CHAPTER IV.

LATIN HYMNS OF THE CELTIC CHURCH.

The following entry among the Irish Charters in the famous Book of

Kells illustrates the fate of much of our ancient Celtic literature,

especially in Scotland: “Anno Domini m^o ui^o (_alias_ 1007).

Soiscela mor coluim cille do dubguit is ind aidci as ind iardom

iartarach in daimliacc moir cenannsa,” &c. A.D. 1006 (_alias_

1007)—The great Gospel of Calum-cille was sacrilegiously stolen at

night out of the western portions of the great church of Kells.

This was the chief relic of the west of the world on account of

the singular cover. This Gospel was found in twenty nights and two

months, with its gold stolen off, and a sod over it. Thus the “great

gospel” of Columba was preserved from destruction by the merest

accident. But cupidity has not been the only foe that the Celt’s

ancient manuscript literature has had to contend with. The ignorance

and indifference of many into whose hands it fell have also played

their part;—a tailor was seen last century in the Hebrides cutting

down Gaelic manuscripts for patterns. More fatal than ignorance has

been the active depreciation of a hostile church operating on the

animosity of a rival race. It is only now—a thousand years after

the era of the ancient Celtic Church—that scholars and unprejudiced

historians have succeeded in showing us a little of it. The “sod over

it” has been partly removed; and the “find” has not been altogether

uninteresting, although the “gold” has been “stolen off.” Zeuss has

furnished us with materials for the reconstruction of the ancient

Celtic language; Skene and others have given us some account of the

early Iro-British Church; but Church history has not fully examined

the available existing material that would show us the character of

the Christian life and devotion of our early Christian ancestors in

these islands. It is proposed in the following chapter to glance at

the Latin Hymns of the ancient Celtic Church in order to realise to

ourselves a little of the inner life of those early evangelists to

whose extraordinary labours and unwearied zeal we are indebted for

the conversion of our forefathers from heathenism. In these hymns

we have relics of that early religious literature which helped to

give Christian comfort to generations of lonely labourers on isle

and mainland. Here we have transmitted to us something of the loving

heavenly motives, the Gospel inspiration, by whose persuasive force

the strongholds of pagan darkness were pulled down throughout the

British islands, as well as in many districts on the Continent.

These devotional compositions were the common property of the whole

Celtic Church at home and abroad. It is intended to look at them here

as remains of the use and wont which prevailed during the “golden

age” of this early Free Church, as it existed in Scotland. In doing

so, it may deepen our interest in them if we briefly recall the

historical setting and political surroundings in which the great work

of this Church was accomplished.

In order to reach the heart of this Church, we must pierce through

that belt of ecclesiastical and religious darkness which Papal Rome

wove round the body of our national life during the four centuries

which preceded the Reformation. Beyond these centuries we are enabled

at once to grasp that one outstanding fact in our early annals, that

from the days of Ninyas, in the beginning of the fifth century, to

the accession of the “Sair Saint,” King David, in 1124 a Free Church,

comparatively evangelical and aggressive, existed in Scotland for a

period of 700 years. No definite attempt has been made to show the

full national significance of this fact. If we contrast that period

of 700 years with the following period of similar length, we find

that during the first half of the latter, decay and death prevailed;

and that even during the second half, with all the advantages

attendant on post-Reformation times, large tracts of our country,

once aglow with gospel life, remained practically heathen until the

lost ground began to be reconquered and reclaimed by the modern Free

Church of Scotland. In all this there is much to humble, instruct

and encourage us. We learn that the essential power of the gospel is

the same in all ages, and that similar results follow the earnest

proclamation of truth in ancient and modern times. The Christian

men that in early days made the gospel a living converting power

throughout our whole land, even in every village of the Highlands,

and every islet of the Hebrides, could not have been very unlike

their countrymen of the present day, among whom evangelical truth is

preserved and preached.

