XX.

_MADAM,_

I am not of your opinion, That nice distinctions and Logistical

arguments discover truth, dissolve doubts, and clear the understanding;

but I say, they rather make doubts of truth, and blind-fold the

understanding; Indeed, nice distinctions and sophistical arguments, are

very pernicious both in Schools, Church, and State: As for the Church,

although in Divinity there is but one Truth, yet nice distinctions, and

Logistical sophistry, have made such confusion in it, as has caused

almost as many several opinions as there are words in the Scripture;

and as for natural Theology, which is moral Philosophy, they have

divided vertues and vices into so many parts, and minced them so small,

that neither can be clearly distinguished. The same in Government; they

endeavour to cut between command and obedience to a hairs breadth.

Concerning causes of Law, they have abolish'd the intended benefit, and

banish'd equity; and instead of keeping Peace, they make War, causing

enmity betwixt men: As for Natural Philosophy, they will not suffer

sense and reason to appear in that study: And as for Physick, they have

kill'd more men then Wars, Plagues, or Famine. Wherefore from nice

distinctions and Logistical sophistry, Good God deliver us, especially,

from those that concern Divinity; for they weaken Faith, trouble

Conscience, and bring in Atheism: In short, they make controversies,

and endless disputes. But least the opening of my meaning in such plain

terms should raise a controversie also between you and me, I'le cut off

here, and rest,

Madam,

_Your faithful Friend_

_and Servant._

Philosophical Letters: or, modest Reflections upon some Opinions in Natural Philosophy · 第 155 / 169 题