Why not tie him on in _front_ we both exclaimed, with that "one great

mind which jumps."

Of course that was obviously the way to get him over those intervening

sixteen miles of hill.

As he was the bigger of the two, and had never been driven in tandem

before, we thought we had better put him in wheeler. Hastily pulling

out the horse which was already harnessed we proceeded to try and fit

our own rotund steed between the shafts. His figure, however, was

hardly slim enough for the position, and he began to resent the

suggestion with some asperity.

Satisfied that we should do no good with them that way on, we reversed

the order; replacing the original horse in the wheel, we hitched our

obese animal on in front. We then started. I must say he fired some

most alarming salutes with his heels going down the avenue, and

terrified us for the safety of our borrowed wheeler, but the ensuing

hills very soon settled him down and brought him to reason, which was

well for us, as we had not started on our journey till pretty late, and

it was rapidly becoming dark. Needless to say we had no lamps, the road

was horribly rough and mountainous, and we had still many miles to go.

At last we turned in to the lodge gates and up the avenue at K--. It

was dark enough outside on the road, where I could just see my

wheeler's outline in the gloom, but here among the trees (for the

approach is more of a wood than an avenue) it was so pitch dark I

positively could not see my own hand in front of me. Having no light,

we proceeded by faith, and appeared to be getting on extremely well,

when suddenly, with an awful jolt and a bump, the whole concern stopped

short and I nearly flew off my perch with the jerk. My sister was out

like a shot and got to the wheeler's head. He was still there, that she

could feel; groping a little further she collided with the leader, he

was there too, that was a comfort, anything further she could nob

discover without the aid of a light.

Fortunately we had provided ourselves with some matches just _in case_,

and, on striking one, we discovered both horses standing on three legs,

one of the leader's traces having caught round his off hind leg, while

the other trace was twisted over the wheeler's near fore-leg! They both

behaved like true Britons, and waited patiently until we got them

disentangled and set straight again, when we set off once more and

managed to get to our destination without further mishap.

The last exciting drive I had with a tandem was again with my father,

and again in the snow. The roads were barely passable with snowdrifts

piled up on either side six foot high or more. It so happened that

Colonel Gardyne had been staying with us, and it behoved him to get

away by a certain train on a certain day.

Inexorable to our entreaties to postpone his departure, we were obliged

to accede to his request that he might be borne somehow to the station.

As the roads were very bad and too heavy with snow for one horse, we

selected another out of the stable and put him on in front; we then

scrambled into the dog-cart and prepared for the worst. As it happened,

however, we were _not_ prepared for what followed. The leader had not

been in before and did not fancy the game, nor did he approve of the

snow walls; notwithstanding this we got to the station fairly intact

and deposited our guest in safety.

We had not proceeded far on our homeward journey when a great black

puffing engine made its appearance round a corner, with crimson eyes,

and snorts, and noise, and all the honours attendant on a perambulating

thrashing machine. Horrid things they are at the best of times, but

more especially objectionable when one has a couple of three-cornered

horses, one behind the other. Of course the effect of this apparition

was wild confusion, the leader waltzed round and round till he got tied

up into a knot, then set to work, and kicked himself free, breaking

every stitch of harness on his body.

We had no extra tackle (which was foolish), therefore the only thing to

be done was to get him home. Luckily we were not far away, so I

scrambled on to his back and rode him, using the remains of the pad as

a pommel and got him in all safe.

My father having some business in the neighbouring town went on in the

cart alone. Soon he overtook an ally, who, bent on the same errand, was

stumping bravely through the slush (having wisely refrained from taking

out his own horses on such a road). On being offered a lift he mounted

gladly, thankful to curtail his disagreeable tramp, and reassured by

the sight of a single and confidential-looking quadruped. His joy,

however, was shortlived, for the very next turn happened to lead

straight up to our park gates. Dobbin (being one of the genus I object

to so strongly who "_think_") instantly _thought_, and made a dive for

the corner. The wheel, colliding violently against the curb-stone,

precipitated the unfortunate passenger headlong into a snow-drift,

where he remained half buried, with only a large pair of feet flapping

in the air to indicate the spot where the casualty had occurred.