A glance at the early history of Ireland reveals the fact that a

similar course of things took place there. Pope Adrian IV., known

to England as Nicolas Breakspere, the only Englishman who ever sat

in the chair of St. Peter, issued a bill in 1155, giving the kingdom

of Ireland to Henry II. of England. This is a remarkable fact, and

deeply suggestive in connection with the reasons assigned for its

accomplishment. The Irish had all along been Protestants against Rome

and her rule. The Pope, who like all the bishops of that holy ilk,

claimed the right to dispose of all Christian lands, finding that

the Irish, according to Roman estimate, were “Schismatics” and “bad

Christians,” like their brethren of the same period in Scotland, made

a present of the island to Henry, in order to make good Catholics

of the inhabitants. Here were two Englishmen engaged in perverting,

or rather completing the perversion of the Free Independent Church

of Ireland to Rome. Hence all the tears of Ireland, England’s great

responsibility, much bloodguiltiness on all sides, the almost utter

futility of all attempts to restore to that much-enduring isle, the

comparatively pure faith of its ancient days. O’Driscol, an honest

Roman Catholic writer, describes the change as follows:—“There is

something very singular in the ecclesiastical history of Ireland.

The Christian Church of that country, as founded by St. Patrick and

his predecessors, existed for many ages free and unshackled. ‘For

above 700 years this Church maintained its independence.’ It had no

connection with England, and differed upon points of importance with

Rome. The work of Henry II. was to reduce the Church of Ireland into

obedience to the Roman Pontiff. Accordingly, he procured a Council

of the Irish clergy, to be held at Cashel in 1172, and the combined

influence and intrigues of Henry and the Pope prevailed. This Council

put an end to the ancient Church of Ireland, and submitted it to

the yoke of Rome. ‘That apostacy has been followed by a series of

calamities, hardly to be equalled in the world.’ From the days of St.

Patrick to the Council of Cashel was a bright and glorious era for

Ireland. From the sitting of this Council to our time, the lot of

Ireland has been unmixed evil, and all her history a tale of woe.”

The influence of Rome on the heart of the Scottish nation, began with

the marriage of Malcolm with the English Roman Catholic Princess

Margaret. This Saxon queen completed the outward perversion of

Scotland to Rome. She pretended to reform, but only managed to

enthral the native Church, whose clergy she summoned to a Council

in 1074. The Gaelic language was the only language the clergy could

speak—they had a professional knowledge of Latin—so King Malcolm,

her husband, acted as her interpreter. They refused to recognise

the absolute supremacy of the great Roman father; they were unable

to speak English; and the queen set herself piously to rectify

these abuses and shortcomings. The Roman Catholic influence of the

Norman went on increasing until the Court, as the Celtic Professor

at Oxford says, “in the time of David, who began to reign in 1124,

after being educated in England in all the ways of the Normans, was

filled with his Anglican and Norman vassals. He is accordingly,

regarded as the first wholly feudal King of Scotland, and the growth

of feudalism went on at the expense of the power and influence of

the Celtic princes, who saw themselves snubbed and crowded out to

make room for the king’s barons, who had grants made to them of land

here and there, wherever it was worth having. The outcome was a deep

seated discontent, which every now and then burst into a flame of

open revolt on the part of the rightful owners of the soil.” The

Celtic Church died away with the decay of the power of the Celtic

princes. At the same time the Roman religion was warmly supported in

the persons of Englishmen, Flemings and Normans, who received every

encouragement to settle in Scotland. The predominance of the Celtic

element seems to have passed away in the eleventh century. “At the

time, however, of the War of Independence, Gaelic appears to have

still reached down to Stirling and Perth, to the Ochil and Sidlaw

Hill, while north of the Tay it had as yet yielded to English or

Broad Scotch, only a very narrow strip along the coast.” The bulk

of Bruce’s army at Bannockburn was composed of the Ivernian and

Celtic descendants of the ancient Free Church of Scotland. The true

Christian devotion of the Fathers had not altogether disappeared:

like the Puritan soldiers of Cromwell these grand old Scots began

the grim work of battle for national freedom, with a fervent prayer

to the God of battles,—a species of homage which surprised the more

Catholic English.

