LIFE IN EUROPE--LITERARY ACTIVITY

When Irving sailed from New York, it was with lively anticipations of

witnessing the stirring events to follow the return of Bonaparte from

Elba. When he reached Liverpool, the curtain had fallen in Bonaparte's

theater. The first spectacle that met the traveler's eye was the mail

coaches, darting through the streets, decked with laurel and bringing

the news of Waterloo. As usual, Irving's sympathies were with the

unfortunate. "I think," he says, writing of the exile of St. Helena,

"the cabinet has acted with littleness toward him. In spite of all his

misdeeds he is a noble fellow [pace Madame de Remusat], and I am

confident will eclipse, in the eyes of posterity, all the crowned

wiseacres that have crushed him by their overwhelming confederacy. If

anything could place the Prince Regent in a more ridiculous light, it is

Bonaparte suing for his magnanimous protection. Every compliment paid

to this bloated sensualist, this inflation of sack and sugar, turns to

the keenest sarcasm."

After staying a week with his brother Peter, who was recovering from

an indisposition, Irving went to Birmingham, the residence of his

brother-in-law, Henry Van Wart, who had married his youngest sister,

Sarah; and from thence to Sydenham, to visit Campbell. The poet was not

at home. To Mrs. Campbell Irving expressed his regret that her husband

did not attempt something on a grand scale.

"'It is unfortunate for Campbell,' said she, 'that he lives in the

same age with Scott and Byron.' I asked why. 'Oh,' said she, 'they

write so much and so rapidly. Mr. Campbell writes slowly, and it

takes him some time to get under way; and just as he has fairly

begun out comes one of their poems, that sets the world agog, and

quite daunts him, so that he throws by his pen in despair.'

I pointed out the essential difference in their kinds of poetry, and

the qualities which insured perpetuity to that of her husband. 'You

can't persuade Campbell of that,' said she. 'He is apt to

undervalue his own works, and to consider his own little lights put

out, whenever they come blazing out with their great torches.'

"I repeated the conversation to Scott some time afterward, and it

drew forth a characteristic comment. 'Pooh!' said he, good

humoredly; 'how can Campbell mistake the matter so much? Poetry

goes by quality, not by bulk. My poems are mere Cairngorms, wrought

up, perhaps, with a cunning hand, and may pass well in the market as

long as Cairngorms are the fashion; but they are mere Scotch

pebbles, after all. Now, Tom Campbell's are real diamonds, and

diamonds of the first water.'"

Returning to Birmingham, Irving made excursions to Kenilworth, Warwick,

and Stratford-on-Avon, and a tour through Wales with James Renwick, a

young American of great promise, who at the age of nineteen had for a

time filled the chair of natural philosophy in Columbia College. He was

a son of Mrs. Jane Renwick, a charming woman and a lifelong friend of

Irving, the daughter of the Rev. Andrew Jeffrey, of Lochmaben, Scotland,

and famous in literature as "The Blue-Eyed Lassie" of Burns. From

another song, "When first I saw my Face," which does not appear in the

poet's collected works, the biographer quotes:

"But, sair, I doubt some happier swain

Has gained my Jeanie's favor;

If sae, may every bliss be hers,

Tho' I can never have her.

"But gang she east, or gang she west,

'Twixt Nith and Tweed all over,

While men have eyes, or ears, or taste,

She'll always find a lover."

During Irving's protracted stay in England he did not by any means lose

his interest in his beloved New York and the little society that was

always dear to him. He relied upon his friend Brevoort to give him the

news of the town, and in return he wrote long letters,--longer and more

elaborate and formal than this generation has leisure to write or to

read; letters in which the writer laid himself out to be entertaining,

and detailed his emotions and state of mind as faithfully as his travels

and outward experiences.

No sooner was our war with England over than our navy began to make a

reputation for itself in the Mediterranean. In his letter of August,

1815, Irving dwells with pride on Decatur's triumph over the Algerine

pirates. He had just received a letter from "that--worthy little tar,

Jack Nicholson," dated on board the Flambeau, off Algiers. In it

Nicholson says that "they fell in with and captured the admiral's ship,

and killed him." Upon which Irving remarks: "As this is all that Jack's

brevity will allow him to say on the subject, I should be at a loss to

know whether they killed the admiral before or after his capture.

The well-known humanity of our tars, however, induces me to the former

conclusion." Nicholson, who has the honor of being alluded to in "The

Croakers," was always a great favorite with Irving. His gallantry on

shore was equal to his bravery at sea, but unfortunately his diffidence

was greater than his gallantry; and while his susceptibility to female

charms made him an easy and a frequent victim, he could never muster the

courage to declare his passion. Upon one occasion, when he was

desperately enamored of a lady whom he wished to marry, he got Irving to

write for him a love-letter, containing an offer of his heart and hand.

The enthralled but bashful sailor carried the letter in his pocket till

it was worn out, without ever being able to summon pluck enough to

deliver it.

While Irving was in Wales the Wiggins family and Madame Bonaparte passed

through Birmingham, on their way to Cheltenham. Madame was still

determined to assert her rights as a Bonaparte. Irving cannot help

expressing sympathy for Wiggins: "The poor man has his hands full, with

such a bevy of beautiful women under his charge, and all doubtless bent

on pleasure and admiration." He hears, however, nothing further of her,

except the newspapers mention her being at Cheltenham. "There are so

many stars and comets thrown out of their orbits, and whirling about the

world at present, that a little star like Madame Bonaparte attracts but

slight attention, even though she draw after her so sparkling a tail as

the Wiggins family." In another letter he exclaims: "The world is surely

topsy-turvy, and its inhabitants shaken out of place: emperors and kings,

statesmen and philosophers, Bonaparte, Alexander, Johnson, and the

Wigginses, all strolling about the face of the earth."

