CHAPTER XI.

GENERAL LITERATURE.

“It is easy to disparage the study of these scanty remains of

a literary language which, though it be not dead, is more of

an unknown tongue to our modern men of letters than almost any

other.”—DR JOSEPH ANDERSON.

The intellectual activity created in the sixteenth century led to the

formation of a new literature for the diffusion of the new learning.

This literature belongs to that period in our national history when

religious ferment, political and ecclesiastical change, began to

operate effectually on the mind of modern Europe. The first Gaelic

effort in this direction was by John Carsuel, superintendent of the

diocese of Argyll, who translated and published (1567) John Knox’s

Prayer-Book. The English original was printed at Edinburgh in 1565,

and the Gaelic version appeared within two years after that date. It

is the first Gaelic book that ever was printed either in Scotland or

Ireland. Only three copies were known to exist previous to 1872; one

perfect copy in possession of the Duke of Argyll, and two imperfect

copies, one in the Edinburgh University Library and the other in

the British Museum. In 1872 the Rev. Dr Maclauchlan made a complete

transcript of the book, and a new edition was published page for page

and line for line with the original. Philologists regard it as very

valuable. Bishop Carsuel was a native of Kilmartin, well versed in

the Gaelic language, and thoroughly acquainted with the people of

the wide district of whose spiritual interests he had charge. In an

address prefixed to his book he alludes to the manuscript literature

then extant, “written in manuscript books in the compositions of

poets and ollaves, and in the remains of learned men.” The bishop

seems to have imbibed something of the earnest, critical spirit of

nineteenth-century Christianity, and deserves our respect for giving

us the first printed book in Gaelic.

Still it is unfortunate for Gaelic literature, though perhaps not

for the Protestant religion, that he and others determined on the

ruthless extinction of the popular ballads among the people.

The _Ursgeuls_, or prose tales, were condemned even with greater

emphasis. The following verses from a ballad from which an extract

has been taken already will show the character of the popular

literature which Carsuel did not consider edifying:—

URNUIGH OISEIN.

_Oisein._

’S gann a chreideás mi do sgeul,

A chlérich leir d’ leabhar ban,

Gu’m biodh Fionn, no cho fial,

Aig duine no aig Dia an lăimh.

_Pàdruig._

Ann ifrinn tha e’n laimh,

Fear le’n sath bhi bronnadh òir,

Air son a dhìmeas air Dia,

Chuir iad e’n tigh pian fo leòn.

_Oisein._

Nan robh Clann-Morni a steach,

Is Clanna-Baoisgne, na fir threun,

Bheireamiad-ne Fionn a mach,

No bhiodh an teach againn féin.

_Pàdruig._

Còig còigeanna na h-Eirinn ma seach,

’Sair leat-sa gu mòr am feum,

Gha tugadh sin Fionn a mach,

Ged bhiodh an teach agaibh féin.

_Oisein._

Nach math an t-aite ifrin féin,

A chléirich dh’an lĕir an sgoil!

Nach go math is flaitheas Dé

Ma gheibhear innt’ féidh is coin?

Translation.

OSSIAN’S PRAYER.

_Ossian._—O clerk of the white book thy tale

From me no faith can win;

That God or man could keep in pain

The brave and generous Finn.

_Patrick._—Ay, captive, he is now in hell

Who used to scatter gold;

Because he scorned to worship God

They thrust him in that hold.

_O._ Clan-Morni and Clan-Baoisgne brave,

If they would there resort,

Soon would we have great Finn released,

And make our own the fort.

_P._ Though Erin’s Clans should all unite,

A mighty host, believe,

Possessing all that place yourselves,

You could not Finn relieve.

_O._ But hell is not so bad a place,

Clerk, to whom school is clear?

As good as is the high heaven of God,

If _there_ be dogs and deer?

Earnest Reformers could not regard this sort of literature as a

powerful auxiliary in the recasting of a nation’s faith; so Carsuel

thought the Gaelic population would benefit spiritually by the

substitution of his own Gaelic liturgy for the popular songs and

tales.

