FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 89, Art. 4]

Whether an Oath Is an Act of Religion, or Latria?

Objection 1: It would seem that an oath is not an act of religion, or

latria. Acts of religion are about holy and divine things. But oaths

are employed in connection with human disputes, as the Apostle

declares (Heb. 6:16). Therefore swearing is not an act of religion or

latria.

Obj. 2: Further, it belongs to religion to give worship to God, as

Tully says (De Invent. Rhet. ii, 53). But he who swears offers

nothing to God, but calls God to be his witness. Therefore swearing

is not an act of religion or latria.

Obj. 3: Further, the end of religion or latria is to show reverence

to God. But the end of an oath is not this, but rather the

confirmation of some assertion. Therefore swearing is not an act of

religion.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Deut. 6:13): "Thou shalt fear the

Lord thy God, and shalt serve Him only, and thou shalt swear by His

name." Now he speaks there of the servitude of religion. Therefore

swearing is an act of religion.

_I answer that,_ As appears from what has been said above (A. 1), he

that swears calls God to witness in confirmation of what he says. Now

nothing is confirmed save by what is more certain and more powerful.

Therefore in the very fact that a man swears by God, he acknowledges

God to be more powerful, by reason of His unfailing truth and His

universal knowledge; and thus in a way he shows reverence to God. For

this reason the Apostle says (Heb. 6:16) that "men swear by one

greater than themselves," and Jerome commenting on Matt. 5:34, says

that "he who swears either reveres or loves the person by whom he

swears." The Philosopher, too, states (Metaph. i, 3) that "to swear

is to give very great honor." Now to show reverence to God belongs to

religion or latria. Wherefore it is evident that an oath is an act of

religion or latria.

Reply Obj. 1: Two things may be observed in an oath. The witness

adduced, and this is Divine: and the thing witnessed to, or that

which makes it necessary to call the witness, and this is human.

Accordingly an oath belongs to religion by reason of the former, and

not of the latter.

Reply Obj. 2: In the very fact that a man takes God as witness by way

of an oath, he acknowledges Him to be greater: and this pertains to

the reverence and honor of God, so that he offers something to God,

namely, reverence and honor.

Reply Obj. 3: Whatsoever we do, we should do it in honor of God:

wherefore there is no hindrance, if by intending to assure a man, we

show reverence to God. For we ought so to perform our actions in

God's honor that they may conduce to our neighbor's good, since God

also works for His own glory and for our good.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 593 / 1128 题