John Wesley said: "Giving up witchcraft is giving up the Bible."

Sir Matthew Hale believed in witchcraft.

(b) The good and great men of many ages believed in hell--that is,

for somebody else. Practically hell is now in the lower case, if not

entirely closed up for repairs.

(c) Millions of good and wise men for many centuries believed that

this earth was flat, and that the sun went daily round it. And these

good and wise people burned all those who did not agree with them.

(d) Millions of the best of earth at one time believed that it was

right and proper to hang a man for stealing a sheep.

(e) At one time almost every body believed that it was well-pleasing

to God, for Christians to torture and murder heretics.

(f) Millions of the wisest and best men have at different times

believed that the world was speedily coming to an end.

(g) The great men of the past professed to believe in Christianity

because they were compelled to do so through fear of persecution,

torture, and death. Millions of prominent men in society to-day,

have to pretend to believe in the doctrines of the church in order

to be respectable.

(h) In every country under the sun people believe in their own

religion.--The good and great Mohammedans, believe in Islamism. The

good and great Buddhists believe in Buddhism, and the good and great

Brahmins, believe in Brahminism.

(i) The wise men of to-day in Europe and America do not believe in

Christianity. The men of science do not attempt to prove the claims

of Christianity.

It is claimed that Infidelity is demoralizing in its tendency.

(a) With such lives before us as those of Paine, Ingersoll, Palmer,

Bennett, Wright, Seaver, and many others this charge proves to be

groundless.

(b) Liberal principles are not degrading. Truth, liberty, and justice

cannot demoralize, but blind faith does.

"Infidels always repent on their death bed."

(a) Paine did not. Bennett did not. Dr. T. Brown did not. Courtlandt

Palmer, Horace Seaver, Elizur Wright, did not--and millions of other

good men have died tranquilly without any belief whatever in another

world.

"Can Infidelity save the world?"

One thing is certain, namely, that Christianity cannot do it, as it

has been trying to do so for eighteen centuries.

There is no such thing as salvation possible.

The world can be improved most rapidly by allowing everyone to

mind his own business--by giving man his natural and equal rights,

by inspiring him with liberty, for nothing so fully prepares people

for liberty as liberty itself.

"What has Freethought done for the world?"

(a) What has Christianity done for the world? Why it has built schools,

churches, and charitable institutions.

(b) It is true that Christianity instituted schools, colleges,

and universities; but not for the purpose of educating the people

in truth, but in only such knowledge as would not conflict with its

own superstitions. Christian schools have been for ages at war with

science and liberty.

(c) It is true that the church builds asylums for the poor--but it is

the church that is in a large degree responsible for the impoverished

condition of the people. And the very money that builds the almshouse

was begged from the poor, by the church. The church has nothing of

itself to give except preaching. When the church builds an institution

it first becomes a beggar.

(d) The church builds insane asylums. And the church has filled them

with her own people. There are more people made crazy and insane by

religious excitements than by any other one thing.

"What have Infidels given for education, charity, and science?"

We will give the names of six noted Freethinkers, and could give

more, but give these six to begin with: Stephen Girard, Robert Owen,

James Lick, William Maclure, John Rodman, and Peter Brigham. These

gentleman who were all Infidels, gave at least fifteen millions of

dollars for education, science, and charity. The vast sum given by

Stephen Girard for a secular education of orphan children has been

stolen by Christians and put to another use.

Orthodoxy and Liberalism Compared.

1. Orthodoxy has a creed, but Liberalism has none. A creed is something

you do not understand, but it is nevertheless necessary for you to

profess that you believe it--and the more unreasonable and impossible

this something is the greater merit you have in saying you believe it.

2. Orthodoxy has a Bible. Liberalism accepts all bibles and books

for what they are worth.

A handbook of Freethought · 第 213 / 221 题