was not in his power to forbear. They

admonished him, however, a second time, to forbear it, and because he

did not, they stripped him naked, and cruelly beat him; this increased

his cough, for which they beat him so often, that at last he died

through the pain and anguish of his stripes!"

Very soon after the accused is conducted to the Inquisition, he is

brought forth from his cell and examined. The place where he appears

before the Inquisitors is called the table of the holy office. At

the further end of it there is placed a crucifix, raised up almost

as high as the ceiling. In the middle of the room stands a table, at

the end of which, nearest the crucifix, sits the secretary or notary

of the Inquisition. The culprit is brought in by the beadle, with his

head, arms, and feet naked, and is followed by one of the keepers. His

attendants conduct him to the door of the chamber of audience, which he

enters alone, and is ordered to sit down on a bench at the other end

of the table, directly opposite the notary. The Inquisitor sits on his

right hand. On the table near the culprit lies a missal, or book of the

Gospels, on which he is ordered to lay his hand, and swear that he will

declare truth, and keep secresy.

He is then asked if he knows where he is, whether he is aware that he

is within the walls of the Inquisition, and why it is that men are

usually detained in the custody of the holy office. If he says that he

cannot guess at the cause of his imprisonment, but knows that he is a

prisoner in the holy office, where heretics or persons suspected of

heresy are confined, he is informed, that seeing he knows that persons

are confined there for their profanation of religion, he ought to

conclude that he is confined for the same reason; and must therefore

declare what he believes to be the cause of his apprehension and

confinement in the prisons of the holy office. If he says he cannot

imagine what it is, he is desired to recollect himself, to run over in

his mind the events of his past life, and to search out and ascertain

whether he may not, on some occasion, have said or done something

contrary to the purity of the Catholic faith, and the authority of the

Inquisition. If he still persists in maintaining his ignorance, he is

informed that every degree of mercy is shown towards those who confess,

while the obstinate are treated with the utmost severity.

The prisoner is next obliged to declare his whole genealogy and

descent, and to make known whether any of his ancestors, or himself,

his brothers, wife, or children, had at any time previous been

arraigned before the tribunal. These questions are put for the purpose

of implicating the accused in a stronger manner, and to obtain

possession of the property he may have inherited, by declaring the

right of succession null and void, to the destruction, perhaps, of many

families. Numerous other questions are asked, varied in every possible

way, and every art of unrighteous investigation is tried; and if, after

all, he still persists in declaring himself ignorant of any word or

action that can be construed into heresy, he is informed, that he must

be carried back to his dungeon, to aid his memory by reflection. This

ceremony is performed three times, with some interval between each.

"The idea all this presents is," says Puigblanch, "that the court

wishes the prisoner to confess, under the hope of being treated with

greater kindness; but, without dreading the charge of temerity, and

judging only from the strict nature of the process, I may venture

to attribute to such a practice the highest refinement of the

Inquisitorial test. At least it will not be denied that the prisoner

is compelled to scrutinize every act and period of his life, till

at last he hits on the cause of his impeachment. Scarcely recovered

from the surprise caused by his arrest, and appalled by the contrast

his imagination forms of the many and secret steps previously taken,

compared with the state of security in which he lately lived, from that

moment the prisoner begins to despair, and hopeless and dismayed, he

already beholds the torment that awaits him. Bewildered, as in the

mazes of a labyrinth, wherever he turns his eyes, some fresh object

increases his pain, and adds to his anguish. Under the undoubted

supposition, that in this abode of wretchedness, the appearance of the

most officious charity conceals acts of the most insidious cruelty,

he beholds no one who is not an enemy, and hears nothing that is not

directed to his ruin. Secluded from every species of intercourse, if

his keeper says any thing unconnected with the service of his person,

it is to assure him that it will be much in his favour to confess

according to the pleasure of the Inquisitors. If an attorney is allowed

him, it is after he has sworn to use every exertion to induce his

client to confess, and that he will abandon his defence from the moment

he discovers his guilt. Thus is it that the prisoner has more to fear

from his advocate than from the proctor of his enemies."

If, on the other hand, the prisoner knows the reason why he is

apprehended, and happens to confess every thing of which he has been

accused to the Inquisitor, he is commended, and encouraged to hope for

a speedy deliverance. If he confesses some things, but cannot guess at

others, he is also commended for having resolved to accuse himself,

and exhorted, "by the bowels of mercy of Jesus Christ," to proceed,

and ingenuously to confess every thing else of which he is accused,

that he may experience that kindness and mercy which this tribunal

uses towards those who manifest a real repentance of their crimes by a

sincere and voluntary confession!

