SECOND ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 30, Art. 2]

Whether the Reason for Taking Pity Is a Defect in the Person Who Pities?

Objection 1: It would seem that the reason for taking pity is not a

defect in the person who takes pity. For it is proper to God to be

merciful, wherefore it is written (Ps. 144:9): "His tender mercies

are over all His works." But there is no defect in God. Therefore a

defect cannot be the reason for taking pity.

Obj. 2: Further, if a defect is the reason for taking pity, those in

whom there is most defect, must needs take most pity. But this is

false: for the Philosopher says (Rhet. ii, 8) that "those who are in

a desperate state are pitiless." Therefore it seems that the reason

for taking pity is not a defect in the person who pities.

Obj. 3: Further, to be treated with contempt is to be defective. But

the Philosopher says (Rhet. ii, 8) that "those who are disposed to

contumely are pitiless." Therefore the reason for taking pity, is not

a defect in the person who pities.

_On the contrary,_ Pity is a kind of sorrow. But a defect is the

reason of sorrow, wherefore those who are in bad health give way to

sorrow more easily, as we shall say further on (Q. 35, A. 1, ad 2).

Therefore the reason why one takes pity is a defect in oneself.

_I answer that,_ Since pity is grief for another's distress, as

stated above (A. 1), from the very fact that a person takes pity on

anyone, it follows that another's distress grieves him. And since

sorrow or grief is about one's own ills, one grieves or sorrows for

another's distress, in so far as one looks upon another's distress as

one's own.

Now this happens in two ways: first, through union of the affections,

which is the effect of love. For, since he who loves another looks

upon his friend as another self, he counts his friend's hurt as his

own, so that he grieves for his friend's hurt as though he were hurt

himself. Hence the Philosopher (Ethic. ix, 4) reckons "grieving with

one's friend" as being one of the signs of friendship, and the

Apostle says (Rom. 12:15): "Rejoice with them that rejoice, weep with

them that weep."

Secondly, it happens through real union, for instance when another's

evil comes near to us, so as to pass to us from him. Hence the

Philosopher says (Rhet. ii, 8) that men pity such as are akin to

them, and the like, because it makes them realize that the same may

happen to themselves. This also explains why the old and the wise who

consider that they may fall upon evil times, as also feeble and

timorous persons, are more inclined to pity: whereas those who deem

themselves happy, and so far powerful as to think themselves in no

danger of suffering any hurt, are not so inclined to pity.

Accordingly a defect is always the reason for taking pity, either

because one looks upon another's defect as one's own, through being

united to him by love, or on account of the possibility of suffering

in the same way.

Reply Obj. 1: God takes pity on us through love alone, in as much as

He loves us as belonging to Him.

Reply Obj. 2: Those who are already in infinite distress, do not fear

to suffer more, wherefore they are without pity. In like manner this

applies to those also who are in great fear, for they are so intent

on their own passion, that they pay no attention to the suffering of

others.

Reply Obj. 3: Those who are disposed to contumely, whether through

having been contemned, or because they wish to contemn others, are

incited to anger and daring, which are manly passions and arouse the

human spirit to attempt difficult things. Hence they make a man think

that he is going to suffer something in the future, so that while

they are disposed in that way they are pitiless, according to Prov.

27:4: "Anger hath no mercy, nor fury when it breaketh forth." For the

same reason the proud are without pity, because they despise others,

and think them wicked, so that they account them as suffering

deservedly whatever they suffer. Hence Gregory says (Hom. in Evang.

xxxiv) that "false godliness," i.e. of the proud, "is not

compassionate but disdainful."

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 223 / 1128 题