The business of the Irving brothers soon absorbed all Washington's time

and attention. Peter was an invalid, and the whole weight of the

perplexing affairs of the failing firm fell upon the one who detested

business, and counted every hour lost that he gave to it. His letters

for two years are burdened with harassments in uncongenial details and

unsuccessful struggles. Liverpool, where he was compelled to pass most

of his time, had few attractions for him, and his low spirits did not

permit him to avail himself of such social advantages as were offered.

It seems that our enterprising countrymen flocked abroad, on the

conclusion of peace. "This place [writes Irving] swarms with Americans.

You never saw a more motley race of beings. Some seem as if just from

the woods, and yet stalk about the streets and public places with all the

easy nonchalance that they would about their own villages. Nothing can

surpass the dauntless independence of all form, ceremony, fashion, or

reputation of a downright, unsophisticated American. Since the war, too,

particularly, our lads seem to think they are 'the salt of the earth' and

the legitimate lords of creation. It would delight you to see some of

them playing Indian when surrounded by the wonders and improvements of

the Old World. It is impossible to match these fellows by anything this

side the water. Let an Englishman talk of the battle of Waterloo, and

they will immediately bring up New Orleans and Plattsburg.

"A thoroughbred, thoroughly appointed soldier is nothing to a Kentucky

rifleman," etc., etc. In contrast to this sort of American was Charles

King, who was then abroad: "Charles is exactly what an American should be

abroad: frank, manly, and unaffected in his habits and manners, liberal

and independent in his opinions, generous and unprejudiced in his

sentiments towards other nations, but most loyally attached to his own."

There was a provincial narrowness at that date and long after in America,

which deprecated the open-minded patriotism of King and of Irving as it

did the clear-sighted loyalty of Fenimore Cooper.

The most anxious time of Irving's life was the winter of 1815-16.

The business worry increased. He was too jaded with the din of pounds,

shillings, and pence to permit his pen to invent facts or to adorn

realities. Nevertheless, he occasionally escapes from the treadmill.

In December he is in London, and entranced with the acting of Miss

O'Neil. He thinks that Brevoort, if he saw her, would infallibly fall in

love with this "divine perfection of a woman." He writes: "She is, to my

eyes, the most soul-subduing actress I ever saw; I do not mean from her

personal charms, which are great, but from the truth, force, and pathos

of her acting. I have never been so completely melted, moved, and

overcome at a theatre as by her performances . . . . Kean, the

prodigy, is to me insufferable. He is vulgar, full of trick, and a

complete mannerist. This is merely my opinion. He is cried up as a

second Garrick, as a reformer of the stage, etc. It may be so. He may

be right, and all the other actors wrong. This is certain: he is either

very good or very bad. I think decidedly the latter; and I find no

medium opinions concerning him. I am delighted with Young, who acts with

great judgment, discrimination, and feeling. I think him much the best

actor at present on the English stage . . . . In certain characters,

such as may be classed with Macbeth, I do not think that Cooper has his

equal in England. Young is the only actor I have seen who can compare

with him." Later, Irving somewhat modified his opinion of Kean.

He wrote to Brevoort: "Kean is a strange compound of merits and defects.

His excellence consists in sudden and brilliant touches, in vivid

exhibitions of passion and emotion. I do not think him a discriminating

actor, or critical either at understanding or delineating character;

but he produces effects which no other actor does."

In the summer of 1816, on his way from Liverpool to visit his sister's

family at Birmingham, Irving tarried for a few days at a country place

near Shrewsbury on the border of Wales, and while there encountered a

character whose portrait is cleverly painted. It is interesting to

compare this first sketch with the elaboration of it in the essay on "The

Angler" in the "Sketch-Book."

"In one of our morning strolls [he writes, July 15] along the banks

of the Aleen, a beautiful little pastoral stream that rises among

the Welsh mountains and throws itself into the Dee, we encountered a

veteran angler of old Isaac Walton's school. He was an old

Greenwich outdoor pensioner, had lost one leg in the battle of

Camperdown, had been in America in his youth, and indeed had been

quite a rover, but for many years past had settled himself down in

his native village, not far distant, where he lived very

independently on his pension and some other small annual sums,

amounting in all to about L 40. His great hobby, and indeed the

business of his life, was to angle. I found he had read Isaac

Walton very attentively; he seemed to have imbibed all his

simplicity of heart, contentment of mind, and fluency of tongue.

We kept company with him almost the whole day, wandering along the

beautiful banks of the river, admiring the ease and elegant

dexterity with which the old fellow managed his angle, throwing the

fly with unerring certainty at a great distance and among

overhanging bushes, and waving it gracefully in the air, to keep it

from entangling, as he stumped with his staff and wooden leg from

one bend of the river to another. He kept up a continual flow of

cheerful and entertaining talk, and what I particularly liked him

for was, that though we tried every way to entrap him into some

abuse of America and its inhabitants, there was no getting him to

utter an ill-natured word concerning us. His whole conversation and

deportment illustrated old Isaac's maxims as to the benign influence

of angling over the human heart . . . . I ought to mention that

he had two companions--one, a ragged, picturesque varlet, that had

all the air of a veteran poacher, and I warrant would find any

fish-pond in the neighborhood in the darkest night; the other was a

disciple of the old philosopher, studying the art under him, and was

son and heir apparent to the landlady of the village tavern."

A contrast to this pleasing picture is afforded by some character

sketches at the little watering-place of Buxton, which our kindly

observer visited the same year.

