SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 92, Art. 2]

Whether There Are Various Species of Superstition?

Objection 1: It would seem that there are not various species of

superstition. According to the Philosopher (Topic. i, 13), "if one

contrary includes many kinds, so does the other." Now religion, to

which superstition is contrary, does not include various species; but

all its acts belong to the one species. Therefore neither has

superstition various species.

Obj. 2: Further, opposites relate to one same thing. But religion, to

which superstition is opposed, relates to those things whereby we are

directed to God, as stated above (Q. 81, A. 1). Therefore

superstition, which is opposed to religion, is not specified

according to divinations of human occurrences, or by the observances

of certain human actions.

Obj. 3: Further, a gloss on Col. 2:23, "Which things have . . . a

show of wisdom in superstition," adds: "that is to say in a

hypocritical religion." Therefore hypocrisy should be reckoned a

species of superstition.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine assigns the various species of

superstition (De Doctr. Christ. ii, 20).

_I answer that,_ As stated above, sins against religion consist in

going beyond the mean of virtue in respect of certain circumstances

(A. 1). For as we have stated (I-II, Q. 72, A. 9), not every

diversity of corrupt circumstances differentiates the species of a

sin, but only that which is referred to diverse objects, for diverse

ends: since it is in this respect that moral acts are diversified

specifically, as stated above (I-II, Q. 1, A. 3; Q. 18, AA. 2, 6).

Accordingly the species of superstition are differentiated, first on

the part of the mode, secondly on the part of the object. For the

divine worship may be given either to whom it ought to be given,

namely, to the true God, but _in an undue mode,_ and this is the

first species of superstition; or to whom it ought not to be given,

namely, to any creature whatsoever, and this is another genus of

superstition, divided into many species in respect of the various

ends of divine worship. For the end of divine worship is in the first

place to give reverence to God, and in this respect the first species

of this genus is _idolatry,_ which unduly gives divine honor to a

creature. The second end of religion is that man may be taught by God

Whom he worships; and to this must be referred _divinatory_

superstition, which consults the demons through compacts made with

them, whether tacit or explicit. Thirdly, the end of divine worship

is a certain direction of human acts according to the precepts of God

the object of that worship: and to this must be referred the

superstition of certain _observances._

Augustine alludes to these three (De Doctr. Christ. ii, 20), where he

says that "anything invented by man for making and worshipping idols

is superstitious," and this refers to the first species. Then he goes

on to say, "or any agreement or covenant made with the demons for the

purpose of consultation and of compact by tokens," which refers to

the second species; and a little further on he adds: "To this kind

belong all sorts of amulets and such like," and this refers to the

third species.

Reply Obj. 1: As Dionysius says (Div. Nom. iv), "good results from a

cause that is one and entire, whereas evil arises from each single

defect." Wherefore several vices are opposed to one virtue, as stated

above (A. 1; Q. 10, A. 5). The saying of the Philosopher is true of

opposites wherein there is the same reason of multiplicity.

Reply Obj. 2: Divinations and certain observances come under the head

of superstition, in so far as they depend on certain actions of the

demons: and thus they pertain to compacts made with them.

Reply Obj. 3: Hypocritical religion is taken here for

"religion as applied to human observances," as the gloss goes on to

explain. Wherefore this hypocritical religion is nothing else than

worship given to God in an undue mode: as, for instance, if a man

were, in the time of grace, to wish to worship God according to the

rite of the Old Law. It is of religion taken in this sense that the

gloss speaks literally.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 610 / 1128 题