THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 132, Art. 3]

Whether Vainglory Is a Mortal Sin?

Objection 1: It seems that vainglory is a mortal sin. For nothing

precludes the eternal reward except a mortal sin. Now vainglory

precludes the eternal reward: for it is written (Matt. 6:1): "Take

heed, that you do not give justice before men, to be seen by them:

otherwise you shall not have a reward of your Father Who is in

heaven." Therefore vainglory is a mortal sin.

Obj. 2: Further, whoever appropriates to himself that which is proper

to God, sins mortally. Now by desiring vainglory, a man appropriates

to himself that which is proper to God. For it is written (Isa.

42:8): "I will not give My glory to another," and (1 Tim. 1:17): "To

. . . the only God be honor and glory." Therefore vainglory is a

mortal sin.

Obj. 3: Further, apparently a sin is mortal if it be most dangerous

and harmful. Now vainglory is a sin of this kind, because a gloss of

Augustine on 1 Thess. 2:4, "God, Who proveth our hearts," says:

"Unless a man war against the love of human glory he does not

perceive its baneful power, for though it be easy for anyone not to

desire praise as long as one does not get it, it is difficult not to

take pleasure in it, when it is given." Chrysostom also says (Hom.

xix in Matth.) that "vainglory enters secretly, and robs us

insensibly of all our inward possessions." Therefore vainglory is a

mortal sin.

_On the contrary,_ Chrysostom says [*Hom. xiii in the Opus

Imperfectum falsely ascribed to St. John Chrysostom] that "while

other vices find their abode in the servants of the devil, vainglory

finds a place even in the servants of Christ." Yet in the latter

there is no mortal sin. Therefore vainglory is not a mortal sin.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (Q. 24, A. 12; Q. 110, A. 4; Q. 112,

A. 2), a sin is mortal through being contrary to charity. Now the sin

of vainglory, considered in itself, does not seem to be contrary to

charity as regards the love of one's neighbor: yet as regards the

love of God it may be contrary to charity in two ways. In one way, by

reason of the matter about which one glories: for instance when one

glories in something false that is opposed to the reverence we owe

God, according to Ezech. 28:2, "Thy heart is lifted up, and Thou hast

said: I am God," and 1 Cor. 4:7, "What hast thou that thou hast not

received? And if thou hast received, why dost thou glory, as if thou

hadst not received it?" Or again when a man prefers to God the

temporal good in which he glories: for this is forbidden (Jer. 9:23,

24): "Let not the wise man glory in his wisdom, and let not the

strong man glory in his strength, and let not the rich man glory in

his riches. But let him that glorieth glory in this, that he

understandeth and knoweth Me." Or again when a man prefers the

testimony of man to God's; thus it is written in reproval of certain

people (John 12:43): "For they loved the glory of men more than the

glory of God."

In another way vainglory may be contrary to charity, on the part of

the one who glories, in that he refers his intention to glory as his

last end: so that he directs even virtuous deeds thereto, and, in

order to obtain it, forbears not from doing even that which is

against God. In this way it is a mortal sin. Wherefore Augustine says

(De Civ. Dei v, 14) that "this vice," namely the love of human

praise, "is so hostile to a godly faith, if the heart desires glory

more than it fears or loves God, that our Lord said (John 5:44): How

can you believe, who receive glory one from another, and the glory

which is from God alone, you do not seek?"

If, however, the love of human glory, though it be vain, be not

inconsistent with charity, neither as regards the matter gloried in,

nor as to the intention of him that seeks glory, it is not a mortal

but a venial sin.

Reply Obj. 1: No man, by sinning, merits eternal life: wherefore a

virtuous deed loses its power to merit eternal life, if it be done

for the sake of vainglory, even though that vainglory be not a mortal

sin. On the other hand when a man loses the eternal reward simply

through vainglory, and not merely in respect of one act, vainglory is

a mortal sin.

Reply Obj. 2: Not every man that is desirous of vainglory, desires

the excellence which belongs to God alone. For the glory due to God

alone differs from the glory due to a virtuous or rich man.

Reply Obj. 3: Vainglory is stated to be a dangerous sin, not only on

account of its gravity, but also because it is a disposition to grave

sins, in so far as it renders man presumptuous and too

self-confident: and so it gradually disposes a man to lose his inward

goods.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 810 / 1128 题