SIXTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 148, Art. 6]

Whether [Five] Daughters Are Fittingly Assigned to Gluttony?

Objection 1: It would seem that [five] daughters are unfittingly

assigned to gluttony, to wit, "unseemly joy, scurrility, uncleanness,

loquaciousness, and dullness of mind as regards the understanding."

For unseemly joy results from every sin, according to Prov. 2:14,

"Who are glad when they have done evil, and rejoice in most wicked

things." Likewise dullness of mind is associated with every sin,

according to Prov. 14:22, "They err that work evil." Therefore they

are unfittingly reckoned to be daughters of gluttony.

Obj. 2: Further, the uncleanness which is particularly the result of

gluttony would seem to be connected with vomiting, according to Isa.

28:8, "All tables were full of vomit and filth." But this seems to be

not a sin but a punishment; or even a useful thing that is a matter

of counsel, according to Ecclus. 31:25, "If thou hast been forced to

eat much, arise, go out, and vomit; and it shall refresh thee."

Therefore it should not be reckoned among the daughters of gluttony.

Obj. 3: Further, Isidore (QQ. in Deut. xvi) reckons scurrility as a

daughter of lust. Therefore it should not be reckoned among the

daughters of gluttony.

_On the contrary,_ Gregory (Moral. xxxi, 45) assigns these daughters

to gluttony.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (AA. 1, 2, 3), gluttony consists

properly in an immoderate pleasure in eating and drinking. Wherefore

those vices are reckoned among the daughters of gluttony, which are

the results of eating and drinking immoderately. These may be

accounted for either on the part of the soul or on the part of the

body. On the part of the soul these results are of four kinds. First,

as regards the reason, whose keenness is dulled by immoderate meat

and drink, and in this respect we reckon as a daughter of gluttony,

"dullness of sense in the understanding," on account of the fumes of

food disturbing the brain. Even so, on the other hand, abstinence

conduces to the penetrating power of wisdom, according to Eccles.

2:3, "I thought in my heart to withdraw my flesh from wine, that I

might turn my mind in wisdom." Secondly, as regards the appetite,

which is disordered in many ways by immoderation in eating and

drinking, as though reason were fast asleep at the helm, and in this

respect "unseemly joy" is reckoned, because all the other inordinate

passions are directed to joy or sorrow, as stated in _Ethic._ ii, 5.

To this we must refer the saying of 3 Esdr. 3:20, that "wine . . .

gives every one a confident and joyful mind." Thirdly, as regards

inordinate words, and thus we have "loquaciousness," because as

Gregory says (Pastor. iii, 19), "unless gluttons were carried away by

immoderate speech, that rich man who is stated to have feasted

sumptuously every day would not have been so tortured in his tongue."

Fourthly, as regards inordinate action, and in this way we have

"scurrility," i.e. a kind of levity resulting from lack of reason,

which is unable not only to bridle the speech, but also to restrain

outward behavior. Hence a gloss on Eph. 5:4, "Or foolish talking or

scurrility," says that "fools call this geniality--i.e. jocularity,

because it is wont to raise a laugh." Both of these, however, may be

referred to the words which may happen to be sinful, either by reason

of excess which belongs to "loquaciousness," or by reason of

unbecomingness, which belongs to "scurrility."

On the part of the body, mention is made of "uncleanness," which may

refer either to the inordinate emission of any kind of superfluities,

or especially to the emission of the semen. Hence a gloss on Eph.

5:3, "But fornication and all uncleanness," says: "That is, any kind

of incontinence that has reference to lust."

Reply Obj. 1: Joy in the act or end of sin results from every sin,

especially the sin that proceeds from habit, but the random riotous

joy which is described as "unseemly" arises chiefly from immoderate

partaking of meat or drink. In like manner, we reply that dullness of

sense as regards matters of choice is common to all sin, whereas

dullness of sense in speculative matters arises chiefly from

gluttony, for the reason given above.

Reply Obj. 2: Although it does one good to vomit after eating too

much, yet it is sinful to expose oneself to its necessity by

immoderate meat or drink. However, it is no sin to procure vomiting

as a remedy for sickness if the physician prescribes it.

Reply Obj. 3: Scurrility proceeds from the act of gluttony, and not

from the lustful act, but from the lustful will: wherefore it may be

referred to either vice.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 889 / 1128 题