"At the hotel where we put up [he writes] we had a most singular and

whimsical assemblage of beings. I don't know whether you were ever

at an English watering-place, but if you have not been, you have

missed the best opportunity of studying English oddities, both moral

and physical. I no longer wonder at the English being such

excellent caricaturists, they have such an inexhaustible number and

variety of subjects to study from. The only care should be not to

follow fact too closely, for I 'll swear I have met with characters

and figures that would be condemned as extravagant, if faithfully

delineated by pen or pencil. At a watering-place like Buxton, where

people really resort for health, you see the great tendency of the

English to run into excrescences and bloat out into grotesque

deformities. As to noses, I say nothing of them, though we had

every variety: some snubbed and turned up, with distended nostrils,

like a dormer window on the roof of a house; others convex and

twisted like a buck-handled knife; and others magnificently

eforescent, like a full-blown cauliflower. But as to the persons

that were attached to these noses, fancy any distortion,

protuberance, and fungous embellishment that can be produced in the

human form by high and gross feeding, by the bloating operations of

malt liquors, and by the rheumy influence of a damp, foggy, vaporous

climate. One old fellow was an exception to this, for instead of

acquiring that expansion and sponginess to which old people are

prone in this country, from the long course of internal and external

soakage they experience, he had grown dry and stiff in the process

of years. The skin of his face had so shrunk away that he could not

close eyes or mouth--the latter, therefore, stood on a perpetual

ghastly grin, and the former on an incessant stare. He had but one

serviceable joint in his body, which was at the bottom of the

backbone, and that creaked and grated whenever he bent. He could

not raise his feet from the ground, but skated along the

drawing-room carpet whenever he wished to ring the bell. The only

sign of moisture in his whole body was a pellucid drop that I

occasionally noticed on the end of along, dry nose. He used

generally to shuffle about in company with a little fellow that was

fat on one side and lean on the other. That is to say, he was

warped on one side as if he had been scorched before the fire; he

had a wry neck, which made his head lean on one shoulder; his hair

was smugly powdered, and he had a round, smirking, smiling, apple

face, with a bloom on it like that of a frostbitten leaf in autumn.

We had an old, fat general by the name of Trotter, who had, I

suspect, been promoted to his high rank to get him out of the way

of more able and active officers, being an instance that a man may

occasionally rise in the world through absolute lack of merit. I

could not help watching the movements of this redoubtable old Hero,

who, I'll warrant, has been the champion and safeguard of half the

garrison towns in England, and fancying to myself how Bonaparte

would have delighted in having such toast-and-butter generals to

deal with. This old cad is doubtless a sample of those generals

that flourished in the old military school, when armies would

manoeuvre and watch each other for months; now and then have a

desperate skirmish, and, after marching and countermarching about

the 'Low Countries' through a glorious campaign, retire on the

first pinch of cold weather into snug winter quarters in some fat

Flemish town, and eat and drink and fiddle through the winter.

Boney must have sadly disconcerted the comfortable system of these

old warriors by the harrowing, restless, cut-and-slash mode of

warfare that he introduced. He has put an end to all the old carte

and tierce system in which the cavaliers of the old school fought

so decorously, as it were with a small sword in one hand and a

chapeau bras in the other. During his career there has been a sad

laying on the shelf of old generals who could not keep up with the

hurry, the fierceness and dashing of the new system; and among the

number I presume has been my worthy house-mate, old Trotter. The

old gentleman, in spite of his warlike title, had a most pacific

appearance. He was large and fat, with a broad, hazy, muffin face,

a sleepy eye, and a full double chin. He had a deep ravine from

each corner of his mouth, not occasioned by any irascible

contraction of the muscles, but apparently the deep-worn channels

of two rivulets of gravy that oozed out from the huge mouthfuls

that he masticated. But I forbear to dwell on the odd beings that

were congregated together in one hotel. I have been thus prolix

about the old general because you desired me in one of your letters

to give you ample details whenever I happened to be in company with

the 'great and glorious,' and old Trotter is more deserving of the

epithet than any of the personages I have lately encountered."

It was at the same resort of fashion and disease that Irving observed a

phenomenon upon which Brevoort had commented as beginning to be

noticeable in America.

"Your account [he writes of the brevity of the old lady's nether

garments] distresses me . . . . I cannot help observing that this

fashion of short skirts must have been invented by the French ladies

as a complete trick upon John Bull's 'woman-folk.' It was

introduced just at the time the English flocked in such crowds to

Paris. The French women, you know, are remarkable for pretty feet

and ankles, and can display them in perfect security. The English

are remarkable for the contrary. Seeing the proneness of the

English women to follow French fashions, they therefore led them

into this disastrous one, and sent them home with their petticoats

up to their knees, exhibiting such a variety of sturdy little legs

as would have afforded Hogarth an ample choice to match one of his

assemblages of queer heads. It is really a great source of

curiosity and amusement on the promenade of a watering-place to

observe the little sturdy English women, trudging about in their

stout leather shoes, and to study the various 'understandings'

betrayed to view by this mischievous fashion."

The years passed rather wearily in England. Peter continued to be an

invalid, and Washington himself, never robust, felt the pressure more and

more of the irksome and unprosperous business affairs. Of his own want

of health, however, he never complains; he maintains a patient spirit in

the ill turns of fortune, and his impatience in the business

complications is that of a man hindered from his proper career. The

times were depressing.

"In America [he writes to Brevoort] you have financial difficulties,

the embarrassments of trade, the distress of merchants, but here you

have what is far worse, the distress of the poor--not merely mental

sufferings, but the absolute miseries of nature: hunger, nakedness,

wretchedness of all kinds that the laboring people in this country

are liable to. In the best of times they do but subsist, but in

adverse times they starve. How the country is to extricate itself

from its present embarrassment, how it is to escape from the poverty

that seems to be overwhelming it, and how the government is to quiet

the multitudes that are already turbulent and clamorous, and are yet

but in the beginning of their real miseries, I cannot conceive."

