THIRD ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 5, Art. 3]

Whether a Man Who Disbelieves One Article of Faith, Can Have Lifeless

Faith in the Other Articles?

Objection 1: It would seem that a heretic who disbelieves one article

of faith, can have lifeless faith in the other articles. For the

natural intellect of a heretic is not more able than that of a

catholic. Now a catholic's intellect needs the aid of the gift of

faith in order to believe any article whatever of faith. Therefore it

seems that heretics cannot believe any articles of faith without the

gift of lifeless faith.

Obj. 2: Further, just as faith contains many articles, so does one

science, viz. geometry, contain many conclusions. Now a man may

possess the science of geometry as to some geometrical conclusions,

and yet be ignorant of other conclusions. Therefore a man can believe

some articles of faith without believing the others.

Obj. 3: Further, just as man obeys God in believing the articles of

faith, so does he also in keeping the commandments of the Law. Now a

man can obey some commandments, and disobey others. Therefore he can

believe some articles, and disbelieve others.

_On the contrary,_ Just as mortal sin is contrary to charity, so is

disbelief in one article of faith contrary to faith. Now charity does

not remain in a man after one mortal sin. Therefore neither does

faith, after a man disbelieves one article.

_I answer that,_ Neither living nor lifeless faith remains in a

heretic who disbelieves one article of faith.

The reason of this is that the species of every habit depends on the

formal aspect of the object, without which the species of the habit

cannot remain. Now the formal object of faith is the First Truth, as

manifested in Holy Writ and the teaching of the Church, which proceeds

from the First Truth. Consequently whoever does not adhere, as to an

infallible and Divine rule, to the teaching of the Church, which

proceeds from the First Truth manifested in Holy Writ, has not the

habit of faith, but holds that which is of faith otherwise than by

faith. Even so, it is evident that a man whose mind holds a conclusion

without knowing how it is proved, has not scientific knowledge, but

merely an opinion about it. Now it is manifest that he who adheres to

the teaching of the Church, as to an infallible rule, assents to

whatever the Church teaches; otherwise, if, of the things taught by

the Church, he holds what he chooses to hold, and rejects what he

chooses to reject, he no longer adheres to the teaching of the Church

as to an infallible rule, but to his own will. Hence it is evident

that a heretic who obstinately disbelieves one article of faith, is

not prepared to follow the teaching of the Church in all things; but

if he is not obstinate, he is no longer in heresy but only in error.

Therefore it is clear that such a heretic with regard to one article

has no faith in the other articles, but only a kind of opinion in

accordance with his own will.

Reply Obj. 1: A heretic does not hold the other articles of faith,

about which he does not err, in the same way as one of the faithful

does, namely by adhering simply to the Divine Truth, because in order

to do so, a man needs the help of the habit of faith; but he holds

the things that are of faith, by his own will and judgment.

Reply Obj. 2: The various conclusions of a science have their

respective means of demonstration, one of which may be known without

another, so that we may know some conclusions of a science without

knowing the others. On the other hand faith adheres to all the

articles of faith by reason of one mean, viz. on account of the First

Truth proposed to us in Scriptures, according to the teaching of the

Church who has the right understanding of them. Hence whoever

abandons this mean is altogether lacking in faith.

Reply Obj. 3: The various precepts of the Law may be referred either

to their respective proximate motives, and thus one can be kept

without another; or to their primary motive, which is perfect

obedience to God, in which a man fails whenever he breaks one

commandment, according to James 2:10: "Whosoever shall . . . offend

in one point is become guilty of all."

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 50 / 1128 题