NINTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 66, Art. 9]

Whether Theft Is a More Grievous Sin Than Robbery?

Objection 1: It would seem that theft is a more grievous sin than

robbery. For theft adds fraud and guile to the taking of another's

property: and these things are not found in robbery. Now fraud and

guile are sinful in themselves, as stated above (Q. 55, AA. 4, 5).

Therefore theft is a more grievous sin than robbery.

Obj. 2: Further, shame is fear about a wicked deed, as stated in

_Ethic._ iv, 9. Now men are more ashamed of theft than of robbery.

Therefore theft is more wicked than robbery.

Obj. 3: Further, the more persons a sin injures the more grievous it

would seem to be. Now the great and the lowly may be injured by

theft: whereas only the weak can be injured by robbery, since it is

possible to use violence towards them. Therefore the sin of theft

seems to be more grievous than the sin of robbery.

_On the contrary,_ According to the laws robbery is more severely

punished than theft.

_I answer that,_ Robbery and theft are sinful, as stated above (AA.

4, 6), on account of the involuntariness on the part of the person

from whom something is taken: yet so that in theft the

involuntariness is due to ignorance, whereas in robbery it is due to

violence. Now a thing is more involuntary through violence than

through ignorance, because violence is more directly opposed to the

will than ignorance. Therefore robbery is a more grievous sin than

theft. There is also another reason, since robbery not only inflicts

a loss on a person in his things, but also conduces to the ignominy

and injury of his person, and this is of graver import than fraud or

guile which belong to theft. Hence the Reply to the First Objection

is evident.

Reply Obj. 2: Men who adhere to sensible things think more of

external strength which is evidenced in robbery, than of internal

virtue which is forfeit through sin: wherefore they are less ashamed

of robbery than of theft.

Reply Obj. 3: Although more persons may be injured by theft than by

robbery, yet more grievous injuries may be inflicted by robbery than

by theft: for which reason also robbery is more odious.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 458 / 1128 题