The embarrassments of the agricultural and laboring classes and of the

government were as serious in 1816 as they have again become in 1881.

During 1817 Irving was mostly in the depths of gloom, a prey to the

monotony of life and torpidity of intellect. Rays of sunlight pierce the

clouds occasionally. The Van Wart household at Birmingham was a frequent

refuge for him, and we have pretty pictures of the domestic life there;

glimpses of Old Parr, whose reputation as a gourmand was only second to

his fame as a Grecian, and of that delightful genius, the Rev. Rann

Kennedy, who might have been famous if he had ever committed to paper the

long poems that he carried about in his head, and the engaging sight of

Irving playing the flute for the little Van Warts to dance. During the

holidays Irving paid another visit to the haunts of Isaac Walton, and his

description of the adventures and mishaps of a pleasure party on the

banks of the Dove suggest that the incorrigible bachelor was still

sensitive to the allurements of life; and liable to wander over the

"dead-line" of matrimonial danger. He confesses that he was all day in

Elysium. "When we had descended from the last precipice," he says, "and

come to where the Dove flowed musically through a verdant meadow--then

--fancy me, oh, thou 'sweetest of poets,' wandering by the course of this

romantic stream--a lovely girl hanging on my arm, pointing out the

beauties of the surrounding scenery, and repeating in the most dulcet

voice tracts of heaven-born poetry. If a strawberry smothered in cream

has any consciousness of its delicious situation, it must feel as I felt

at that moment." Indeed, the letters of this doleful year are enlivened

by so many references to the graces and attractions of lovely women, seen

and remembered, that insensibility cannot be attributed to the author of

the "Sketch-Book."

The death of Irving's mother in the spring of 1817 determined him to

remain another year abroad. Business did not improve. His

brother-in-law Van Wart called a meeting of his creditors, the Irving

brothers floundered on into greater depths of embarrassment, and

Washington, who could not think of returning home to face poverty in New

York, began to revolve a plan that would give him a scanty but sufficient

support. The idea of the "Sketch-Book" was in his mind. He had as yet

made few literary acquaintances in England. It is an illustration of the

warping effect of friendship upon the critical faculty that his opinion

of Moore at this time was totally changed by subsequent intimacy. At a

later date the two authors became warm friends and mutual admirers of

each other's productions. In June, 1817, "Lalla Rookh" was just from the

press, and Irving writes to Brevoort: "Moore's new poem is just out. I

have not sent it to you, for it is dear and worthless. It is written in

the most effeminate taste, and fit only to delight boarding-school girls

and lads of nineteen just in their first loves. Moore should have kept

to songs and epigrammatic conceits. His stream of intellect is too small

to bear expansion--it spreads into mere surface." Too much cream for the

strawberry!

Notwithstanding business harassments in the summer and fall of 1817 he

found time for some wandering about the island; he was occasionally in

London, dining at Murray's, where he made the acquaintance of the elder

D'Israeli and other men of letters (one of his notes of a dinner at

Murray's is this: "Lord Byron told Murray that he was much happier after

breaking with Lady Byron--he hated this still, quiet life"); he was

publishing a new edition of the "Knickerbocker," illustrated by Leslie

and Allston; and we find him at home in the friendly and brilliant

society of Edinburgh; both the magazine publishers, Constable and

Blackwood, were very civil to him, and Mr. Jeffrey (Mrs. Renwick was his

sister) was very attentive; and he passed some days with Walter Scott,

whose home life he so agreeably describes in his sketch of "Abbotsford."

He looked back longingly to the happy hours there (he writes to his

brother): "Scott reading, occasionally, from 'Prince Arthur;' telling

border stories or characteristic ancedotes; Sophy Scott singing with

charming 'naivete' a little border song; the rest of the family disposed

in listening groups, while greyhounds, spaniels, and cats bask in

unbounded indulgence before the fire. Everything about Scott is perfect

character and picture."

In the beginning of 1818 the business affairs of the brothers became so

irretrievably involved that Peter and Washington went through the

humiliating experience of taking the bankrupt act. Washington's

connection with the concern was little more than nominal, and he felt

small anxiety for himself, and was eager to escape from an occupation

which had taken all the elasticity out of his mind. But on account of

his brothers, in this dismal wreck of a family connection, his soul was

steeped in bitterness. Pending the proceedings of the commissioners, he

shut himself up day and night to the study of German, and while waiting

for the examination used to walk up and down the room, conning over the

German verbs.

In August he went up to London and cast himself irrevocably upon the

fortune of his pen. He had accumulated some materials, and upon these he

set to work. Efforts were made at home to procure for him the position

of Secretary of Legation in London, which drew from him the remark, when

they came to his knowledge, that he did not like to have his name

hackneyed about among the office-seekers in Washington. Subsequently his

brother William wrote him that Commodore Decatur was keeping open for him

the office of Chief Clerk in the Navy Department. To the mortification

and chagrin of his brothers, Washington declined the position. He was

resolved to enter upon no duties that would interfere with his literary

pursuits.

This resolution, which exhibited a modest confidence in his own powers,

and the energy with which he threw himself into his career, showed the

fiber of the man. Suddenly, by the reverse of fortune, he who had been

regarded as merely the ornamental genius of the family became its stay

and support. If he had accepted the aid of his brothers, during the

experimental period of his life, in the loving spirit of confidence in

which it was given, he was not less ready to reverse the relations when

the time came; the delicacy with which his assistance was rendered, the

scrupulous care taken to convey the feeling that his brothers were doing

him a continued favor in sharing his good fortune, and their own

unjealous acceptance of what they would as freely have given if

circumstances had been different, form one of the pleasantest instances

of brotherly concord and self-abnegation. I know nothing more admirable

than the lifelong relations of this talented and sincere family.

