SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 126, Art. 2]

Whether Fearlessness Is Opposed to Fortitude?

Objection 1: It seems that fearlessness is not opposed to fortitude.

For we judge of habits by their acts. Now no act of fortitude is

hindered by a man being fearless: since if fear be removed, one is

both brave to endure, and daring to attack. Therefore fearlessness is

not opposed to fortitude.

Obj. 2: Further, fearlessness is a vice, either through lack of due

love, or on account of pride, or by reason of folly. Now lack of due

love is opposed to charity, pride is contrary to humility, and folly

to prudence or wisdom. Therefore the vice of fearlessness is not

opposed to fortitude.

Obj. 3: Further, vices are opposed to virtue and extremes to the

mean. But one mean has only one extreme on the one side. Since then

fortitude has fear opposed to it on the one side and daring on the

other, it seems that fearlessness is not opposed thereto.

_On the contrary,_ The Philosopher (Ethic. iii) reckons fearlessness

to be opposed to fortitude.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (Q. 123, A. 3), fortitude is

concerned about fear and daring. Now every moral virtue observes the

rational mean in the matter about which it is concerned. Hence it

belongs to fortitude that man should moderate his fear according to

reason, namely that he should fear what he ought, and when he ought,

and so forth. Now this mode of reason may be corrupted either by

excess or by deficiency. Wherefore just as timidity is opposed to

fortitude by excess of fear, in so far as a man fears what he ought

not, and as he ought not, so too fearlessness is opposed thereto by

deficiency of fear, in so far as a man fears not what he ought to

fear.

Reply Obj. 1: The act of fortitude is to endure death without fear,

and to be aggressive, not anyhow, but according to reason: this the

fearless man does not do.

Reply Obj. 2: Fearlessness by its specific nature corrupts the mean

of fortitude, wherefore it is opposed to fortitude directly. But in

respect of its causes nothing hinders it from being opposed to other

virtues.

Reply Obj. 3: The vice of daring is opposed to fortitude by excess of

daring, and fearlessness by deficiency of fear. Fortitude imposes the

mean on each passion. Hence there is nothing unreasonable in its

having different extremes in different respects.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 785 / 1128 题