The horses, some in their stalls, some picketed outside unde

Produced by Julia Miller and the Online Distributed

Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was

produced from images generously made available by The

Internet Archive/American Libraries.)

LADIES IN THE FIELD

Sketches of Sport

EDITED BY

THE LADY GREVILLE

NEW YORK

D. APPLETON AND COMPANY

1894

PREFACE.

It is scarcely necessary nowadays to offer an apology for sport, with

its entrancing excitement, its infinite variety of joys and interests.

Women cheerfully share with men, hardships, toil and endurance, climb

mountains, sail on the seas, face wind and rain and the chill gusts of

winter, as unconcernedly as they once followed their quiet occupations

by their firesides. The feverish life of cities too, with its

enervating pleasures, is forgotten and neglected for the witchery of

legitimate sport, which need not be slaughter or cruelty. Women who

prefer exercise and liberty, who revel in the cool sea breeze, and love

to feel the fresh mountain air fanning their cheeks, who are afraid

neither of a little fatigue nor of a little exertion, are the better,

the truer, and the healthier, and can yet remain essentially feminine

in their thoughts and manners. They may even by their presence refine

the coarser ways of men, and contribute to the gradual disuse of bad

language in the hunting field, and to the adoption of a habit of

courtesy and kindness. The duties of the wife of the M. F. H. fully bear

out this view.

When women prove bright and cheerful companions, they add to the man's

enjoyment and to the enlarging of their own practical interests. When,

in addition, they endeavour to love Nature in her serenest and grandest

moods, to snatch from her mighty bosom some secrets of her being, to

study sympathetically the habits of birds, beasts and flowers, and to

practise patience, skill, ingenuity and self-reliance, they have learnt

valuable lessons of life.

Lastly, in the words of a true lover of art: "The sportsman who walked

through the turnip fields, thinking of nothing but his dog and his gun,

has been drinking in the love of beauty at every pore of his

invigorated frame, as, from each new tint of autumn, from every misty

September morning, from each variety of fleeting cloud, each flash of

light from distant spire or stream, the unnoticed influence stole over

him like a breeze, bringing health from pleasant places, and made him

capable of clearer thoughts and happier emotions."

VIOLET GREVILLE.

CONTENTS.

PAGE

RIDING IN IRELAND AND INDIA. 1

_By the Lady Greville._

HUNTING IN THE SHIRES. 29

HORSES AND THEIR RIDERS. 61

_By The Duchess of Newcastle._

THE WIFE OF THE M. F. H. 71

_By Mrs Chaworth Musters._

FOX-HUNTING. 89

TEAM AND TANDEM DRIVING. 105

_By Miss Rosie Anstruther Thomson._

TIGERS I HAVE SHOT. 143

_By Mrs C. Martelli._

RIFLE-SHOOTING. 157

_By Miss Leale._

DEER-STALKING AND DEER-DRIVING. 173

_By Diane Chasseresse._

COVERT SHOOTING. 197

_By Lady Boynton._

A KANGAROO HUNT. 233

_By Mrs Jenkins._

CYCLING. 245

_By Mrs E. R. Pennell._

PUNTING. 267

_By Miss Sybil Salaman._

LADIES IN THE FIELD.

RIDING IN IRELAND AND INDIA.

BY THE LADY GREVILLE.