The Latin hymns of this ancient Church will be found in the “Leabhar

imuin” (Book of Hymns) and the Bangor Antiphonary, both miscellanies

of odes, canticles, blessings, prayers, &c. Altogether the number

is upwards of thirty. The “Leabhar imuin” is a MS. of the ninth

or tenth century in Trinity College Library, Dublin, of which two

thirds have been printed. The first part, edited by the late Dr

Todd, appeared in 1855, and contained the following four hymns, with

extensive annotations from the “Leabhar Breac,” &c.:—1, The Hymn

of St. Sechnall in praise of St. Patrick; 2, The Hymn of St. Ultán

in praise of St. Brigit; 3, The Hymn of Cummain Fota in praise of

the Apostles; 4, The Hymn of St. Mugint. These are specimens of the

terminology of the hymn titles.

The Bangor Antiphonary is a MS. in the Ambrosian Library, Milan.

It was written between 680 and 691; and was printed by Muratori in

1713. Some of the pieces in this MS. have a historical, as well as a

devotional value, such as “The Versicles of the Family of Benchor,”

and “The Commemoration of our Abbots,” in which the names of fifteen

abbots of the Bangor (County Down) monastery are given in the same

order in which their obits occur in the annals. Dr Reeves speaks

well of its accuracy, considering that the MS. has been some 1200

years absent from Ireland. These are the sources in which this Latin

hymnology of the ancient Gaels will be found. They are not very

accessible. As already remarked, versions of them will be also found

in the “Leabhar Breac;” some of them were printed by Sir James Ware,

in the appendix to his “Opuscula S. Patricii;” while the Isidore

Codex of the “Leabhar imuin” recently brought from Rome to Dublin,

has never yet been printed. These MSS., written in a peculiar ornate

style, have become known to archæologists under the description

“libri Scottice Scripti,” (books written in Scotch).

Some of these devotional compositions are as old as the fourth

century, such as the “Hymnum dicat” ascribed to Hilary, and the

“Mediæ noctis,” ascribed to the famous Ambrose of Milan. The

“Audite Omnes” was composed by Sechnall, the nephew of Patrick,

towards the close of the fifth century, in praise of the Irish

apostle. This piece, rather a poem than a hymn, bears to have been

written “in Domhnach Sechnaill,” (now Dunshaughlin in Meath), by

the St. Sechnall, or Secundinus, who was a son of Patrick’s sister,

“by her husband _Restitutus_” of the “Longobards of Leatha.” The

superscription reminds us of the fact that the Scots and the Gaidels

were the same people, whether found in Ireland or parts of Britain.

It runs thus: “Incipit Ymnus sancti Patricii episcopi Scotorum.”

(“The hymn beginning, St. Patrick, Bishop of the Scots.”) The

following note on it occurs in the “Leabhar Breac”: “Tempus autem.”

(“But the time”);—viz: “when Leogaire, son of Niall, was King of

Eirinn came to praise Patrick. Sechnall said to Patrick, ‘When shall

I make a hymn of praise for thee?’ Patrick said, ‘I desire not to be

so praised during my life.’ Sechnall answered, ‘Non interrogavi utrum

faciam, sed quando faciam.’ (‘I did not ask whether I should do it,

but when’). Patrick said, ‘Si facias venit tempus.’ (‘If you do it,

the time has come’)—i.e. because Patrick knew that the time of his

(Sechnall’s) death was at hand.” In the third verse we have the old

Scottic interpretation of the famous passage in Matthew on which St.

Peter’s chair is founded:—

“Constans in Dei timore

Et fide immobilis

Super quem aedificatur

Ut Petrum Ecclesia.”

“Constant in the fear of God, and immovable in faith, upon him as

upon a Peter is built a Church.”

