FIFTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 171, Art. 5]

Whether the Prophet Always Distinguishes What He Says by His Own

Spirit from What He Says by the Prophetic Spirit?

Objection 1: It would seem that the prophet always distinguishes what

he says by his own spirit from what he says by the prophetic spirit.

For Augustine states (Confess. vi, 13) that his mother said "she

could, through a certain feeling, which in words she could not

express, discern betwixt Divine revelations, and the dreams of her

own soul." Now prophecy is a Divine revelation, as stated above (A.

3). Therefore the prophet always distinguishes what he says by the

spirit of prophecy, from what he says by his own spirit.

Obj. 2: Further, God commands nothing impossible, as Jerome

[*Pelagius. Ep. xvi, among the supposititious works of St. Jerome]

says. Now the prophets were commanded (Jer. 23:28): "The prophet that

hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath My word, let him

speak My word with truth." Therefore the prophet can distinguish what

he has through the spirit of prophecy from what he sees otherwise.

Obj. 3: Further, the certitude resulting from a Divine light is

greater than that which results from the light of natural reason. Now

he that has science, by the light of natural reason knows for certain

that he has it. Therefore he that has prophecy by a Divine light is

much more certain that he has it.

_On the contrary,_ Gregory says (Hom. i super Ezech.): "It must be

observed that sometimes the holy prophets, when consulted, utter

certain things by their own spirit, through being much accustomed to

prophesying, and think they are speaking by the prophetic spirit."

_I answer that,_ The prophet's mind is instructed by God in two ways:

in one way by an express revelation, in another way by a most

mysterious instinct to "which the human mind is subjected without

knowing it," as Augustine says (Gen. ad lit. ii, 17). Accordingly the

prophet has the greatest certitude about those things which he knows

by an express revelation, and he has it for certain that they are

revealed to him by God; wherefore it is written (Jer. 26:15): "In

truth the Lord sent me to you, to speak all these words in your

hearing." Else, were he not certain about this, the faith which

relies on the utterances of the prophet would not be certain. A sign

of the prophet's certitude may be gathered from the fact that Abraham

being admonished in a prophetic vision, prepared to sacrifice his

only-begotten son, which he nowise would have done had he not been

most certain of the Divine revelation.

On the other hand, his position with regard to the things he knows by

instinct is sometimes such that he is unable to distinguish fully

whether his thoughts are conceived of Divine instinct or of his own

spirit. And those things which we know by Divine instinct are not all

manifested with prophetic certitude, for this instinct is something

imperfect in the genus of prophecy. It is thus that we are to

understand the saying of Gregory. Lest, however, this should lead to

error, "they are very soon set aright by the Holy Ghost [*For

instance, cf. 2 Kings 7:3 seqq.], and from Him they hear the truth,

so that they reproach themselves for having said what was untrue," as

Gregory adds (Hom. i super Ezech.).

The arguments set down in the first place consider the revelation

that is made by the prophetic spirit; wherefore the answer to all the

objections is clear.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 1009 / 1128 题