In favour of experimental illustration he says:--

"I need not point out ... the difference in the perceptive powers of

the eye and the ear, and the facility and clearness with which the

first of these organs conveys ideas to the mind--ideas which, being

thus gained, are held far more retentively and firmly in the memory

than when introduced by the ear.... Apparatus, therefore, is an

essential part of every lecture in which it can be introduced.... When

... apparatus is to be exhibited, some kind of order should be

observed in the arrangement of them on the lecture-table. Every

particular part illustrative of the lecture should be in view, no one

thing should hide another from the audience, nor should anything stand

in the way of or obstruct the lecturer. They should be so placed, too,

as to produce a kind of uniformity in appearance. No one part should

appear naked and another crowded, unless some particular reason

exists and makes it necessary to be so."

On October 13, 1813, Faraday left the Royal Institution, in order to

accompany Sir Humphry Davy in a tour on the Continent. His journal

gives some interesting details, showing the inconveniences of foreign

travel at that time. Sir Humphry Davy took his carriage with him in

pieces, and these had to be put together after escaping the dangers of

the French custom-house on the quay at Morlaix, two years before the

battle of Waterloo.

One apparently trivial incident somewhat marred Faraday's pleasure

throughout this journey. It was originally intended that the party

should comprise Sir Humphry and Lady Davy, Faraday, and Sir Humphry's

valet, but at the last moment that most important functionary declined

to leave his native shores. Davy then requested Faraday to undertake

such of the duties of valet as were essential to the well-being of the

party, promising to secure the services of a suitable person in Paris.

But no eligible candidate appeared for the appointment, and thus

Faraday had throughout to take charge of domestic affairs as well as

to assist in experiments. Had there been only Sir Humphry and himself,

this would have been no hardship. Sir Humphry had been accustomed to

humble life in his early days; but the case was different with his

lady, and, apparently, Faraday was more than once on the point of

leaving his patron and returning home alone. A circumstance which

occurred at Geneva illustrates the position of affairs. Professor E.

de la Rive invited Sir Humphry and Lady Davy and Faraday to dinner.

Sir Humphry could not go into society with one who, in some respects,

acted as his valet. When this point was represented to the professor,

he replied that he was sorry, as it would necessitate his giving

another dinner-party. Faraday subsequently kept up a correspondence

with De la Rive, and continued it with his son. In writing to the

latter he says, in speaking of Professor E. de la Rive, that he was

"the first who personally at Geneva, and afterwards by correspondence,

encouraged and by that sustained me."

At Paris Faraday met many of the most distinguished men of science of

the time. One morning Ampere, Clement, and Desormes called on Davy, to

show him some iodine, a substance which had been discovered only about

two years before, and Davy, while in Paris, and afterwards at

Montpellier, executed a series of experiments upon it. After three

months' stay, the party left Paris for Italy, _via_ Montpellier, Aix,

and Nice, whence they crossed the Col de Tende to Turin. The transfer

of the carriage and baggage across the Alps was effected by a party of

sixty-five men, with sledges and a number of mules. The description of

the journey, as recorded in Faraday's diary, makes us respect the

courage of an Englishman who, in the early part of this century, would

attempt the conveyance of a carriage across the Alps in the winter.

