XVI.

_MADAM,_

Concerning your question of the ascending nature of fire, I am

absolutely of _Aristotle's_ Opinion, that it is as natural for Fire

to ascend, as it is for Earth to descend; And why should we believe

the nature of one, and doubt the nature of the other? For if it be

granted, that there are as well ascending, as descending bodies in

Nature, as also low and high places, (according to the situation of

Particulars) and Circumferences, as well as Centers, (considering the

shape of bodies) I cannot perceive by humane reason, but that the

Nature of fire is ascending, and that it is very improbable, it should

have a descending or contracting nature, as to tend or endeavour to a

Center. But, _Madam_, give me leave to ask what sort of Fire you mean,

whether a Celestial, or a Terrestrial Fire, _viz._ that which is named

an Elemental fire, or any other sort of fire? for there may be as many

several sorts of fire, as of other Creatures; or whether you mean onely

that sort of fire that belongs to this terrestrial Globe, or all the

fire in general that is in Infinite Nature? and if you mean onely that

sort of fire which belongs to this Terrestrial World we live upon; I

answer, There are many several sorts of that fire too; for all the

fire belonging to this Earthly Globe, doth not lie in one place, body,

or part, no more then all metal, or but one sort of metal, as Gold,

lies in one mine, or all Mankind in one womb. Neither can I believe,

that the Sun is the onely Celestial Fire in Nature, but that there may

be as numerous Suns, as there are other sorts of Creatures in Nature.

But as for the ascending propriety of this terrestrial Fire, you may

say, That the Elements do commix and unite in this worldly Globe, and

if Fire should have an ascending motion, it would pierce into other

Globes, or Worlds, and never leave ascending. I answer: That, first of

all, the strength of fire is to be considered, consisting not onely

in its quantity, but also in its quality; as whether it can ascend

to those bodies and places which are far above it: For example; A

Man, or any other Creature, hath never so much strength, or ability,

or length of life, as to travel to the utmost parts of the Universe,

were the way never so plain and free, and the number of men never so

great: the like for Elementary fire, which hath life and death, that

is, generation and dissolution, and successive motion, as well as other

Creatures. But you would fain know, whether fire, if it were left at

liberty, would not turn to a Globous figure? I answer; That, to my

sense and reason, it would not: but some men, seeing the flame of fire

in an arched Oven, descend round the sides of the Oven in a Globous

figure, do perhaps imagine the nature of fire to be descending, and its

natural figure round as a Globe, which is ridiculous; for the fire in

the Oven, although every where incompassed and bound, yet, according

to its nature, ascends to the top of the Oven; and finding a stoppage

and suppression, offers to descend perpendicularly; but by reason of

a continual ascending of the following flame, the first, and so all

the following parts of flame are forced to spread about, and descend

round the sides of the Oven, so that the descension of the flame is

forced, and not natural, and its Globous figure is caused, as it were,

by a mould, which is the Oven. But some are of opinion, that all bodies

have descending motions towards the Center of this worldly Globe, and

therefore they do not believe, that any bodies do ascend naturally:

But what reason have they to believe one, and not the other? Besides,

how do they know that all bodies would rest in the Center of this

terrestrial Globe, if they came thither? For if it was possible, that a

hole could be digged from the superficies of this Earthly Globe thorow

the middle or Center of it unto the opposite superficies, and a stone

be sent thorow; the question is, whether the stone would rest in the

Center, and not go quite thorow? Wherefore this is but an idle Fancy;

and the proof that Fire tends not to a Center, is, because it cannot

be poised or weighed, not onely by reason of its rarity, but of its

dilative and aspiring Nature; and as fire is ascending, or aspiring,

so likewise do I, _Madam_, aspire to the top of your favour, and shall

never descend from the ambition to serve you, but by the suppression of

death. Till then, I remain,

Madam,

_Your constant Friend,_

_and faithful Servant._

Philosophical Letters: or, modest Reflections upon some Opinions in Natural Philosophy · 第 151 / 169 题