Of all the exercises indulged in by men and women, riding is perhaps

the most productive of harmless pleasure. The healthful, exhilarating

feeling caused by rapid motion through the air, and the sense of power

conveyed by the easy gallop of a good horse, tends greatly to moral and

physical well-being and satisfaction. Riding improves the temper, the

spirits and the appetite; black shadows and morbid fancies disappear

from the mental horizon, and wretched indeed must he be who can

preserve a gloomy or discontented frame of mind during a fine run in a

grass country, or even in a sharp, brisk gallop over turfy downs. Such

being the case, no wonder that the numbers of horsemen increase every

day, and that the hunting field, from the select company of a few

country squires and hard-riding young men, has developed into an unruly

mob of people, who ride over the hounds, crush together in the

gateways, and follow like a flock of sheep through the gaps and over

the fences, negotiated by more skilful or courageous sportsmen. Women,

too, have rushed in where their mothers feared to tread. Little girls

on ponies may be seen holding their own nobly out hunting, while Hyde

Park, during the season, is filled with fair, fresh-looking girls in

straw hats, covert coats and shirts, driving away the cobwebs of

dissipation and the deleterious effects of hot rooms by a mild canter

in the early morning. Unfortunately, though a woman never looks better

than on horseback, _when she knows how to ride_, the specimens one

often encounters riding crookedly, all one side, to the inevitable

detriment of the horse's back, bumping on the saddle like a sack of

potatoes, or holding on with convulsive effort to the horse's mouth,

are sufficient to create a holy horror in the minds of reasonable

spectators. Park-riding is not difficult compared with cross-country

riding, yet how seldom do you see it perfect? To begin with, a certain

amount of horsemanship is absolutely necessary. There must be art, and

the grace that conceals art; there must be self-possession, quiet, and

a thorough knowledge of the horse you are riding. Take, for instance, a

fresh young hunter into the park for the first time. He shies at the

homely perambulator, starts at the sound of cantering hoofs, is

terrified by a water-cart, maddened by the strains of the regimental

band, or the firing of the guards at their matutinal drill, and finally

attempts to bolt or turn round as other horses, careering along, meet

and pass him in a straggling gallop. If he backs, rears, kicks, shies

and stops short, or wheels round suddenly, with ears thrown back, his

rider need not be surprised. Horses cantering in every direction

disturb, distress and puzzle him. On which side are the hounds? he

wonders. Why does not his rider extend him? Where are the fences, and

when will the fun begin? These, no doubt, are some of the thoughts that

pass through a well-bred hunter's mind, for that horses _do_ reason

in their own peculiar fashion I am convinced, and that they fully

recognise the touch and voice of the master, no one can doubt who has

noticed the difference in the behaviour of a hunter when ridden by

different persons. If the park rider wishes for a pleasant conveyance I

should strongly recommend a hack, neither a polo pony nor a cob. But

where, oh where, are perfect hacks to be found? They should be

handsome, well-bred, not quite thorough-bred, about 15·3, with fine

shoulders, good action, and, above all, perfect mouth and manners. No

Irish horse has manners, as a rule, until he comes to England, or has

the slightest idea of bending and holding himself, owing to the fact of

his being usually broken and ridden in a snaffle bridle. This practice

has its uses, notably in that it makes the horses bold fencers, and

teaches them not to be afraid of facing the bit, but it is not

conducive to the development of a park hack, which should be able to

canter round a sixpence. I remember in my young days seeing Mr

Mackenzie Greaves and Lord Cardigan riding in the park, the latter

mounted on a beautiful chestnut horse, which cantered at the slowest

and easiest of paces, the real proverbial arm-chair, with a beautifully

arched neck, champing proudly at the bit, yet really guided as by a

silken thread. _That_ was a perfect hack, and would probably fetch

now-a-days four or five hundred guineas. No lady ought to ride (if she

wishes to look well) on anything else. Men may bestride polo ponies, or

clatter lumberingly along on chargers, or exercise steeple-chase horses

with their heads in the air, yawing at a snaffle; but, if a woman wants

to show off her figure and her seat she should have a perfect hack, not

too small, with a good forehand, nice action, and, above all, a good

walker, one that neither fidgets nor shuffles nor breaks into a trot.

Bitting is, as a rule, not sufficiently considered. In the park, a

light, double bridle, or what they call in Ireland a Ward bit, is the

best, and no martingale should be required. People often wonder why a

horse does not carry his head in the right place. Generally, unless the

horse is unfortunately shaped, this is the fault of the bit, sometimes

it is too severe, or too narrow, which frets and irritates the horse's

mouth. A horse with a very tender mouth will stand only the lightest of

bits, and is what they call a snaffle bridle horse, not always the

pleasantest of mouths, at least out hunting; for I cannot think that a

lady can really ever hold a horse well together over a deep country,

intersected by stiff fences, with a snaffle, especially if he is a big

horse with somewhat rolling action. It has been said by a great

authority on riding that no horse's mouth is good enough for a snaffle,

and no man's hands good enough for a curb. I remember the late Lord

Wilton, one of the finest cross-country riders, telling me to be sure

never to ride my horse on the curb over a fence. But, as I suppose

there is no absolute perfection in horse or man, each rider must, to a

certain extent, judge for himself, and ride different horses in

different ways. But you may be sure of this, that the bitting of grooms

is generally too severe, and the hands of a man who rides all his

horses in martingales, snaffles, and complicated arrangements of bit

and bridle, are sure to be wrong. The matter practically resolves

itself into hands. They, after all, are the chief essentials in riding.

The "Butcher" on horseback who tugs at his horse's head as if it were a

bedpost, who loses his temper, who digs in the spurs incessantly, and

generally has a fight with his horse over every fence, invariably

possesses bad hands as well as a bad temper. I believe the reason that

women who ride hard generally get fewer falls than men, is to be

accounted for by the fact that they leave their horse's head alone, do

not interfere with and bully him, and are generally on good terms with

their mounts. For this reason I disapprove strongly of women riding

with spurs, and think that in most cases _men_ would be better without

them. I had a personal experience of this once, when I one day lent a

very clever hunter, who had carried me perfectly, to the huntsman. He

rode her with spurs, she went unkindly all day and refused several

fences, a thing I had never known her do before. Many men are too

fond of looking upon horses as machines, ignoring their wishes and

peculiarities, whereas the true horseman is in thorough sympathy with

the animal he bestrides, and contrives by some occult influence to

inspire him with confidence and affection. A horse, bold as a lion with

his master on his back, may very often refuse with a timid, nervous or

weak rider. One man, like the late George Whyte Melville, can get the

rawest of four-year-olds brilliantly over a country, while another

finds difficulty even with an experienced hunter.

I believe thoroughly in kindness and gentleness in stable management. I

would dismiss at once a groom or helper who hit, or swore at, or

knocked about a horse. Horses are very nervous creatures, and keenly

susceptible to affection. I had once a beautiful chestnut hunter, quite

thorough-bred, and a perfect picture, with a small, beautifully-shaped

head, and large, gentle eye. He had evidently been fearfully

ill-treated, for, if anyone came near him he would shrink into the

corner of his box, tremble violently, and put his ears back from sheer

nervousness. After a bit, seeing he was kindly treated, he learnt to

follow me like a dog. Another mare, who came with the reputation of

a vicious animal, and was supposed to bite all those who approached

her, used, after a time, to eat nicely from my hand, much to the

astonishment of her late master, who saw me go freely into her box. No

man can be a really good rider who is not fond of horses, and does not

care to study their peculiarities and tempers, and govern them rather

by kind determination than by sheer ill-treatment.

