SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 105, Art. 2]

Whether Disobedience Is the Most Grievous of Sins?

Objection 1: It seems that disobedience is the most grievous of sins.

For it is written (1 Kings 15:23): "It is like the sin of witchcraft

to rebel, and like the crime of idolatry to refuse to obey." But

idolatry is the most grievous of sins, as stated above (Q. 94, A. 3).

Therefore disobedience is the most grievous of sins.

Obj. 2: Further, the sin against the Holy Ghost is one that removes

the obstacles of sin, as stated above (Q. 14, A. 2). Now disobedience

makes a man contemn a precept which, more than anything, prevents a

man from sinning. Therefore disobedience is a sin against the Holy

Ghost, and consequently is the most grievous of sins.

Obj. 3: Further, the Apostle says (Rom. 5:19) that "by the

disobedience of one man, many were made sinners." Now the cause is

seemingly greater than its effect. Therefore disobedience seems to be

a more grievous sin than the others that are caused thereby.

_On the contrary,_ Contempt of the commander is a more grievous sin

than contempt of his command. Now some sins are against the very

person of the commander, such as blasphemy and murder. Therefore

disobedience is not the most grievous of sins.

_I answer that,_ Not every disobedience is equally a sin: for one

disobedience may be greater than another, in two ways. First, on the

part of the superior commanding, since, although a man should take

every care to obey each superior, yet it is a greater duty to obey a

higher than a lower authority, in sign of which the command of a

lower authority is set aside if it be contrary to the command of a

higher authority. Consequently the higher the person who commands,

the more grievous is it to disobey him: so that it is more grievous

to disobey God than man. Secondly, on the part of the things

commanded. For the person commanding does not equally desire the

fulfilment of all his commands: since every such person desires above

all the end, and that which is nearest to the end. Wherefore

disobedience is the more grievous, according as the unfulfilled

commandment is more in the intention of the person commanding. As to

the commandments of God, it is evident that the greater the good

commanded, the more grievous the disobedience of that commandment,

because since God's will is essentially directed to the good, the

greater the good the more does God wish it to be fulfilled.

Consequently he that disobeys the commandment of the love of God sins

more grievously than one who disobeys the commandment of the love of

our neighbor. On the other hand, man's will is not always directed to

the greater good: hence, when we are bound by a mere precept of man,

a sin is more grievous, not through setting aside a greater good, but

through setting aside that which is more in the intention of the

person commanding.

Accordingly the various degrees of disobedience must correspond with

the various degrees of precepts: because the disobedience in which

there is contempt of God's precept, from the very nature of

disobedience is more grievous than a sin committed against a man,

apart from the latter being a disobedience to God. And I say this

because whoever sins against his neighbor acts also against God's

commandment. And if the divine precept be contemned in a yet graver

matter, the sin is still more grievous. The disobedience that

contains contempt of a man's precept is less grievous than the sin

which contemns the man who made the precept, because reverence for

the person commanding should give rise to reverence for his command.

In like manner a sin that directly involves contempt of God, such as

blasphemy, or the like, is more grievous (even if we mentally

separate the disobedience from the sin) than would be a sin involving

contempt of God's commandment alone.

Reply Obj. 1: This comparison of Samuel is one, not of equality but

of likeness, because disobedience redounds to the contempt of God

just as idolatry does, though the latter does so more.

Reply Obj. 2: Not every disobedience is sin against the Holy Ghost,

but only that which obstinacy is added: for it is not the contempt of

any obstacle to sin that constitutes sin against the Holy Ghost, else

the contempt of any good would be a sin against the Holy Ghost, since

any good may hinder a man from committing sin. The sin against the

Holy Ghost consists in the contempt of those goods which lead

directly to repentance and the remission of sins.

Reply Obj. 3: The first sin of our first parent, from which sin was

transmitted to all men, was not disobedience considered as a special

sin, but pride, from which then man proceeded to disobey. Hence the

Apostle in these words seems to take disobedience in its relation to

every sin.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 678 / 1128 题