The student of these ancient writings is surprised to find the

modern Irish persist in making Patrick a Frenchman. In the “Leabhar

Breac” the following note, as decisive of his nationality, occurs in

connection with this hymn. “Patraic umorro do bretnaibh h ercluaide

a bunadus.” “Now Patrick in his origin was of the Britons of

Er-Cluaide”—i.e. of the Strathclyde Britons, among whom his name has

found its topographical monument in Kilpatrick, as already pointed

out.

The ancient Christian Scots had their own saints, to whom they were

naturally attached as the fathers of their Church. The names of

Patrick, Columba, and others, as well as of Brigit constantly occur

in these Latin Hymns. Brigit comes next in importance to Patrick in

Hibernian hagiology. Ultán’s hymn in praise of her begins with these

words, “Christus in nostra insola que uscatur hibernia;” and towards

the end, the “angelic and most holy Brigit” in all her wondrous works

of power, is spoken of as “like unto the holy Mary.” We have only

fragments of this poem. It appears to have been originally composed,

like Sechnall’s and several others in these MSS., in the A B C style,

with a stanza for each letter of the alphabet. There is another

found in the beginning of an old Celtic copy of the Greek Psalter,

in praise of Brigit, whose feast day is also celebrated in another,

“Phœbi diem.” The feast day of Patrick has also its celebration hymn,

beginning thus: “Lo, the solemn feast day of Patrick is shining most

brightly.”

The hymn “In Te Christe” is one of the three attributed to Columba,

and bears in some places the stamp of his majestic spirit. The

“Ignis Creator igneus” starts with the conception of the Paschal

candle, and proceeds to describe the columns of smoke and flame

which guided Israel out of Egypt. A few of the metrical compositions

in the Bangor Antiphonary have a more local and historical than a

devotional interest, such as the “Good Rule of Bangor,” and the

commemoration of the abbots of that place, already referred to. The

name of Comgall, the head of the monastery, who died in 602, occurs,

as also Molaisran, or Molio of the Holy Isle, Arran, who died in 639.

There is an evening hymn beginning with “Christe qui Lux es” and a

Pentecostal one about the Apostles, with the initial words “Christi,

Patris in dextera.” There is one hymn, and only one, in the group in

praise of the Blessed Virgin Mary, “Cantemus in omni die.”

Metrical translations of seven, in whole or in part, of these hymns

are given here, to indicate the general character of the devotional

portions of the group. The one beginning with the words: “Precamur

Patrem” has not had any date assigned it, but judging by internal

evidence, it appears to belong to the era of Patrick. It contains

one hundred and sixty-eight lines; starting with an address to the

Lord’s Day, it proceeds to give an abstract of the life of Christ. A

comparison made between the beginning of the physical and that of the

spiritual creation, is worked out in somewhat original fashion. In

the following verses the Lord and His Own Day are contrasted as the

first-born children of light:

PRECAMUR PATREM.

We worship Thee, Almighty King:

To God the Father praise we bring;

To Jesus, Saviour of the lost;

And to the Blessed Holy Ghost.

Thou art, O God, our life and might;

The source of all the worlds of light,

Which on the brows of heaven lie,

And make resplendent earth and sky.

Of old this day was earth’s first-born;

It shone from heaven a holy morn:

Even so the Word, Eternal Light,

The Father gave this world of night.

That day the chaos dark destroyed;

Dispelling night into the void:

So Victor o’er the foe did He

This world from death’s fierce fetters free.

Upon the deep thick darkness lay

Before the dawning of that day;

So ignorance the heart enwound

Till Jesus shed His light around.

A remarkable composition, probably belonging to the same period, and

intended to be used on the birthdays of the martyrs has, like a few

others, the refrain “Alleluia” introduced after every verse. The term

“birthday” does not bear here its ordinary meaning, but birth by

temporal death into a higher life. This hymn is regarded as one of

the best productions of the Latino-Celtic muse:

SACRATISSIMI MARTYRES.

Martyrs of the God Most High,

Who for Christ did bravely die;

Leaders on the heavenly road;

Victors, sing with saints to God,—

Alleluia!

