FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 132, Art. 1]

Whether the Desire of Glory Is a Sin?

Objection 1: It seems that the desire of glory is not a sin. For no

one sins in being likened to God: in fact we are commanded (Eph.

5:1): "Be ye . . . followers of God, as most dear children." Now by

seeking glory man seems to imitate God, Who seeks glory from men:

wherefore it is written (Isa. 43:6, 7): "Bring My sons from afar, and

My daughters from the ends of the earth. And every one that calleth

on My name, I have created him for My glory." Therefore the desire

for glory is not a sin.

Obj. 2: Further, that which incites a man to do good is apparently

not a sin. Now the desire of glory incites men to do good. For Tully

says (De Tusc. Quaest. i) that "glory inflames every man to strive

his utmost": and in Holy Writ glory is promised for good works,

according to Rom. 2:7: "To them, indeed, who according to patience in

good work . . . glory and honor" [*Vulg.: 'Who will render to every

man according to his works, to them indeed who . . . seek glory and

honor and incorruption, eternal life.']. Therefore the desire for

glory is not a sin.

Obj. 3: Further, Tully says (De Invent. Rhet. ii) that glory is

"consistent good report about a person, together with praise": and

this comes to the same as what Augustine says (Contra Maximin. iii),

viz. that glory is, "as it were, clear knowledge with praise." Now it

is no sin to desire praiseworthy renown: indeed, it seems itself to

call for praise, according to Ecclus. 41:15, "Take care of a good

name," and Rom. 12:17, "Providing good things not only in the sight

of God, but also in the sight of all men." Therefore the desire of

vainglory is not a sin.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Civ. Dei v): "He is better

advised who acknowledges that even the love of praise is sinful."

_I answer that,_ Glory signifies a certain clarity, wherefore

Augustine says (Tract. lxxxii, c, cxiv in Joan.) that to be

"glorified is the same as to be clarified." Now clarity and

comeliness imply a certain display: wherefore the word glory properly

denotes the display of something as regards its seeming comely in the

sight of men, whether it be a bodily or a spiritual good. Since,

however, that which is clear simply can be seen by many, and by those

who are far away, it follows that the word glory properly denotes

that somebody's good is known and approved by many, according to the

saying of Sallust (Catilin.) [*The quotation is from Livy: Hist.,

Lib. XXII C, 39]: "I must not boast while I am addressing one man."

But if we take the word glory in a broader sense, it not only

consists in the knowledge of many, but also in the knowledge of few,

or of one, or of oneself alone, as when one considers one's own good

as being worthy of praise. Now it is not a sin to know and approve

one's own good: for it is written (1 Cor. 2:12): "Now we have

received not the spirit of this world, but the Spirit that is of God

that we may know the things that are given us from God." Likewise it

is not a sin to be willing to approve one's own good works: for it is

written (Matt. 5:16): "Let your light shine before men." Hence the

desire for glory does not, of itself, denote a sin: but the desire

for empty or vain glory denotes a sin: for it is sinful to desire

anything vain, according to Ps. 4:3, "Why do you love vanity, and

seek after lying?"

Now glory may be called vain in three ways. First, on the part of the

thing for which one seeks glory: as when a man seeks glory for that

which is unworthy of glory, for instance when he seeks it for

something frail and perishable: secondly, on the part of him from

whom he seeks glory, for instance a man whose judgment is uncertain:

thirdly, on the part of the man himself who seeks glory, for that he

does not refer the desire of his own glory to a due end, such as

God's honor, or the spiritual welfare of his neighbor.

Reply Obj. 1: As Augustine says on John 13:13, "You call Me Master

and Lord; and you say well" (Tract. lviii in Joan.):

"Self-complacency is fraught with danger of one who has to beware of

pride. But He Who is above all, however much He may praise Himself,

does not uplift Himself. For knowledge of God is our need, not His:

nor does any man know Him unless he be taught of Him Who knows." It

is therefore evident that God seeks glory, not for His own sake, but

for ours. In like manner a man may rightly seek his own glory for the

good of others, according to Matt. 5:16, "That they may see your good

works, and glorify your Father Who is in heaven."

Reply Obj. 2: That which we receive from God is not vain but true

glory: it is this glory that is promised as a reward for good works,

and of which it is written (2 Cor. 10:17, 18): "He that glorieth let

him glory in the Lord, for not he who commendeth himself is approved,

but he whom God commendeth." It is true that some are heartened to do

works of virtue, through desire for human glory, as also through the

desire for other earthly goods. Yet he is not truly virtuous who does

virtuous deeds for the sake of human glory, as Augustine proves (De

Civ. Dei v).

Reply Obj. 3: It is requisite for man's perfection that he should

know himself; but not that he should be known by others, wherefore it

is not to be desired in itself. It may, however, be desired as being

useful for something, either in order that God may be glorified by

men, or that men may become better by reason of the good they know to

be in another man, or in order that man, knowing by the testimony of

others' praise the good which is in him, may himself strive to

persevere therein and to become better. In this sense it is

praiseworthy that a man should "take care of his good name," and that

he should "provide good things in the sight of God and men": but not

that he should take an empty pleasure in human praise.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 808 / 1128 题