Ossian’s “Prayer” appears to have been treated with disparagement by

the Highlanders of last century as well, especially by the “clerics,”

who were such a source of annoyance to poor Ossian himself while

he lived. One feels inclined to ask, after reading some of the old

ballads, whether the Patrick who described all the ancient Finians as

in hell, was a species of the modern Protestant, so well represented

by the late valiant Dr Begg and the late Dr Cumming. Whether or

not it is evident that he was a persistent Protestant against the

heathenism of the Féinne, indeed quite a thorn in the side of the

poor old bard. The Irish monks of later days, however, appear to have

taken very kindly to the laureate of the Fingalians, and to have

lopped off many of the excrescences of the faithful Patrick. Scottish

ecclesiastics appropriated the new Irish versions, but pruned off

the excrescences with which the Basque, or Spano-Iberian imagination

of the south-west of Ireland, had clothed the simple originals.

Carsuel, in the sixteenth century, under the pressure of Reformation

doctrines, was the first to touch unkindly the hoary locks of the

ancient bard. The Féinne and their singer, however, survived in

the affections and traditions of the population, until the Gospel

according to the English Puritans and our own Scottish Covenanters

began to out-root entirely the semi-heathen and Finian ideals of the

people. So now in many districts of the Highlands, and throughout

the Islands, much to the disgust of students of folk-lore, like

Campbell of Islay, the only singing you hear is, not the rehearsal

of the old heroic lays or the Ossianic duans, but the Psalms of David

or the hymns of Sankey. As already remarked, the “clerics” of last

century treated the Ossianic compositions with as little respect as

Patrick, Carsuel, or Spurgeon would. At the end of a copy of Ossian’s

Prayer there is a stanza by Duncan Rioch Macnicol, who was then

styled the “Modern Ossian,” very much in the fashion of our present

day Gaelic bards, who dub themselves as of this or that ilk. Duncan,

whose feelings towards the old bards must have been _rioch_ enough,

describes poor Ossian in the following terms, given already in the

original (p. 87), in sending the copy to the Rev. Donald Macnicol,

Lismore:—

To Master Donald take this story;

There he dwells beside the billow;

The prayer said by Ossian hoary,

Who was aye a worthless fellow.

The last line is a condensation—though Duncan Rioch was probably in

a fit of humour, supposed to be a rare state of soul for a Highland

Celt—of the Protestant or Evangelic disposition of Patrick, Carsuel,

and Peter Grant. These remarks have been suggested by the specimen

of Gaelic which follows. Specimens have already been given of the

style of writing ancient Gaelic from the earliest period down to the

beginning of the sixteenth century. To those who may have paid a

little attention to them it may have been interesting to discern the

gradual change which Gaelic has undergone, until we find it about

1600 beginning to take the Scottish form out of which our present

standard of the Gaelic Bible has been developed:—

_Gaelic Prose_, 1567.

Agas is mor an doile agas an dorchadas peacaidh, agas aineolais

agas indtleachda do lucht deachtaìdh agas scriobhtha agas chumdaigh

na gaoidheilge, gurab mó is mian leo agas gurab mó ghnathuidheas

siad eachdradha dimhaoineacha buaidheartha bregacha saoghalta do

cumadh ar thuathaibh dédhanond agas air mhacaibh mileadh agas arna

curadhaibh agas hind mhac cumhaill gona fhianaibh agas ar mhoran

eile noch airbhim.

TRANSLATION:

And great is the blindness and sinful darkness, and ignorance, and

evil design, of such as teach and write, and cultivate the Gaelic

language, that, with the view of obtaining for themselves the vain

rewards of this world, they are more desirous, and more accustomed,

to compose vain, tempting, lying, worldly histories, concerning

the _Tuath de dannan_, and concerning warriors and champions, and

_Fingal_ the son of _Cumhal_, with his heroes, and concerning many

others which I will not at present enumerate.

The Highland love of Paganism was destined to flourish down to our

own time, a Stornoway woman having been seen worshipping the moon as

recently as the beginning of the present century, the parish minister

of Uig at the time being the witness.

In his Hibbert Lectures (1888) Professor Rhys says—“It is worthy

of note that this kind of Paganism died hard in the islands on the

Armoric coast; in fact it lasted, in spite of Church and State, down

to the time of the Norsemen’s ravages.” Fifteen centuries of vigorous

Christianity have not yet extirpated the serpent of superstition in

the British Islands.