Before the "Sketch-Book" was launched, and while Irving was casting about

for the means of livelihood, Walter Scott urged him to take the

editorship of an anti-Jacobin periodical in Edinburgh. This he declined

because he had no taste for politics, and because he was averse to

stated, routine literary work. Subsequently Mr. Murray offered him a

salary of a thousand guineas to edit a periodical to be published by

himself. This was declined, as also was another offer to contribute to

the "London Quarterly" with the liberal pay of one hundred guineas an

article. For the "Quarterly" he would not write, because, he says,

"it has always been so hostile to my country, I cannot draw a pen in its

service." This is worthy of note in view of a charge made afterwards,

when he was attacked for his English sympathies, that he was a frequent

contributor to this anti-American review. His sole contributions to it

were a gratuitous review of the book of an American author, and an

explanatory article, written at the desire of his publisher, on the

"Conquest of Granada." It is not necessary to dwell upon the small

scandal about Irving's un-American' feeling. If there was ever a man who

loved his country and was proud of it; whose broad, deep, and strong

patriotism did not need the saliency of ignorant partisanship, it was

Washington Irving. He was, like his namesake, an American, and with the

same pure loyalty and unpartisan candor.

The first number of the "Sketch-Book" was published in America in May,

1819. Irving was then thirty-six years old. The series was not

completed till September, 1820. The first installment was carried mainly

by two papers, "The Wife" and "Rip Van Winkle:" the one full of tender

pathos that touched all hearts, because it was recognized as a genuine

expression of the author's nature; and the other a happy effort of

imaginative humor, one of those strokes of genius that re-create the

world and clothe it with the unfading hues of romance; the theme was an

old-world echo, transformed by genius into a primal story that will

endure as long as the Hudson flows through its mountains to the sea.

A great artist can paint a great picture on a small canvas.

The "Sketch-Book" created a sensation in America, and the echo of it was

not long in reaching England. The general chorus of approval and the

rapid sale surprised Irving, and sent his spirits up, but success had the

effect on him that it always has on a fine nature. He writes to Leslie:

"Now you suppose I am all on the alert, and full of spirit and

excitement. No such thing. I am just as good for nothing as ever I was;

and, indeed, have been flurried and put out of my way by these pufflngs.

I feel something as I suppose you did when your picture met with success,

--anxious to do something better, and at a loss what to do."

It was with much misgiving that Irving made this venture. "I feel great

diffidence," he writes Brevoort, March 3, 1819, "about this reappearance

in literature. I am conscious of my imperfections, and my mind has been

for a long time past so pressed upon and agitated by various cares and

anxieties, that I fear it has lost much of its cheerfulness and some of

its activity. I have attempted no lofty theme, nor sought to look wise

and learned, which appears to be very much the fashion among our American

writers at present. I have preferred addressing myself to the feelings

and fancy of the reader more than to his judgment. My writings may

appear, therefore, light and trifling in our country of philosophers and

politicians. But if they possess merit in the class of literature to

which they belong, it is all to which I aspire in the work. I seek only

to blow a flute accompaniment in the national concert, and leave others

to play the fiddle and Frenchhorn." This diffidence was not assumed.

All through his career, a breath of criticism ever so slight acted

temporarily like a boar-frost upon his productive power. He always saw

reasons to take sides with his critic. Speaking of "vanity" in a letter

of March, 1820, when Scott and Lockhart and all the Reviews were in a

full chorus of acclaim, he says: "I wish I did possess more of it, but it

seems my curse at present to have anything but confidence in myself or

pleasure in anything I have written."

In a similar strain he had written, in September, 1819, on the news of

the cordial reception of the "Sketch-Book" in America:

"The manner in which the work has been received, and the eulogiums

that have been passed upon it in the American papers and periodical

works, have completely overwhelmed me. They go far, far beyond my

most sanguine expectations, and indeed are expressed with such

peculiar warmth and kindness as to affect me in the tenderest

manner. The receipt of your letter, and the reading of some of the

criticisms this morning, have rendered me nervous for the whole day.

I feel almost appalled by such success, and fearful that it cannot

be real, or that it is not fully merited, or that I shall not act up

to the expectations that may be formed. We are whimsically

constituted beings. I had got out of conceit of all that I had

written, and considered it very questionable stuff; and now that it

is so extravagantly be praised, I begin to feel afraid that I shall

not do as well again. However, we shall see as we get on. As yet I

am extremely irregular and precarious in my fits of composition.

The least thing puts me out of the vein, and even applause flurries

me and prevents my writing, though of course it will ultimately be a

stimulus . . . .

"I have been somewhat touched by the manner in which my writings

have been noticed in the 'Evening Post.' I had considered Coleman

as cherishing an ill-will toward me, and, to tell the truth, have

not always been the most courteous in my opinions concerning him.

It is a painful thing either to dislike others or to fancy they

dislike us, and I have felt both pleasure and self-reproach at

finding myself so mistaken with respect to Mr. Coleman. I like to

out with a good feeling as soon as it rises, and so I have dropt

Coleman a line on the subject.

"I hope you will not attribute all this sensibility to the kind

reception I have met to an author's vanity. I am sure it proceeds

from very different sources. Vanity could not bring the tears into

my eyes as they have been brought by the kindness of my countrymen.

