Here, for example, is Mr. Romanes' definition of instinct:--

"Instinct is reflex action into which there is imported the element of

consciousness. The term is therefore a generic one, comprising all

those faculties of mind which are concerned in conscious and adaptive

action, antecedent to individual experience, without necessary

knowledge of the relation between means employed and ends attained,

but similarly performed under similar and frequently recurring

circumstances by all the individuals of the same species." {240}

If Mr, Romanes would have been content to build frankly upon Professor

Hering's foundation, the soundness of which he has elsewhere abundantly

admitted, he might have said--

"Instinct is knowledge or habit acquired in past generations--the new

generation remembering what happened to it before it parted company with

the old." Then he might have added as a rider--

"If a habit is acquired as a new one, during any given lifetime, it is

not an instinct. If having been acquired in one lifetime it is

transmitted to offspring, it is an instinct in the offspring though it

was not an instinct in the parent. If the habit is transmitted

partially, it must be considered as partly instinctive and partly

acquired."

This is easy; it tells people how they may test any action so as to know

what they ought to call it; it leaves well alone by avoiding all such

debatable matters as reflex action, consciousness, intelligence, purpose,

knowledge of purpose, &c.; it both introduces the feature of inheritance

which is the one mainly distinguishing instinctive from so-called

intelligent actions, and shows the manner in which these last pass into

the first, that is to say, by way of memory and habitual repetition;

finally it points the fact that the new generation is not to be looked

upon as a new thing, but (as Dr. Erasmus Darwin long since said {241}) as

"a branch or elongation" of the one immediately preceding it.

But then to have said this would have made it too plain that Mr. Romanes

was following some one else. Mr. Romanes should remember that no one

would mind how much he took if he would only take it well. But this is

what those who take without due acknowledgment never do.

In Mr. Darwin's case it is hardly possible to exaggerate the waste of

time, money, and trouble that has been caused by his not having been

content to appear as descending with modification like other people from

those who went before him. It will take years to get the evolution

theory out of the mess in which Mr. Darwin has left it. He was heir to a

discredited truth; he left behind him an accredited fallacy. Mr.

Romanes, if he is not stopped in time, will get the theory connecting

heredity and memory into just such another muddle as Mr. Darwin has got

Evolution, for surely the writer who can talk about "_heredity being able

to work up_ the faculty of homing into the instinct of migration," {242a}

or of "the principle of (natural) selection combining with that of

lapsing intelligence to the formation of a joint result," {242b} is

little likely to depart from the usual methods of scientific procedure

with advantage either to himself or any one else. Fortunately Mr.

Romanes is not Mr. Darwin, and though he has certainly got Mr. Darwin's

mantle, and got it very much too, it will not on Mr. Romanes' shoulders

hide a good deal that people were not going to observe too closely while

Mr. Darwin wore it.

REMARKS ON MR. ROMANES' MENTAL EVOLUTION IN ANIMALS--(_concluded_).

I gather that in the end the late Mr. Darwin himself admitted the

soundness of the view which the reader will have found insisted upon in

the extracts from my earlier books given in this volume. Mr. Romanes

quotes a letter written by Mr. Darwin in the last year of his life, in

which he speaks of an intelligent action gradually becoming

"_instinctive_, _i.e._, _memory transmitted from one generation to

another_." {243a}

Briefly, the stages of Mr. Darwin's opinion upon the subject of

hereditary memory are as follows:--

1859. "It would be _the most serious error_ to suppose that the greater

number of instincts have been acquired by habit in one generation and

transmitted by inheritance to succeeding generations." {243b} And this

more especially applies to the instincts of many ants.

Selections from Previous Works With Remarks on Romanes' Mental Evolution in Animals, and a Psalm of Montreal · 第 31 / 44 题