Christ exalted! Cherubim

Render homage unto Him,

On the Father’s throne on high,

While the saints with martyrs cry,—

Alleluia!

Glorious One! The first to bear

Shame upon the Cross, our share;

In thy triumph blessings came;

Now the martyr saints proclaim,—

Alleluia!

The Apostles, strong in faith,

Suffered on the Cross to death;

Shielded now, and saved by grace,

Chant within Thy holy place,—

Alleluia!

Christ! the Helper of the saints,

Heard their weary hearts’ complaints;

Now these martyrs praises bring

And rehearse before their King,—

Alleluia!

Praised, O Lord, Thy power be,

Which obtains the victory;

Crushes Satan by the way

While the saints with martyrs say,—

Alleluia!

God’s strong hand will be their shield;

With His grace their hearts are steeled

To resist the enemy’s ways,

While with saints they ever raise,—

Alleluia!

Heirs with Christ! Their crowns behold!

Filled with fruit a hundred-fold;

Pains are past; they now rejoice,

Uttering in thankful voice,—

Alleluia!

Let us humbly pray for grace,

Till we see the Father’s face

In Jerusalem on high

Where we raise with saints the cry,—

Alleluia!

Another very ancient hymn is the “Spiritus Divinae,” which is one of

the matins used for the Lord’s Day:

SPIRITUS DIVINAE.

O glorious Spirit of the Light Divine;

Come, favour me;

Thou, God of Truth, in Israel once didst shine;

Lord, look on me;

Thou, Saviour, Son, and Light of Light, I know:

Shed forth Thy living lustre on my woe.

Thy Spirit is one substance with the Son,

Lord, look on me;

Thou, Christ, the only first-begotten One,

Wilt look on me;

I have redemption from my sin in Thee:

I seek Thy pardoning aid—Lord, look on me.

Born of the Virgin that poor men might live;

Lord, look on me;

The rights of sonship, Thou alone canst give;

Lord, look on me;

Joint-heir with Thee, Creator of all things:

God-Jesus, everlasting King of Kings.

King of the everlasting ages, Light of God,

Illumine me;

Out of thy boundless fitness shed abroad

Thy love in me;

Father, and Son, and Spirit, One in Three,

In power and substance One, Lord look on me.

The hymn “Sancti Venite” was intended for communion service. Dr

Neale has rendered it into English. A legend relates how Patrick and

his nephew Sechnall heard a company of angels once rehearsing it;

and declares, “So that from that time to the present, that hymn is

chanted in Eirinn when the body of Christ is received”:—

SANCTI VENITE.

Take the blessed Bread and Wine,

Emblems of that Life Divine,

That for sin has been out-poured,

By our sacrificing Lord:

Blessed Jesus crucified,

Life flows from Thy bleeding side.

He renews us by his grace:

Let us give to God the praise:

He has died the lost to save,

Risen Victor o’er the grave:

Giver of salvation He;

Let His Cross our burden be.

He, the Father’s suffering Son,

Priest and Victim all in one,

Has become the Lamb of God

To remove our guilty load:

Saviour, Giver of all light;

He will lead by day and night.

With pure minds let us draw near,

And discern the Shepherd here;

For the hungry, bread He brings,

Water from the living springs;

In our hearts He lives enshrined

Lord and Judge of all mankind.

The Spirit of Gildas, the Welsh monk, who was born in 520, and who

pronounced bitter jeremiads on the princes of his own race and

time, is clearly traceable in the next hymn, of whose prologue

a translation is given. He is one of the Romish corrupters of

the native Church. His “Suffragare” is one of the “Loricae”

breast-plates, used to protect those who rehearsed them against evil:—

SUFFRAGARE.

O Unity in Trinity!

Help, for in Thee I live,

O Trinity in Unity!

My sins forgive:

Exposed, I need Thy help and sympathy,

Like one in peril of the mighty sea!

Thou wilt preserve me by Thy power

From all my raging foes;

Thy heavenly host in danger’s hour,

Before me goes;

Cherubic and seraphic ranks in might,

Far scattering the forces of my night.