After the publication of Carsuel’s Book of Prayers, which led the

way, the only species of literature that the press helped to diffuse

for more than a century was of an ecclesiastical or religious

character. In the seventeenth century appeared a translation of

Calvin’s Catechism, “_Faoseid Eoin Stiubhairt_,” the Synod of

Argyll’s translation of the Psalter, the Confession of Faith in

the eighteenth century, followed by catechisms and summaries of

Christian doctrine. Endeavours were made to awaken the people out of

the spiritual lethargy induced by the age of inaction which preceded

the Reformation era. The only successful way to reach the heart of

the people was felt to be through the medium of their native tongue.

Towards the close of the last century, for this end, translations of

all sorts of religious works became numerous, even Roman Catholic

Highlanders having a bulky volume of a summary of Christian doctrine

translated for their use.

During this time the Highlanders had no version of the Scriptures

in their own tongue, Welshmen and Irishmen being favoured earlier

than they in this respect. The first portion translated was the

Psalter by the Synod of Argyll in 1659. The Bible was not much known

in the north-west at this period. A few individuals possessed the

Irish version, but this was never much in practical use. Preachers

used the English Bible, of which they gave their own extemporaneous

translation as they went along. A good specimen of written Gaelic

towards the end of the seventeenth century will be found in the Rev.

Robert Kirk’s preface to his metrical version of the Book of Psalms.

To the ordinary reader it is hardly distinguishable from the Irish of

the same period. The Highlander will be glad to have an opportunity

of reading in his own language such an eloquent encomium on the

Psalms which he prizes so so dearly.

_Gaelic Prose_, 1684.

Ataid na Psalma taitneamhach, tarbhach: beag nach mion-fhlaitheas

làn dainglibh, Cill fhonn-mhar, le ceol naomhtha. Mur abholghort

Eden, lionta do chrannaibh brioghmhoire-na beatha, agus do

luibhennibh iocshlainteamhail, amhluidh an leabhar Psalmso

Dhaibhioth, a ta na liaghais air uile anshocair na nanma. Ata an

saoghail agus gach beò chreatair da bfuil an, na chlarsigh; an

duine se is Chlairseoir agus duanaire, chum moladh an mor-Dhia

mirbhuileach do chein; agus ata Daibhidh do gná mar fhear don

chuideachd bhias marso ag caoin-chaint gu ceolmhar ma nard-Rí.

ENGLISH:

The Psalms are pleasant and profitable. A church resounding with

sacred melody is almost a little Heaven full of angels. As the

Garden of Eden, replenished with trees of life of potent efficacy

and with medicinal plants, so is this Book of Psalms of David,

which contains a remedy of all the diseases of the soul. The world

and every living creature it contains are the Harp; Man is the

Harper and Poet, who sings the praise of the great wonder-working

God; and David is ever one of the company who are thus employed in

sweetly and tunefully discoursing about the Almighty King.

The Highland clergy at this time were, as a class, fairly

well-educated. This will be seen in the accounts of English

travellers who now began to take tours to the Celtic north-west. In

earlier times the intercourse between the Highlands and the great

world beyond was greater than in the seventeenth century. Before the

seats of government were all removed from the districts of the Gael

further south, the communication with Ireland and the Continent of

Europe in the north and in France was considerable. Till the days of

Queen Elizabeth relations were fitfully sustained between the insular

court of the Princedom of the Isles and the English Court. It was

during the seventeenth century that the Gaelic regions became a very

_terra incognita_ to South Britain. Now a learned and sympathetic

visitor arrived, from whose pages we get glimpses of the state of

learning and culture among the Gaels.