I have felt cast down, blighted, and broken-spirited, and these

sudden rays of sunshine agitate me more than they revive me. I

hope--I hope I may yet do something more worthy of the appreciation

lavished on me."

Irving had not contemplated publishing in England, but the papers began

to be reprinted, and he was obliged to protect himself. He offered the

sketches to Murray, the princely publisher, who afterwards dealt so

liberally with him, but the venture was declined in a civil note, written

in that charming phraseology with which authors are familiar, but which

they would in vain seek to imitate. Irving afterwards greatly prized

this letter. He undertook the risks of the publication himself, and the

book sold well, although "written by an author the public knew nothing

of, and published by a bookseller who was going to ruin." In a few

months Murray, who was thereafter proud to be Irving's publisher,

undertook the publication of the two volumes of the "Sketch-Book," and

also of the "Knickerbocker" history, which Mr. Lockhart had just been

warmly praising in "Blackwood's." Indeed, he bought the copyright of the

"Sketch-Book" for two hundred pounds. The time for the publisher's

complaisance had arrived sooner even than Scott predicted in one of his

kindly letters to Irving, "when

"'Your name is up and may go

From Toledo to Madrid.'"

Irving passed five years in England. Once recognized by the literary

world, whatever was best in the society of letters and of fashion was

open to him. He was a welcome guest in the best London houses, where he

met the foremost literary personages of the time, and established most

cordial relations with many of them; not to speak of statesmen, soldiers,

and men and women of fashion, there were the elder D'Israeli, Southey,

Campbell, Hallam, Gifford, Milman, Foscolo, Rogers, Scott, and Belzoni

fresh from his Egyptian explorations. In Irving's letters this old

society passes in review: Murray's drawing-rooms; the amusing

blue-stocking coteries of fashion of which Lady Caroline Lamb was a

promoter; the Countess of Besborough's, at whose house the Duke could be

seen; the Wimbledon country seat of Lord and Lady Spence; Belzoni, a

giant of six feet five, the center of a group of eager auditors of the

Egyptian marvels; Hallam, affable and unpretending, and a copious talker;

Gifford, a small, shriveled, deformed man of sixty, with something of a

humped back, eyes that diverge, and a large mouth, reclining on a sofa,

propped up by cushions, with none of the petulance that you would expect

from his Review, but a mild, simple, unassuming man,--he it is who prunes

the contributions and takes the sting out of them (one would like to have

seen them before the sting was taken out); and Scott, the right

honest-hearted, entering into the passing scene with the hearty enjoyment

of a child, to whom literature seems a sport rather than a labor or

ambition, an author void of all the petulance, egotism, and peculiarities

of the craft. We have Moore's authority for saying that the literary

dinner described in the "Tales of a Traveller," whimsical as it seems and

pervaded by the conventional notion of the relations of publishers and

authors, had a personal foundation. Irving's satire of both has always

the old-time Grub Street flavor, or at least the reminiscent tone, which

is, by the way, quite characteristic of nearly everything that he wrote

about England. He was always a little in the past tense. Buckthorne's

advice to his friend is, never to be eloquent to an author except in

praise of his own works, or, what is nearly as acceptable, in

disparagement of the work of his contemporaries. "If ever he speaks

favorably of the productions of a particular friend, dissent boldly from

him; pronounce his friend to be a blockhead; never fear his being vexed.

Much as people speak of the irritability of authors, I never found one to

take offense at such contradictions. No, no, sir, authors are

particularly candid in admitting the faults of their friends." At the

dinner Buckthorne explains the geographical boundaries in the land of

literature: you may judge tolerably well of an author's popularity by the

wine his bookseller gives him. "An author crosses the port line about

the third edition, and gets into claret; and when he has reached the

sixth or seventh, he may revel in champagne and burgundy." The two ends

of the table were occupied by the two partners, one of whom laughed at

the clever things said by the poet, while the other maintained his

sedateness and kept on carving. "His gravity was explained to us by my

friend Buckthorne. He informed me that the concerns of the house were

admirably distributed among the partners. Thus, for instance, said he,

the grave gentleman is the carving partner, who attends to the joints;

and the other is the laughing partner, who attends to the jokes." If any

of the jokes from the lower end of the table reached the upper end, they

seldom produced much effect. "Even the laughing partner did not think it

necessary to honor them with a smile; which my neighbor Buckthorne

accounted for by informing me that there was a certain degree of

popularity to be obtained before a book seller could afford to laugh at

an author's jokes."

In August, 1820, we find Irving in Paris, where his reputation secured

him a hearty welcome: he was often at the Cannings' and at Lord

Holland's; Talma, then the king of the stage, became his friend, and

there he made the acquaintance of Thomas Moore, which ripened into a

familiar and lasting friendship. The two men were drawn to each other;

Irving greatly admired the "noble hearted, manly, spirited little fellow,

with a mind as generous as his fancy is brilliant." Talma was playing

"Hamlet" to overflowing houses, which hung on his actions with breathless

attention, or broke into ungovernable applause; ladies were carried

fainting from the boxes. The actor is described as short in stature,

rather inclined to fat, with a large face and a thick neck; his eyes are

bluish, and have a peculiar cast in them at times. He said to Irving

that he thought the French character much changed--graver; the day of the

classic drama, mere declamation and fine language, had gone by;

the Revolution had taught them to demand real life, incident, passion,

character. Irving's life in Paris was gay enough, and seriously

interfered with his literary projects. He had the fortunes of his

brother Peter on his mind also, and invested his earnings, then and for

some years after, in enterprises for his benefit that ended in

disappointment.

