XIV.

_MADAM,_

I have read your _Authors_ discourse concerning _Sensation_,[1] but it

was as difficult to me to understand it, ash was tedious to read it;

Truly, all the business, might have been easily declared in a short

Chapter, and with more clearness and perspicuity: For Sensation, is

nothing else but the action of sense proceeding from the corporeal

sensitive motions, which are in all Creatures or parts of Nature, and

so all have sense and sensation, although not alike after one and the

same manner, but some more, some less, each according to the nature and

propriety of its figure. But your _Author_ speaks of _Motion without

Sense, and Sense without Motion_, which is a meer impossibility; for

there is not, nor cannot be any Motion in Nature without Sense, nor

any Sense without Motion; there being no Creature without self-motion,

although not always perceptible by us, or our external senses; for all

motion is not exteriously local, and visible. Wherefore, not any part

of Nature, according to my opinion, wants Sense and Reason, Life and

Knowledg; but not such a substanceless Life as your _Author_ describes,

but a substantial, that is a corporeal Life. Neither is Light the

principle of Motion, but Motion, is the principle of Light: Neither is

Heat the principle of Motion, but its effect as well as Cold is; for

I cannot perceive that Heat should be more active then Cold. Neither

is there any such thing as Unsensibleness in Nature, except it be in

respect of some particular Sensation in some particular Figure: As

for example, when an Animal dies, or its Figure is dissolved from the

Figure of an Animal; we may say it hath not animal sense or motion,

but we cannot say, it hath no sense or motion at all; for as long as

Matter is in Nature, Sense and Motion will be; so that it is absurd and

impossible to believe, or at least to think, that Matter, as a body,

can be totally deprived of Life, Sense, and Motion, or that Life can

perish and be corrupted, be it the smallest part of Matter conceivable,

and the same turned or changed into millions of Figures; for the

Life and Soul of Nature is self-moving Matter, which by Gods Power,

and leave, is the onely Framer and Maker, as also the Dissolver and

Transformer of all Creatures in Nature, making as well Light, Heat, and

Cold, Gas, Blas, and Ferments, as all other natural Creatures beside,

as also Passions, Appetites, Digestions, Nourishments, Inclination,

Aversion, Sickness and Health; nay, all Particular Ideas, Thoughts,

Fancies, Conceptions, Arts, Sciences, &c. In brief, it makes all that

is to be made in Nature. But many great Philosophers conceive Nature to

be fuller of Intricacy, Difficulty, and Obscurity, then she is, puzling

themselves about her ordinary actions, which yet are easie and free,

and making their arguments hard, constrained, and mystical, many of

them containing neither sense nor reason; when as, in my opinion, there

is nothing else to be studied in Nature, but her substance and her

actions. But I will leave them to their own Fancies and Humors, and say

no more, but rest,

Madam,

_Your humble and_

_faithful Servant._

[1] Of the Disease of the Stone. _Ch._ 9.

Philosophical Letters: or, modest Reflections upon some Opinions in Natural Philosophy · 第 103 / 169 题