It is a Welshman, Professor Rhys of Oxford, that has given us

the best work on Celtic philology and Celtic paganism, in the

present day; and it was a Welshman that wrote the best book on

the same subjects upwards of 200 years ago. Edward Lhuyd’s great

work on Celtic scholarship appeared in 1707. The title runs

thus:—“_Archæologica Britannica_, giving some account, additional

to what has been hitherto published, of the Languages, Histories,

and Customs of the Original Inhabitants of Great Britain, from

collections and observations in travels through Wales, Cornwall,

Bas-Bretagne, Ireland, and Scotland. By Edward Lhuyd, M.A. of Jesus

College, keeper of the Ashmolean Museum in Oxford. Oxford: Printed

at the Theater for the author, MDCCVII.” Were the matter within

the bounds of the 460 folio pages of this handsome volume printed

in the style in which books are now generally published it would

make three or four very considerable volumes. At the beginning of

an appendix the following note occurs: “Having since the printing

this Irish dictionary sent copies to Ireland and Scotland in order

to have it improved, the following supplement consists chiefly of

some notes returned thence by two gentlemen well known to be able

scholars and masters of that language.” It is in connection with

these “copies,” I suppose, that the poetical complimentary verses

inserted at the beginning of the volume were sent to the author.

These verses were written in Latin, Gaelic, and Welsh. Two or three

Latin ones and four in Gaelic are sent from the Highlands. The

character of this great work may be gathered from the titles of the

several departments: Comparative Etymology, 40 pp.; A Comparative

Vocabulary of the Original Languages of Britain and Ireland, 130

pp.; An Armoric Grammar and Vocabulary, 33 pp.; Some Welsh Words, A

Cornish Grammar, British MSS., and a British Etymologican, 86 pp.;

A Brief Introduction to the Irish or Ancient Scottish Language, and

_Foclair Gaoidheilge-Shasonach no Bearladoir Scot-Sagsamhuil_; An

Irish-English Dictionary, 136 pp.; two pp. describing Gaelic MSS.,

and An Index. In the preface he proceeds to explain what induced him

“to an undertaking so laborious, so little diverting, and so much out

of the common road.”

It is interesting to note how this laborious Oxford student met

the prejudices of the day. The undertaking “proceeded not from

any conceited opinion, as some might be apt to imagine, of the

plausibleness of these languages. Most of us commonly hear or read

too much to be ignorant that the generality of people are rather

disposed to a ridiculing than a favourable reception of anything in

that kind. This did not, I own, in the least discourage me, as well

knowing that the same prejudice in the like case prevails in all

other great governments, and that in any uncommon undertaking the

judgment of men of distinction (or at least particular experience in

the subject proposed), is to be only regarded. The inducement I had

was no other than a seeming probability that such an essay might in

this curious age contribute not a little towards a clearer notion of

the first planters of the three kingdoms, and a better understanding

of our ancient names of persons and places.” No grammar of the

Scottish Gaelic appeared up to the time of Lhuyd; but he speaks of “a

Scotish gentleman who had some thoughts of publishing” one. It would

be interesting to know who this gentleman was; perhaps he was one of

those who sent the poetical addresses to Lhuyd.

In connection with this great work Lhuyd experienced the same

discouragements which often beset similar works of learning. He was

told by some considerate critic that his volume would meet with but

a cold reception; for it consisted “only of etymology and Welsh and

Irish vocabularies.” The critic exclaims, “Now there are not half a

dozen or half a score in the kingdom that are curious in that way.

The world expected, according to his promise and undertaking, a

natural history, which is a study of established request, and that

a great many are curious in.” But Lhuyd has in the published list

the names of two hundred lords, knights, and gentlemen of learning

and distinction belonging to England alone. This was something to

begin with for such a work, and must have been rather a disconcerting

refutation of the critic’s remark about “half a dozen” readers. It

is quite possible that this complaining critic looked forward to an

interesting dissertation on the strange human animals that inhabited

in those days Lorn, Mull, and Islay, and other Celtic parts. He

and others could scarcely realise to themselves that the Celtic

barbarians who dwelt in those distant regions could write and talk

good English; and in their leisure hours exercised themselves in the

composition of Latin verse or Gaelic poetry.

Lhuyd was accompanied everywhere on his travels by David Parry, A.B.

of Jesus College, Oxford, who wrote a small section of the work.

It is a very interesting picture that the travels of these learned

Oxonians in the Highlands suggest seventy or eighty years before the

mighty Johnson visited the Western Isles, which in earlier ages were

so well known throughout the ecclesiastical world. Here is a specimen

of Latin verse from the pen of a Highland minister two hundred years

ago:—

IN EDV. LUIDI GLOSSOGRAPHIAM.

