XXXI.

_MADAM,_

I will leave the Controversie of Free-Will and Necessity, which your

_Author_ is discoursing of,[1] to Divines to decide it, onely I say

this, that Nature hath a natural Free-will and power of self-moving,

and is not necessitated; but yet that this Free-will proceeds from God,

who hath given her both will and power to act freely. But as for the

question, whether there be nothing in the Universe, but meer body?[2]

I answer, My opinion is not, that there is nothing in the world but

meer Body; but that Nature is purely material or corporeal, and that

there is no part of Nature, or natural Creature, which is not Matter,

or Body, or made of Matter; also, that there is not any thing else

mixt with body, as a copartner in natural actions, which is distinct

from Body or Matter; nevertheless, there may be supernatural spiritual

beings or substances in Nature, without any hinderance to Matter or

corporeal Nature. The same I may say of the natural material, and

the divine and supernatural Soul; for though the divine Soul is in

a natural body, and both their powers and actions be different, yet

they cause no ruine or disturbance to each other, but do in many cases

agree with each other, without incroachment upon each others powers or

actions; for God, as he is the God of all things, so the God of Order.

Wherefore it is not probable, that created Immaterial or Incorporeal

beings should order Corporeal Nature, no more then Corporeal Nature

orders Immaterial or Incorporeal Creatures. Neither can, in my opinion,

Incorporeal Creatures be clearly conceived by Corporeals, although

they may really exist and subsist in Nature; onely, as I said before,

it is well to be considered, that there is difference betwixt being

in Nature, and being a part of Nature; for bodiless things, and so

spiritual substances, although they may exist in Nature, yet they

are not natural, nor parts of Nature, but supernatural, Nature being

meerly corporeal, and Matter the ground of Nature; and all that is

not built upon this material ground, is nothing in Nature. But you

will say, The divine Soul is a part of Man, and Man a part of Nature,

wherefore the divine Soul must needs be a part of Nature. I answer,

Not: For the divine Soul is not a part of Nature, but supernatural, as

a supernatural Gift from God onely to Man, and to no other Creature:

and although in this respect it may be called a part of Man, yet it is

no natural or material part of Man; neither doth this supernatural Gift

disturb Nature or natural Matter, or natural Matter this supernatural

Gift. And so leaving them both, I rest,

Madam,

_Your faithful Friend_

_and Servant._

[1] _Of the Immortality of the Soul. l._ 1. _c._ 3.

[2] _Lib._ 2. _c._ 2.

Philosophical Letters: or, modest Reflections upon some Opinions in Natural Philosophy · 第 84 / 169 题