FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 11, Art. 4]

Whether the Church Should Receive Those Who Return from Heresy?

Objection 1: It would seem that the Church ought in all cases to

receive those who return from heresy. For it is written (Jer. 3:1) in

the person of the Lord: "Thou hast prostituted thyself to many lovers;

nevertheless return to Me saith the Lord." Now the sentence of the

Church is God's sentence, according to Deut. 1:17: "You shall hear the

little as well as the great: neither shall you respect any man's

person, because it is the judgment of God." Therefore even those who

are guilty of the prostitution of unbelief which is spiritual

prostitution, should be received all the same.

Obj. 2: Further, Our Lord commanded Peter (Matt. 18:22) to forgive

his offending brother "not" only "till seven times, but till seventy

times seven times," which Jerome expounds as meaning that "a man

should be forgiven, as often as he has sinned." Therefore he ought to

be received by the Church as often as he has sinned by falling back

into heresy.

Obj. 3: Further, heresy is a kind of unbelief. Now other unbelievers

who wish to be converted are received by the Church. Therefore

heretics also should be received.

_On the contrary,_ The Decretal Ad abolendam (De Haereticis, cap. ix)

says that "those who are found to have relapsed into the error which

they had already abjured, must be left to the secular tribunal."

Therefore they should not be received by the Church.

_I answer that,_ In obedience to Our Lord's institution, the Church

extends her charity to all, not only to friends, but also to foes who

persecute her, according to Matt. 5:44: "Love your enemies; do good

to them that hate you." Now it is part of charity that we should both

wish and work our neighbor's good. Again, good is twofold: one is

spiritual, namely the health of the soul, which good is chiefly the

object of charity, since it is this chiefly that we should wish for

one another. Consequently, from this point of view, heretics who

return after falling no matter how often, are admitted by the Church

to Penance whereby the way of salvation is opened to them.

The other good is that which charity considers secondarily, viz.

temporal good, such as life of the body, worldly possessions, good

repute, ecclesiastical or secular dignity, for we are not bound by

charity to wish others this good, except in relation to the eternal

salvation of them and of others. Hence if the presence of one of

these goods in one individual might be an obstacle to eternal

salvation in many, we are not bound out of charity to wish such a

good to that person, rather should we desire him to be without it,

both because eternal salvation takes precedence of temporal good, and

because the good of the many is to be preferred to the good of one.

Now if heretics were always received on their return, in order to

save their lives and other temporal goods, this might be prejudicial

to the salvation of others, both because they would infect others if

they relapsed again, and because, if they escaped without punishment,

others would feel more assured in lapsing into heresy. For it is

written (Eccles. 8:11): "For because sentence is not speedily

pronounced against the evil, the children of men commit evils without

any fear."

For this reason the Church not only admits to Penance those who

return from heresy for the first time, but also safeguards their

lives, and sometimes by dispensation, restores them to the

ecclesiastical dignities which they may have had before, should their

conversion appear to be sincere: we read of this as having frequently

been done for the good of peace. But when they fall again, after

having been received, this seems to prove them to be inconstant in

faith, wherefore when they return again, they are admitted to

Penance, but are not delivered from the pain of death.

Reply Obj. 1: In God's tribunal, those who return are always

received, because God is a searcher of hearts, and knows those who

return in sincerity. But the Church cannot imitate God in this, for

she presumes that those who relapse after being once received, are

not sincere in their return; hence she does not debar them from the

way of salvation, but neither does she protect them from the sentence

of death.

Reply Obj. 2: Our Lord was speaking to Peter of sins committed

against oneself, for one should always forgive such offenses and

spare our brother when he repents. These words are not to be applied

to sins committed against one's neighbor or against God, for it is

not left to our discretion to forgive such offenses, as Jerome says

on Matt. 18:15, "If thy brother shall offend against thee." Yet even

in this matter the law prescribes limits according as God's honor or

our neighbor's good demands.

Reply Obj. 3: When other unbelievers, who have never received the

faith are converted, they do not as yet show signs of inconstancy

in faith, as relapsed heretics do; hence the comparison fails.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 89 / 1128 题