THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 90, Art. 3]

Whether It Is Lawful to Adjure an Irrational Creature?

Objection 1: It would seem unlawful to adjure an irrational creature.

An adjuration consists of spoken words. But it is useless to speak to

one that understands not, such as an irrational creature. Therefore

it is vain and unlawful to adjure an irrational creature.

Obj. 2: Further, seemingly wherever adjuration is admissible,

swearing is also admissible. But swearing is not consistent with an

irrational creature. Therefore it would seem unlawful to employ

adjuration towards one.

Obj. 3: Further, there are two ways of adjuring, as explained above

(AA. 1, 2). One is by way of appeal; and this cannot be employed

towards irrational creatures, since they are not masters of their own

actions. The other kind of adjuration is by way of compulsion: and,

seemingly, neither is it lawful to use this towards them, because we

have not the power to command irrational creatures, but only He of

Whom it was said (Matt. 8:27): "For the winds and the sea obey Him."

Therefore in no way, apparently, is it lawful to adjure irrational

creatures.

_On the contrary,_ Simon and Jude are related to have adjured dragons

and to have commanded them to withdraw into the desert. [*From the

apocryphal Historiae Certam. Apost. vi. 19.]

_I answer that,_ Irrational creatures are directed to their own

actions by some other agent. Now the action of what is directed and

moved is also the action of the director and mover: thus the movement

of the arrow is an operation of the archer. Wherefore the operation

of the irrational creature is ascribed not only to it, but also and

chiefly to God, Who disposes the movements of all things. It is also

ascribed to the devil, who, by God's permission, makes use of

irrational creatures in order to inflict harm on man.

Accordingly the adjuration of an irrational creature may be of two

kinds. First, so that the adjuration is referred to the irrational

creature in itself: and in this way it would be vain to adjure an

irrational creature. Secondly, so that it be referred to the director

and mover of the irrational creature, and in this sense a creature of

this kind may be adjured in two ways. First, by way of appeal made to

God, and this relates to those who work miracles by calling on God:

secondly, by way of compulsion, which relates to the devil, who uses

the irrational creature for our harm. This is the kind of adjuration

used in the exorcisms of the Church, whereby the power of the demons

is expelled from an irrational creature. But it is not lawful to

adjure the demons by beseeching them to help us.

This suffices for the Replies to the Objections.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 603 / 1128 题