ROSIE ANSTRUTHER THOMSON.

"TIGERS I HAVE SHOT."

BY MRS C. MARTELLI.

My personal experiences of tiger-shooting in India have been neither on

a large scale nor of a very heroic and exciting nature; yet, such as

they are, I gladly place them upon record for the sake of those who may

not have had the good fortune to see sport of this particular kind.

Tiger-shooting, however, has been so well and so often described that I

cannot hope to be able to tell anything of a novel character about it.

It has been my good fortune to "assist" (in the French sense of the

word) at the death of five tigers. And here I should premise that,

according to the laws of Indian sport, a tiger is considered the trophy

of the gun that first hits it, whether that shot prove fatal or not. As

will be seen presently, I succeeded in killing the third of the five,

but it was my husband's tiger and not mine, as my first shot missed it.

I did _not_ kill the first and second of the five, but they were my

tigers because I was the first to hit them. In the case of the fourth

tiger I was the first to hit, and with a second shot I killed it; but

the tiger was mine by virtue of the first shot, not the second. This is

a not unfair rule, because the first shot often proves fatal, even

though for a time the tiger manages to get away, and if some rule of

the kind were not in existence, and the tiger were supposed to belong

to the gun that appeared to administer the _coup de grâce_, there would

be a great deal of indiscriminate firing, which would result, to say

the least of it, in the skin being hopelessly ruined.

But to come to my story. In January 1887, my husband, Colonel Martelli,

who was at the time Political Agent and Superintendent of the Estates

of Rewa, Central India (the Maharajah being a minor), was making his

annual tour, and we were in camp at Govindghar, about fourteen miles

from the capital. There were with us my sister, the agency surgeon and

the usual tribe of camp followers.

After we had been in camp about a week, a shikari brought us news that

there was unquestionably a tiger not many miles away. To discover more

exactly where he was, buffaloes were tied as bait to trees in four or

five places, at a radius of three or four miles from the camp, and we

waited in much excitement for further intelligence. As apparel of a

very noticeable or attractive character is obviously unsuited to a

tiger-hunt, I gave my native tailor overnight some plain cotton

material, and he presented it to me in the morning, dyed green and made

up into a serviceable dress. He had also covered my Terai sun-hat with

the same material. Early in the morning word came into camp that we

were to be on the alert, and, about ten a.m., news reached us that the

tiger had been seen.

We started off immediately, my husband and I on one elephant, and the

doctor and my sister on another. Seated behind us in the howdah was a

shikari, carrying our guns. _My_ weapon was a 450 double express rifle,

by Alex. Henry.

We had had Chota Hazrie, so took a lunch-breakfast with us. Passing on

our way what we thought would be a charming spot for our _déjeuner_, we

left our servant Francis there with our hamper. Imagine our disgust

when, upon reaching this spot, hungry and expectant, on our return, we

found that Francis had disappeared, and with him all traces of the

hoped-for meal. It turned out afterwards that some bears had come

unexpectedly upon the scene, and Francis had, not altogether

unnaturally, sought refuge in flight.

Ignorant of the fate of our breakfast, however, we pushed on, and about

two miles from camp met the head shikari--Mothi Singh by name. Acting

under his instructions we dismounted and followed him through the

jungle. We pushed along what professed to be a path, but of which all I

can say in its favour is that it was slightly better than the jungle of

grass and underwood through which it passed, more than once indeed

boughs and branches had to be cut down to make it possible for my

sister and myself to get along.

