FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 56, Art. 1]

Whether the Precepts of the Decalogue Should Have Included a Precept

of Prudence?

Objection 1: It would seem that the precepts of the decalogue should

have included a precept of prudence. For the chief precepts should

include a precept of the chief virtue. Now the chief precepts are

those of the decalogue. Since then prudence is the chief of the moral

virtues, it seems that the precepts of the decalogue should have

included a precept of prudence.

Obj. 2: Further, the teaching of the Gospel contains the Law

especially with regard to the precepts of the decalogue. Now the

teaching of the Gospel contains a precept of prudence (Matt. 10:16):

"Be ye . . . prudent [Douay: 'wise'] as serpents." Therefore the

precepts of the decalogue should have included a precept of prudence.

Obj. 3: Further, the other lessons of the Old Testament are directed

to the precepts of the decalogue: wherefore it is written (Malach.

4:4): "Remember the law of Moses My servant, which I commanded him in

Horeb." Now the other lessons of the Old Testament include precepts

of prudence; for instance (Prov. 3:5): "Lean not upon thy own

prudence"; and further on (Prov. 4:25): "Let thine eyelids go before

thy steps." Therefore the Law also should have contained a precept of

prudence, especially among the precepts of the decalogue.

The contrary however appears to anyone who goes through the precepts

of the decalogue.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (I-II, Q. 100, A. 3; A. 5, ad 1)

when we were treating of precepts, the commandments of the decalogue

being given to the whole people, are a matter of common knowledge to

all, as coming under the purview of natural reason. Now foremost

among the things dictated by natural reason are the ends of human

life, which are to the practical order what naturally known

principles are to the speculative order, as shown above (Q. 47, A.

6). Now prudence is not about the end, but about the means, as stated

above (Q. 47, A. 6). Hence it was not fitting that the precepts of

the decalogue should include a precept relating directly to prudence.

And yet all the precepts of the decalogue are related to prudence, in

so far as it directs all virtuous acts.

Reply Obj. 1: Although prudence is simply foremost among all the

moral virtues, yet justice, more than any other virtue, regards its

object under the aspect of something due, which is a necessary

condition for a precept, as stated above (Q. 44, A. 1; I-II, Q. 99,

AA. 1, 5). Hence it behooved the chief precepts of the Law, which are

those of the decalogue, to refer to justice rather than to prudence.

Reply Obj. 2: The teaching of the Gospel is the doctrine of

perfection. Therefore it needed to instruct man perfectly in all

matters relating to right conduct, whether ends or means: wherefore

it behooved the Gospel teaching to contain precepts also of prudence.

Reply Obj. 3: Just as the rest of the teaching of the Old Testament

is directed to the precepts of the decalogue as its end, so it

behooved man to be instructed by the subsequent lessons of the Old

Testament about the act of prudence which is directed to the means.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 384 / 1128 题