The "Sketch-Book" was making a great fame for him in England. Jeffrey,

in the "Edinburgh Review," paid it a most flattering tribute, and even

the savage "Quarterly" praised it. A rumor attributed it to Scott, who

was always masquerading; at least, it was said, he might have revised it,

and should have the credit of its exquisite style. This led to a

sprightly correspondence between Lady Littleton, the daughter of Earl

Spencer, one of the most accomplished and lovely women of England, and

Benjamin Rush, Minister to the Court of St. James, in the course of which

Mr. Rush suggested the propriety of giving out under his official seal

that Irving was the author of "Waverley." "Geoffrey Crayon is the most

fashionable fellow of the day," wrote the painter Leslie. Lord Byron, in

a letter to Murray, underscored his admiration of the author, and

subsequently said to an American, "His Crayon,--I know it by heart; at

least, there is not a passage that I cannot refer to immediately."

And afterwards he wrote to Moore, "His writings are my delight." There

seemed to be, as some one wrote, "a kind of conspiracy to hoist him over

the heads of his contemporaries." Perhaps the most satisfactory evidence

of his popularity was his publisher's enthusiasm. The publisher is an

infallible contemporary barometer.

It is worthy of note that an American should have captivated public

attention at the moment when Scott and Byron were the idols of the

English-reading world.

In the following year Irving was again in England, visiting his sister in

Birmingham, and tasting moderately the delights of London. He was,

indeed, something of an invalid. An eruptive malady,--the revenge of

nature, perhaps, for defeat in her earlier attack on his lungs,-appearing

in his ankles, incapacitated him for walking, tormented him at intervals

so that literary composition was impossible, sent him on pilgrimages to

curative springs, and on journeys undertaken for distraction and

amusement, in which all work except that of seeing and absorbing material

had to be postponed. He was subject to this recurring invalidism all his

life, and we must regard a good part of the work he did as a pure triumph

of determination over physical discouragement. This year the fruits of

his interrupted labor appeared in "Bracebridge Hall," a volume that was

well received, but did not add much to his reputation, though it

contained "Dolph Heyliger," one of his most characteristic Dutch stories,

and the "Stout Gentleman," one of his daintiest and most artistic bits of

restrained humor.--['I was once' says his biographer reading aloud in his

presence a very flattering review of his works, which, had been sent him

by the critic in 1848, and smiled as I came to this sentence: 'His most

comical pieces have always a serious end in view.'--'You laugh,' said he,

but it is true. I have kept that to myself hitherto, but that man has

found me out. He has detected the moral of the Stout Gentleman with that

air of whimsical significance so natural to him.']

Irving sought relief from his malady by an extended tour in Germany.

He sojourned some time in Dresden, whither his reputation had preceded

him, and where he was cordially and familiarly received, not only by the

foreign residents, but at the prim and antiquated little court of King

Frederick Augustus and Queen Amalia. Of Irving at this time Mrs. Emily

Fuller (nee Foster), whose relations with him have been referred to,

wrote in 1860:

"He was thoroughly a gentleman, not merely in external manners

and look, but to the innermost fibres and core of his heart;

sweet-tempered, gentle, fastidious, sensitive, and gifted with the

warmest affections; the most delightful and invariably interesting

companion; gay and full of humor, even in spite of occasional fits

of melancholy, which he was, however, seldom subject to when with

those he liked; a gift of conversation that flowed like a full

river in sunshine,--bright, easy, and abundant."

Those were pleasant days at Dresden, filled up with the society of bright

and warm-hearted people, varied by royal boar hunts, stiff ceremonies at

the little court, tableaux, and private theatricals, yet tinged with a

certain melancholy, partly constitutional, that appears in most of his

letters. His mind was too unsettled for much composition. He had little

self-confidence, and was easily put out by a breath of adverse criticism.

At intervals he would come to the Fosters to read a manuscript of his

own.

"On these occasions strict orders were given that no visitor should

be admitted till the last word had been read, and the whole praised

or criticised, as the case may be. Of criticism, however, we were

very spare, as a slight word would put him out of conceit of a whole

work. One of the best things he has published was thrown aside,

unfinished, for years, because the friend to whom he read it,

happening, unfortunately, not to be well, and sleepy, did not seem

to take the interest in it he expected. Too easily discouraged, it

was not till the latter part of his career that he ever appreciated

himself as an author. One condemning whisper sounded louder in his

ear than the plaudits of thousands."

This from Miss Emily Foster, who elsewhere notes his kindliness in

observing life:

"Some persons, in looking upon life, view it as they would view a

picture, with a stern and criticising eye. He also looks upon life

as a picture, but to catch its beauties, its lights,--not its

defects and shadows. On the former he loves to dwell. He has a

wonderful knack at shutting his eyes to the sinister side of

anything. Never beat a more kindly heart than his; alive to the

sorrows, but not to the faults, of his friends, but doubly alive to

their virtues and goodness. Indeed, people seemed to grow more good

with one so unselfish and so gentle."

In London, some years later:

"He was still the same; time changed him very little. His

conversation was as interesting as ever [he was always an excellent

relater]; his dark gray eyes still full of varying feeling; his smile

'half playful, half melancholy, but ever kind. All that was mean,

or envious, or harsh, he seemed to turn from so completely that,

when with him, it seemed that such things were not. All gentle and

tender affections, Nature in her sweetest or grandest moods,

pervaded his whole imagination, and left no place for low or evil

thoughts; and when in good spirits, his humor, his droll

descriptions, and his fun would make the gravest or the saddest

laugh."