A lady rider should look to her bit before she starts, see that the

curb chain is not too tight, and the bit in the proper position. She

should visit her horse daily, and feed him in the stable till he knows

her voice as well as one of mine did who, on hearing it, would rise up

on his hind legs and try to turn himself round in his stall whinnying

with pleasure. And, above all, she should study her saddle. Sore backs

are the terrible curse of a hunting stable, and are generally produced

by bad riding, hanging on to the stirrup, instead of rising when

trotting, from the body, and sitting crooked on a badly-fitting saddle.

The woman's seat should be a perfectly straight one. She should look,

as she sits, exactly between the horse's ears, and, with the third

pommel to give her assistance, she ought to maintain a perfect balance.

Every lady's saddle should be made for her, as some women take longer

saddles than others. The stuffing should be constantly seen to, and,

while the girths are loosed, the saddle itself never taken off till the

horse's back is cool. If it is a well-made saddle and does not come

down too low on the withers, a horse should very rarely have a bad

back. I have always preferred a saddle of which the seat was flat and

in old days used to have mine stuffed a good deal at the back so as to

prevent the feeling of riding uphill. Messrs Wilkinson & Champion now

make saddles on that principle, on which one can sit most comfortably.

Numnahs I do not care for, or if they are used they should only be a

thin leather panel, well oiled, and kept soft and pliable.

No lady should hunt till she can ride, by which I mean, till she can

manage all sorts of horses, easy and difficult to ride, till she knows

how to gallop, how to jump, and is capable of looking after herself.

Half the accidents in the hunting field occur from women, who can

scarcely ride, being put upon a hunter, and, while still perfectly

inexperienced, told to ride to hounds. They may have plenty of courage

but no knowledge. Whyte Melville depicts pluck as "a moral quality, the

result of education, natural self-respect and certain high aspirations

of the intellect;" and nerve "as a gift of nature, dependent on the

health, the circulation and the liver. As memory to imagination in the

student, so is nerve to pluck in the horseman." Women are remarkable

for nerve, men for pluck. Women who ride are generally young and

healthy. Youth is bold and inconscient of its danger. Yet few men or

women have the cool courage of Jim Mason, who was seen galloping down a

steep hill in Leicestershire, the reins on his horse's neck, his knife

in his mouth, mending the lash of his whip. In fact, a good deal of the

hard riding one sees is often due to what is called "jumping powder,"

or the imbibing of liqueurs and spirits. For hard riding, it should

never be forgotten, is essentially not good riding. The fine old

sportsman, ripened by experience, who, while quietly weighing the

chances against him, and perfectly aware of the risks he runs, is yet

ready to face them boldly, with all the resources of a cool head and a

wide knowledge, is on the high road to being a hero. These calm,

unassuming, courageous men are those who make their mark on the field

of battle, and to whom the great Duke of Wellington referred when he

spoke of the hunting field being the best school of cavalry in the

world.

Most of us want to fly before we can walk. This vaulting ambition

accounts for the contemptible spectacles that occasionally meet our

sight. A city man, who has had half-a-dozen riding lessons, an enriched

tradesman, or an unsportmanlike foreigner, must needs start a stud of

hunters. We all remember the immortal adventures of Jorrocks and Soapy

Sponge, but how often do we see scenes quite as ludicrous as any

depicted in Sartees' delightful volumes. Because everyone he knows goes

across country, the novice believes fondly that he can do the same. He

forgets that the real sportsman has ridden from earliest childhood; has

taken his falls cheerfully off a pony; and learned how to ride without

stirrups, often clinging on only bareback; has watched, while still a

little chap in knickerbockers or white frocks, holding tight to the

obliging nurse's hand, some of the mysteries of the stable; has seen

the horses groomed and shod, physicked or saddled, with the keen

curiosity and interest of childhood, and has grown up, as it were in

the atmosphere of the stable. Every English boy, the son of a country

gentleman, loves the scent of the hay, not perhaps poetically in the

hay field, but practically in the manger. He knows the difference in

the quality of oats, and the price of straw, the pedigree of the colts,

and the performances of the mares, long before he has mastered the

intricacies of Euclid, or the diction of Homer. To ride is to him as

natural as to walk, and he acquires a seat and hands as unconsciously

as the foals learn to trot and jump after their mother; and

consequently, as riding is an art eminently necessary to be acquired in

youth, everything is in his favour, when in after life the poor and

plucky subaltern pits himself on his fifty-guinea screw against the

city magnate riding his four-hundred-guinea hunter. Fortunately this is

so, for riding, while entrancing to its votaries, is also an expensive

amusement; yet so long as a man has a penny in his pocket that he can

legitimately dispose of for amusement, so long would one wish him to

spend it thus, for the moral qualities necessary to make a good rider

are precisely those which have given England her superiority in the

rank of nations. The Irish with their ardent and enthusiastic natures,

are essentially lovers of horses; and an Irish hunter is without

exception the cleverest in the world. He has generally a light mouth,

always a leg to spare, and the nimbleness of a deer in leaping.