Quid si reversus spiritus afforet

Jam Buchanani, nobile callidi

Tentare plectrum, pristinumque

Officium renovare chordis?

Antiqua tellus, dic, age, Scotia,

Quem destinares Tu, facili Virum

Ornare versu; quem parares

Non humili celebrare cantu?

Luidus priorum qui Britonum decus,

Poscit Camœnas; pulvere sen diu

Fœdata purgator reponat,

In superam referatque lucem.

Sive Ille morsu temporis improbo

Exesa fida restituat manu,

Atque acer Interpus recudat

In veniens renovata sæclum.

Sive Ille vocum exquirere origines

Longo recursu gestiat, et suo

A fonte deducat, redire

Ad veterem faciatque ritum.

Quamvis dolendo pressa silentio

Jam Buchanani conticeat lyra,

Stat fama Luido, vendicantque

Perpetuam sibi scripta laudem.

ANDREAS FRAZIER, _Eccl. Scot. Presb._

Another poetical address is sent from the romantic district of North

Argyll, where many of the deeds recorded in the ancient ballads

took place, and where, no doubt, the distinguished Cymric scholar

received hearty Highland hospitality from Colin Campbell, pastor of

Ardchattan. The conclusion runs as follows:—

Restituit Scotis sublapsa; caduca Britannis;

Celtis et Pictis deperdita. Cornubiensis

Cantaber, et Scotus quam linquam agnoscit uterque,

Comparat: Affinis sensus hacarte resolvens,

Et renovat surdis aures et lumina cæcis.

Linguas prisca loqui, cogit dum vera fateri,

Literulis larvas fucos dum vocibus aufert,

Hispanum Scotum de divisâ stirpe, Britannum

Historiæ ut taceant, statuit; sermonis amussi

Albanii metas Bretonis Cambrique resignans.

Primus enim Cephilos Scotus, Pephilosque Britannos,

Nosque notas Britonum sib’lasse ostendit anhelas.

Mille alia invenit doctis celebranda Camænis:

Cedite Banniades: Non vestra cupressus erica.

Amicitiæ et gratitudinis ergô

COLLINUS CAMPBELL, _Ardchattanus Pastor_, Lornensis.

The Gaelic addresses are highly interesting to the philologist, as

showing Scottish Gaelic in a transition state. At the period of

Lhuyd’s visit to the Highlands and Isles, and down to the middle of

last century, the Highland clergyman wrote either in Latin or Gaelic.

It was at that time, also, that the Scottish Gael began to depart

from the old style of Gaelic writing and orthography. This departure

might have been dictated to some extent by a Protestant feeling,

but was mainly caused by the desire to make the orthography exactly

expressive of the popular speech. The difference between the Irish

and Scottish dialects was rendered greater by the change. Highland

clergymen of that period being of the better families throughout the

country, were generally well-educated gentlemen. Even generations

after, we find more literary talent than can be found in many places

to-day.

A glimpse of the state of the country after the gory struggle which

ended on Culloden Moor shows a far higher state of literary culture

than an outsider would readily believe possible in the circumstances.

The Ossianic controversy which subsequently arose brought forward the

names of many clergymen who during the last half of the eighteenth

century were a credit to their country. Such men were the Rev. James

Calder and the Rev. Dr Alexander Fraser, in the north-east; the

Rev. Thomas Ross of Lochbroom, the Rev. Mr Macqueen of Kilmuir, in

Skye, and the Rev. Dr Macpherson of Sleat, in the north-west; the

Rev. Dr John Macarthur of Mull, the Rev. Dr Macnicol of Lismore,

Johnson’s formidable opponent, the Rev. Mr Woodrow of Islay, and the

Rev. Dr John Smith of Campbeltown, with his accomplished brother,

Dr Donald Smith, in the south-west; the MacLaurins of Cowal, the

distinguished divine and the professor of mathematics, the Stewarts,

translators of the Bible, Professor Adam Ferguson of Edinburgh, and

Professor Macleod of Glasgow, the Rev. Dr Macintyre of Glenorchay,

Dr Grahame of Aberfoyle, and the Rev. Messrs Macdiarmid, Gallie, and

Maclagan, in the central Highlands. The atmosphere in which such

men breathed—and they were scattered throughout all parts of the

Highlands—could not be altogether one of ignorance; and the large

mass of the people were, no doubt, largely benefited by the culture

of and intercourse with their clerical superiors.

