IMMORTALITY.

There is still another question. Why should God, a being of infinite

tenderness, leave the question of immortality in doubt? How is it

that there is nothing in the Old Testament on this subject? Why is

it that he who made all the constellations did not put in his heaven

the star of hope? How do you account for the fact that you do not

find in the Old Testament, from the first mistake in Genesis to the

last curse in Malachi, a funeral service? Is it not strange that some

one in the Old Testament did not stand by an open grave of father or

mother and say, "We shall meet again"? Was it because the divinely

inspired men did not know? You taunt me by saying that I know no more

of the immortality of the soul than Cicero knew. I admit it. I know

no more than the lowest savage, no more than a doctor of divinity,

that is to say, nothing.--Ingersoll, Ingersoll-Field Discussion.

Some urge that the soul is life. What is life? Is it not the word

by which we express the aggregate normal functional activity of

vegetable and animal organisms, necessarily differing in degree, if

not in kind, with each different organization? To talk of immortal

life, and yet to admit the decay and destruction of the organization,

is much the same as to talk of a square circle. You link together two

words which contradict each other. The solution of the soul problem

is not so difficult as many imagine. The greatest difficulty is, that

we have been trained to use certain words as "God," "matter," "mind,"

"spirit," "soul," "intelligence," and we have been further trained

to take these words as representatives of realities, which in fact,

they do not represent. We have to unlearn much of our school lore. We

have specially to carefully examine the meaning of each word we use. I

am told that the mind and the body are separate from one another. Are

the brightness and steel of the knife separate? Is not brightness the

quality attaching to a certain modification of existence--steel? Is

not intelligence a quality attaching to a certain modification of

existence--man? The word brightness has no meaning, except as relating

to some bright thing. The word intelligence, no meaning, except as

relating to some intelligent thing. I take some water and drop it

upon the steel, in due course the process of oxidation takes place,

and the brightness is gone. I drop into a man's brain a bullet; the

process of the destruction of life takes place, and his intelligence

is gone. By changing the state of the steel we destroy its brightness,

and by disorganizing the man destroy his intelligence. Is mind an

entity or result? an existence or a condition? Surely it is but the

result of organic activity, a phenomenon of animal life. ("Has Man

a Soul?" Charles Bradlaugh.)

The idea of immortality, like the great sea, has ebbed and flowed in

the human heart, beating its countless waves of hope and joy against

the shores of time, and was not born of an book, nor of any religion,

nor of any creed; it was born of human affection, and will continue

to ebb and flow beneath the clouds and mists of doubt and darkness

as long as love kisses the lips of death. It is the rainbow of hope

shining upon the tears of grief. We love, therefore we wish to live,

and the foundation of the idea of immortality is human affection

and human love, and I have a thousand times more confidence in the

affections of the human heart, in the deep and splendid feelings of

the human soul than I have in any book that ever was or ever can be

written by mortal man.--Ingersoll.

A handbook of Freethought · 第 176 / 221 题