XVII.

_MADAM,_

Your _Author_ concerning Place and Magnitude says,[1], that _Place

is nothing out of the mind, nor Magnitude any thing within it; for

Place is a meer Phantasme of a body of such quantity and figure, and

Magnitude a peculiar accident of the body_; but this doth not well

agree with my reason, for I believe that Place, Magnitude and Body are

but one thing, and that Place is as true an extension as Magnitude,

and not a feigned one; Neither am I of his opinion, _that Place is

Immoveable_, but that place moves, according as the body moveth, for

not any body wants place, because place and body is but one thing, and

wheresoever is body, there is also place, and wheresoever is place,

there is body, as being one and the same; Wherefore _Motion cannot be a

relinquishing of one place and acquiring another_,[2] for there is no

such thing as place different from body, but what is called change of

place, is nothing but change of corporeal motions; for, say an house

stands in such a place, if the house be gone, the place is gone also,

as being impossible that the place of the house should remain, when the

house is taken away; like as a man when he is gone out of his chamber,

his place is gone too; 'Tis true, if the ground or foundation do yet

remain, one may say, there stood such an house heretofore, but yet the

place of the house is not there really at that present, unless the same

house be built up again as it was before, and then it hath its place

as before; Nevertheless the house being not there, it cannot be said

that either place or house are annihilated, _viz._, when the materials

are dissolved, no not when transformed into millions of several other

figures, for the house remains still in the power of all those several

parts of matter; and as for _space_, it is onely a distance betwixt

some parts or bodies; But an _Empty place_ signifies to my opinion

Nothing, for if place and body are one and the same, and empty is

as much as nothing; then certainly these two words cannot consist

together, but are destructive to one another. Concerning, that your

_Author_ says,[3] _Two bodies cannot be together in the same place, nor

one body in two places at the same time_, is very true, for there are

no more places then bodies, nor more bodies then places, and this is to

be understood as well of the grosser, as the purest parts of nature, of

the mind as well as of the body, of the rational and sensitive animate

matter as well as of the inanimate, for there is no matter, how pure

and subtil soever, but is imbodied, and all that hath body hath place.

Likewise I am of his opinion,[4] _That one body hath always one and

the same magnitude_; for, in my opinion, magnitude, place and body do

not differ, and as place, so magnitude can never be separated from

body. But when he speaks of _Rest_, I cannot believe there is any such

thing truly in Nature, for it is impossible to prove, that any thing

is without Motion, either consistent, or composing, or dissolving, or

transforming motions, or the like, although not altogether perceptible

by our senses, for all the Matter is either moving or moved, and

although the moved parts are not capable to receive the nature of

self-motion from the self-moving parts, yet these self-moving parts,

being joyned and mixt with all other parts of the moved matter, do

always move the same; for the Moved or Inanimate part of Matter,

although it is a Part of it self, yet it is so intermixt with the

self-moving Animate Matter, as they make but one Body; and though some

parts of the Inanimate may be as pure as the Sensitive Animate Matter,

yet they are never so subtil as to be self-moving; Wherefore the

Sensitive moves in the Inanimate, and the Rational in the Sensitive,

but often the Rational moves in it self. And, although there is no rest

in nature, nevertheless Matter could have been without Motion, when as

it is impossible that Matter could be without place or magnitude, no

more then Variety can be without motion; And thus much at this present:

I conclude, and rest,

Madam,

_Your Faithful Friend_

_and Servant._

[1] _Part._ 2. _c._ 8. _a._ 5.

[2] _Art._ 10.

[3] _Art._ 8.

[4] _Art._ 5.

Philosophical Letters: or, modest Reflections upon some Opinions in Natural Philosophy · 第 25 / 169 题