THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 104, Art. 3]

Whether Obedience Is the Greatest of the Virtues?

Objection 1: It seems that obedience is the greatest of the virtues.

For it is written (1 Kings 15:22): "Obedience is better than

sacrifices." Now the offering of sacrifices belongs to religion,

which is the greatest of all moral virtues, as shown above (Q. 81, A.

6). Therefore obedience is the greatest of all virtues.

Obj. 2: Further, Gregory says (Moral. xxxv) that "obedience is the

only virtue that ingrafts virtues in the soul and protects them when

ingrafted." Now the cause is greater than the effect. Therefore

obedience is greater than all the virtues.

Obj. 3: Further, Gregory says (Moral. xxxv) that "evil should never

be done out of obedience: yet sometimes for the sake of obedience we

should lay aside the good we are doing." Now one does not lay aside a

thing except for something better. Therefore obedience, for whose

sake the good of other virtues is set aside, is better than other

virtues.

_On the contrary,_ obedience deserves praise because it proceeds from

charity: for Gregory says (Moral. xxxv) that "obedience should be

practiced, not out of servile fear, but from a sense of charity, not

through fear of punishment, but through love of justice." Therefore

charity is a greater virtue than obedience.

_I answer that,_ Just as sin consists in man contemning God and

adhering to mutable things, so the merit of a virtuous act consists

in man contemning created goods and adhering to God as his end. Now

the end is greater than that which is directed to the end. Therefore

if a man contemns created goods in order that he may adhere to God,

his virtue derives greater praise from his adhering to God than from

his contemning earthly things. And so those, namely the theological,

virtues whereby he adheres to God in Himself, are greater than the

moral virtues, whereby he holds in contempt some earthly thing in

order to adhere to God.

Among the moral virtues, the greater the thing which a man contemns

that he may adhere to God, the greater the virtue. Now there are

three kinds of human goods that man may contemn for God's sake. The

lowest of these are external goods, the goods of the body take the

middle place, and the highest are the goods of the soul; and among

these the chief, in a way, is the will, in so far as, by his will,

man makes use of all other goods. Therefore, properly speaking, the

virtue of obedience, whereby we contemn our own will for God's sake,

is more praiseworthy than the other moral virtues, which contemn

other goods for the sake of God.

Hence Gregory says (Moral. xxxv) that "obedience is rightly preferred

to sacrifices, because by sacrifices another's body is slain whereas

by obedience we slay our own will." Wherefore even any other acts of

virtue are meritorious before God through being performed out of

obedience to God's will. For were one to suffer even martyrdom, or to

give all one's goods to the poor, unless one directed these things to

the fulfilment of the divine will, which pertains directly to

obedience, they could not be meritorious: as neither would they be if

they were done without charity, which cannot exist apart from

obedience. For it is written (1 John 2:4, 5): "He who saith that he

knoweth God, and keepeth not His commandments, is a liar . . . but he

that keepeth His word, in him in very deed the charity of God is

perfected": and this because friends have the same likes and dislikes.

Reply Obj. 1: Obedience proceeds from reverence, which pays worship

and honor to a superior, and in this respect it is contained under

different virtues, although considered in itself, as regarding the

aspect of precept, it is one special virtue. Accordingly, in so far

as it proceeds from reverence for a superior, it is contained, in a

way, under observance; while in so far as it proceeds from reverence

for one's parents, it is contained under piety; and in so far as it

proceeds from reverence for God, it comes under religion, and

pertains to devotion, which is the principal act of religion.

Wherefore from this point of view it is more praiseworthy to obey God

than to offer sacrifice, as well as because, "in a sacrifice we slay

another's body, whereas by obedience we slay our own will," as

Gregory says (Moral. xxxv). As to the special case in which Samuel

spoke, it would have been better for Saul to obey God than to offer

in sacrifice the fat animals of the Amalekites against the

commandment of God.

Reply Obj. 2: All acts of virtue, in so far as they come under a

precept, belong to obedience. Wherefore according as acts of virtue

act causally or dispositively towards their generation and

preservation, obedience is said to ingraft and protect all virtues.

And yet it does not follow that obedience takes precedence of all

virtues absolutely, for two reasons. First, because though an act of

virtue come under a precept, one may nevertheless perform that act of

virtue without considering the aspect of precept. Consequently, if

there be any virtue, whose object is naturally prior to the precept,

that virtue is said to be naturally prior to obedience. Such a virtue

is faith, whereby we come to know the sublime nature of divine

authority, by reason of which the power to command is competent to

God. Secondly, because infusion of grace and virtues may precede,

even in point of time, all virtuous acts: and in this way obedience

is not prior to all virtues, neither in point of time nor by nature.

Reply Obj. 3: There are two kinds of good. There is that to

which we are bound of necessity, for instance to love God, and so

forth: and by no means may such a good be set aside on account of

obedience. But there is another good to which man is not bound of

necessity, and this good we ought sometimes to set aside for the sake

of obedience to which we are bound of necessity, since we ought not to

do good by falling into sin. Yet as Gregory remarks (Moral. xxxv), "he

who forbids his subjects any single good, must needs allow them many

others, lest the souls of those who obey perish utterly from

starvation, through being deprived of every good." Thus the loss of

one good may be compensated by obedience and other goods.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 672 / 1128 题