FIRST ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 51, Art. 1]

Whether _Euboulia_ Is a Virtue?

Objection 1: It would seem that _euboulia_ is not a virtue. For,

according to Augustine (De Lib. Arb. ii, 18, 19) "no man makes evil

use of virtue." Now some make evil use of _euboulia_ or good counsel,

either through devising crafty counsels in order to achieve evil

ends, or through committing sin in order that they may achieve good

ends, as those who rob that they may give alms. Therefore _euboulia_

is not a virtue.

Obj. 2: Further, virtue is a perfection, according to _Phys._ vii.

But _euboulia_ is concerned with counsel, which implies doubt and

research, and these are marks of imperfection. Therefore _euboulia_

is not a virtue.

Obj. 3: Further, virtues are connected with one another, as stated

above (I-II, Q. 65). Now _euboulia_ is not connected with the other

virtues, since many sinners take good-counsel, and many godly men are

slow in taking counsel. Therefore _euboulia_ is not a virtue.

_On the contrary,_ According to the Philosopher (Ethic. vi, 9)

_euboulia_ "is a right counselling." Now the perfection of virtue

consists in right reason. Therefore _euboulia_ is a virtue.

_I answer that,_ As stated above (Q. 47, A. 4) the nature of a human

virtue consists in making a human act good. Now among the acts of

man, it is proper to him to take counsel, since this denotes a

research of the reason about the actions he has to perform and

whereof human life consists, for the speculative life is above man,

as stated in _Ethic._ x. But _euboulia_ signifies goodness of

counsel, for it is derived from the _eu_, good, and _boule_, counsel,

being "a good counsel" or rather "a disposition to take good

counsel." Hence it is evident that _euboulia_ is a human virtue.

Reply Obj. 1: There is no good counsel either in deliberating for an

evil end, or in discovering evil means for attaining a good end, even

as in speculative matters, there is no good reasoning either in

coming to a false conclusion, or in coming to a true conclusion from

false premisses through employing an unsuitable middle term. Hence

both the aforesaid processes are contrary to _euboulia,_ as the

Philosopher declares (Ethic. vi, 9).

Reply Obj. 2: Although virtue is essentially a perfection, it does

not follow that whatever is the matter of a virtue implies

perfection. For man needs to be perfected by virtues in all his

parts, and this not only as regards the acts of reason, of which

counsel is one, but also as regards the passions of the sensitive

appetite, which are still more imperfect.

It may also be replied that human virtue is a perfection according to

the mode of man, who is unable by simple insight to comprehend with

certainty the truth of things, especially in matters of action which

are contingent.

Reply Obj. 3: In no sinner as such is _euboulia_ to be found: since

all sin is contrary to taking good counsel. For good counsel requires

not only the discovery or devising of fit means for the end, but also

other circumstances. Such are suitable time, so that one be neither

too slow nor too quick in taking counsel, and the mode of taking

counsel, so that one be firm in the counsel taken, and other like due

circumstances, which sinners fail to observe when they sin. On the

other hand, every virtuous man takes good counsel in those things

which are directed to the end of virtue, although perhaps he does not

take good counsel in other particular matters, for instance in

matters of trade, or warfare, or the like.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 354 / 1128 题