I see the Patriarchs of eld,

The Prophets bold and strong;

Apostles who the Lord beheld,

The Martyrs’ throng;

All faithful witnesses, who hence have gone;

I gaze, and pause afresh to reach the throne.

O Unity in Trinity!

In mercy grant Thine aid;

O Trinity in Unity!

I seek thy shade,

Where Christ has made a covenant sure with me;

Oh, fearless, there let me abide with Thee!

There is a hymn by another author of Welsh extraction, St. Mugint,

in the “Leabhar imuin,” beginning with the words “Parce dne.” The

“Altus” of Columba, who arrived in Scotland from Ireland in 563, is

a production of considerable length and much merit, in the A B C

Darian style. It takes cognisance of the whole sphere of sacred and

Scriptural truths, somewhat in the fashion of the compositions of the

Brytho-Saxon Caedmon, and has been regarded as a highly effective

“Lorica”:—

ALTUS PROSATOR.

Great Father of all, the Almighty, we praise,

The One-unbegotten, the Ancient of Days,

Eternally first, and eternally last!

With Thee there remains neither future nor past.

With Thee co-eternal in glory and might,

Reigns Christ on the throne in the regions of light,

Thine Only-begotten, the Son of Thy love,

And there, too, the Spirit, the heavenly Dove.

Bright myriads of angels a ministrant throng,

Ring praises unceasing, rejoicing in song,

Where crowns are cast down at Immanuel’s feet,

And anthems eternal the elders repeat.

The judgements of heaven shall be scattered abroad

On all who deny that our Saviour is God;

But we shall be raised up with Jesus on high,

To where the new mansions all glorious lie.

There is a Gaelic hymn attributed to Columba, which illustrates the

manner and occasions of using these “Loricae”—in Gaelic _lurech_. Its

superscription runs thus: “Colum cilli cecinit, while passing alone;

and it will be a protection to the person who will repeat it going

on a journey.” The author in the first verse represents himself as

lonely on the hillside, and addressing the royal “Sun.” M’oenuran dam

is in sliabh, &c.:—

“Alone am I in the mountain,

O Royal Sun of prosperous path;

Nothing is to be feared by me,

Not if I were _attended by_ sixty-hundred.”

The _rig-grian_—Sun-king, is applied to the Creator.

The third Latin hymn ascribed to Columba, and beginning with the

words “Noli Pater” is also a “Lorica.” It is connected with the

lighting of fires on St. John’s Eve. In some prefatory remarks, its

virtues are thus described:—“It is sung against every fire and every

thunderstorm, and whosoever sings it at bedtime and at rising, it

protects him against lightning.”

NOLI PATER.

Father, restrain Thy thunder,

Thy lightning from our frame,

Lest in our trembling wonder

They smite us with their flame!

Thou Awful One! we fear Thee,

For there is none like Thee;

In thy dread steps we hear Thee;

And to Thy shelter flee.

To Thee awake loud praises,

One universal song

The great creation raises,

Sung by the angel throng:

Our Jesus, King most loving!

The lofty heavens extol:

We see Thee grandly moving

Where flashing lightnings roll.

O King of kings! Thou reignest

In righteousness and love;

And righteous rule maintainest

From Thy pure throne above.

God’s love—a blessed fuel—

Burns in my heart a flame;

Like to a golden jewel

Preserved in silver flame.

Much is made of the elements in this composition. In the Gaelic one

already referred to, Columba guards in the last verses against any

tendency to Pantheism that might be connected with his expressions.

He declares:—

“I adore not the voice of birds,

Nor the _sreod_, nor a destiny, or the earthly world,

Nor a son, nor chance, nor woman;

My Druid is Christ, the Son of God,—

Christ, the Son of Mary, the Great Abbot,

The Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost.

My estates are with the King of kings;

My order is at Cenannus and Moen.”

