FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 137, Art. 1]

Whether Perseverance Is a Virtue?

Objection 1: It seems that perseverance is not a virtue. For,

according to the Philosopher (Ethic. vii, 7), continency is greater

than perseverance. But continency is not a virtue, as stated in

_Ethic._ iv, 9. Therefore perseverance is not a virtue.

Obj. 2: Further, "by virtue man lives aright," according to Augustine

(De Lib. Arb. ii, 19). Now according to the same authority (De

Persever. i), no one can be said to have perseverance while living,

unless he persevere until death. Therefore perseverance is not a

virtue.

Obj. 3: Further, it is requisite of every virtue that one should

persist unchangeably in the work of that virtue, as stated in

_Ethic._ ii, 4. But this is what we understand by perseverance: for

Tully says (De Invent. Rhet. ii) that "perseverance is the fixed and

continued persistence in a well-considered purpose." Therefore

perseverance is not a special virtue, but a condition of every virtue.

_On the contrary,_ Andronicus [*Chrysippus: in De Affect.] says that

"perseverance is a habit regarding things to which we ought to stand,

and those to which we ought not to stand, as well as those that are

indifferent." Now a habit that directs us to do something well, or to

omit something, is a virtue. Therefore perseverance is a virtue.

_I answer that,_ According to the Philosopher (Ethic. ii, 3), "virtue

is about the difficult and the good"; and so where there is a special

kind of difficulty or goodness, there is a special virtue. Now a

virtuous deed may involve goodness or difficulty on two counts.

First, from the act's very species, which is considered in respect of

the proper object of that act: secondly, from the length of time,

since to persist long in something difficult involves a special

difficulty. Hence to persist long in something good until it is

accomplished belongs to a special virtue.

Accordingly just as temperance and fortitude are special virtues, for

the reason that the one moderates pleasures of touch (which is of

itself a difficult thing), while the other moderates fear and daring

in connection with dangers of death (which also is something

difficult in itself), so perseverance is a special virtue, since it

consists in enduring delays in the above or other virtuous deeds, so

far as necessity requires.

Reply Obj. 1: The Philosopher is taking perseverance there, as it is

found in one who bears those things which are most difficult to

endure long. Now it is difficult to endure, not good, but evil. And

evils that involve danger of death, for the most part are not endured

for a long time, because often they soon pass away: wherefore it is

not on this account that perseverance has its chief title to praise.

Among other evils foremost are those which are opposed to pleasures

of touch, because evils of this kind affect the necessaries of life:

such are the lack of food and the like, which at times call for long

endurance. Now it is not difficult to endure these things for a long

time for one who grieves not much at them, nor delights much in the

contrary goods; as in the case of the temperate man, in whom these

passions are not violent. But they are most difficult to bear for one

who is strongly affected by such things, through lacking the perfect

virtue that moderates these passions. Wherefore if perseverance be

taken in this sense it is not a perfect virtue, but something

imperfect in the genus of virtue. On the other hand, if we take

perseverance as denoting long persistence in any kind of difficult

good, it is consistent in one who has even perfect virtue: for even

if it is less difficult for him to persist, yet he persists in the

more perfect good. Wherefore such like perseverance may be a virtue,

because virtue derives perfection from the aspect of good rather than

from the aspect of difficulty.

Reply Obj. 2: Sometimes a virtue and its act go by the same name:

thus Augustine says (Tract. in Joan. lxxix): "Faith is to believe

without seeing." Yet it is possible to have a habit of virtue without

performing the act: thus a poor man has the habit of magnificence

without exercising the act. Sometimes, however, a person who has the

habit, begins to perform the act, yet does not accomplish it, for

instance a builder begins to build a house, but does not complete it.

Accordingly we must reply that the term "perseverance" is sometimes

used to denote the habit whereby one chooses to persevere, sometimes

for the act of persevering: and sometimes one who has the habit of

perseverance chooses to persevere and begins to carry out his choice

by persisting for a time, yet completes not the act, through not

persisting to the end. Now the end is twofold: one is the end of the

work, the other is the end of human life. Properly speaking it

belongs to perseverance to persevere to the end of the virtuous work,

for instance that a soldier persevere to the end of the fight, and

the magnificent man until his work be accomplished. There are,

however, some virtues whose acts must endure throughout the whole of

life, such as faith, hope, and charity, since they regard the last

end of the entire life of man. Wherefore as regards these which are

the principal virtues, the act of perseverance is not accomplished

until the end of life. It is in this sense that Augustine speaks of

perseverance as denoting the consummate act of perseverance.

Reply Obj. 3: Unchangeable persistence may belong to a virtue in two

ways. First, on account of the intended end that is proper to that

virtue; and thus to persist in good for a long time until the end,

belongs to a special virtue called perseverance, which intends this

as its special end. Secondly, by reason of the relation of the habit

to its subject: and thus unchangeable persistence is consequent upon

every virtue, inasmuch as virtue is a "quality difficult to change."

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 831 / 1128 题