I must reserve other remarks upon this subject for another occasion.

SANCTUARIES OF OROPA AND GRAGLIA. (FROM CHAPTERS XV. AND XVI. OF ALPS

AND SANCTUARIES.)

The morning after our arrival at Biella, we took the daily diligence for

Oropa, leaving Biella at eight o'clock. Before we were clear of the town

we could see the long line of the hospice, and the chapels dotted about

near it, high up in a valley at some distance off; presently we were

shown another fine building some eight or nine miles away, which we were

told was the sanctuary of Graglia. About this time the pictures and

statuettes of the Madonna began to change their hue and to become

black--for the sacred image of Oropa being black, all the Madonnas in her

immediate neighbourhood are of the same complexion. Underneath some of

them is written, "Nigra sum sed sum formosa," which, as a rule, was more

true as regards the first epithet than the second.

It was not market-day, but streams of people were coming to the town.

Many of them were pilgrims returning from the sanctuary, but more were

bringing the produce of their farms or the work of their hands for sale.

We had to face a steady stream of chairs, which were coming to town in

baskets upon women's heads. Each basket contained twelve chairs, though

whether it is correct to say that the basket contained the chairs--when

the chairs were all, so to say, froth running over the top of the

basket--is a point I cannot settle. Certainly we had never seen anything

like so many chairs before, and felt almost as though we had surprised

nature in the laboratory wherefrom she turns out the chair-supply of the

world. The road continued through a succession of villages almost

running into one another for a long way after Biella was passed, but

everywhere we noticed the same air of busy thriving industry which we had

seen in Biella itself. We noted also that a preponderance of the people

had light hair, while that of the children was frequently nearly white,

as though the infusion of German blood was here stronger even than usual.

Though so thickly peopled, the country was of great beauty. Near at hand

were the most exquisite pastures close shaven after their second mowing,

gay with autumnal crocuses, and shaded with stately chestnuts; beyond

were rugged mountains, in a combe on one of which we saw Oropa itself now

gradually nearing; behind, and below, many villages, with vineyards and

terraces cultivated to the highest perfection; farther on, Biella already

distant, and beyond this a "big stare," as an American might say, over

the plains of Lombardy from Turin to Milan, with the Apennines from Genoa

to Bologna hemming the horizon. On the road immediately before us, we

still faced the same steady stream of chairs flowing ever Biella-ward.

After a couple of hours the houses became more rare; we got above the

sources of the chair-stream; bits of rough rock began to jut out from the

pasture; here and there the rhododendron began to shew itself by the

roadside; the chestnuts left off along a line as level as though cut with

a knife; stone-roofed _cascine_ began to abound, with goats and cattle

feeding near them; the booths of the religious trinket-mongers increased;

the blind, halt, and maimed became more importunate, and the

foot-passengers were more entirely composed of those whose object was, or

had been, a visit to the sanctuary itself. The numbers of these

pilgrims--generally in their Sunday's best, and often comprising the

greater part of a family--were so great, though there was no special

festa, as to testify to the popularity of the institution. They

generally walked barefoot, and carried their shoes and stockings; their

baggage consisted of a few spare clothes, a little food, and a pot or pan

or two to cook with. Many of them looked very tired, and had evidently

tramped from long distances--indeed, we saw costumes belonging to valleys

which could not be less than two or three days distant. They were almost

invariably quiet, respectable, and decently clad, sometimes a little

merry, but never noisy, and none of them tipsy. As we travelled along

the road, we must have fallen in with several hundreds of these pilgrims

coming and going; nor is this likely to be an extravagant estimate,

seeing that the hospice can make up more than five thousand beds. By

eleven we were at the sanctuary itself.

Fancy a quiet upland valley, the floor of which is about the same height

as the top of Snowdon, shut in by lofty mountains upon three sides, while

on the fourth the eye wanders at will over the plains below. Fancy

finding a level space in such a valley watered by a beautiful mountain

stream, and nearly filled by a pile of collegiate buildings, not less

important than those, we will say, of Trinity College, Cambridge. True,

Oropa is not in the least like Trinity, except that one of its courts is

large, grassy, has a chapel and a fountain in it, and rooms all round it;

but I do not know how better to give a rough description of Oropa than by

comparing it with one of our largest English colleges.