As to Irving's "state of mind" in Dresden, it is pertinent to quote a

passage from what we gather to be a journal kept by Miss Flora Foster:

"He has written. He has confessed to my mother, as to a true and

dear friend, his love for E----, and his conviction of its utter

hopelessness. He feels himself unable to combat it. He thinks he

must try, by absence, to bring more peace to his mind. Yet he

cannot bear to give up our friendship,--an intercourse become so

dear to him, and so necessary to his daily happiness. Poor Irving!"

It is well for our peace of mind that we do not know what is going down

concerning us in "journals." On his way to the Herrnhuthers, Mr. Irving

wrote to Mrs. Foster:

"When I consider how I have trifled with my time, suffered painful

vicissitudes of feeling, which for a time damaged both mind and

body,--when I consider all this, I reproach myself that I did not

listen to the first impulse of my mind, and abandon Dresden long

since. And yet I think of returning! Why should I come back to

Dresden? The very inclination that dooms me thither should furnish

reasons for my staying away."

In this mood, the Herrnhuthers, in their right-angled, whitewashed world,

were little attractive.

"If the Herrnhuthers were right in their notions, the world would

have been laid out in squares and angles and right lines, and

everything would have been white and black and snuff-color, as they

have been clipped by these merciless retrenchers of beauty and

enjoyment. And then their dormitories! Think of between one and

two hundred of these simple gentlemen cooped up at night in one

great chamber! What a concert of barrel-organs in this great

resounding saloon! And then their plan of marriage! The very birds

of the air choose their mates from preference and inclination; but

this detestable system of lot! The sentiment of love may be, and

is, in a great measure, a fostered growth of poetry and romance, and

balder-dashed with false sentiment; but with all its vitiations, it

is the beauty and the charm, the flavor and the fragrance, of all

intercourse between man and woman; it is the rosy cloud in the

morning of life; and if it does too often resolve itself into the

shower, yet, to my mind, it only makes our nature more fruitful in

what is excellent and amiable."

Better suited him Prague, which is certainly a part of the "naughty

world" that Irving preferred:

"Old Prague still keeps up its warrior look, and swaggers about with

its rusty corselet and helm, though both sadly battered. There

seems to me to be an air of style and fashion about the first people

of Prague, and a good deal of beauty in the fashionable circle.

This, perhaps, is owing to my contemplating it from a distance, and

my imagination lending it tints occasionally. Both actors and

audience, contemplated from the pit of a theatre, look better than

when seen in the boxes and behind the scenes. I like to contemplate

society in this way occasionally, and to dress it up by the help of

fancy, to my own taste. When I get in the midst of it, it is too

apt to lose its charm, and then there is the trouble and ennui of

being obliged to take an active part in the farce; but to be a mere

spectator is amusing. I am glad, therefore, that I brought no

letters to Prague. I shall leave it with a favorable idea of its

society and manners, from knowing nothing accurate of either; and

with a firm belief that every pretty woman I have seen is an angel,

as I am apt to think every pretty woman, until I have found her

out."

In July, 1823, Irving returned to Paris, to the society of the Moores and

the fascinations of the gay town, and to fitful literary work. Our

author wrote with great facility and rapidity when the inspiration was on

him, and produced an astonishing amount of manuscript in a short period;

but he often waited and fretted through barren weeks and months for the

movement of his fitful genius. His mind was teeming constantly with new

projects, and nothing could exceed his industry when once he had taken a

work in hand; but he never acquired the exact methodical habits which

enable some literary men to calculate their power and quantity of

production as accurately as that of a cotton mill.

The political changes in France during the period of Irving's long

sojourn in Paris do not seem to have taken much of his attention. In a

letter dated October 5, 1826, he says: "We have had much bustle in Paris

of late, between the death of one king and the succession of another.

I have become a little callous to public sights, but have,

notwithstanding, been to see the funeral of the late king, and the

entrance into Paris of the present one. Charles X. begins his reign in a

very conciliating manner, and is really popular. The Bourbons have

gained great accession of power within a few years."

The succession of Charles X. was also observed by another foreigner,

who was making agreeable personal notes at that time in Paris, but who is

not referred to by Irving, who, for some unexplained reason, failed to

meet the genial Scotsman at breakfast. Perhaps it is to his failure to

do so that he owes the semi-respectful reference to himself in Carlyle's

"Reminiscences." Lacking the stimulus to his vocabulary of personal

acquaintance, Carlyle simply wrote: "Washington Irving was said to be in

Paris, a kind of lion at that time, whose books I somewhat esteemed.

One day the Emerson-Tennant people bragged that they had engaged him to

breakfast with us at a certain cafe next morning. We all attended duly,

Strackey among the rest, but no Washington came. 'Could n't rightly

come,' said Malcolm to me in a judicious aside, as we cheerfully

breakfasted without him. I never saw Washington at all, but still have a

mild esteem of the good man." This ought to be accepted as evidence of

Carlyle's disinclination to say ill-natured things of those he did not

know.

The "Tales of a Traveller" appeared in 1826. In the author's opinion,

with which the best critics agreed, it contained some of his best

writing. He himself said in a letter to Brevoort, "There was more of an

artistic touch about it, though this is not a thing to be appreciated by

the many." It was rapidly written. The movement has a delightful

spontaneity, and it is wanting in none of the charms of his style,

unless, perhaps, the style is over-refined; but it was not a novelty, and

the public began to criticise and demand a new note. This may have been

one reason why he turned to a fresh field and to graver themes. For a

time he busied himself on some American essays of a semi-political

nature, which were never finished, and he seriously contemplated a Life

of Washington; but all these projects were thrown aside for one that

kindled his imagination,--the Life of Columbus; and in February, 1826, he

was domiciled at Madrid, and settled down to a long period of unremitting

and intense labor.

The Complete Project Gutenberg Writings of Charles Dudley Warner · 第 502 / 509 题