BRAYBROOKE.

Audley End.

* * * * *

Replies to Minor Queries.

_Cromwell Poisoned_ (Vol. ii., p. 393.).--Your correspondent P. T. queries

if there be any other statement than that which he adduces respecting

Cromwell having been poisoned. I would refer him to the _Athenæ Oxoniensis_

of Anthony à Wood, vol. ii. p. 303.,[2] in which it is stated that Dr.

George Bate's friends gave him credit for having given a baneful dose to

the Protector, to ingratiate himself with Charles II. Amidst all the

mutations of those changeful times, and whether Charles I., Cromwell, or

Charles II. were in the ascendant, Dr. George Bate always contrived to be

the chief state physician. In Whitelock's _Memorials of the English

Affairs_ (1732), p. 494, it appears that the Parliament, in 1651, ordered

Dr. Bate to go into Scotland to attend the General (Cromwell), and to take

care of his health; he being his usual physician in London, and well

esteemed by him. He wrote a work styled _Elenchus Motuum nuperorum in

Angliâ_. This was severely scrutinised in another, entitled _Elenchus

Elenchi; sive Animadversiones in Georgii Batei, Cromwelli Paricidæ,

aliquando Protomedici, Elenchi Motuum nuperorum in Angliâ. Autore Robt.

Pugh; Parisiis, 1664_.

Dr. Bate, who died 19th April, 1669, was buried at Kingston upon Thames.

§ N.

Nov. 9. 1850.

[Footnote 2: I allude to the old edition, 2 vols. Lond. 1691-2, folio; not

having any other at hand.]

"_Never did Cardinal bring Good to England_" (Vol. ii., pp. 424,

450.).--BERUCHINO is right in his suggestion that Dr. Lingard may

accidentally have omitted a reference to the place from whence he really

derived this saying; for Hall tells us in his _Chronicle_ (ed. 1809, p.

758.), that

"Charles, Duke of Suffolke, seeing the delay, gave a great clappe on

the table with his hande and said, 'By the masse, now I see that the

olde saied sawe is true, _that there was never Legatt nor Cardinall

that did good in Englande_.'"

Whether Charles Brandon was a reader of _Piers Ploughman_, I know not; but

the following passage from that poem proves he was giving expression to a

feeling which had long been popular in this country. I quote from Mr.

Wright's edition, published by Pickering:

"I knew nevere Cardinal

That he ne cam fra the Pope;

And we clerkes, whan thei come,

For hir comunes paieth,

For hir pelure and hir palfreyes mete,

And pilours that hem folweth.

"The comune _clamat cotidie_

Ech a man til oother,

_The contree is the corseder_

_That Cardinals comme inne_;

And ther thei ligge and lenge moost,

Lecherie there regneth."

Notes and Queries, Number 58, December 7, 1850 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 55 / 90 题