The buildings consist of two main courts. The first comprises a couple

of modern wings, connected by the magnificent facade of what is now the

second or inner court. This facade dates from about the middle of the

seventeenth century; its lowest storey is formed by an open colonnade,

and the whole stands upon a raised terrace from which a noble flight of

steps descends into the outer court.

Ascending the steps and passing under the colonnade, we find ourselves in

the second or inner court, which is a complete quadrangle, and is, so at

least we were told, of rather older date than the facade. This is the

quadrangle which gives its collegiate character to Oropa. It is

surrounded by cloisters on three sides, on to which the rooms in which

the pilgrims are lodged open--those at least that are on the

ground-floor, but there are three storeys. The chapel, which was

dedicated in the year 1600, juts out into the court upon the north-east

side. On the north-west and south-west sides are entrances through which

one may pass to the open country. The grass at the time of our visit was

for the most part covered with sheets spread out to dry. They looked

very nice, and, dried on such grass, and in such an air, they must be

delicious to sleep on. There is, indeed, rather an appearance as though

it were a perpetual washing-day at Oropa, but this is not to be wondered

at considering the numbers of comers and goers; besides, people in Italy

do not make so much fuss about trifles as we do. If they want to wash

their sheets and dry them, they do not send them to Ealing, but lay them

out in the first place that comes handy, and nobody's bones are broken.

On the east side of the main block of buildings there is a grassy slope

adorned with chapels that contain figures illustrating scenes in the

history of the Virgin. These figures are of terra-cotta, for the most

part life-size, and painted up to nature. In some cases, if I remember

rightly, they have hemp or flax for hair, as at Varallo, and throughout

realism is aimed at as far as possible, not only in the figures, but in

the accessories. We have very little of the same kind in England. In

the Tower of London there is an effigy of Queen Elizabeth going to the

city to give thanks for the defeat of the Spanish Armada. This looks as

if it might have been the work of some one of the Valsesian sculptors.

There are also the figures that strike the quarters of Sir John Bennett's

city clock in Cheapside. The automatic movements of these last-named

figures would have struck the originators of the Varallo chapels with

envy. They aimed at realism so closely that they would assuredly have

had recourse to clockwork in some one or two of their chapels; I cannot

doubt, for example, that they would have eagerly welcomed the idea of

making the cock crow to Peter by a cuckoo-clock arrangement, if it had

been presented to them. This opens up the whole question of realism

_versus_ conventionalism in art--a subject much too large to be treated

here.

As I have said, the founders of these Italian chapels aimed at realism.

Each chapel was intended as an illustration, and the desire was to bring

the whole scene more vividly before the faithful by combining the

picture, the statue, and the effect of a scene upon the stage in a single

work of art. The attempt would be an ambitious one though made once only

in a neighbourhood, but in most of the places in North Italy where

anything of the kind has been done, the people have not been content with

a single illustration; it has been their scheme to take a mountain as

though it had been a book or wall and cover it with illustrations. In

some cases--as at Orta, whose Sacro Monte is perhaps the most beautiful

of all as regards the site itself--the failure is complete, but in some

of the chapels at Varese and in many of those at Varallo, great works

have been produced which have not yet attracted as much attention as they

deserve. It may be doubted, indeed, whether there is a more remarkable

work of art in North Italy than the crucifixion chapel at Varallo, where

the twenty-five statues, as well as the frescoes behind them, are (with

the exception of the figure of Christ, which has been removed) by

Gaudenzio Ferrari. It is to be wished that some one of these

chapels--both chapel and sculptures--were reproduced at South Kensington.

Varallo, which is undoubtedly the most interesting sanctuary in North

Italy, has forty-four of these illustrative chapels; Varese, fifteen;

Orta, eighteen; and Oropa, seventeen. No one is allowed to enter them,

except when repairs are needed; but when these are going on, as is

constantly the case, it is curious to look through the grating into the

somewhat darkened interior, and to see a living figure or two among the

statues; a little motion on the part of a single figure seems to

communicate itself to the rest and make them all more animated. If the

living figure does not move much, it is easy at first to mistake it for a

terra-cotta one. At Orta, some years since, looking one evening into a

chapel when the light was fading, I was surprised to see a saint whom I

had not seen before; he had no glory except what shone from a very red

nose; he was smoking a short pipe, and was painting the Virgin Mary's

face. The touch was a finishing one, put on with deliberation, slowly,

so that it was two or three seconds before I discovered that the

interloper was no saint.