_Cenannus_ is now Headfort in Meath, where Columba erected a

monastery. _Moen_ is now Moon, in Kildare.

The renderings of hymns given in the preceding paragraphs will convey

some idea of the hymnology of the Gaelic Church. The singing of these

Latin compositions awoke echoes for ages along the glens of Gaelic

Scotland as well as in the forests of Germany; among the Swiss and

Italian Alps, as well as along the sweet hills of Devon and Cornwall.

They indicate a practical literary activity which served well its

generation; and frequently helped to soothe the relentless spirit of

revenge of the Pagan nations of the period.

The primitive Free Church of the Gaels of Britain was an important

branch of this powerful missionary Church of the Celts. Its

operations and results were largely obscured by successors on the

same fields who departed from its methods of work; but recent efforts

of impartial investigators, have helped to assign it its proper

place in the ancient Christianization of Western Europe. It does not

lie within the scope of this work to discuss the character of the

organization of this Church of the Gaels. Indeed the question has

been already so thoroughly investigated by competent pens that it

would be perfectly superfluous to attempt it. To the literary student

this period of church history is chiefly interesting on account of

the fact that it is through the hands of these devoted workers of

those ages that the first fruits of written literature have been

handed down to us. These men being our earliest literary artists, we

naturally turn with perennial interest to the Christian organizations

which some had founded, and in which others were bred.

A small production, some three quarto pages in prose, gives us a

picture of a holy brother who might be expected to cultivate the

virtues of the Gospel in solitude rather than in the circle of

the active community. It is called the “Rule of Calumcille;” and

has been found in the Burgundian Library of Brussells. The Rule

recommends residence close to a church; a fast place with one door;

the company of one attendant only, whose duties must be light; and

access to be granted only to those whose converse will be of God

and His Testament. The time is to be spent in prayers for those

taught and for those dying in the faith. The day is to be divided

into three parts, one for prayers, for good works, and for reading

respectfully. The work is to be divided into three parts; the first

for his own benefit in doing what is needed for his own habitation;

the second for the good of the brethren; and the third for that of

the neighbours. The work of benefiting his neighbours to consist in

giving precepts, writing manuscripts, sewing clothes, or any other

profitable industry. The great end to be obtained is that there “be

no idleness;” “ut Deus ait: non apparebis ante me vacuus.”

This sentiment of “no idleness” is highly creditable to the ancient

Gaelic Christian communities; and if we combine with it another found

in one of the lives of Columba,—

“He drank not ale; he loved not satiety:

He avoided flesh;”

we make a clean discovery which absolutely refutes the unneighbourly

charges of more southern brethren in our own time which associate

Celts, whisky, and idleness too closely and unfairly together.

Our early Highland teachers inculcated industry and sobriety; the

dangerous powers of whisky were unknown to them; and even the lighter

inspirations of ale they eschewed until their own primitive virtues

were undermined by contact with the beer-drinking Pagan Norse on

the one hand, and in later times with the fiercer spirits which

were imported from Teutonic fens on the other. Such are the strange

reversals of popular opinions which accurate study of the facts of

history unfolds. The alleged idleness of the Gael of the present

day, does not appear thus to have any essential connection with the

original sin of the race; the development of the quality appears to

have taken place in contact with a more sluggish and a less lively

people.

In his great work on “English Writers,” Professor Henry Morley

writes:—“When darkness gathered over all the rest of western Europe,

the churches and monasteries of the British island, first among the

Celts and afterwards among the English, supplied, says the Danish

scholar [Professor Sophus Bugge], in and after the seventh century,

the only shelter and home to the higher studies. The British clergy

travelled far in search of books, until in the time of Charlemagne it

was from the Church in Britain that the clearest light shone through

the western world.” The devotional spirit by which these men were

animated, will be fairly illustrated by the renderings of their Latin

Hymns contained in this chapter.

It is freely acknowledged that the ancient Free Church of the Scots,

even in its golden age, held and practised peculiar tenets which in

course of time developed undesirable and even unscriptural fruit.