"From Turin we proceeded to Genoa, which place we left afterwards in

an open boat, and proceeded by sea towards Lerici. This place we

reached after a very disagreeable passage, and not without

apprehensions of being overset by the way. As there was nothing there

very enticing, we continued our route to Florence; and, after a stay

of three weeks or a month, left that fine city, and in four days

arrived here at Rome." The foregoing is from Faraday's letter to his

mother. At Florence a good deal of time was spent in the Academia del

Cimento. Here Faraday saw the telescope with which Galileo discovered

Jupiter's satellites, with its tube of wood and paper about three feet

and a half long, and simple object-glass and eye-glass. A red velvet

electric machine with a rubber of gold paper, Leyden jars pierced by

the discharge between their armatures, the first lens constructed by

Galileo, and a number of other objects, were full of interest to the

recently enfranchised bookbinder's apprentice; but it was the great

burning-glass of the grand-duke which was the most serviceable of all

the treasures of the museum. With this glass--which consisted of two

convex lenses about three feet six inches apart, the first lens having

a diameter of about fourteen or fifteen inches, and the second a

diameter of three inches--Davy succeeded in burning several diamonds

in oxygen gas, and in proving that the diamond consists of little else

than carbon. In 1818 Faraday published a paper on this subject in the

_Quarterly Journal of Science_. At Genoa some experiments were made

with the torpedo, but the specimens caught were very small and weak,

and their shocks so feeble that no definite results were obtained. At

Rome Davy attempted to repeat an experiment of Signor Morrichini,

whereby a steel needle was magnetized by causing the concentrated

violet and blue rays from the sun to traverse the needle from the

middle to the north end several times. The experiment did not succeed

in the hands of Davy and Faraday, and it was left to the latter to

discover a relation between magnetism and light. From Rome they

visited Naples and ascended Vesuvius, and shortly afterwards left

Italy for Geneva. In the autumn of 1814 they returned from Switzerland

through Germany, visiting Berne, Zurich, the Tyrol, Padua, Venice, and

Bologne, to Florence, where Davy again carried out some chemical

investigations in the laboratory of the academy. Thence they returned

to Rome, and in the spring went on to Naples, and again visited

Vesuvius, returning to England in April, _via_ Rome, the Tyrol,

Stuttgart, Brussels, and Ostend.

A fortnight after his return from the Continent Faraday was again

assistant at the Royal Institution, but with a salary of thirty

shillings a week. His character will be sufficiently evident from the

quotations which have been given from his diary and letters.

Henceforth we must be mainly occupied with the consideration of his

scientific work.

In January, 1816, he gave his first lecture to the City Philosophical

Society. In a lecture delivered shortly afterwards before the same

society, the following passage, which gives an idea of one of the

current beliefs of the time, occurs:--

"The conclusion that is now generally received appears to be that

light consists of minute atoms of matter of an octahedral form,

possessing polarity, and varying in size or in velocity....

"If now we conceive a change as far beyond vaporization as that is

above fluidity, and then take into account also the proportional

increased extent of alteration as the changes rise, we shall, perhaps,

if we can form any conception at all, not fall far short of radiant

matter;[6] and as in the last conversion many qualities were lost, so

here also many more would disappear.

[Footnote 6: Not Crookes's.]

"It was the opinion of Newton, and of many other distinguished

philosophers, that this conversion was possible, and continually going

on in the processes of nature, and they found that the idea would bear

without injury the application of mathematical reasoning--as regards

heat, for instance. If assumed, we must also assume the simplicity of

matter; for it would follow that all the variety of substances with

which we are acquainted could be converted into one of three kinds of

radiant matter, which again may differ from one another only in the

size of their particles or their form. The properties of known bodies

would then be supposed to arise from the varied arrangements of their

ultimate atoms, and belong to substances only as long as their

compound nature existed; and thus variety of matter and variety of

properties would be found co-essential. The simplicity of such a

system is singularly beautiful, the idea grand and worthy of Newton's

approbation. It was what the ancients believed, and it may be what a

future race will realize."

In the closing words of his fifth lecture to the City Philosophical

Society, Faraday said:--

"The philosopher should be a man willing to listen to every

suggestion, but determined to judge for himself. He should not be

biassed by any appearances; have no favourite hypothesis; be of no

school; and in doctrine have no master. He should not be a respecter

of persons, but of things. Truth should be his primary object. If to

these qualities be added industry, he may indeed hope to walk within

the veil of the temple of nature."

Many years afterwards he stated that, of all the suggestions to which

he had patiently listened after his lectures at the Royal Institution,

only one proved on investigation to be of any value, and that led to

the discovery of the "extra current" and the whole subject of

self-induction.

Faraday always kept a note-book, in which he jotted down any thoughts

which occurred to him in reference to his work, as well as extracts

from books or other publications which attracted his attention. He

called it his "commonplace-book." Many of the queries which he here

took note of he subsequently answered by experiment. For example:--

"Query: the nature of sounds produced by flame in tubes."

"Convert magnetism into electricity."

"General effects of compression, either in condensing gases or

producing solutions, or even giving combinations at low temperature."

"Do the pith-balls diverge by the disturbance of electricity through

mutual induction or not?"

Speaking of this book, he says, "I already owe much to these notes,

and think such a collection worth the making by every scientific man.

I am sure none would think the trouble lost after a year's

experience."

Heroes of Science: Physicists · 第 35 / 65 题