VII.

_MADAM,_

Your _Author_ being very earnest in arguing against those that maintain

the opinion of Matter being self-moving, amongst the rest of his

arguments brings in this:[1] _Suppose_, says he, _Matter could move it

self, would meer Matter with self-motion amount to that admirable wise

contrivance of things which we see in the World?--All the evasion I can

imagine, our adversaries may use here, will be this: That Matter is

capable of sense, and the finest and most subtil of the most refined

sense; and consequently of Imagination too, yea happily of Reason and

Understanding._ I answer, it is very probable, that not onely all the

Matter in the World or Universe hath Sense, but also Reason; and that

the sensitive part of matter is the builder, and the rational the

designer; whereof I have spoken of before, and you may find more of it

in my Book of Philosophy. _But,_ says your Author, _Let us see, if all

their heads laid together can contrive the anatomical Fabrick of any

Creature that liveth?_ I answer, all parts of Nature are not bound to

have heads or tayls; but if they have, surely they are wiser then many

a man's. _I demand_, says he, _Has every one of these Particles, that

must have a hand in the framing of the body of an animal, the whole

design of the work by the Impress of some Phantasme upon it? or as

they have several offices, so have they several parts of the design?_

I answer, All the actions of self-moving Matter are not Impresses, nor

is every part a hand-labourer, but every part unites by degrees into

such or such a Figure. Again, says he, _How is it conceiveable that

any one Particle of Matter, or many together, (there not existing, yet

in Nature an animal) can have the Idea Impressed of that Creature they

are to frame?_ I answer, all figures whatsoever have been, are, or can

be in Nature, are existent in nature. _How_, says he, _can they in

framing several parts confer notes? by what language or speech can they

communicate their Counsels one to another?_ I answer, Knowledg doth

not always require speech, for speech is an effect and not a cause,

but knowledg is a cause and not an effect; and nature hath infinite

more ways to express knowledg then man can imagine, _Wherefore_, he

concludes, _that they should mutually serve one another in such a

design, is more impossible, then that so many men, blind and dumb from

their nativity, should joyn their forces and wits together to build a

Castle, or carve a statue of such a Creature, as none of them knew any

more in several, then some one of the smallest parts thereof, but not

the relation it bore to the whole._ I answer, Nature is neither blind

nor dumb, nor any ways defective, but infinitely wise and knowing;

for blindness and dumbness are but effects of some of her particular

actions, but there is no defect in self-moving matter, nor in her

actions in general; and it is absurd to conceive the Generality of

wisdom according to an Irregular effect or defect of a particular

Creature; for the General actions of Nature are both life and knowledg,

which are the architects of all Creatures, and know better how to frame

all kinds and sorts of Creatures then man can conceive; and the several

parts of Matter have a more easie way of communication, then Mans head

hath with his hand, or his hand with pen, ink, and paper, when he is

going to write; which later example will make you understand my opinion

the better, if you do but compare the rational part of Matter to the

head, the sensitive to the hand, the inanimate to pen, ink and paper,

their action to writing, and their framed figures to those figures or

letters which are written; in all which is a mutual agreement without

noise or trouble. But give me leave, _Madam_, to tell you, That

self-moving Matter may sometimes erre and move irregularly, and in some

parts not move so strong, curious, or subtil at sometimes, as in other

parts, for Nature delights in variety; Nevertheless she is more wise

then any Particular Creature or part can conceive, which is the cause

that Man thinks Nature's wise, subtil and lively actions, are as his

own gross actions, conceiving them to be constrained and turbulent, not

free and easie, as well as wise and knowing; Whereas Nature's Creating,

Generating and Producing actions are by an easie connexion of parts to

parts, without Counterbuffs, Joggs and Jolts, producing a particular

figure by degrees, and in order and method, as humane sense and reason

may well perceive: And why may not the sensitive and rational part of

Matter know better how to make a Bee, then a Bee doth how to make Honey

and Wax? or have a better communication betwixt them, then Bees that

fly several ways, meeting and joyning to make their Combes in their

Hives? But pardon, _Madam_, for I think it a Crime to compare the

Creating, Generating and producing Corporeal Life and Wisdom of Nature

unto any particular Creature, although every particular Creature hath

their share, being a part of Nature. Wherefore those, in my opinion, do

grossly err, that bind up the sensitive matter onely to taste, touch,

hearing, seeing, and smelling; as if the sensitive parts of Nature had

not more variety of actions, then to make five senses; for we may well

observe, in every Creature there is difference of sense and reason

according to the several modes of self-motion; For the Sun, Stars,

Earth, Air, Fire, Water, Plants, Animals, Minerals; although they have

all sense and knowledg, yet they have not all sense and knowledg alike,

because sense and knowledg moves not alike in every kind or sort of

Creatures, nay many times very different in one and the same Creature;

but yet this doth not cause a general Ignorance, as to be altogether

Insensible or Irrational, neither do the erroneous and irregular

actions of sense and reason prove an annihilation of sense and reason;

as for example, a man may become Mad or a Fool through the irregular

motions of sense and reason, and yet have still the Perception of sense

and reason, onely the alteration is caused through the alteration of

the sensitive and rational corporeal motions or actions, from regular

to irregular; nevertheless he has Perceptions, Thoughts, Ideas,

Passions, and whatsoever is made by sensitive and rational Matter,

neither can Perception be divided from Motion, nor Motion from Matter;

for all sensation is Corporeal, and so is Perception. I can add no

more, but take my leave, and rest,

Madam,

_Your faithful Friend_

_and Servant._

[1] _Of the Immortality of the Soul, l._ 1. _c._ 12.

Philosophical Letters: or, modest Reflections upon some Opinions in Natural Philosophy · 第 60 / 169 题