On the other hand, it must be allowed that it adhered for a long

period to the main doctrines of evangelical Christianity. From the

hymns which we have been considering, and from Patrick’s “Epistle of

Coroticus,” and his “Confession,” in which we have something of the

nature of a creed or a confession of faith, as well as from other

sources, we gather a fair representation of the chief dogmas of its

faith. It held and taught the chief doctrines of the Trinity, of the

incarnation, death, resurrection, and ascension of Christ, and of His

coming again at the last day to judge all men; and likewise of the

outpouring of the Holy Spirit to make us sons of God, and heirs of

immortality. It held, moreover, the Holy Scriptures to be the Word

of God, and used them freely and exclusively as the authority by

which all statements of doctrine are to be proved and confirmed. At

the same time the doctrine of human merit, purgatory, saint-worship,

transubstantiation, papal infallibility, and other distinctive tenets

of modern Romanism, find no recognition. While, as we are told by

St. Bernard, its followers “rejected auricular confession as well as

authoritative absolution, and confessed to God alone, believing God

alone could forgive sins,” they would neither give to the Church of

Rome the tenths, nor the first-fruits, which of course rendered them

“schismatics and heretics” at Rome. Marriage was regarded as a civil

rite, and was performed by the magistracy.

The purity of doctrine and generally healthy influence cultivated and

exercised by the ancient Celtic Church, are shown in a remarkable

manner in the products of Celtic art, which attained to its highest

development in the tenth, eleventh, and twelfth centuries. The

remains of this school of ancient sculpture, if collected into one

national museum, would form an exhibition of native art such as,

according to Mr Joseph Anderson, the Rhind lecturer, no northern

nation can boast of. Respecting these sculptured stones, memorials

that are not unworthy of our valiant Christian ancestors, Burton,

in an interesting chapter, remarks: “It deserves to be commemorated

that in the hundreds of specimens of native sculpture of this class

recently brought to light there is no single instance of indecency,

while in the scanty remains of Roman art within the same area it

would be easy to point out several.”

The character of the two races that blended into one through the

agency of this Church and outward political pressure is not unfairly

represented by Professor Rhys, when he says, touching first on the

Gael or ancient Scot: “One of the lessons of this chapter is that

the Goidel, where he owned a fairly fertile country, as in the

neighbourhood of the Tay, showed that he was not wanting in genius

for political organisation; and the history of the kingdom of

Scotland, as modelled by Kenneth mac Alpin and his descendants, warns

one not to give ear to the spirit of race-weighing and race-damning

criticism that jauntily discovers, in what it fancies the character

of a nation, the reasons why it has not achieved results not fairly

placed within its reach by the accidents either of geography or

history.” The other ancient race of Albin was neither Celtic nor

Aryan in its origin. It has been generally known as Pictish, and

constitutes the backbone of the Scottish nation. Mr Rhys calls it

_Ivernian_. The following sentences state a fact and describe a

process: “The trouble the non-Celtic Picts were able to give the

Romans and the Romanising Brythons has often been dilated upon

by historians, who have seldom dwelt on the much more remarkable

fact, that a power, with its head-quarters in the neighbourhood of

the Ness, had been so organised as to make itself obeyed from the

Orkneys to the Mull of Cantyre, and from Skye to the mouth of the

Tay, so early as the middle of the sixth century. It is important

to bear this in mind in connection with the question as to how far

the earlier Celtic invaders of this country may have mixed with the

ancient inhabitants; since it clearly shows that there was no such a

gulf between them as would make it impossible or even difficult for

them to amalgamate; and it may readily be supposed that the Goidelic

race has been greatly modified in its character by its absorption

of this ancient people of the Atlantic seaboard.” The Latin hymns

considered here are the remains of the devotional literature of these

two races, and bind the history and memories of modern Scotsmen to

the history and memories of a people among whom the fervid national

genius of Scotland was first fashioned.

[Illustration: (decorative end-of-chapter icon)]

The literature of the Highlanders · 第 4 / 17 章