FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 151, Art. 1]

Whether Chastity Is a Virtue?

Objection 1: It would seem that chastity is not a virtue. For here we

are treating of virtues of the soul. But chastity, seemingly, belongs

to the body: for a person is said to be chaste because he behaves in

a certain way as regards the use of certain parts of the body.

Therefore chastity is not a virtue.

Obj. 2: Further, virtue is "a voluntary habit," as stated in _Ethic._

ii, 6. But chastity, apparently, is not voluntary, since it can be

taken away by force from a woman to whom violence is done. Therefore

it seems that chastity is not a virtue.

Obj. 3: Further, there is no virtue in unbelievers. Yet some

unbelievers are chaste. Therefore chastity is not a virtue.

Obj. 4: Further, the fruits are distinct from the virtues. But

chastity is reckoned among the fruits (Gal. 5:23). Therefore chastity

is not a virtue.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Decem Chord. [*Serm. ix de

Tempore]): "Whereas thou shouldst excel thy wife in virtue, since

chastity is a virtue, thou yieldest to the first onslaught of lust,

while thou wishest thy wife to be victorious."

_I answer that,_ Chastity takes its name from the fact that reason

"chastises" concupiscence, which, like a child, needs curbing, as the

Philosopher states (Ethic. iii, 12). Now the essence of human virtue

consists in being something moderated by reason, as shown above

(I-II, Q. 64, A. 1). Therefore it is evident that chastity is a

virtue.

Reply Obj. 1: Chastity does indeed reside in the soul as its subject,

though its matter is in the body. For it belongs to chastity that a

man make moderate use of bodily members in accordance with the

judgment of his reason and the choice of his will.

Reply Obj. 2: As Augustine says (De Civ. Dei i, 18), "so long as her

mind holds to its purpose, whereby she has merited to be holy even in

body, not even the violence of another's lust can deprive her body of

its holiness, which is safeguarded by her persevering continency." He

also says (De Civ. Dei i, 18) that "in the mind there is a virtue

which is the companion of fortitude, whereby it is resolved to suffer

any evil whatsoever rather than consent to evil."

Reply Obj. 3: As Augustine says (Contra Julian. iv, 3), "it is

impossible to have any true virtue unless one be truly just; nor is

it possible to be just unless one live by faith." Whence he argues

that in unbelievers there is neither true chastity, nor any other

virtue, because, to wit, they are not referred to the due end, and as

he adds (Contra Julian. iv, 3) "virtues are distinguished from vices

not by their functions," i.e. their acts, "but by their ends."

Reply Obj. 4: Chastity is a virtue in so far as it works in

accordance with reason, but in so far as it delights in its act, it

is reckoned among the fruits.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 901 / 1128 题