FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 152, Art. 4]

Whether Virginity Is More Excellent Than Marriage?

Objection 1: It would seem that virginity is not more excellent than

marriage. For Augustine says (De Bono Conjug. xxi): "Continence was

equally meritorious in John who remained unmarried and Abraham who

begot children." Now a greater virtue has greater merit. Therefore

virginity is not a greater virtue than conjugal chastity.

Obj. 2: Further, the praise accorded a virtuous man depends on his

virtue. If, then, virginity were preferable to conjugal continence,

it would seem to follow that every virgin is to be praised more than

any married woman. But this is untrue. Therefore virginity is not

preferable to marriage.

Obj. 3: Further, the common good takes precedence of the private

good, according to the Philosopher (Ethic. i, 2). Now marriage is

directed to the common good: for Augustine says (De Bono Conjug.

xvi): "What food is to a man's wellbeing, such is sexual intercourse

to the welfare of the human race." On the other hand, virginity is

ordered to the individual good, namely in order to avoid what the

Apostle calls the "tribulation of the flesh," to which married people

are subject (1 Cor. 7:28). Therefore virginity is not greater than

conjugal continence.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Virgin. xix): "Both solid

reason and the authority of Holy Writ show that neither is marriage

sinful, nor is it to be equaled to the good of virginal continence or

even to that of widowhood."

_I answer that,_ According to Jerome (Contra Jovin. i) the error of

Jovinian consisted in holding virginity not to be preferable to

marriage. This error is refuted above all by the example of Christ

Who both chose a virgin for His mother, and remained Himself a

virgin, and by the teaching of the Apostle who (1 Cor. 7) counsels

virginity as the greater good. It is also refuted by reason, both

because a Divine good takes precedence of a human good, and because

the good of the soul is preferable to the good of the body, and again

because the good of the contemplative life is better than that of the

active life. Now virginity is directed to the good of the soul in

respect of the contemplative life, which consists in thinking "on the

things of God" [Vulg.: 'the Lord'], whereas marriage is directed to

the good of the body, namely the bodily increase of the human race,

and belongs to the active life, since the man and woman who embrace

the married life have to think "on the things of the world," as the

Apostle says (1 Cor. 7:34). Without doubt therefore virginity is

preferable to conjugal continence.

Reply Obj. 1: Merit is measured not only by the kind of action, but

still more by the mind of the agent. Now Abraham had a mind so

disposed, that he was prepared to observe virginity, if it were in

keeping with the times for him to do so. Wherefore in him conjugal

continence was equally meritorious with the virginal continence of

John, as regards the essential reward, but not as regards the

accidental reward. Hence Augustine says (De Bono Conjug. xxi) that

both "the celibacy of John and the marriage of Abraham fought

Christ's battle in keeping with the difference of the times: but John

was continent even in deed, whereas Abraham was continent only in

habit."

Reply Obj. 2: Though virginity is better than conjugal continence, a

married person may be better than a virgin for two reasons. First, on

the part of chastity itself; if to wit, the married person is more

prepared in mind to observe virginity, if it should be expedient,

than the one who is actually a virgin. Hence Augustine (De Bono

Conjug. xxii) charges the virgin to say: "I am no better than

Abraham, although the chastity of celibacy is better than the

chastity of marriage." Further on he gives the reason for this: "For

what I do now, he would have done better, if it were fitting for him

to do it then; and what they did I would even do now if it behooved

me now to do it." Secondly, because perhaps the person who is not a

virgin has some more excellent virtue. Wherefore Augustine says (De

Virgin. xliv): "Whence does a virgin know the things that belong to

the Lord, however solicitous she be about them, if perchance on

account of some mental fault she be not yet ripe for martyrdom,

whereas this woman to whom she delighted in preferring herself is

already able to drink the chalice of the Lord?"

Reply Obj. 3: The common good takes precedence of the private good,

if it be of the same genus: but it may be that the private good is

better generically. It is thus that the virginity that is consecrated

to God is preferable to carnal fruitfulness. Hence Augustine says (De

Virgin. ix): "It must be confessed that the fruitfulness of the

flesh, even of those women who in these times seek naught else from

marriage but children in order to make them servants of Christ,

cannot compensate for lost virginity."

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 909 / 1128 题