FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 107, Art. 4]

Whether Favors Should Be Withheld from the Ungrateful?

Objection 1: It seems that favors should withheld from the

ungrateful. For it is written (Wis. 16:29): "The hope of the

unthankful shall melt away as the winter's ice." But this hope would

not melt away unless favors were withheld from him. Therefore favors

should be withheld from the ungrateful.

Obj. 2: Further, no one should afford another an occasion of

committing sin. But the ungrateful in receiving a favor is given an

occasion of ingratitude. Therefore favors should not be bestowed on

the ungrateful.

Obj. 3: Further, "By what things a man sinneth, by the same also he

is tormented" (Wis. 11:17). Now he that is ungrateful when he

receives a favor sins against the favor. Therefore he should be

deprived of the favor.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Luke 6:35) that "the Highest . . .

is kind to the unthankful, and to the evil." Now we should prove

ourselves His children by imitating Him (Luke 6:36). Therefore we

should not withhold favors from the ungrateful.

_I answer that,_ There are two points to be considered with regard to

an ungrateful person. The first is what he deserves to suffer and

thus it is certain that he deserves to be deprived of our favor. The

second is, what ought his benefactor to do? For in the first place he

should not easily judge him to be ungrateful, since, as Seneca

remarks (De Benef. iii), "a man is often grateful although he repays

not," because perhaps he has not the means or the opportunity of

repaying. Secondly, he should be inclined to turn his ungratefulness

into gratitude, and if he does not achieve this by being kind to him

once, he may by being so a second time. If, however, the more he

repeats his favors, the more ungrateful and evil the other becomes,

he should cease from bestowing his favors upon him.

Reply Obj. 1: The passage quoted speaks of what the ungrateful man

deserves to suffer.

Reply Obj. 2: He that bestows a favor on an ungrateful person affords

him an occasion not of sin but of gratitude and love. And if the

recipient takes therefrom an occasion of ingratitude, this is not to

be imputed to the bestower.

Reply Obj. 3: He that bestows a favor must not at once act the part

of a punisher of ingratitude, but rather that of a kindly physician,

by healing the ingratitude with repeated favors.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 690 / 1128 题