Dr Samuel Johnson, notwithstanding many surly prepossessions,

besought, with that good broad honesty of his nature, such educated

Highlanders and Irishmen to furnish the world with correct

information regarding their language and literature. All English

readers know of his tour to the Hebrides, whither he journeyed more

than a century ago, in those days of difficult travelling, to judge

for himself concerning the people among whom appeared so remarkable

a poet as Ossian. He did not visit Ireland, but early in life he

corresponded with an accomplished Irish gentleman, Mr Charles

O’Connor of Ballinegare, Roscommon, in relation to Irish literature.

In his first letter, April 9, 1737, he says:—“Sir William Temple

complains that Ireland is less known than any other country as to

its ancient state. The natives have had little leisure and little

encouragement for inquiry, and strangers, not knowing the language,

have had no ability. I have long wished that Irish literature were

cultivated. Ireland is known by tradition to have been once the seat

of piety and learning, and surely it would be very acceptable to all

those who are curious, either in the original of nations, or the

affinities of languages, to be further informed of the revolutions

of a people so ancient, and once so illustrious.” He hopes O’Connor

will continue his Irish studies, and speaks of the great pleasure

he has in hearing of the progress of his undertaking. Twenty-two

years afterwards Johnson renews the correspondence, and complains

of O’Connor disappointing him:—“I expected great discoveries in

Irish antiquities, and large publications in the Irish language,

but the world still remains as it was—doubtful and ignorant. What

the Irish language is in itself, and to what languages it has

affinity, are very interesting questions, which every man wishes

to see resolved that has any philological or historical curiosity.

Dr Leland begins his history too late; the ages that deserve an

exact inquiry are those times (for such they were) when Ireland

was the school of the west, the quiet habitation of sanctity and

literature. If you could give a history, though imperfect, of the

Irish nation from its conversion to Christianity to the invasion

from England, you would amplify knowledge with new views and new

objects. Set about it, therefore, if you can; do what you can

easily do without anxious exactness. Lay the foundation, and leave

the superstructure to posterity.” This is a very interesting and

remarkable letter, and exhibits Johnson as entirely free from the

vulgar anti-Celtic prejudices which long obtained in many quarters

after his day. It pointed to the lines of study which the Celtic

student should follow. But both Irish and Highland scholars failed

to comply with the lexicographer’s wishes. Philology did not then

exist, and accurate philosophical histories had not then made much

progress. Celtic scholars travelled to Spain and Egypt and other

places in the East for the cradle in which the first pure Gaelic

baby was rocked; linguistic affinities were sought in Hebrew and

Arabic; while Gaelic or Celtic was sometimes declared to be the

mother of all languages. This race of Gaelic Orientals continued

to exist till recently, if indeed it is even now wholly extinct.

