FIFTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 88, Art. 5]

Whether a Vow Is an Act of Latria or Religion?

Objection 1: It would seem that a vow is not an act of latria or

religion. Every act of virtue is matter for a vow. Now it would seem

to pertain to the same virtue to promise a thing and to do it.

Therefore a vow pertains to any virtue and not to religion especially.

Obj. 2: Further, according to Tully (De Invent. ii, 53) it belongs to

religion to offer God worship and ceremonial rites. But he who takes

a vow does not yet offer something to God, but only promises it.

Therefore, a vow is not an act of religion.

Obj. 3: Further, religious worship should be offered to none but God.

But a vow is made not only to God, but also to the saints and to

one's superiors, to whom religious vow obedience when they make their

profession. Therefore, a vow is not an act of religion.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Isa. 19:21): "(The Egyptians) shall

worship Him with sacrifices and offerings and they shall make vows to

the Lord, and perform them." Now, the worship of God is properly the

act of religion or latria. Therefore, a vow is an act of latria or

religion.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (Q. 81, A. 1, ad 1), every act of

virtue belongs to religion or latria by way of command, in so far as

it is directed to the reverence of God which is the proper end of

latria. Now the direction of other actions to their end belongs to

the commanding virtue, not to those which are commanded. Therefore

the direction of the acts of any virtue to the service of God is the

proper act of latria.

Now, it is evident from what has been said above (AA. 1, 2) that a

vow is a promise made to God, and that a promise is nothing else than

a directing of the thing promised to the person to whom the promise

is made. Hence a vow is a directing of the thing vowed to the worship

or service of God. And thus it is clear that to take a vow is

properly an act of latria or religion.

Reply Obj. 1: The matter of a vow is sometimes the act of another

virtue, as, for instance, keeping the fast or observing continency;

while sometimes it is an act of religion, as offering a sacrifice or

praying. But promising either of them to God belongs to religion, for

the reason given above. Hence it is evident that some vows belong to

religion by reason only of the promise made to God, which is the

essence of a vow, while others belong thereto by reason also of the

thing promised, which is the matter of the vow.

Reply Obj. 2: He who promises something gives it already in as far as

he binds himself to give it: even as a thing is said to be made when

its cause is made, because the effect is contained virtually in its

cause. This is why we thank not only a giver, but also one who

promises to give.

Reply Obj. 3: A vow is made to God alone, whereas a promise may be

made to a man also: and this very promise of good, which is made to a

man, may be the matter of a vow, and in so far as it is a virtuous

act. This is how we are to understand vows whereby we vow something

to the saints or to one's superiors: so that the promise made to the

saints or to one's superiors is the matter of the vow, in so far as

one vows to God to fulfil what one has promised to the saints or

one's superiors.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 580 / 1128 题