SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 140, Art. 2]

Whether the Precepts of the Parts of Fortitude Are Suitably Given in

the Divine Law?

Objection 1: It seems that the precept of the parts of fortitude are

unsuitably given in the Divine Law. For just as patience and

perseverance are parts of fortitude, so also are magnificence,

magnanimity, and confidence, as stated above (Q. 128). Now we find

precepts of patience in the Divine Law, as also of perseverance.

Therefore there should also have been precepts of magnificence and

magnanimity.

Obj. 2: Further, patience is a very necessary virtue, since it is the

guardian of the other virtues, as Gregory says (Hom. in Evang. xxxv).

Now the other virtues are commanded absolutely. Therefore patience

should not have been commanded merely, as Augustine says (De Serm.

Dom. in Monte i), as to the preparedness of the mind.

Obj. 3: Further, patience and perseverance are parts of fortitude, as

stated above (Q. 128; Q. 136, A. 4; Q. 137, A. 2). Now the precepts

of fortitude are not affirmative but only negative, as stated above

(A. 1, ad 2). Therefore the precepts of patience and perseverance

should have been negative and not affirmative.

The contrary, however, follows from the way in which they are given

by Holy Writ.

_I answer that,_ The Divine Law instructs man perfectly about such

things as are necessary for right living. Now in order to live aright

man needs not only the principal virtues, but also the secondary and

annexed virtues. Wherefore the Divine Law contains precepts not only

about the acts of the principal virtues, but also about the acts of

the secondary and annexed virtues.

Reply Obj. 1: Magnificence and magnanimity do not belong to the genus

of fortitude, except by reason of a certain excellence of greatness

which they regard in their respective matters. Now things pertaining

to excellence come under the counsels of perfection rather than under

precepts of obligation. Wherefore, there was need of counsels, rather

than of precepts about magnificence and magnanimity. On the other

hand, the hardships and toils of the present life pertain to patience

and perseverance, not by reason of any greatness observable in them,

but on account of the very nature of those virtues. Hence the need of

precepts of patience and perseverance.

Reply Obj. 2: As stated above (Q. 3, A. 2), although affirmative

precepts are always binding, they are not binding for always, but

according to place and time. Wherefore just as the affirmative

precepts about the other virtues are to be understood as to the

preparedness of the mind, in the sense that man be prepared to fulfil

them when necessary, so too are the precepts of patience to be

understood in the same way.

Reply Obj. 3: Fortitude, as distinct from patience and perseverance,

is about the greatest dangers wherein one must proceed with caution;

nor is it necessary to determine what is to be done in particular. On

the other hand, patience and perseverance are about minor hardships

and toils, wherefore there is less danger in determining, especially

in general, what is to be done in such cases.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 843 / 1128 题