_Apropos_ of the latter quality, I remember the answer of an Irishman

who was selling a horse, when asked if he could jump,--

"Is't lep, ye mane, yer honour? Well there never was a leper the likes

of him!"

"Does he feed well?"

"Feed, yer honour? He'd fatten on a bowling alley!"

Hunting in Ireland, while rougher and more unconventional, is certainly

safer than in England. The fences are big, but you do not as a rule

ride so fast at them, and are therefore not so likely to get a bad

fall; in addition, there is rarely if ever any timber to jump. But

against that, there are a great many stone walls, and nasty big black

ditches, called drains, which are boggy and unfathomable, and the banks

of which are rotten; and there is no road riding possible, and few

gates, while lanes are rare and far between. Nevertheless, I believe it

is the best hunting country for ladies. It has no big hairy fences to

scratch your face and tear your habit, and no ox-rails; the country is

grass and beautiful going; you can ride a horse a stone lighter than in

England, and on a good bold horse you can go pretty nearly straight.

The vexed question of habits appears now to be one of the most serious

matters, in consequence of the many accidents that have happened to

ladies. When I began riding, we wore habits that tore if they caught,

and, consequently, no one was ever hung up or dragged. The strong

melton cloth of the present day does not give at all, and therefore is

a source of great danger if the habit catches on the pommel. None of

the so-called safety habits up to the present seem to be absolutely

satisfactory, nor any of the dodges of elastic or safety stirrups. Mr

Scott, Jr., of South Molton Street, has invented the latest safety

skirt, but this is in reality no habit at all, only an apron, and

therefore can scarcely be called a skirt. One great security is to have

no hem to the habit. Another is, to be a good rider (for the bad riders

always fall on the off side, which is the reason their habit catches on

the crutch). The third is to have a habit made of tearable material;

and this, I believe, is the only solution of the question, unless

ladies decide definitely to adopt a man's dress. Meanwhile, I would

impress upon all women the great danger of hunting, unless they are

fully capable of managing their horses, choosing their own place at a

fence, omitting to ride over their pilot, or to gallop wildly with a

loose rein, charging every obstacle in front of them, and finally,

unless they have some experience in the art of horsemanship.

Military men possess great advantages in the hunting field. To begin

with, they are taught to ride, and probably have passed some years in

India, where the exercise is commonly preferred to walking. Ladies of

all ages and figures ride there, and, no doubt, in so doing, preserve

their health and their looks. There is a peculiar charm in Indian

riding. It is indulged in in the early morning, when the body is

rested, the nerves strong, and the air brisk and fresh; or at eventide,

when the heat of the day is over, and a canter in the cool breeze seems

peculiarly acceptable. How delightful are those early morning rides,

when, after partaking of the refreshing cup of tea or coffee, your

"syce" or groom brings the pawing steed to your door, and once in the

saddle, you wander for miles, with nothing to impede your progress but

an occasional low mud wall, or bank and ditch, which your horse takes

in his stride, or a thorny "nullah," up and down whose steep sides you

scramble. There is something fascinating in the sense of space and

liberty, the feeling that you can gallop at your own sweet will across

a wide plain, pulled up by no fear of trespassing, no gates nor fences

nor unclosed pastures with carefully guarded sheep and cattle, no

flowery cottage gardens; the wide expanse of cloudless sky above you,

the golden plain with its sandy monotony stretched out in front, broken

only by occasional clumps of mango trees, or tilled spaces, where the

crops grow, intersected by small ditches, cut for the purposes of

irrigation--free as a bird, you lay the reins on your horse's neck, and

go till he or you are tired. Or in northern India, on a real cold,

nipping morning before sunrise, you gather at the accustomed

trysting-place and hear the welcome sound of the hounds' voices. A

scratch pack, they are, perhaps, even a "Bobbery" pack, as the name

goes in India; but the old excitement is on you, the rush for a start,

and the sense of triumphant exhilaration, as the hounds settle to their

work, and the wretched little jackal, or better still, the wolf, takes

his unchecked course over the sandy hillocks and the short grass. A

twenty-minutes' run covers the horses with lather, and sets your pulses

tingling. Presently the sun is high in the horizon, and its rays are

beginning to make themselves felt. A few friendly good-byes, some

parting words of mutual congratulation, and you turn to ride gently

home, with a feeling of self-righteousness in your heart, as you greet

the lazy sister, or wife, or brother, who stands in the verandah

looking for your coming. A bath--that inestimable Indian luxury--a

lingering toilette, and so to breakfast. And what a breakfast, with a

lovely appetite to eat it. Fish, beefsteaks, cutlets, the most savoury

and delicate of curries, fruit and coffee, ought to satisfy a Sybarite.

After which a cigarette on a lounge in the verandah may be indulged in.

By this time the day is only just begun, and you are free to fill the

remaining hours with work or the claims of society.

Most lovers of horseflesh, seizing their sun-hats from the peg, sally

out into the "compound" (a kind of grass enclosure with a few mango or

tamarisk trees planted in the middle, the low roofs of the stables and

the native servants' dwellings forming a background to it), and talk

that cheery rambling talk all true sportsmen delight in.