We at length reached a rock, fifteen or twenty feet in height, on the

summit of which Mothi Singh placed us, and past which the tiger would

be driven. I was to have first shot. The beaters, three hundred or four

hundred in number, now began their work, shouting, beating drums and

tom-toms, blowing bugles, firing blank cartridges, and steadily

pressing forward in our direction. We, of course, maintained the most

profound silence, and watched with the deepest interest for the

appearance of the tiger. As we waited, all sorts of creatures, scared

by the beaters, passed us--pig and deer, pea-fowl and jungle fowl, the

majestic sambhur, and the pretty nilghai, not to mention foxes and

jackals, went by within shot, but for to-day, at anyrate, they were

safe. At last came the tiger. He advanced like an enormous cat, now

crouching upon the ground, now crawling forward, now turning round to

try and discover the meaning of the unwonted noise behind him. When he

was about eighty yards from us I fired and hit him on the shoulder;

then the others fired, and the tiger bolted. At this moment Hera Sahib,

the commander-in-chief of the Rewa army, and who had been directing

"the beat," came up on an elephant, and, as he had brought with him a

spare elephant, my husband mounted the latter, and they went off

together in search of the tiger, leaving us upon the rock.

Two hours later they came upon the wounded tiger hiding in the jungle.

The moment he saw that he was discovered, he charged Hera Sahib's

elephant, and the latter, being a young animal, bolted. The tiger then

turned and charged the elephant my husband was riding, which stood his

ground. The tiger, charged underneath the elephant, but fortunately my

husband got a snap-shot at him and rolled him over. He crept into the

jungle again, however, but was now past serious resistance, and

although he made a brave attempt to reach his enemies, he was easily

despatched. He measured over nine feet in length.

My husband's tour over, we returned to our head-quarters at Rewa, and a

very few days later, in the dusk of the evening, news came that another

tiger had been seen in the same neighbourhood as that in which we shot

the first. My husband and I started off at three the next morning in a

dog-cart; our horse was only half broken in, and I was driving. About

eleven and a half miles from Govindghar our steed deposited us in a

ditch, and we were compelled to walk the rest of the way there. At

Govindghar elephants were in waiting for us, and we made our way in

much the same fashion as on the previous occasion to the rock of which

I have already told. The beat, too, was precisely similar to the former

one. Presently the tiger appeared. I was so struck by his magnificent

appearance, that, although I was to have first shot, I waited so long

that eventually my husband and I fired together. The tiger facing us, I

fired again, and then, in his rage, he charged straight at the rock on

which we were standing. As he came on I fired a third time, and hit him

between the shoulders. He disappeared somewhere at the base of the

rock, and, although he was out of sight, we could hear him growling

with pain. We did not dare, of course, to come down from our rock, as

we had no idea where he was, or to what extent he was crippled, but,

after waiting about half-an-hour, Hera Sahib came up on an elephant and

killed him. It turned out that the tiger had crept under another rock

at the base of that on which we were standing, and was too badly

wounded to come out and face his foes. This tiger was a much handsomer,

and a larger one than the first.

Not long after the above, my husband was appointed Political Agent,

Eastern States, Rajputana, which consists of Bhurtpore, Dholepore, and

Karowlie. Each state has its own Rajah. I did no more tiger-shooting

until the early part of the year 1891.

In February then we went to Karowlie, and on our arrival there we were

met by the Maharajah, who at once informed us that news had just

arrived that a tiger was in the neighbourhood, and courteously asked us

to accompany him in pursuit of it. We gladly accepted this invitation,

and were told to hold ourselves in readiness, as a gun would be fired

from the palace as soon as definite information arrived, and it would

then be necessary to start at once.

The gun was fired at about noon and off we went, the Maharajah and his

retinue, and our two selves. We were conducted through very thick

jungle to the Maharajah's shooting-box, about nine miles distant. We

were able to ride only a portion of the way, part of the remainder I

was carried in a "Tonjon" (sedan chair), and for the rest of the

journey I had to walk and struggle through the dense jungle as best I

could. The shooting-box we found to consist of a small stone tower,

built on the edge of a ravine. We were posted upon the top of the

tower, and the tiger was to be driven up the ravine and within shot of

our rifles.

The Maharajah is a very keen sportsman and a capital shot, but with

great politeness he insisted upon my firing first. Alas, when the

moment arrived--and the tiger--the jungle was so thick that I could

hardly see the animal, and, I regret to say, I missed him altogether.