In these examinations, the Inquisitors have recourse to the meanest

artifices, in order to draw from the prisoner a confession of those

crimes of which he is accused, making great professions of sympathy,

and numerous promises of favour, if he will but yield to their

solicitations. By these flattering assurances, they sometimes impose

on the unwary; and when they have gained their object, they forget

their promises, and treat the unhappy objects of their deception

with the utmost rigour. In proof of this, the following among other

stratagems, drawn up by Nicholas Eymeric, Inquisitor-general of

Arragon, about the middle of the fourteenth century, are submitted

to the reader:—"When the prisoner has been impeached of the crime of

heresy, but not convicted, and he obstinately persists in his denial,

let the Inquisitor take the proceedings into his hands, or any other

file of papers, and looking them over in his presence, let him feign to

have discovered the offence fully established therein, and that he is

desirous he should at once make his confession. The Inquisitor shall

then say to the prisoner, as if in astonishment, 'And is it possible

that you shall still deny what I have here before my own eyes?' He

shall then seem as if he read, and to the end that the prisoner may

know no better, he shall fold down the leaf, and after reading some

moments longer, he shall say to him, 'It is just as I have said, why,

therefore, do you deny it, when you see I know the whole matter?' When

the Inquisitor has an opportunity, he shall manage so as to introduce

to the conversation of the prisoner some one of his accomplices, or

any other converted heretic, who shall feign that he still persists in

his heresy, telling him that he had abjured for the sole purpose of

escaping punishment by deceiving the Inquisition. Having thus gained

his confidence, he shall go into his cell some day after dinner, and

keeping up the conversation till night, shall remain with him, under

pretext of its being too late to return home. He shall then urge the

prisoner to tell him all the particulars of his life, having first told

him the whole of his own; and in the meantime spies shall be kept at

the door, as well as a notary, in order to certify what may be said

within!!" All this needs no comment, it speaks for itself; and were

it not given on the most unexceptionable authority, we could not but

reject it as a fiction. But, alas! what the fanatical Eymeric taught

has been too implicitly followed; and thus the procedure of a court,

impiously called HOLY, is sufficient to put the most barbarous nations,

nay devils themselves, to the blush.

Gonsalvius, for example, mentions a striking instance of the duplicity

and cruelty of the lords of the Holy Office. "In the first fire that

was blown up at Seville," says the author, "in 1558 or 1559, among

many others who were taken up, were a certain pious matron, her two

daughters, and her niece. Unable to effect his purpose by means of the

torture, the Inquisitor ordered one of the daughters to be brought

before him. Having discoursed with her for a considerable time, he

pretended to feel the greatest affliction for her amidst her trials.

All this, as the event showed, had only this tendency, that after he

had persuaded the poor simple girl that he was really, and with a

fatherly affection, concerned for her calamity, and would consult as a

father, what might be for her benefit and salvation, and that of her

relatives, she might throw herself upon his protection. After spending

several days in such familiar discourses, during which he pretended

to mourn with her over her sufferings, and to be affected with her

miseries, adding innumerable promises of his desire to free her from

them; when he perceived that he had deceived the girl, he proceeded

to persuade her to discover all she knew, not only of herself, but

of her mother, sisters, and aunts, protesting upon oath, that if she

would faithfully reveal to him every particular, he would find out a

method to relieve her from all her misfortunes, and to send them all

back again to their homes. Possessed of no great penetration, the

girl, allured by the promises and persuasions of this father of the

holy faith, proceeded to inform him of some things relative to the

doctrines which she had been taught, and concerning which they had

been accustomed to converse with each other. Having now got hold of

the thread, the Inquisitor dexterously enough endeavoured to find his

way through the whole labyrinth—often calling the girl to audience,

that what she had deposed might be taken down in a legal manner; and

always persuading her that this would be the only just means to put an

end to all her evils. But when the poor girl expected the performance

of his numerous promises, the Inquisitor, finding the success of his

craftiness, by which he had in part drawn from her what before he could

not extort by torments, determined again to put her to the torture,

in order to force out of her what he imagined she had yet concealed.

She was accordingly subjected to torture, both by the rack and water,

till the Inquisitors had squeezed out of her, as with a press, both the

heresies and accusations of the persons they had been hunting after;

for, through the extremity of her torture, she accused her mother and

sister, and several others, who were apprehended and tortured, and

burnt alive in the same fire with the girl!"

FOOTNOTE:

[13] The following affords a view of the secrecy with which the

affairs of the holy office are conducted: "When the familiar is sent

for to apprehend any person," says Limborch, "he has the following

order put into his hand: 'By the command of the reverend father N. an

Inquisitor of heretical pravity, let B. be apprehended, and committed

to the prisons of this holy office, and not to be released out of

them, but by the express order of the said reverend Inquisitor.' And

if several persons are to be taken up at the same time, the familiars

are commanded so to order things, that they may know nothing of one

another's being apprehended. And at this the familiars are so very

expert, that a father and his three sons and three daughters, who

lived together in the same house, were all carried prisoners to the

Inquisition, without knowing any thing of one another's being there

until seven years afterwards, when they that were alive came forth to

an auto-da-fé."

History of the Inquisition from Its Establishment Till the Present Time · 第 3 / 9 章