The horses, some in their stalls, some picketed outside under the

trees, are munching large bundles of fresh green lucern (a kind of

vetch, and a substitute for grass); while the ebon grooms, seated on

their haunches on the ground, hold bits and bridles between their toes,

and rub away at them with praiseworthy energy. On one side are the polo

and harness ponies, the match pair which the lady shows you with pride;

on the other, the pony unbroken and savage, just bought at a fair while

beyond are two or three "whalers," fine sixteen-hand upstanding horses,

all pronounced excellent fencers and first-rate pig-stickers. The grey

yonder, a compact, neat-looking animal, resembling an Irish hunter, was

out this morning. Like most Australian horses, he is a great

buck-jumper, and going to covert his master has some trouble in keeping

a steady seat, but when settled down into his gallop, no mud wall is

too high, no ditch too broad, and no day too long for him. Many are the

prize spears he has won on hardly-contested pig-sticking expeditions.

Then on Sunday, the day voted to sport in India, merry paper chases

fill an idle hour or two just before sunset. Any old screw,

country-bred pony or short-shouldered Arab may be brought out on these

occasions. The hard ground resounds with a noise like the distant roll

of thunder, as the line of horsemen clatter along, raising a cloud of

dust behind them. Falls abound, for the pace is good, and the leader of

the chase well mounted.

The sugar canes rattle crisply like peas on a drum, as you push your

way quickly through the tall grass crops, which, forced violently

asunder by your horse's progress, fall together again, and leave no

trace of your passage. Down a soft, sandy lane, you canter, while your

horse sinks in up to his fetlocks, past a dirty little native village,

swarming with black children, where women in picturesque attitudes lean

and chatter by the shady well; then over a rough, stony plain,

intersected by cracks and crevices in the hard gaping earth, where you

must pick your way carefully, and hold your horse together lest he

break his leg and your neck, for (drawback of all in India) the ground

is dreadfully hard, and falls do hurt. At last the chase is over, and

your wearied beast stands with legs apart and nostrils heaving, trying

to get his wind. The sun has gone down in the sudden fashion peculiar

to tropical climes. Gloaming there is none, but a lovely starlight, and

the clear rays of the moon to guide you safely on your way home. Ruddy

lights shine out from the native huts, sundry fires shed a wild lustre,

the faint, sickly odour of tobacco and opium fills the air, and the

weird beating of a tom-tom is heard in the distance.

For those to whom such a wild hot scramble, or the long free gallop

over the plains does not appeal, there is the pleasant ride along the

mall under the flowering acacia trees, where friends meet you at every

step, and your easily-cantering Arab, with flowing mane and tail, is in

harmony with the picturesque Oriental scene. Everyone rides in India,

for in many places it is the only means of transit. In Assam and

Central India, where roads are bad, or non-existent, and the railroads

are many miles away, it is absolutely necessary for the tea-planter to

reach his plantations on horseback, riding long distances over rough

ground; while the commissioner or civilian making his judicial rounds,

or the sportsman in search of big game, rides his twelve or fourteen

miles a day, camping out in the jungle at night. The lowest subaltern

owns a pony or two, and rides to and from his military duties, and the

pony may be seen led up and down in front of the mess house, or

standing playfully flicking the flies off with his tail, while the

faithful syce, his lean brown limbs trained to exceeding fineness by

the long distances he runs, squats meekly on the dusty ground, and

calls his charge by all sorts of endearing names, which the animal

seems perfectly to understand. Hand-rubbing, or what is vulgarly called

"elbow grease," is much practised in India, and a groom attentive to

his duties takes a pride in polishing a horse's coat till it is smooth

and glistening as satin. Notwithstanding this personal care, however,

Indian horses, especially country-breds, are not famed for the

sweetness of their tempers, and generally disagreeably resent their

masters' attempt to mount. This has accordingly to be done in the most

agile manner. Animals may be seen kicking, biting, plunging and even

flying at one another like savage dogs, with teeth exposed, lips drawn

back, nostrils heaving and eyes flashing. Yet few people would exchange

the wild, daring horsemanship of India with its pig-sticking and its

wild game hunting, necessitating the utmost degree of nerve and

determination, for the flat and unprofitable constitutional in Rotten

Row, the country ride along a road, or even the delights of fox-hunting

in England.

Riding men, who love the sport for its own value, are usually

sunny-tempered, kindly at heart, and generously disposed. Women, who

ride, are easy to please and unaffected; in fact, what many men

describe as "a good sort." In conclusion, my advice to girls is, to

take a riding man for a husband, and to follow themselves as far as

possible all out-door pursuits and amusements. Their moral qualities

will not suffer from it, while their physique will gain considerably,

for bright eyes, a clear complexion, and a slim figure are beauties

never to be despised.

VIOLET GREVILLE.

HUNTING IN THE SHIRES.

"There are emotions deeply seated in the joy of exercise, when the body

is brought into play, and masses move in concert, of which the subject

is but half conscious.

"Music and dance, and the delirium of battle or _the chase_ acts thus

upon spontaneous natures.

"The mystery of rhythm and associated energy and blood-tingling in

sympathy is here. It lies at the root of man's most tyrannous

instinctive impulses."

Considering that J. Addington Symonds was a permanent invalid, exiled

to Davos by his health, he shows in this paragraph extraordinary

understanding.