My husband fired and wounded the tiger severely; I then fired again and

killed him.

News was brought to us not to leave our post as there was another tiger

in the jungle. The Maharajah had been much put out at my missing my

first shot and so losing the tiger, but insisted courteously on my

having an opportunity of retrieving my disaster; of course I was only

too glad to avail myself of his kindness.

A few minutes later the second tiger appeared, and, getting a better

view of him than of his predecessor, I succeeded in hitting him in the

chest. The Maharajah then fired and put a second bullet into him; I

fired and gave him his _coup de grâce_.

Within a week news was brought to Karowlie that another tiger had made

his appearance, this time about ten miles away, and in quite another

direction. The whole country in this neighbourhood was cut up by

ravines, and when we arrived at the place indicated to us, we found

that there was no rock which we could turn into a citadel, no handy

tree from whose branches we might fire upon the foe, and of course no

shooting-box; and, as in addition, it was quite impossible to bring the

elephants along, we had to take our stand on foot and hope for the

best. Should the wounded tiger charge us, we should have to make sure

of stopping him before he could reach us. With us, on this occasion,

were three young officers, who had never been present at a tiger-hunt,

and who probably had never seen a tiger out of the Zoological Gardens.

Accordingly, they were allowed to draw for choice of places and for

first shot. They naturally selected the coign of vantage, and between

them slew the tiger. I did not even see him till he was dead. They went

off immediately, in a great state of elation; but the Maharajah told me

that there was a panther in the jungle. Presently the animal came in

sight with a tremendous rush, and I fired, wounding him severely; but

although we traced him for some miles we saw no more of him and he got

away.

This is all I have to tell. If, from the description I have given,

anyone should be inclined to say that the tiger does not appear to have

much chance of escape, the answer is that it is not intended that he

should have any. Tigers are shot in India, not as game is in England

for hunting, to give amusement to men, horses and dogs, not as in

pheasant or partridge shooting, with a remote reference to the demands

of the table, but to save the lives of the natives and their cattle. If

you don't kill the tiger he will kill you. But although the odds are on

the shikari and against the tiger, whether you fire from the back of an

elephant, from the top of a rock, or in the branch of a tree, there is

always room, unfortunately, for a misadventure, and consequently

tiger-shooting will always be a useful school for endurance, judgment

and self-reliance.

KATE MARTELLI.

RIFLE-SHOOTING.

BY MISS LEALE.

At the Bisley Meeting of 1891, I took part in some of the competitions

open to all comers. The measure of success which I achieved has gained

a publicity for which I was scarcely prepared, and has brought around

me a group of correspondents who have plied me with questions as to my

experience in rifle-shooting, and the rise and progress of my devotion

to an accomplishment so unusual for ladies, and even deemed by many to

be somewhat out of their reach.

I purpose, therefore, to put a few notes together, in which I shall

endeavour to answer some of the questions proposed to me, and to relate

such passages of my experience as may serve to encourage those of my

own sex who may have some ambition in this direction.

It was a little more than four years ago when I first handled a

Martini-Henry rifle. I was looking on at the shooting one afternoon at

the Guernsey "Wimbledon," and wondered if it was a very difficult thing

to hit the target, which appeared to me to be such a mere speck when

seen from so great a distance. I had, some time before this, fired a

few shots with a fowling-piece at an impromptu target, but

rifle-shooting looked to me far more real and interesting. At length I

succeeded in persuading my father to allow me to try my hand at a shot

with a rifle.

I remember that there was some discussion, at that time, about the

recoil, but as I was so very ignorant of the management and powers of

the rifle, I did not give this really serious question the necessary

attention. I believe that had I heard, at this early stage, as much

about recoil as I have since, I should probably have been afraid to

shoot with a Martini.

A certain militia man, who is now one of our best shots, related to me

a curious incident which happened to him when he first fired with a

service rifle. He was shooting in the prone position; and, after

pulling the trigger, he heard a great noise, and immediately there was

a good deal of smoke about; but the rifle had disappeared. On looking

round, however, he saw his rifle behind him! He had been resting the

under part of the butt lightly on his shoulders, and holding the rifle

loosely; thus the force of the recoil had actually driven it past him

over his shoulder.

