SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 121, Art. 2]

Whether the Second Beatitude, "Blessed Are the Meek," Corresponds to

the Gift of Piety?

Objection 1: It seems that the second beatitude, "Blessed are the

meek," does not correspond to the gift of piety. For piety is the

gift corresponding to justice, to which rather belongs the fourth

beatitude, "Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after justice,"

or the fifth beatitude, "Blessed are the merciful," since as stated

above (A. 1, Obj. 3), the works of mercy belong to piety. Therefore

the second beatitude does not pertain to the gift of piety.

Obj. 2: Further, the gift of piety is directed by the gift of

knowledge, which is united to it in the enumeration of the gifts

(Isa. 11). Now direction and execution extend to the same matter.

Since, then, the third beatitude, "Blessed are they that mourn,"

corresponds to the gift of knowledge, it seems that the second

beatitude corresponds to piety.

Obj. 3: Further, the fruits correspond to the beatitudes and gifts,

as stated above (I-II, Q. 70, A. 2). Now among the fruits, goodness

and benignity seem to agree with piety rather than mildness, which

pertains to meekness. Therefore the second beatitude does not

correspond to the gift of piety.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Serm. Dom. in Monte i): "Piety

is becoming to the meek."

_I answer that,_ In adapting the beatitudes to the gifts a twofold

congruity may be observed. One is according to the order in which

they are given, and Augustine seems to have followed this: wherefore

he assigns the first beatitude to the lowest gift, namely, fear, and

the second beatitude, "Blessed are the meek," to piety, and so on.

Another congruity may be observed in keeping with the special nature

of each gift and beatitude. In this way one must adapt the beatitudes

to the gifts according to their objects and acts: and thus the fourth

and fifth beatitudes would correspond to piety, rather than the

second. Yet the second beatitude has a certain congruity with piety,

inasmuch as meekness removes the obstacles to acts of piety.

This suffices for the Reply to the First Objection.

Reply Obj. 2: Taking the beatitudes and gifts according to their

proper natures, the same beatitude must needs correspond to knowledge

and piety: but taking them according to their order, different

beatitudes correspond to them, although a certain congruity may be

observed, as stated above.

Reply Obj. 3: In the fruits goodness and benignity may be directly

ascribed to piety; and mildness indirectly in so far as it removes

obstacles to acts of piety, as stated above.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 751 / 1128 题