Fox-hunting is not merely an idle amusement; it is an outlet for man's

natural instincts; a healthy way of making him active, and training his

character. Whether it exercises his mental faculties in a like degree

is another question. I do not think a man can be very stupid who rides

well to hounds. The qualifying remark that "he is so perfectly mounted"

rather adds to his credit than otherwise, for, with unlimited means,

and the best possible intention it is difficult in these days of

competition to get together a stud of hunters of the right stamp.

People vary considerably in their notions of the right stamp; but most

men and women who know anything about horses look out for quality, good

bone, loose elbows, active shoulders, strong back, clean hocks, and a

head put on the right way; whether in a horse over sixteen-hands or a

pony. A judge of horse flesh will never be mistaken about these

qualifications, either in the meanest-looking cab horse or a rough

brute in a farmyard.

Hunting people of long experience will tell us they have had one horse

in their lives. One that suited their temperament, that they took

greater liberties with, that gave them fewer falls, and showed them

more sport than all the others. Whyte Melville says, "Forty minutes

over an enclosed country establishes the partnership of man and beast

in relation of confidence." The combination of pluck, decision and

persuasion in a man, and nervous susceptibility in a horse, begets

intimacy and mutual affection which many married couples might envy.

One horse may make a man's reputation, and pleasantly raise the average

of an unequal, even shady, lot in his sale at Tattersall's.

I had a brown horse that did a great deal for me. He was nearly

thorough-bred; by Lydon, dam by Pollard, 15·3, with beautiful limbs and

freedom. He had poor ribs, rather a fractious mouth, and the courage of

an army. I hunted him for six seasons; in Cheshire, Yorkshire,

Lincolnshire, Wiltshire, Gloucestershire, Bedfordshire, Leicestershire,

Buckinghamshire, and Northamptonshire, and he never gave me a fall.

I once fell off him. After an enormous jump over an average fence,

prompted by a feeling of power and capacity, he gave a sort of skip on

landing, and on this provocation I "cut a voluntary," to use a sporting

phrase. He died of lockjaw, to my unceasing regret. I remember in 1885

being mounted on an extraordinary hunter. I had not gone ten strides

before I knew I could not hold him. My patron, on receiving this

information, said, "What does it matter! hounds are running--you surely

don't want to stop?" "Oh, no!" I replied, "but I cannot guide him."

"That doesn't matter--they are running straight," so, stimulated by

this obvious common sense, I went on in the delirium of the chase, till

I had jumped so close to an innocent man that my habit skirt carried

off his spur, and, in avoiding a collision at a ford, I jumped the

widest brook I have ever seen jumped; and after that I got a pull at

him. He could not put a foot wrong, and was perfectly unconscious of my

wish to influence him.

I began hunting with the inestimable advantage of possessing no horses

of my own. For four years I rode hired horses, and had many uncouth

falls, but I never hurt myself or my horse. There is freemasonry among

"hirelings," I think: they know how to protect themselves and their

riders. They jump without being bold; they are stale without being

tired; and they live to be very old; by which, I presume, they are

treated better than one would suppose. The first horse I ever possessed

of my own cost £100, and was called Pickwell, after a manor house in

Leicestershire. He was 15·2, with a swivel neck. For the benefit of

people who do not understand this expression, I will say he could

almost put his head upon my lap. He was a very poor "doer," and,

towards the end of the season, assumed the proportions of a tea-leaf,

and had to be sold. He could not do a whole day even when only hunted

three days a fortnight. He was an airy performer, and I was sorry to

part with him. I hunted him with the Grafton, the Bicester, and Selby

Lownides. Parts of the Grafton country are as fine as Leicestershire,

without having quite its scope or freedom. It is a very sporting

country, with fine woodlands and good wild foxes. When I hunted there

we had, in Frank Beers, as good a huntsman as you could wish to see.

In a paper of this length any criticism of the various merits of

hunting countries would be impossible. In a rough way this is how I

should appraise them. The Cottesmore for hounds. The Burton for foxes.

The Holdernesse for horses. The Pytchley for riders, and the Quorn for

the field.

This needs some explanation.

The Cottesmore is the most beautiful hound country in England. It is

wild and undisturbed: all grass, and carrying a good scent. No huntsman

can interfere with his hounds, and no field over-ride them, for the

simple reason that they cannot reach them easily. The drawbacks of this

from a horseman's point of view are as obvious as the advantages to a

houndman's. The country is very hilly in parts, and a good deal divided

by unjumpable "bottoms," which the experienced do not meddle with, and

which are only worth risking if you get away on good terms with the

pack, "while they stream across the first field with a dash that brings

the mettle to your heart and the blood to your brain," and your

instinct tells you that you are in for a good thing! You gain nothing

by chancing one of these bottoms in an average hunting run. The

scientific subscriber who knows every inch of the country will be in

front of you, and you are fortunate if you get your horse out before

dark. Brookesby thus describes the Cottesmore:--"A wide-spread region,

scarcely inhabited; ground that carries a scent in all weathers;

woodlands which breed a travelling race; and mile upon mile of

untracked grass, where a fox will meet nothing more terrifying than a

bullock."

If hounds really race over the hilly part of the Cottesmore, no horse

or rider can follow them straight. He must use his head and eyes, not

merely test his pluck and quickness.