The Irish, however, at last have abundantly shown the great extent

of literature, manuscript and printed, which is enshrined in their

language. The recent works of learned Irishmen are evidence that the

interest is not abating in Irish literature. While it is admitted

that the Irish Gael is in possession of some literature, it is yet

denied that the Scottish Gael has any literary remains to show. And

indeed, looking at the barrenness of the Highland hills, and the

bareness of the Highland glens, the stranger from the sunnier South

is apt to think that no literature could flourish on so sterile a

soil. The lakes and straths, swept by the fresh breezes, he feels

too coldly uncongenial—too frigid a home for the cultivation of

letters—too dreary a land for the muses to dwell in. Men of stout

arms and lion hearts have issued from these regions. That fact is

recognised. But it is not well known that also there, far from what

have hitherto been regarded as the great civilising centres, letters

and knowledge have had for ages their sacred precincts and earnest

votaries. Unpromising though the Highlands look to the literary

eye, yet we find that even Dr Samuel Johnson, no lover of either

Celts or Scotsmen, touches with pathetic beauty in two or three

sentences written upwards of a century ago, on the conditions under

which, even in the heart of the Highlands and Isles, in times of

old, the production of Gaelic literature was possible: “We are now

treading that illustrious island which was once the luminary of the

Caledonian regions, whence savage clans and roving barbarians derived

the benefits of knowledge and the blessings of religion. Far from

me and from my friends be such a frigid philosophy as may conduct

us indifferent and unmoved over any ground which has been dignified

by wisdom, bravery, or virtue. That man is not to be envied whose

patriotism would not gain force upon the plain of Marathon, or whose

piety would not grow warmer among the ruins of Iona.” Dr Macculloch,

again, speaks of our country as owing a “deep debt of civilisation,

of letters, and of religion” to the same place. From that little

isle, lying grandly with its white brows of sand on the bosom of the

mighty Atlantic, learned men went forth twelve and thirteen hundred

years ago to Ireland, to England, and to many places on the Continent

of Europe, to found colleges and establish churches. Adamnan and Bede

testify that at that period Gaelic and Latin learning was cultivated

in “the Celtic colleges of Iona, Oransay, Ardchattan, Uist, Rowdill,

and Melrose,” and then and subsequently also in a score of other

academic centres of Gaelic learning and activity.

Towards the close of the eighteenth century, when translations of

Gaelic poetry brought the genius of the Celtic spirit in contact with

the intellectual forces of modern Europe, many who hitherto despised

our Gaelic literature, began to look into this neglected field. Lord

Bute, a Scot, with Gaelic sympathies, was Prime Minister then. The

extract to be immediately given from a letter by the distinguished

Lord Bannatyne, who, as Sheriff of Bute, and subsequently as Judge on

Circuit at Inveraray, became interested in Gaelic manuscripts, will

show the attention bestowed on the subject by men of position. Lord

Bannatyne used his influence to get the valuable Gaelic manuscripts

of Major Maclachlan of Kilbride in Argyllshire transferred to the

Highland Society, and in writing on the subject says:—“The result,

you know, was, that by means of the Rev. Francis Stuart, minister of

Craignish, I obtained confirmation of the fact that his family had

once possessed a very large collection, of which he had given two or

three to General Sir Adolphus Oughton and the late Sir James Foulis,

both of whom were Gaelic scholars, and that there still remained

above twenty in his possession.” Elsewhere we come across these and

other titled gentlemen acquiring knowledge of Gaelic over a hundred

years ago. It was the Earl of Eglintoun, with the approbation of

Boswell and Johnson, that inspired the publication of the _Gaelic

Analysis_ by Shaw, who describes the acquisition of the language

late in life by Sir James Foulis in the following terms:—“who, late

in advanced years, has learned to read and write it, and now drinks

of the Pierian spring untainted by reading fragments of poetry in

Fingal’s own language.” Shaw was delighted with the patronage which

his aristocratic friends bestowed on Gaelic. The following verses,

translated by Sir James, found a place in his Grammar:—

_CLAIDHEAMH_ GUTH-ULLIN, OR _The SWORD

of_ GUCHULLIN.

Chuir e an claidheamh, fada, fiorchruaidh,

Fulanach, tean, tainic, geur,

’So chean air a chuir ann gu socair,

Mar chuis mholta gan dochair lein,

’Se gu dirach, diasadach, dubh-ghorm,

’Se cultuidh, cumtadh, conolach,

Go leathan, liobhadh, liobharadh,

Go socair, sasdadh, so-bhuailte,

Air laimh-chli a’ ghaisgaich;

Gur aisaiche do naimhdan a sheachnadh,

No tachairt ris ’san am sin;

Cho bu lughe no cnoc sleibh,

Gach ceum a dheanadh an gaisgach.

TRANSLATION BY SIR JAMES FOULIS, BARONET.

He seized his sword, thick, broad, and long,

Well-forged, well-hammered, tempered strong,

Polished, of purest metal made,

Like lightning blazed the shining blade;

Jagged like a saw, it tore and hewed,

Inured to slaughter, blood-embrued;

Dire horror, and destructive fate,

On the full age attentive wait;

’Twas certain death its stroke to feel;

Strength-withering, life-devouring steel,

Even valiant foes, struck at the sight,

Durst hope no safety but by flight;

Their ranks wide-scattering all abroad

From hill to hill the hero strode.

[Illustration: (decorative end-of-chapter icon)]

The literature of the Highlanders · 第 11 / 17 章