THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 33, Art. 3]

Whether Fraternal Correction Belongs Only to Prelates?

Objection 1: It would seem that fraternal correction belongs to

prelates alone. For Jerome [*Origen, Hom. vii in Joan.] says: "Let

priests endeavor to fulfil this saying of the Gospel: 'If thy brother

sin against thee,'" etc. Now prelates having charge of others were

usually designated under the name of priests. Therefore it seems that

fraternal correction belongs to prelates alone.

Obj. 2: Further, fraternal correction is a spiritual alms. Now

corporal almsgiving belongs to those who are placed above others in

temporal matters, i.e. to the rich. Therefore fraternal correction

belongs to those who are placed above others in spiritual matters,

i.e. to prelates.

Obj. 3: Further, when one man reproves another he moves him by his

rebuke to something better. Now in the physical order the inferior is

moved by the superior. Therefore in the order of virtue also, which

follows the order of nature, it belongs to prelates alone to correct

inferiors.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Dist. xxiv, qu. 3, Can. Tam

Sacerdotes): "Both priests and all the rest of the faithful should be

most solicitous for those who perish, so that their reproof may

either correct their sinful ways, or, if they be incorrigible, cut

them off from the Church."

_I answer that,_ As stated above (A. 1), correction is twofold. One

is an act of charity, which seeks in a special way the recovery of an

erring brother by means of a simple warning: such like correction

belongs to anyone who has charity, be he subject or prelate.

But there is another correction which is an act of justice purposing

the common good, which is procured not only by warning one's brother,

but also, sometimes, by punishing him, that others may, through fear,

desist from sin. Such a correction belongs only to prelates, whose

business it is not only to admonish, but also to correct by means of

punishments.

Reply Obj. 1: Even as regards that fraternal correction which is

common to all, prelates have a grave responsibility, as Augustine

says (De Civ. Dei i, 9): "for just as a man ought to bestow temporal

favors on those especially of whom he has temporal care, so too ought

he to confer spiritual favors, such as correction, teaching and the

like, on those who are entrusted to his spiritual care." Therefore

Jerome does not mean that the precept of fraternal correction

concerns priests only, but that it concerns them chiefly.

Reply Obj. 2: Just as he who has the means wherewith to give corporal

assistance is rich in this respect, so he whose reason is gifted with

a sane judgment, so as to be able to correct another's wrong-doing,

is, in this respect, to be looked on as a superior.

Reply Obj. 3: Even in the physical order certain things act mutually

on one another, through being in some respect higher than one

another, in so far as each is somewhat in act, and somewhat in

potentiality with regard to another. In like manner one man can

correct another in so far as he has a sane judgment in a matter

wherein the other sins, though he is not his superior simply.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 245 / 1128 题