The figures in the chapels at Oropa are not as good as the best of those

at Varallo, but some of them are very nice notwithstanding. We liked the

seventh chapel the best--the one which illustrates the sojourn of the

Virgin Mary in the Temple. It contains forty-four figures, and

represents the Virgin on the point of completing her education as head

girl at a high-toned academy for young gentlewomen. All the young ladies

are at work making mitres for the bishop, or working slippers in Berlin

wool for the new curate, but the Virgin sits on a dais above the others

on the same platform with the venerable lady-principal, who is having

passages read out to her from some standard Hebrew writer. The statues

are the work of a local sculptor, named Aureggio, who lived at the end of

the seventeenth and beginning of the eighteenth century.

The highest chapel must be a couple of hundred feet above the main

buildings, and from near it there is an excellent bird's-eye view of the

sanctuary and the small plain behind; descending on to this last, we

entered the quadrangle from the north-west side, and visited the chapel

in which the sacred image of the Madonna is contained. We did not see

the image itself, which is only exposed to public view on great

occasions. It is believed to have been carved by St. Luke the

Evangelist. It is said that at one time there was actually an

inscription on the image in Greek characters, of which the translation

is, "Eusebius. A token of respect and affection from his sincere friend,

Luke;" but this being written in chalk or pencil only, has been worn off,

and is known by tradition only. I must ask the reader to content himself

with the following account of it which I take from Marocco's work upon

Oropa:--

"That this statue of the Virgin is indeed by St. Luke is attested by

St. Eusebius, a man of eminent piety, and no less enlightened than

truthful, and the store which he set by it is proved by his shrinking

from no discomforts in his carriage of it from a distant country, and

by his anxiety to put it in a place of great security. His desire,

indeed, was to keep it in the spot which was most near and dear to

him, so that he might extract from it the higher incitement to

devotion, and more sensible comfort in the midst of his austerities

and apostolic labours.

"This truth is further confirmed by the quality of the wood from which

the statue is carved, which is commonly believed to be cedar; by the

Eastern character of the work; by the resemblance both of the

lineament and the colour to those of other statues by St. Luke; by the

tradition of the neighbourhood, which extends in an unbroken and well-

assured line to the time of St. Eusebius himself; by the miracles that

have been worked here by its presence, and elsewhere by its

invocation, or even by indirect contact with it; by the miracles,

lastly, which are inherent in the image itself, {311} and which endure

to this day, such as is its immunity from all worm and from the decay

which would naturally have occurred in it through time and damp--more

especially in the feet, through the rubbing of religious objects

against them.

* * * * *

"The authenticity of this image is so certainly and clearly

established, that all supposition to the contrary becomes inexplicable

and absurd. Such, for example, is a hypothesis that it should not be

attributed to the Evangelist, but to another Luke, also called

'Saint,' and a Florentine by birth. This painter lived in the

eleventh century--that is to say, about seven centuries after the

image of Oropa had been known and venerated! This is indeed an

anachronism.

"Other difficulties drawn either from the ancient discipline of the

Church or from St. Luke the Evangelist's profession, which was that of

a physician, vanish at once when it is borne in mind--firstly, that

the cult of holy images, and especially of that of the most blessed

Virgin, is of extreme antiquity in the Church, and of apostolic

origin, as is proved by ecclesiastical writers and monuments found in

the catacombs which date, as far back as the first century (see among

other authorities, Nicolas, La Vergine vivente nella Chiesa, lib. iii.

cap. iii. section 2); secondly, that as the medical profession does

not exclude that of artists, St. Luke may have been both artist and

physician; that he did actually handle both the brush and the scalpel

is established by respectable and very old traditions, to say nothing

of other arguments which can be found in impartial and learned writers

upon such matters."

Selections from Previous Works With Remarks on Romanes' Mental Evolution in Animals, and a Psalm of Montreal · 第 40 / 44 题