He need never lose sight of the pack if he is clever, and he will see a

vision of grass landscape stretching away below him, and all around

him, that will not fade with the magic of the moment.

There are people who predict the abolition of fox-hunting in England.

These think themselves the penetrating observers of life; they are

really the ignorant spectators, who take more trouble to avoid barbed

wire than to prevent it being put up; people who join in the groan of

the times, without energy or insight. Prophecies of this kind should

have no value, unless it be to make hunting people more consciously

careful. Since there are larger subscriptions than ever, and more

people hunt, we can only trust that compensation will be given

liberally, but not lavishly, and upon principles of good sense and

justice. I have thus digressed merely to say that if such a day should

arrive, hunting is likely to survive longer in the Cottesmore than in

most countries.

The Burton (Lincolnshire) presents a striking contrast to the

Cottesmore. It is as flat as Holland, and you must be on the back of

hounds if you wish to see them work. Most of the country is ploughed,

and, by a time-honoured custom which brought both credit and money to

the Lincolnshire farmers, many of the fields are double ploughed. This

latter, to ride over, is only a little better than steam plough. As the

price of wheat in England has fallen by 30 per cent. the farmers are

ruined, and they are laying down more grass every year. The

characteristic fence of the county is a wide drain set a little away

from the hedge and cut very deep. The upstanding fences, although lower

than those in the shires, are pretty high if you look at the depth of

the ground from which you take off.

The gorse covers are splendidly thick and overgrown and take a long

time to draw; a good many of the fashionable packs, I know, would

hesitate to expose themselves to such rough work as drawing Toff Newton

or Torrington gorse. The foxes are more like Scotch foxes, large and

grey. They are wild, and take some killing, sometimes running for two

hours. There are not enough inhabitants to head them or cheer the

discouraged huntsman by occasional information.

In Cheshire I saw five foxes killed on one day, but a huntsman in

Lincolnshire will be lucky if he kills two in a week.

I hunted two winters with the Burton hounds, and I am sure the largest

field I ever saw was twenty people. The master, huntsman and two whips

included. Hunting in a big country with a small field and wild foxes is

the best way of learning to be independent. If, as was my experience,

you have a hard-riding huntsman, who gets down early in the run; one

whip who takes the wrong turn out of cover, and the other who hangs

back after a refractory couple of hounds, a few poorly-mounted farmers

and unlucky gentlemen, you can realise with moderate difficulty the

possibility of the proud position of being alone with hounds; although

this distinction may be capable of the same explanation as was the

position of the Scotch boy who, when boasting of being second in his

class, was compelled to admit that it consisted of "Me and a lassie."

I said the Holdernesse for horses, and I certainly never saw a better

mounted field or a finer lot of riding farmers--all of them sportsmen

and gentlemen. They ask long prices for their young horses, if they

will sell them to you at all, but the chances are they have already

promised them to some London dealer. Yorkshire horses are, perhaps,

after Irish, the most famous. They are mostly thorough-bred, and can

gallop and stay. I shall never forget a horse I held for a young farmer

which would not allow him to mount. I can see it now. A long,

loose-limbed bay, with a small, keen, bony face, and an eye that looked

through you. I have a great weakness for a horse's face, and think in a

general way it shows as much character as a man's. His back was perhaps

a trifle too long, but his girth was deep, and he moved like an

athlete. He was as wild as a hawk, and could hardly keep still for love

of life, dancing at every shadow, and springing feet into the air when

anyone passed too near him. He was beautifully ridden and humoured and

ultimately settled into the discouraging trot known as "hounds pace." I

asked his owner what he wanted for him, and how old he was. The man

said that he was rising six, that he wanted £300, and had often refused

£250. We had a long talk, as we trotted down the road to draw the next

cover, about horses in general and his bay in particular. I fancy his

feats lost nothing by being repeated, but I shall not relate them, as

what they gained by tradition they would lose by print.

The Holdernesse is a light plough country, and, like Lincolnshire, its

common fence is a deep drain, into which your horse can absolutely

disappear. I saw eight men down in one, all at the same time, and a

young thorough-bred horse in a deep drain is about the worst company in

the world.

There is not a finer country to ride over in England than the Pytchley.

Unfortunately, too many people agree with us, which is a slight

objection to hunting there.

They have wonderful sport, a first-rate huntsman and a rich community.

Lord Spencer is the keenest of masters and best of sportsmen. Whyte

Melville says of him in his riding recollections: "The present Lord

Spencer, of whom it is enough to say he hunts one pack of his own in

Northamptonshire, and is always in the same field with them, never

seems to have a horse pull, or, until it is tired, even lean on his

hand." I should like to have been praised by Whyte Melville. He is one

of the few novelists whose heroes are gentlemen, who can describe

English society and a straight forty minutes over countries that we

recognise.

The Pytchley is not cut up by railroads, like the Quorn. There is not

nearly so much timber as there is in Leicestershire, but it is as big

if not bigger.

In old days, Lord Spencer told me, they said, "You may, perhaps, go

through the Pytchley, but you must get over the Quorn."

If anything will teach one to gallop, it is riding for a bridle gate in

the company of three or four hundred people, none of them morbidly

civil.

