TENTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 154, Art. 1]

Whether Sacrilege Can Be a Species of Lust?

Objection 1: It would seem that sacrilege cannot be a species of

lust. For the same species is not contained under different genera

that are not subalternated to one another. Now sacrilege is a species

of irreligion, as stated above (Q. 99, A. 2). Therefore sacrilege

cannot be reckoned a species of lust.

Obj. 2: Further, the Decretals (XXXVI, qu. 1 [*Append. Grat. ad can.

Lex illa]), do not place sacrilege among other sins which are

reckoned species of lust. Therefore it would seem not to be a species

of lust.

Obj. 3: Further, something derogatory to a sacred thing may be done

by the other kinds of vice, as well as by lust. But sacrilege is not

reckoned a species of gluttony, or of any other similar vice.

Therefore neither should it be reckoned a species of lust.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Civ. Dei xv, 16) that "if it is

wicked, through covetousness, to go beyond one's earthly bounds, how

much more wicked is it through venereal lust to transgress the bounds

of morals!" Now to go beyond one's earthly bounds in sacred matters

is a sin of sacrilege. Therefore it is likewise a sin of sacrilege to

overthrow the bounds of morals through venereal desire in sacred

matters. But venereal desire pertains to lust. Therefore sacrilege is

a species of lust.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (I-II, Q. 18, AA. 6, 7), the act of

a virtue or vice, that is directed to the end of another virtue or

vice, assumes the latter's species: thus, theft committed for the

sake of adultery, passes into the species of adultery. Now it is

evident that as Augustine states (De Virgin. 8), the observance of

chastity, by being directed to the worship of God, becomes an act of

religion, as in the case of those who vow and keep chastity.

Wherefore it is manifest that lust also, by violating something

pertaining to the worship of God, belongs to the species of

sacrilege: and in this way sacrilege may be accounted a species of

lust.

Reply Obj. 1: Lust, by being directed to another vice as its end,

becomes a species of that vice: and so a species of lust may be also

a species of irreligion, as of a higher genus.

Reply Obj. 2: The enumeration referred to, includes those sins which

are species of lust by their very nature: whereas sacrilege is a

species of lust in so far as it is directed to another vice as its

end, and may coincide with the various species of lust. For unlawful

intercourse between persons mutually united by spiritual

relationship, is a sacrilege after the manner of incest. Intercourse

with a virgin consecrated to God, inasmuch as she is the spouse of

Christ, is sacrilege resembling adultery. If the maiden be under her

father's authority, it will be spiritual seduction; and if force be

employed it will be spiritual rape, which kind of rape even the civil

law punishes more severely than others. Thus the Emperor Justinian

says [*Cod. i, iii de Episc. et Cler. 5]: "If any man dare, I will

not say to rape, but even to tempt a consecrated virgin with a view

to marriage, he shall be liable to capital punishment."

Reply Obj. 3: Sacrilege is committed on a consecrated thing. Now a

consecrated thing is either a consecrated person, who is desired for

sexual intercourse, and thus it is a kind of lust, or it is desired

for possession, and thus it is a kind of injustice. Sacrilege may

also come under the head of anger, for instance, if through anger an

injury be done to a consecrated person. Again, one may commit a

sacrilege by partaking gluttonously of sacred food. Nevertheless,

sacrilege is ascribed more specially to lust which is opposed to

chastity for the observance of which certain persons are specially

consecrated.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 927 / 1128 题