I have heard of many other cases of the recoil becoming dangerous; but

I believe it is from fear of being "kicked" that recruits fail to hold

their rifles properly while pulling the trigger.

In my own case, certainly, "ignorance was bliss"; for, in firing my

first shot, I was enabled to give my whole attention to keeping the

rifle steady, and placing it firmly against my shoulder for that

purpose alone undisturbed by any fear of recoil. And I believe that

this absence of fear is the chief reason why I have been able to use a

Martini-Henry rifle without suffering from the recoil.

Thinking from the experience of my first shot that shooting was easy, I

was anxious to go on with it. Many experienced shots volunteered

information which was very helpful; but I soon discovered that I was

wrong in thinking that rifle-shooting was merely a matter of seeing the

bull's eye over the sights. The first difficulty was that of keeping

the rifle steady. I had to learn exactly how to hold it and for this I

had to study _position_.

I had fired my first shot in the kneeling position. I did not then know

of any other, except the standing and lying down. The former I could

not manage, as the rifle was too heavy to hold up without any support

for the arms; and the lying down position seemed to me, then, to

require a great deal of practice. This conjecture has been well

justified by my subsequent experience. I have never since fired from

the kneeling position, as a much better one was recommended to me,

namely, the sitting position. In this way I can have a rest for both

arms, which is an advantage over the other method in which it is only

possible to rest one.

Having chosen a position, I found that it needed a great deal of

studying. It was then that I discovered another great difficulty,

_i.e._, that of pulling the trigger without disturbing the aim. I

received some advice on this subject which at first sounded rather

curious. I was told to squeeze the trigger "like I would a lemon" and

to let it go off without my knowing. This accomplishment requires a

great deal of practice, but is well worth the trouble of learning; for

I am confident that it is the great secret of good shooting.

During my first few months of shooting, I only used to think of taking

a correct aim at the bull's eye, and trying to keep still while pulling

the trigger. I was so absorbed in this effort, that it did not occur to

me for some time that there was much more than this dexterity to be

gained in order to be sure of making a good score. There remained the

great question of finding the bull's eye.

This, of course, involves the scientific part of rifle-shooting; and

although, at first, I was alarmed at the difficulty of the subject, I

soon saw that the shooting would become tame and monotonous without it.

The range where I was in the habit of practising (and still do

practise) is near the sea. The targets have the sea for a background,

and, as is often the case near the sea, we have a great deal of wind.

It was quite easy to understand that the wind would affect the course

of the bullet; but it did not turn out to be so easy as it appeared, to

calculate in feet and inches how much allowance should be made for this

source of disturbance. Fortunately "young shots" are not expected to be

able to find out this for themselves by the long and painful discipline

of repeated failure; and it is always easy for them to obtain advice

from persons on the range who have had more experience than themselves.

I was very fortunate in that way myself, and feel very grateful for the

good instruction I have received from several "crack-shots."

There are two things to be considered--the elevation and windage.

The elevation does not vary so much as the windage. Having once found

the normal elevation of a given rifle for the different ranges, it will

not afterwards need very great alterations. But the different effects

of wind, light, and atmosphere upon it are interesting, and require

careful attention.

If the wind is blowing straight down the range from the targets, it

will naturally increase the resistance for the bullet. Also, by

retarding its speed the trajectory will be lowered, thus causing the

shot to strike below the spot aimed at. To counteract this the aim must

be taken higher, but the rifle is so constructed that by raising the

slide of the backsight a little, aim may be taken at the original spot.

When the wind is blowing towards the targets, from the firing point, it

has little or no effect upon the bullet, as the speed of the latter is

so much greater than that of the wind. A side wind will slightly alter

the elevation of the bullet, in a ratio to its strength.

Ladies in the Field: Sketches of Sport · 第 5 / 10 段