You must get there, and get there soon, as it is the only visible means

of securing a start, or getting into the next field. Sometimes one's

horse has a sensitive habit of backing when he is pressed, which allows

everyone to pass you. In any case, you will have a horse's head under

each arm; a spur against your instep; a kicker with a red tape in his

tail pressed towards your favourite mare, with the doubtful consolation

of being told, when the iron of his hoof has rattled against her

fore-leg that "it was too near to have hurt her." Your hat will be

knocked off by an enthusiast pointing to the line the fox is taking,

and your eye will dimly perceive the pack swaying over the ridge and

furrow, like swallows crossing the sea, two fields ahead of you. If you

harden your heart and jump the generally gigantic fence at the side of

the gate, you expose yourself to the ridicule of the whole field; for

it is on these occasions that your favourite is pretty sure to fall on

her head.

No one is responsible for the manners of a field which is largely made

up of "specials" from Rugby, Leamington and Banbury. A Northamptonshire

hunting-man is as nice a fellow as there is in England, and outside his

own country has the finest manners; but the struggle for existence in

the field with hard-riding casuals has hardened his heart and

embittered his speech.

Every field has its own character; an indescribable "something" which

one feels without being able to define. There is a friendliness and

distinction about the Melton field peculiarly its own. The Quorn

Fridays are joined by Mr Fernie's field, the Cottesmore, Belvoir and

others, and is in consequence very large. Tom Firr, the huntsman--and a

man who can very nearly catch a fox himself--is less moved by a large

crowd than anyone I ever saw, unless, perhaps, it be his hounds who

"come up through a crowd of horses, and stick to the line of their fox,

or fling gallantly forward to recover it, without a thought of personal

danger, or the slightest misgiving; that not one man in ten is master

of the two pair of hoofs beneath him, carrying death in every shoe."

A friend of mine--a cricketer--said that he did not know which country

he preferred hunting in--Leicestershire or Northamptonshire--but there

was the same difference between them as playing at Lords and playing at

the Oval.

Melton Mowbray is about three hours and a half from London. By leaving

London at 7·30 you can hunt with the Pytchley at an eleven o'clock

meet. You must get up earlier to hunt with the Quorn. I doubt if many

people would risk leaving London between five and six in a climate like

ours, where you cannot be quite sure that between five and eleven heavy

snow may not have fallen, or that the damp in one county is not hard

black frost in the next.

Some say that Melton is not what it was. Perhaps this is because there

are no poets left to sing of it. Bromley Davenport, Whyte Melville and

others have left us. Perhaps the red town has spread, and the old

fox-hunters who grumble have grown older. Of course the old days were

better when they found themselves leading "The cream of the cream in

the shire of the shires." These days do not come twice. A man is

fortunate to have had them once, and be able to say with the poet and

philosopher,--

Be fair or foul, or rain or shine,

The joys I have possessed in spite of fate are mine.

Not Heaven itself upon the Past has power.

What has been _has_ been, and I have had my hour.

It is no small consideration to a Meltonian that he can hunt six days a

week, and never leave his house at an undue hour.

The Duke of Beaufort told me that the three best huntsmen living were

Tom Firr, old Mr Watson (of the Carlow hounds), and Lord Worcester, and

he is pretty sure to be right on any sporting matter. Whatever people

may think of the last two named, Tom Firr's reputation is as firmly

established as was Fred Archer's in another line.

From criticising the countries, I should like to pass on to the riders,

both men and women, that I have seen and admired; but, not being a

journalist, I could not commit this indiscretion. I shall content

myself, and perhaps not offend anyone, by writing a few general

observations on women's riding.

No woman can claim to be first-rate over a country, unless she can take

her own line. Most women have pluck, and would follow their pioneer

were he to attempt jumping an arm of the sea; but place them alone in

an awkward enclosure, they will not know how to get out of it. They

need not of necessity take a new place in every fence, but if a gap is

away from the line they imagine to be the right one, it is irritating

to see them pull out to follow one particular person. They don't

diminish the danger by surrendering their intelligence, if they are

well mounted and conscious of what they are doing. A good rider chances

nothing, but must of necessity risk a good deal.

I do not think women are good judges of pace, and although they are

seldom afraid of jumping, they hardly ever gallop. Men will say it is

because they sit on one side and have not the power to make a horse

gallop. This is obviously true in the case of many horses, but there

are some who, roused by the nervous force in their riders, will gallop

without being squeezed, and who want nothing more than to be held

together and left alone.

There is a great deal of nonsense talked about "lifting" and

"recovering" a horse. More horses have recovered themselves by being

left alone in moments of difficulty than by all the theories ever

propounded. When a horse pecks with a man he is thrown forward; a

woman, if she is sitting properly and not hanging her toe in a short

stirrup, is, if anything, thrown back, and, from the security of her

seat, is able to recover her horse with more natural advantage than a

man. A woman's seat is strong, but never balanced; a horse refusing

suddenly to the left may upset her balance without moving her in her

seat. When a horse bucks, from the very fact that to keep on, she must

sit tight, it is so tiring that the chances are she will be bucked off

sooner than a man. If she gets the least out of her saddle she cannot,

by reason of the pommels, get back, whereas a horse may play cup and

ball with a man for a long time without missing him.

There are two classes of hunters that a woman should not be mounted on;

the two that Whyte Melville says want coercion.

Ladies in the Field: Sketches of Sport · 第 1 / 10 段