FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 44, Art. 4]

Whether It Is Fittingly Commanded That Man Should Love God with His

Whole Heart?

Objection 1: It would seem that it is unfittingly commanded that man

should love God with his whole heart. For the mode of a virtuous act

is not a matter of precept, as shown above (A. 1, ad 1; I-II, Q. 100,

A. 9). Now the words "with thy whole heart" signify the mode of the

love of God. Therefore it is unfittingly commanded that man should

love God with his whole heart.

Obj. 2: Further, "A thing is whole and perfect when it lacks nothing"

(Phys. iii, 6). If therefore it is a matter of precept that God be

loved with the whole heart, whoever does something not pertaining to

the love of God, acts counter to the precept, and consequently sins

mortally. Now a venial sin does not pertain to the love of God.

Therefore a venial sin is a mortal sin, which is absurd.

Obj. 3: Further, to love God with one's whole heart belongs to

perfection, since according to the Philosopher (Phys. iii, text. 64),

"to be whole is to be perfect." But that which belongs to perfection

is not a matter of precept, but a matter of counsel. Therefore we

ought not to be commanded to love God with our whole heart.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Deut. 6:5): "Thou shalt love the

Lord thy God with thy whole heart."

_I answer that,_ Since precepts are given about acts of virtue, an

act is a matter of precept according as it is an act of virtue. Now

it is requisite for an act of virtue that not only should it fall on

its own matter, but also that it should be endued with its due

circumstances, whereby it is adapted to that matter. But God is to be

loved as the last end, to which all things are to be referred.

Therefore some kind of totality was to be indicated in connection

with the precept of the love of God.

Reply Obj. 1: The commandment that prescribes an act of virtue does

not prescribe the mode which that virtue derives from another and

higher virtue, but it does prescribe the mode which belongs to its

own proper virtue, and this mode is signified in the words "with thy

whole heart."

Reply Obj. 2: To love God with one's whole heart has a twofold

signification. First, actually, so that a man's whole heart be always

actually directed to God: this is the perfection of heaven. Secondly,

in the sense that a man's whole heart be habitually directed to God,

so that it consent to nothing contrary to the love of God, and this

is the perfection of the way. Venial sin is not contrary to this

latter perfection, because it does not destroy the habit of charity,

since it does not tend to a contrary object, but merely hinders the

use of charity.

Reply Obj. 3: That perfection of charity to which the counsels are

directed, is between the two perfections mentioned in the preceding

reply: and it consists in man renouncing, as much as possible,

temporal things, even such as are lawful, because they occupy the

mind and hinder the actual movement of the heart towards God.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 304 / 1128 题